|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:Is it time for guillotines? It's been time for the guillotines for a while now
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:10 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 03:01 |
|
spacetoaster posted:jesus christ at the amount of money they have. i'm sure myron earned his position
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:11 |
|
mastershakeman posted:What the heck is fbr off-brand malaysian pbr sold at family dollar
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:15 |
|
i say swears online posted:i'm sure myron earned his position How about warren, director of corn research, stine?
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:16 |
|
I voted Bernie in the primary and wrote in Monica Moorehead for the general because she was the first name I saw on the write in list hanging above the voting booth. I have only told one other person about this and will take it to my grave otherwise
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:18 |
|
Nikita Khrushchev posted:I voted Bernie in the primary and wrote in Monica Moorehead for the general because she was the first name I saw on the write in list hanging above the voting booth. I have only told one other person about this and will take it to my grave otherwise I'll say this every time Monica Moorehead comes up in conversation, that is the perfect porn star name for the late 90s and early 2000s
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:20 |
|
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6054/text poo poo! I guess my clown army could be screwed if this goes through.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:33 |
|
spacetoaster posted:jesus christ at the amount of money they have. *CEO pointing at his two sons* The Chad President and the Virgin Assistant Director of Corn Research
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:37 |
|
so much political capital
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:38 |
|
lol corn boys bio tries to cover up his complete lack of non-nepotistic accomplishments by talking about how good he is at chess and ping pong
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:38 |
https://twitter.com/BrandyLJensen/status/1017780588009459713
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:39 |
|
why would it matter that the Abolish ICE bill fails in THIS congress, if the earliest possible date in which it could pass would be the NEXT congress, presumably after more democrats (lol) are in the House and Senate?
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:50 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:why would it matter that the Abolish ICE bill fails in THIS congress, if the earliest possible date in which it could pass would be the NEXT congress, presumably after more democrats (lol) are in the House and Senate? I guess they want to hammer it for longer in the next few months leading up to the election but they blew all that momentum now
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:51 |
|
Feldegast42 posted:I guess they want to hammer it for longer in the next few months leading up to the election but they blew all that momentum now obvious solution is to just vote for it then change the name to get around that one rule and just carry on like nothing happened
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:55 |
Agean90 posted:obvious solution is to just vote for it then change the name to get around that one rule and just carry on like nothing happened that would be insufficiently decorous
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:58 |
|
docbeard posted:Same thing applies to them, I guess. pretty sure that logic only applies to the person who actually introduces the bill. the other two can't use that excuse mastershakeman posted:What the heck is fbr #FollowBackResistance, or something like that basically they're promising that if you are anti-Trump and follow them and retweet all their poo poo, they'll follow you back and retweet all of your poo poo. this will help to #resist Trump by making sure ineffectual twitter #resistance types will have a lot of follows and retweets, which will make them feel good about themselves and satisfy twitter warriors who dream of being #influencers and imagine that posting the blue wave emoji a dozen times will be the thing that destroys TRUMP once and for all
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 15:59 |
|
Feldegast42 posted:I guess they want to hammer it for longer in the next few months leading up to the election but they blew all that momentum now Just because it failed a vote doesn't mean they can't campaign on it. Hell, campaign harder on how you need more votes to have it pass next term. The real problem is that most dems aren't on board and don't want to have to either vote for it or be on record as not voting for it because god forbid they take a stand on something.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:00 |
|
Feldegast42 posted:I guess they want to hammer it for longer in the next few months leading up to the election but they blew all that momentum now They're just accruing political capital to spend on
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:06 |
|
Thoguh posted:Just because it failed a vote doesn't mean they can't campaign on it. Hell, campaign harder on how you need more votes to have it pass next term. only 25% of americans want to abolish ice so i think there's actually no political benefit at all to "campaigning hard on it."
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:06 |
|
Concerned Citizen posted:only 25% of americans want to abolish ice so i think there's actually no political benefit at all to "campaigning hard on it." counterpoint: shut up, CC
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:07 |
|
Concerned Citizen posted:only 25% of americans want to abolish ice so i think there's actually no political benefit at all to "campaigning hard on it." it was a measly fraction a year earlier, when you campaign for things people start liking it
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:08 |
|
Concerned Citizen posted:only 25% of americans want to abolish ice so i think there's actually no political benefit at all to "campaigning hard on it." only 25% of americans want to abolish slavery so i think there's actually no political benefit at all to "campaigning hard on it."
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:08 |
|
quotes not edit, also cc still fails to realize that the Dems can actually affect the opinions of the public storage large instead of letting the gop have a monopoly on it.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:08 |
|
Agean90 posted:quotes not edit, also cc still fails to realize that the Dems can actually affect the opinions of the public storage large instead of letting the gop have a monopoly on it. voters are going to take "abolish ice" as "abolish all border control" and basically no amount of campaigning is going to make that idea a popular one (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:12 |
https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/1017788509913059331
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:12 |
Concerned Citizen posted:voters are going to take "abolish ice" as "abolish all border control" and basically no amount of campaigning is going to make that idea a popular one coward
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:12 |
|
lock her up
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:13 |
|
Concerned Citizen posted:voters are going to take "abolish ice" as "abolish all border control" and basically no amount of campaigning is going to make that idea a popular one Oh no, they might think we mean what we actually mean? HEAVEN FORBID
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:13 |
|
Concerned Citizen posted:voters are going to take "abolish ice" as "abolish all border control" and basically no amount of campaigning is going to make that idea a popular one they're taking that way because the gop is spinning it that way, just like they spun defending daca as screwing over Americans in favor of illegals. You are once again mistaking the outcome of a focused pr campaign as a natural law and saying to do nothing about it.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:14 |
voters are dumb babies who must be soothed with the peaceful sound of data center consolidaton
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:15 |
|
Concerned Citizen posted:voters are going to take "abolish ice" as "abolish all border control" and basically no amount of campaigning is going to make that idea a popular one oh no
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:15 |
|
Remember when Medicare for all went from impratical to broadly supported in less than a year? It's almost like... campaigning for things can make them popular
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:15 |
|
voters are going to take "abolish slavery" as "force your white daughter to marry a black man" and basically no amount of campaigning is going to make that idea a popular one
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:17 |
abolishing ice was an insane fringe policy with like 2% support at the beginning of this year it's now a mainstream policy with legislation ready to go on it once again, as I pointed out yesterday by the way, the centrist argument boils down to inaction
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:17 |
|
docbeard posted:Oh no, they might think we mean what we actually mean? HEAVEN FORBID That's not what most people mean though. It's the boogyman that the GOP is throwing up and the handful of people in this thread who want to abolish borders are probably an appreciable percentage of the overall population that supports that idea.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:17 |
|
i fo one am utterly shocked cc has no clue how politics works
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:18 |
treating voters as mentally incapable makes sense when you consider that the voters being pursued are the moderate republicans
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:18 |
|
Agean90 posted:Remember when Medicare for all went from impratical to broadly supported in less than a year? It's almost like... campaigning for things can make them popular But would that be pragmatic?
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:18 |
|
Centrists: activists need to step up and spread progressive ideals Activists: Okay *primaries a centrists, makes previously unthinkable policies mainstream* Centrists: no not those ideals
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:20 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 03:01 |
|
Taintrunner posted:lock her up
|
# ? Jul 13, 2018 16:21 |