|
Pick posted:Someone's doing an interesting project showing how the WIR style would have looked on the princesses who were already 3d. it's weird. Tell that person to include the Kingdom Hearts 3 versions too.
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 04:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 19:53 |
|
|
Kangra posted:Is this on Hoopla, or physical copy? I'm seeing the 'Scooby-Doo' Team-Up if that's what it is. Scooby-Doo! and Kiss Rock and Roll Mystery : Original Movie Both the city and the county library systems have physical copies.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 04:36
|
|
|
Wait, what's wrong with Your Name's ending?
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 15:45
|
|
|
Dog Kisser posted:Wait, what's wrong with Your Name's ending? People are cynics and want everyone to be sad forever even when they don't exist
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 16:42
|
|
|
Unmature posted:People are cynics and want everyone to be sad forever even when they don't exist Either that or they want to see the leads get married as well.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 16:48
|
|
|
Dog Kisser posted:Wait, what's wrong with Your Name's ending? They could’ve done a fifth breast groping joke but didn’t. I was ready to laugh again!
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 16:52
|
|
|
I hate this. Second pic makes her look dumber, "prettier", and without authentic emotions, like something a bad male artist would do.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 17:01
|
|
|
It makes her look like a child.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 17:04
|
|
|
Kart Barfunkel posted:They could’ve done a fifth breast groping joke but didn’t. I was ready to laugh again! B-bakaaaaaaa!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 17:35
|
|
|
Boss Baby 3?
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 20:38
|
|
|
Dog Kisser posted:Wait, what's wrong with Your Name's ending? They didnt all die. Also it wasnt jusy the movie Frequency but animated
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2018 01:43
|
|
|
Barudak posted:They didnt all die. *grabs his dad's boobs* DESU?!? *receives text* "baka!"
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2018 01:46
|
|
|
https://www.polygon.com/2018/6/13/17457980/dumbo-trailer-baby-mine-aurora-cover-song Eeeeeeeew. He's gonna spackle it with so much whimsical melancholy that it'll drown out everything else.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2018 16:57
|
|
|
Dog Kisser posted:Wait, what's wrong with Your Name's ending? 10 minutes of will they won't they nonsense based on the assumption that I care about whether two kids with 30 seconds of screen time together and even less chemistry, meet in later life. Meanwhile the entire rest of the plot is resolved offscreen.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 10:18
|
|
|
it's me, the guy who thinks that the movie is about the comet and not the relationship of the two main characters
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 14:31
|
|
|
It's really about the relationship between the comet and the town
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 14:39
|
|
|
Robindaybird posted:https://www.polygon.com/2018/6/13/17457980/dumbo-trailer-baby-mine-aurora-cover-song It looks alright, and I'm always down for more Eva Green, but Dumbo is already perfect, so I'm not sure how a remake could possibly improve upon it. ALFbrot posted:it's me, the guy who thinks that the movie is about the comet and not the relationship of the two main characters But enough about Armageddon.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 14:41
|
|
|
Samuel Clemens posted:Dumbo is already perfect, 
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 14:45
|
|
|
why did they add a whole family to the dumbo premise? I like this answer because it works on two levels.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 16:03
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8LWUyUy7jM This looks... Fine. I guess  I will say, I do like that it seems he doesn't hate his dog. edit: Though I really don't know why they keep wanting to give him any kind of origin story about WHY he hates Christmas. Can't he literally just be a grinch
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 16:15
|
|
|
Because Tim Burton can't go a movie without ramming in daddy issues.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 16:16
|
|
|
I'm glad we agree.  Macaluso posted:edit: Though I really don't know why they keep wanting to give him any kind of origin story about WHY he hates Christmas. Can't he literally just be a grinch Look, it's not easy to pad these out to 90 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 17:12
|
|
|
paradoxGentleman posted:why did they add a whole family to the dumbo premise? More importantly, why did they add the family and remove Timothy, and by extension the crows? On a more facetious note, I'll bet they're going to take out the stork too 
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 17:26
|
|
|
As much as I complained about Be Prepared being take out of the Lion King, these live action remakes would be even more pointless if they made no changes from the original and were the same movie but not cartoons Dumbo will probably be bad but the story also isn't much of a stretch for Burton and honestly already fits the story he always tells way better than Alice in Wonderland
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 18:21
|
|
|
glam rock hamhock posted:Dumbo will probably be bad but the story also isn't much of a stretch for Burton and honestly already fits the story he always tells way better than Alice in Wonderland What is the story he always tells? The movies of his that I remember seeing are Nightmare Before Christmas and Alice in Wonderland, and beyond the whole "travel to another world" thing I can't think of a lot of things in common.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 18:34
|
|
|
paradoxGentleman posted:What is the story he always tells? The movies of his that I remember seeing are Nightmare Before Christmas and Alice in Wonderland, and beyond the whole "travel to another world" thing I can't think of a lot of things in common. "I'll go to the circus because daddy doesn't love me"
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 18:41
|
|
|
Uh oh I made another video about cartoons https://youtu.be/BdAwmwYBU-g And this didn't take long 
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 18:46
|
|
|
Reminder that Tim Burton neither wrote the screenplay* nor directed Nightmare Before Christmas. * Although he did write a three-page poem that the movie's based on, which was later adapted into a children's book.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 18:48
|
|
|
Aces High posted:More importantly, why did they add the family and remove Timothy, and by extension the crows? The lead crow was literally named "Jim Crow." We don't need the crows.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 18:57
|
|
|
paradoxGentleman posted:What is the story he always tells? The movies of his that I remember seeing are Nightmare Before Christmas and Alice in Wonderland, and beyond the whole "travel to another world" thing I can't think of a lot of things in common. He loves to tell the story of someone who is an outcast but in the end becomes beloved or saves the day with the thing that makes them an outcast.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 19:07
|
|
|
Unmature posted:And this didn't take long 
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 19:32
|
|
|
Anyone else see an Incredibles 1/2 double feature last night? Ours was plagued with problems (like the house lights not dimming until 10 minutes into the first film and the previews being all garbled) and they had no intermission between the two films. But once it got rolling, it was great. The sequel's just as good as the first movie, in that they're both rocking good times. Watching the first film re-rendered in 4K on a gigantic screen definitely shows that we've advanced in terms of the graphics and realism of these CGI rendered movies.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 19:34
|
|
|
Gonna try to catch Incredibles 2 after I get my car's oil changed this afternoon, and I'm definitely looking forward to it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 19:39
|
|
|
Unmature posted:Uh oh I made another video about cartoons drat it Matthew!
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 19:46
|
|
|
kefkafloyd posted:The sequel's just as good as the first movie, in that they're both rocking good times. Watching the first film re-rendered in 4K on a gigantic screen definitely shows that we've advanced in terms of the graphics and realism of these CGI rendered movies. drat I wish I had seen this. That's what I thought when they did the Toy Story 1/2 double features right before 3 came out. CG animation ages like milk.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 20:36
|
|
|
Unmature posted:drat I wish I had seen this. It's not as rough as that, I think. Incredibles was when they got solid, no-excuses human animation working, and Bird was the guy to make it happen. Everyone is so expressive and the characters on-screen are so fluid in motion that it really helps paper over the fact that texturing, particle effects, and lighting are leaps and bounds ahead in the new film. The lava and rock texturing in the island are particular offenders. The city and house sets still manage to look OK due to strong art direction, but that's because they're intentionally minimalist to fit the art deco/retro-future style. I loved the original when it came out (saw it twice in the theater) and bought the art book and I still love watching it even though it has aged. DVDs in lower resolutions (as well as film projections) have a kind of antialias effect that softens these things up a bit, and that made some of the old flaws more apparent. But what was actually improved was the lighting and dynamic range. I had an appreciation for the scene where Mr. Incredible is doing his workout montage in the trainyard, which had pretty strong lighting and shadow texture and detail was considerable. On the other hand the resolution was great for things that had any kind of art detail. Bob's office/study was an absolute treat. The most distracting thing was where hair met heads, though. I remember Syndrome and Helen's hair looking great when I originally saw the film. Now when you see where the hair meets skin, it seems like a doll. New films are able to do better simulations of those kinds of things. This is the kind of stuff that render speed has bought us. Ignoring all the things I noticed about visual cues, though, is that the movie is so strong on its writing and direction that they just kind of fade into the background. I wish more movies were able to pull off the simultaneous love/skewering that Incredibles 1 and 2 do, because that's what says it's a work of art to me. A recognition and embrace of its flaws yet tries nonetheless to be better. kefkafloyd fucked around with this message at 22:55 on Jun 14, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2018 22:47
|
|
|
Unmature posted:Uh oh I made another video about cartoons Yeah, but surely there has to be a limit to patience. The Thief and the Cobbler took thirty years to never be completed, and even in it's 'definitive' cut it's not a very good movie. It plays like an animation test reel. There's no excusing John Kricfalusi taking six years and counting to release a 5 minute short.
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 00:44
|
|
|
SolarFire2 posted:Yeah, but surely there has to be a limit to patience. The Thief and the Cobbler took thirty years to never be completed, and even in it's 'definitive' cut it's not a very good movie. It plays like an animation test reel. There's no excusing John Kricfalusi taking six years and counting to release a 5 minute short. and really all the stuff added back into the Thief and Cobbler, while visually impressive when it's not pencil tests/ashcan level set up, really just dragged the pacing down to a snail's crawl. And honestly, the longer something takes in animation/film, the higher the chances of it either just being shelved, or end up like Pluto Nash
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 01:04
|
|
|
Honestly, does Richard Williams gain much of anything from animating on 1s instead of 2s? I know it does make the movement more fluid, but as long as the key frames are good does it make enough of a difference to justify doubling the amount of effort involved?
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 06:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 19:53 |
|
|
Yeah, I just saw The Incredibles and Incredibles 2 back-to-back also (although I just saw the first one at my house instead of at a movie theater). I was expecting the new one to be a little worse than the original, but I think it was actually a little better instead, with the inherent problems of sequelization bringing it back down to about as good as the original. Incredibles 3 is the main Pixar sequel I'd be interested in going forward, and I would happily cancel Toy Story 4 to make it happen. (Although that's not really a fair trade, given that I think Toy Story 4 is a bad idea that shouldn't happen anyway.) In any case I'm glad that Pixar is backing off of the sequels, but this is an example of what Pixar sequels should be, as opposed to Cars 2 (simply terrible, everyone knows this movie is bad and it's probably actually single-handedly responsible for the "Pixar sequels are bad" consensus just by throwing the average), Monsters University (I actually do like this movie quite a bit, but I still think making it was a bad decision on a lot of levels, which is pretty much the best case scenario for Toy Story 4 at this point), or Finding Dory (pretty and fun but a bizarrely fleeting experience, probably because it doesn't sufficiently embrace Dory and Hank as the protagonist and deuteragonist and tries to spin too many plates by looping Marlin and Nemo in just because they were the leads of the first movie).
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2018 06:42
|
|