|
facialimpediment posted:https://twitter.com/anniekarni/status/1005907927868297222?s=19 Maybe Trump or someone close to him found out they were preserving stuff and for what ever reason the hair furor didn't like it.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2018 21:59 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 23:13 |
i'm still stunned by saying we will stop all trade with g7 nations. i got nothing funny to say about it, it's the dumbest thing i've ever heard
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2018 22:10 |
|
Slavic Crime Yacht posted:i'm still stunned by saying we will stop all trade with g7 nations. One of these days Trump's going to follow through for real on one opf his brain cheese tweets and the markets are going to wake up the morning after and finally real that oh poo poo, Donald loving Trump is the president. But until then, good times are here to stay!
|
# ? Jun 10, 2018 22:15 |
|
Slavic Crime Yacht posted:i'm still stunned by saying we will stop all trade with g7 nations. It's also his dumbest bluff ever. It's like pronouncing to the entire table that he has a Royal Flush with a bunch of low off suit cards showing.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2018 22:17 |
psydude posted:It's also his dumbest bluff ever. It's like pronouncing to the entire table that he has a Royal Flush with a bunch of low off suit cards showing. Yeah I mean every other world leader knows it's fraudulent on its face. But... I dunno., If I was Merkel or Trudeau or any of them, I'd be going 'jesus, if this is what they're going to elect, it's really time we started looking to ourselves because they can't be relied on ever again.'
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2018 22:21 |
|
psydude posted:It's also his dumbest bluff ever. It's like pronouncing to the entire table that he has a Royal Flush with a bunch of low off suit cards showing. As problematic as it would be, a small part of me wants them to call it and just cut him out. Dropped from the G7, cut off from trade, the works, and just let him spew his crap into the wind with no-one left to abuse. But no, half-assed will win out and the pissbaby will have to wait even longer to learn about consequences. He'd probably just blame the democrats (or clinton, since she's such a great bogeyman for his base) anyways.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2018 22:34 |
kupachek posted:As problematic as it would be, a small part of me wants them to call it and just cut him out. Dropped from the G7, cut off from trade, the works, and just let him spew his crap into the wind with no-one left to abuse. the economy would stop dude. literally stop. like, it's fraudulent on its face because it's literally impossible to do such a thing.
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2018 22:36 |
Terrifying Effigies posted:One of these days Trump's going to follow through for real on one opf his brain cheese tweets and the markets are going to wake up the morning after and finally real that oh poo poo, Donald loving Trump is the president. Trump is blaming democrats for families getting separated and a large amount of people believe it. He will just blame democrats. Party politics is bigger than democracy.
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2018 22:37 |
|
Slavic Crime Yacht posted:the economy would stop dude. literally stop. Being outside of his immediate influence, it wouldn't effect me quite as badly or as quickly, which is why I can entertain such thoughts. Short of him causing the balloon to go up, I'm comfortably insulated from the bulk of his insanity. So, if trade stops, would that be enough to get people off their asses to remove him from office? Because if thats the case, maybe that is what needs to happen.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2018 22:45 |
kupachek posted:Being outside of his immediate influence, it wouldn't effect me quite as badly or as quickly, which is why I can entertain such thoughts. If it causes the market to irreversibly tank, yes. But at that point the damage is done and they’ll just blame democrats.
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2018 22:46 |
|
kupachek posted:Being outside of his immediate influence, it wouldn't effect me quite as badly or as quickly, which is why I can entertain such thoughts. if you live on the planet earth, you are immediately within the influence of the American economy. if this happened it would be very, very bad for everybody.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2018 22:50 |
kupachek posted:Being outside of his immediate influence, it wouldn't effect me quite as badly or as quickly, which is why I can entertain such thoughts. This would require republican voters to believe (senator / state Rep name) over Donald Trump and not vote out (senator / state rep) immediately after. So, it would require voters to blame Trump instead of Obama, Clinton, ISIS, every other thing it could be spun into. Until then the elected GOP have only shown that they are completely willing to abandon any/ all principles both personal and conservative if that doesn't endanger their re-election.
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2018 23:02 |
|
Like most extreme policies, if enacted, the requisite beauacracies will all shudder and delay acting until they have requisite specific guidance. Director of huge policy will get distracted and an extremely watered down version will be enacted eight years from now and nobody will really know why.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 00:24 |
|
Hey it would be like remember that Chinese emperor who decided to keep China great and since China didn't need or want nothing from the rest of the world he ordered all ships burned and all borders sealed and since he was Emperor it got done, then China rocketed straight to the top of every chart and totally didn't get left behind developmentally or anything? That's the kind of poo poo that can get done when you're an emperor and don't have to deal with rules.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 00:43 |
|
That was Japan, and it was at the start of the Edo period through Nelson's forced entry.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 01:05 |
|
"Kill every whitey that lands a boat" worked pretty well keeping Japan from being colonized until they were ready to become a colonizing superpower
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 01:07 |
|
EVA BRAUN BLOWJOBS posted:That was Japan, and it was at the start of the Edo period through Nelson's forced entry. No, one of the dynasties in China did what he said. Closed their borders, burned their ships, and went back to a very traditional way of life that left them behind everyone else. Edit: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...f-a7612276.html It was the Ming dynasty. It's one of the few things I remember from my college history classes.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 01:18 |
|
EVA BRAUN BLOWJOBS posted:That was Japan, and it was at the start of the Edo period through Nelson's forced entry. Nah, he means the Jingtai Emperor who -- after his brother got captured by the Mongols -- decided to reinforce the Great Wall of China and let the Imperial navy rot. The same navy that was launching 400' treasure ships out into the Indian Ocean about 20 years before.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 01:24 |
|
Eh they had treasure ships but they weren’t 400’ as there weren’t wooden ships anywhere close to that size until the 1800s and those were steel reinforced. If they did have anything over 200’ they didn’t ever take it out of the rivers because the open ocean would have wrecked them. The engineering skills of humans just weren’t capable of ships of the purported magnitude and the ships supposedly over 400 feet are myth more than history.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 01:36 |
|
https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1005812424572919808
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 01:53 |
|
I feel like the answer to https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hn1VxaMEjRU is rapidly approaching “yes, yes we are” at this point.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 02:01 |
|
Seekhay posted:I feel like the answer to https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hn1VxaMEjRU is rapidly approaching “yes, yes we are” at this point. Well, what do you do about that? Because I have no loving idea.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 02:19 |
|
What the gently caress
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 02:30 |
|
Acebuckeye13 posted:What the gently caress We're the baddies.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 02:34 |
|
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1005979207544000512Zeroisanumber posted:We're the baddies.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 02:38 |
I finally understand. He thinks that 100billion that Canada makes through trading with the US comes directly out of the USA's pockets, instead of being part of the natural flow of cash in a trading economy. He really is that loving stupid.
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 02:40 |
|
Slavic Crime Yacht posted:I finally understand. He thinks that 100billion that Canada makes through trading with the US comes directly out of the USA's pockets, instead of being part of the natural flow of cash in a trading economy. We take migrant womens' kids from them by telling them that we're going to give them showers and then never return them to their parents.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 02:42 |
|
Slavic Crime Yacht posted:I finally understand. He thinks that 100billion that Canada makes through trading with the US comes directly out of the USA's pockets, instead of being part of the natural flow of cash in a trading economy. I wonder how much of that ends up back in American corporations by way of their Canadian subsidiaries? I can't imagine them being happy about this.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 02:46 |
Zeroisanumber posted:We take migrant womens' kids from them by telling them that we're going to give them showers and then never return them to their parents. You sure you meant to reply to me? I was just trying to parse that trumptweet™
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 02:47 |
Slavic Crime Yacht posted:I finally understand. He thinks that 100billion that Canada makes through trading with the US comes directly out of the USA's pockets, instead of being part of the natural flow of cash in a trading economy. Yes. He thinks a trade balance is literally theft.
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 03:02 |
|
This NYT article does a good job of explaining what a trade deficit is and why it's a dumb yardstick. And also why the dollar as the world's preferred currency means the US almost always runs a trade deficit. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/09/upshot/what-is-the-trade-deficit.html
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 03:10 |
|
psydude posted:This NYT article does a good job of explaining what a trade deficit is and why it's a dumb yardstick. And also why the dollar as the world's preferred currency means the US almost always runs a trade deficit. Next you'll be telling us a "strong dollar" isn't necessarily good.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 04:00 |
You give us the stuff we tell you to and we give you worthless numbers on a ledger in the hope that one day we may bless you by giving back something of meager value
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 04:05 |
|
Doc Hawkins posted:Next you'll be telling us a "strong dollar" isn't necessarily good. I can't tell if you're joking or not.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 04:09 |
|
Slavic Crime Yacht posted:You sure you meant to reply to me? I was just trying to parse that trumptweet™ We're the baddies.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 04:17 |
|
Slavic Crime Yacht posted:I finally understand. He thinks that 100billion that Canada makes through trading with the US comes directly out of the USA's pockets, instead of being part of the natural flow of cash in a trading economy. Or he thinks the redhats are that stupid. And they are. https://twitter.com/misterbumface/status/1005979814434516993
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 04:20 |
|
Zeroisanumber posted:Well, what do you do about that? Because I have no loving idea. I don’t either and it scares me. Like really scares me.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 04:30 |
|
Fallout 76 release date is November 14th. http://m.ign.com/articles/2018/06/11/e3-2018-fallout-76-release-date-announced
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 04:34 |
|
Gonna gently caress this up because I'm phone posting but check out the Economist cover this week.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 05:00 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 23:13 |
|
DaNerd posted:Gonna gently caress this up because I'm phone posting but check out the Economist cover this week. Good drat.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2018 05:02 |