|
Khorne posted:The gimmick chip is also presumably using tim. So you do kinda need a decent bin. TIM is not a problem with a 5.0 GHz single-core turbo, and the all-core turbo is 4.3 like normal.
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 16:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 00:13 |
|
|
Paul MaudDib posted:TIM is not a problem with a 5.0 GHz single-core turbo, and the all-core turbo is 4.3 like normal. I really hope AMD is able to approach 5 in 2019/2020 and Intel stops leaving so much on the table. Khorne fucked around with this message at 16:55 on Jun 19, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 16:51
|
|
|
Khorne posted:I didn't realize they aren't even going 5.0GHz on all cores. Sorry about that. Isn't a 4.3 turbo on all cores really lackluster? Every single turbo step on the 8086K is exactly the same as the 8700K except for the single-core one, which is 5.0 instead of 4.7. It's a marketing gimmick or to be charitable a limited-edition anniversary label, not an actual upgrade.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 17:11
|
|
|
Khorne posted:I really hope AMD is able to approach 5 in 2019/2020 and Intel stops leaving so much on the table. It would be hilarious if they punched up the clocks and their run-of-the-mill processors are spanking the "anniversary" edition in a year's time.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 18:20
|
|
|
Paul MaudDib posted:It would be hilarious if they punched up the clocks and their run-of-the-mill processors are spanking the "anniversary" edition in a year's time. Isn't that how all technology works? Pay 10x the price for a 10% gain that will be under preforming the baseline in a year or two.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 18:56
|
|
|
Silicone Lottery posted their numbers for the 8086K today. Almost 100% hit 5.1GHz all core, 60/40 shot for 5.2GHz, 15/85 for 5.3GHz. (iirc off the top of my head) It's a measurable difference, but YMMV on whether those extra couple hundred MHz are worth the extra hundred bucks.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 19:21
|
|
|
Khorne posted:I didn't realize they aren't even going 5.0GHz on all cores. Sorry about that. Isn't a 4.3 turbo on all cores really lackluster? Intel's cpus have been able to hit 4.7-5.0 all core consistently since 2011. Yes it's really lackluster, which is why all the reviews have been saying don't buy one. And Intel already put it on the table. Coffee lake was what they were keeping in reserve, they pushed it to near it's thermal max to keep their edge over Ryzen. That's the reason the 8086k is  , even with binned CPUs there wasn't a lot left. The delays to 10nm hosed them, and until that process is producing chips they're kinda stuck.People were speculating that the 8086k would be soldered instead of TIM, but intel is not gonna change up their production line just for 50k enthusiast CPUs. AMD caters to us because the enthusiast PC market still matters to them, Intel is so big that they're kinda eh.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 19:40
|
|
|
quote:Threadripper 2990X https://www.hkepc.com/16912/ Translation: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=zh&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hkepc.com%2F16912%2F
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 20:05
|
|
|
 250W base TDP. 1950X was 180W TDP and like ~270W pull from the wall, without overclocking or graphics cards. We might be talkin 400W here. Got dang. Hey look, we finally found a CPU where your VRM will matter! https://videocardz.com/76585/could-amd-ryzen-threadripper-2990x-be-the-next-flagship-cpu
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 20:07
|
|
|
Now that is a flagship HEDT part 
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 20:10
|
|
|
~12-13 watts per core is alright...
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 20:22
|
|
|
Man, I wonder what kind of cooling solution you would need for that 4.2 GHz overclock? I'm more interested in seeing if they made it any more video game friendly compared to the 1950x.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 20:31
|
|
|
I absolutely love this. Intel offered a sweepstakes where people could win an 8086k, AMD responded by offering a free swap out for a Threadripper 1950x for the winners. https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-amd-sweepstakes-8086k-threadripper-1950x,37320.html
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 20:49
|
|
|
Klyith posted:People were speculating that the 8086k would be soldered instead of TIM, but intel is not gonna change up their production line just for 50k enthusiast CPUs. AMD caters to us because the enthusiast PC market still matters to them, Intel is so big that they're kinda eh. AMD also happens to hold several key patents related to soldering dies to heatspreaders, so it's a lot cheaper if you're AMD.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 22:11
|
|
|
I did not know this. All good for compounding intel's 
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2018 22:18
|
|
|
Cygni posted:
Ugh I’m going to spend like 3 grand on my next build aren’t I? Better start putting in for OT.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 05:22
|
|
|
Intel making a good showing of sassing back. https://twitter.com/IntelGaming/status/1008831597221593088 I eagerly await further one-upsmanship.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 12:53
|
|
|
SwissArmyDruid posted:Intel making a good showing of sassing back. I'm sure AMD could get a joke about melting down in there somewhere.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 13:01
|
|
|
AMD: "We're just doing our part to prevent Global Warming" edit: "And Meltdown of the polar ice caps" 
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 13:06
|
|
|
Jesus, that polar bear looks so goddamn skinny, it makes me sad. =(
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 13:14
|
|
|
SwissArmyDruid posted:Jesus, that polar bear looks so goddamn skinny, it makes me sad. =( Don’t worry, that bear is just a crisis actor.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 13:43
|
|
|
SwissArmyDruid posted:Jesus, that polar bear looks so goddamn skinny, it makes me sad. =( it's okay to be sad sometimes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 13:51
|
|
|
i scrolled down to comments and now i'm just loving mad 
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 14:12
|
|
|
wcccccftech: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X Flagship 32 Core, 64 Thread 4.00 GHz CPU Detailed and Benchmarked - Overclocks Up To 4.12 GHz Across All Cores on High-End Corsair AIO Liquid Cooler https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-threadripper-2990x-32-core-64-thread-cpu-specs-performance-overclock-leak/
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 16:07
|
|
|
jesus, how much power is 4.12ghz all 32 cores???
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 16:11
|
|
|
1.21 jiggawatts. which is somehow still less than intel's thing that needs a chiller lmao
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 16:20
|
|
|
But would it be able to handle Crysis?
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 16:23
|
|
|
Broose posted:But would it be able to handle Crysis? On medium sure.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 16:25
|
|
|
Actually, is there enough power in a 2990X to render Crysis without a GPU? To do it all in software?
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 20:16
|
|
|
FaustianQ posted:Actually, is there enough power in a 2990X to render Crysis without a GPU? To do it all in software? I have no idea, but Microsoft provides a pretty optimized software rasterizer for Direct3D so theoretically we could find out  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Advanced_Rasterization_Platform
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 20:24
|
|
|
repiv posted:I have no idea, but Microsoft provides a pretty optimized software rasterizer for Direct3D so theoretically we could find out That screams "leftovers from the Larrabee project" to me.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 20:28
|
|
|
FaustianQ posted:Actually, is there enough power in a 2990X to render Crysis without a GPU? To do it all in software? It's possible. The software renderer for Unreal with the 3DNOW/SSE extensions was pretty good back in the day.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 20:39
|
|
|
Funnily enough Microsoft's own documentation uses a Crysis benchmark to show WARPs performance: Maybe the 2990X could just about scape past 30fps at 800x600 at the lowest settings then? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2018 20:41
|
|
|
are you ready 2 get ur WRAITH straight up RIPPED??? https://www.anandtech.com/show/12996/amd-teams-up-with-cooler-master-for-wraith-ripper-megacooler   lol, thing is like as big as an ITX case
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2018 03:29
|
|
|
rip my wraith, daddy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2018 03:54
|
|
|
Cygni posted:are you ready 2 get ur WRAITH straight up RIPPED??? Love to strap a vintage refrigerator chiller to my CPU.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2018 04:04
|
|
|
That unironically owns hard.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2018 04:05
|
|
|
https://www.nextplatform.com/2018/06/20/amds-epyc-return-to-the-datacenter-ring/ “Our plan for the Naples-Rome-Milan roadmap was based on assumptions around Intel’s roadmap and our estimation of what would we do if we were Intel,” Norrod continues. “We thought deeply about what they are like, what they are not like, what their culture is and what their likely reactions are, and we planned against a very aggressive Intel roadmap, and I really Rome and Milan and what is after them against what we thought Intel could do. And then, we come to find out that they can’t do what we thought they might be able to. And so, we have an incredible opportunity. Rome was designed to compete favorably with “Ice Lake” Xeons, but it is not going to be competing against that chip. We are incredibly excited, and it is all coming together at one point. We have reintroduced ourselves to the market, gotten the initial traction and wins, we got the initial customer support, and we validated that AMD is a safe choice with an effective processor. With the Rome processor and process, we are going to be in an incredible position going forward.”
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2018 06:40
|
|
|
Intel CEO was fired for banging an employee.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2018 15:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 00:13 |
|
|
Otakufag posted:Intel CEO was fired for banging an employee. Wonder if he’d still have been retained if they were doing better on the CPU side.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2018 16:13
|
|
