Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Doronin
Nov 22, 2002

Don't be scared
The only theory I really, really wanted to believe was if somehow Rey were a descendant of Palpatine. Which would have actually fit in with the way things were set up in the Aftermath books with the vaults and Operation... Cinder? Was that it? The Emperors contingency plan. Either way, I thought that would be cool :shrug:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

exquisite tea
Apr 21, 2007

Carly shook her glass, willing the ice to melt. "You still haven't told me what the mission is."

She leaned forward. "We are going to assassinate the bad men of Hollywood."


Episode 9 is in this weird position where the only new interesting character they really have is Kylo Ren and everybody knows it, yet you have to invent some kind of satisfactory arc for Rey and whatever the hell they're doing with Finn after they've spent all of TLJ spinning wheels. And now they'll have zero OT characters to rely on.

Vinylshadow
Mar 20, 2017

I just want Force Ghost Luke chasing Ben Solo around banging pots and pans together while reading off some of Yoda's long boring lectures to him as he's trying to sleep

BravestOfTheLamps
Oct 12, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
Lipstick Apathy

aBagorn posted:

I was completely exhausted at this panel and like half falling asleep once I sat down.

I jumped out of my seat screaming with glee like a child. It was my favorite part of Celebration by far.

Not so much "like" but "because I am", I gather.

aBagorn
Aug 26, 2004

BravestOfTheLamps posted:

Not so much "like" but "because I am", I gather.

I mean, I legally haven’t been a child for over a decade and a half, but sure I guess.

I have a connection to my inner child and can get excited about things

galagazombie
Oct 31, 2011

A silly little mouse!

exquisite tea posted:

Episode 9 is in this weird position where the only new interesting character they really have is Kylo Ren and everybody knows it, yet you have to invent some kind of satisfactory arc for Rey and whatever the hell they're doing with Finn after they've spent all of TLJ spinning wheels. And now they'll have zero OT characters to rely on.

Someone made a good point that while Kylo is a good character he's not a good head villain. He's spent two movies getting clowned on by the hero and the very character traits that make him such a good character make him unintimidating to the audience as a threat. But every other villain except comic-relief Hux is dead so they have no good "final boss" for Rey to face. Is anyone really going to feel like she's in danger when she's made a fool out of him every movie so far?
I'd disagree he's the only interesting character though. I legitimately like Finn and thought he had a good arc going in TFA. It's kind of a bummer they had him forget it and repeat it verbatim in TLJ but he still has stuff you could build off of, unlike non-entity Poe and Blandly inoffensive Rey.

SimonCat
Aug 12, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo
College Slice
I like how all of you think that the 3rd movie is going to resolve anything instead of just setting up endless sequels. You can't make more money from Rey and Co. if their story is over.

No Mods No Masters
Oct 3, 2004

Poe and Finn were both likable in star wars 7 but I think their plots in star wars 8 were so insipid as to kind of ruin the characters for a lot of people going forward. Cheers

Vinylshadow
Mar 20, 2017

No Mods No Masters posted:

Poe and Finn were both likable in star wars 7 but I think their plots in star wars 8 were so insipid as to kind of ruin the characters for a lot of people going forward. Cheers

Should've stuck with the Bromance angle and had Poe and Finn go to Canto Bight and do something more meaningful than free animals

Or skip straight to infiltrating the Supremacy with Finn's stormtrooper codes

Because why would they revoke them? :V

galagazombie
Oct 31, 2011

A silly little mouse!
I think they really missed an opportunity in TLJ with Finn's Imperial past. Instead of a pointless casino detour they could have explored something like learning how to live like a "real person" instead of an indoctrinated flesh robot or maybe given him some arc about seeing the Stormtroopers as victims of the First Order who need to be saved from it just as much as everyone else.They almost did something like the latter in the alternate Phasma showdown on the DVD/Blu-Ray but A, Thats not the scene that actually was used in the movie and B, Even if they had used it it's only a single scene that no other part of the movie before or after references, builds on, or shares themes with.

Dishwasher
Dec 5, 2006

Congratulations on not getting fit in 2011!

SimonCat posted:

I like how all of you think that the 3rd movie is going to resolve anything instead of just setting up endless sequels. You can't make more money from Rey and Co. if their story is over.

The story seems so incomplete and the characters so underdeveloped going into IX that if they decided to keep going forward Marvel style it wouldn't be surprising and may even be ideal. I'd be fine with it as for all the mistakes I think they made, I'd still like to see it finish cooking even if it takes more time.

Beef Hardcheese
Jan 21, 2003

HOW ABOUT I LASH YOUR SHIT


Dishwasher posted:

The story seems so incomplete and the characters so underdeveloped going into IX that if they decided to keep going forward Marvel style it wouldn't be surprising and may even be ideal. I'd be fine with it as for all the mistakes I think they made, I'd still like to see it finish cooking even if it takes more time.

I can't be the only one to notice the distinct lack of "Episode 7" and "Episode 8" on any merchandise, or even mentioned anywhere after the official titles were announced (in direct contrast to the prequels). They don't want to keep reminding people of how many of the things there are, and if they abandon the numbers entirely after 9 then it would make it that much easier to just poo poo them out from now until forever.

Jerkface
May 21, 2001

HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE DEAD, MOTHERFUCKER?

Fallen Rib

Beef Hardcheese posted:

I can't be the only one to notice the distinct lack of "Episode 7" and "Episode 8" on any merchandise, or even mentioned anywhere after the official titles were announced (in direct contrast to the prequels). They don't want to keep reminding people of how many of the things there are, and if they abandon the numbers entirely after 9 then it would make it that much easier to just poo poo them out from now until forever.

im feel like this happened with the prequels? episode 1 is the only one i refer to by numerical the others are aotc and rots and i honestly dont recall them being referred to by their numericals on toys and advertisements.

galagazombie
Oct 31, 2011

A silly little mouse!

Jerkface posted:

im feel like this happened with the prequels? episode 1 is the only one i refer to by numerical the others are aotc and rots and i honestly dont recall them being referred to by their numericals on toys and advertisements.

While you're right it wasn't as prominent as putting "Episode I" on everything but it was definitely all over EPII&III merch. Even just the official logos plastered on everything had the episode number on it. Compared to that it definitely feels like they're trying to make everyone forget about the whole "Episode" thing. But on the other hand they put the "Star Wars Story" moniker on the other movies which kind of implies the episode moniker for TFA/TLJ by default so maybe its something else like marketing said the episode numbering was too long for the packaging?

Mooey Cow
Jan 27, 2018

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Pillbug

Jerkface posted:

im feel like this happened with the prequels? episode 1 is the only one i refer to by numerical the others are aotc and rots and i honestly dont recall them being referred to by their numericals on toys and advertisements.

The episode number definitely had emphasis at the time. Everyone talked about them using the number until their "real" title was revealed some time before release.

Jerkface
May 21, 2001

HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE DEAD, MOTHERFUCKER?

Fallen Rib

Mooey Cow posted:

The episode number definitely had emphasis at the time. Everyone talked about them using the number until their "real" title was revealed some time before release.


yea on the poster and before release of the name for sure im talking about after on the merch and how it was discussed by fans. even on these here forums im pretty sure they get referred to more as their titles.

also lol does anyone remember when they revealed aotc title and everyone was like uhhhhhhhhhjnnhhhhhh

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless

Jerkface posted:

also lol does anyone remember when they revealed aotc title and everyone was like uhhhhhhhhhjnnhhhhhh

There's even video evidence for some of them.

tino
Jun 4, 2018

by Smythe

Dishwasher posted:

The story seems so incomplete and the characters so underdeveloped going into IX that if they decided to keep going forward Marvel style it wouldn't be surprising and may even be ideal. I'd be fine with it as for all the mistakes I think they made, I'd still like to see it finish cooking even if it takes more time.

You are fine with paying $40-60 and 8 hours of your life for an incomplete story? Are you representative of average Star Wars fans?

cargohills
Apr 18, 2014

what's funny about "attack of the clones"? this is a genuine question, i really don't get what's wrong with it.

remusclaw
Dec 8, 2009

cargohills posted:

what's funny about "attack of the clones"? this is a genuine question, i really don't get what's wrong with it.

All the main series Star Wars movies have 40s serial style subtitles but "Attack of the Clones" is probably both the most on the nose of all of them, as well as being so completely lacking in any sort of pomp so as to lose whatever sort of dignity the other titles somehow conveyed, coming across almost as camp.

Timeless Appeal
May 28, 2006

cargohills posted:

what's funny about "attack of the clones"? this is a genuine question, i really don't get what's wrong with it.
It's an intentionally dorky title harkening back to old monster movies. But I think the clones bit also throws people of, even in the movie itself where the clones seem almost like a vestigial plot point.

Empire Strikes Back is also a dorky title, but it's evocative in that it indicates a film where our heroes are in a more precarious situation.

Dishwasher
Dec 5, 2006

Congratulations on not getting fit in 2011!

tino posted:

You are fine with paying $40-60 and 8 hours of your life for an incomplete story? Are you representative of average Star Wars fans?

I'm fine with an additional $40-60 and 8 hours for a 'complete' story if it comes to that. I'm "not" pleased that this current trilogy seems to lack so much, even a reason to exist, going into the last one. I'd feel even better if the main story switched to a TV show format so there'd be more time if that's what they need.

Representative? I wouldn't say that. But franchises and Disney Pixar movies are the only films making real guaranteed money at the theater nowadays and it's the only series I'm willing to go to a theater for. I won't boycott unless it becomes dumpster trash (it's close...) because I'm a total whore. Once its all over ( :lol: ) theaters will likely never see me again and are free to gently caress off to the dustbin of history.

Dishwasher fucked around with this message at 14:49 on Jul 2, 2018

Mooey Cow
Jan 27, 2018

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Pillbug

Jerkface posted:

yea on the poster and before release of the name for sure im talking about after on the merch and how it was discussed by fans. even on these here forums im pretty sure they get referred to more as their titles.
It took a while for the common internet shorthand for the film to move from "EpII" to "AotC", several years after the movie had come out I believe. I think it depended on if the discussion was about the prequels, or also related to the OT, since the OT films already had letter abbreviations; ANH, ESB and RotJ; and were only very rarely referred to by their episode number.

The merch I don't know too much about, but a lot of the AotC logos have a big ol "II" behind the Star Wars logo.

quote:

also lol does anyone remember when they revealed aotc title and everyone was like uhhhhhhhhhjnnhhhhhh
That was a great time to be alive.

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
The prequels had their episode numbers very prominently displayed, but I don't think I recall the same being true for the OT movies, at least when I was little (i.e. the late 90s/early 00s).

My dad had the OT movies on video and they didn't say "Episode IV/V/VI" on the covers, but I got TPM on video and the "Episode I" was at least as prominent as the subtitle.

Jerkface
May 21, 2001

HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE DEAD, MOTHERFUCKER?

Fallen Rib
The posters for the PT all have small star wars, big episode numerical, followed by smaller subtitle. The OT all had Big subtitle, no numerical. The ST follows the OT stylization but with a much more prominently displayed "Star Wars". I don't think its really evidence that Disney is trying to lose the "episodes" rather than hew closer to the OT styling of poster.

I did like all the PT posters though.

remusclaw
Dec 8, 2009

As prequels, I feel like focusing on the the number was only practical. For low info consumers, it tells you straight up what you are getting. I was deployed when the Matrix sequels came out and caught the second movie on a bootleg DVD and was totally surprised when it ended with a to be continued because the last I had heard the Matrix movies where going to be one sequel and one prequel .

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless

Jerkface posted:

I did like all the PT posters though.

They are good posters. They really get across that "classic Hollywood" theme Lucas was going for. It is a shame big movies get boring photoshops with floating heads instead of nice painted posters.

Wheat Loaf fucked around with this message at 16:05 on Jul 2, 2018

Harime Nui
Apr 15, 2008

The New Insincerity

cargohills posted:

what's funny about "attack of the clones"? this is a genuine question, i really don't get what's wrong with it.

It's because Clones sounds like Clowns and also, like Timeless Appeal notes, an intentional homage to cheesy 50's sci-fi movies.

Wild Horses
Oct 31, 2012

There's really no meaning in making beetles fight.
Attack of the Clones is such a cool title i've been going months at a time just kinda repeating it in my head.
It evokes a hell of a lot more imagination than "force awakens" "last jedi"

Ingmar terdman
Jul 24, 2006

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwL8wlBMflA

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
The movie titles are no big deal. They're all fine.

Pops Mgee
Aug 20, 2009

People all over the world,
Join Hands,
Start the Love Train!
The Force Awakens is still a bad clunky not star warsy title.

my kinda ape
Sep 15, 2008

Everything's gonna be A-OK
Oven Wrangler
edit: wrong thread

my kinda ape fucked around with this message at 09:07 on Jul 4, 2018

DeimosRising
Oct 17, 2005

¡Hola SEA!


tino posted:

You are fine with paying $40-60 and 8 hours of your life for an incomplete story? Are you representative of average Star Wars fans?

Oh my yes

Neo Rasa
Mar 8, 2007
Everyone should play DUKE games.

:dukedog:

Wheat Loaf posted:

The movie titles are no big deal. They're all fine.

I think Attack of the Clones was the only time one was subject to wide ridicule, even it's not particularly bad. There was a lot of disappointment though that the title was Attack of the Clones and then the clone wars kind of don't really get underway until the movie's climax. A common sentiment I remember was that Attack of the Clones should have been episode 1.

remusclaw
Dec 8, 2009

Neo Rasa posted:

A common sentiment I remember was that Attack of the Clones should have been episode 1.

That was in vogue during the short period of time after the movies release where people were looking for every reason they could find to like the movie. All the prequels, even the first had a period where people tried really really hard to like them.

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless

Neo Rasa posted:

I think Attack of the Clones was the only time one was subject to wide ridicule, even it's not particularly bad. There was a lot of disappointment though that the title was Attack of the Clones and then the clone wars kind of don't really get underway until the movie's climax. A common sentiment I remember was that Attack of the Clones should have been episode 1.

Fair enough. I was 11 when it came out so I suppose I wasn't terribly discerning about titles.

Lampsacus
Oct 21, 2008

I vaguely recall a rumour that Disney was looking into rebooting the prequels as a tv series. Does anybody know what I'm talking about/have any links?

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
There's a tv series happening, which is going to be produced by Jon Favreau, but it's supposed to be set between ROTJ and TFA.

I think the idea that Disney is going to redo the prequel trilogy has been making the rounds since they bought the company. I don't really see it happening, though.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'
I think it's inevitable, especially given how little Disney refers to them except in the broadest possible strokes. That, and they introduced time travel into the canon.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply