|
ikanreed posted:This is on purpose, right? Apparently it's from an actual textbook, so no: https://twitter.com/TerribleMaps/status/1018549973774839808 I think the map represents the world after some cataclysm where Africa and South America switched places, and the resulting climate chaos and earthquakes decimated the bird species. Still no idea about the purple regions...
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2018 02:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 16:46 |
|
|
That cone is from the great pyramids' gift shop
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2018 03:36
|
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:If they were ethical you wouldn't see $14 16 ounce cans at concerts. The construction of sports venues is always paid for by tax dollars as well. So you pay for it even if you don't go and get gouged!
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2018 06:26
|
|
|
Panty Saluter posted:literally at the top of this page dudes steinrokkan has no sense of object permanence yet, cut some slack
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2018 08:53
|
|
|
SerialKilldeer posted:Apparently it's from an actual textbook, so no: stunning: eight shades on the map, five on the legend so which failson got gifted the contract to make these books
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2018 08:57
|
|
|
I'm the overlapping ranges in the legend
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2018 09:10
|
|
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/08/toblerone-faces-mountain-of-criticism-over-stupid-change-to-its/ mondelez are simultaneously some of the dumbest and most evil idiots i've ever had the pleasure of working with and it really shows
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2018 09:42
|
|
|
SerialKilldeer posted:Still no idea about the purple regions... They’re rife with anti-birds; when birds and anti-birds meet, both entities are annihilated.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2018 13:57
|
|
|
Trig Discipline posted:steinrokkan has no sense of object permanence yet, cut some slack https://twitter.com/Chainbody/status/1010641799944331264
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2018 14:30
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/newscientist/status/1019311281499791361
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2018 01:55
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/irishrygirl/status/1018578821442949120
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2018 17:39
|
|
|
It’d make its point better if it was actually accurate, too. It’s a shame 
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2018 18:49
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2018 20:46
|
|
|
Feels like they should have pro-rated 2001.
|
|
#
?
Jul 18, 2018 20:52
|
|
|
Whats the projected height for 2050? Or 2002 was just an outlier.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2018 00:10
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Whats the projected height for 2050? Negative 75,000 feet. So a pit about 25 miles deep.
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2018 20:36
|
|
|
SerialKilldeer posted:Negative 75,000 feet. So a pit about 25 miles deep. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2018 20:59
|
|
|
America.jpg
|
|
#
?
Jul 19, 2018 21:19
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 00:07
|
|
|
Loss edits gettin good
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 00:08
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 00:10
|
|
|
DarkHorse posted:Loss edits gettin good
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 00:45
|
|
|
Edit a drone strike flying in over the rich bar and you've got something realistic.
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 00:47
|
|
|
DarkHorse posted:Loss edits gettin good
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 00:53
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/1019958637236809728
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 02:08
|
|
|
That is so many layers of stupid piled together I don't even know where to begin.
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 02:11
|
|
|
i'm here for all of this
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 03:13
|
|
|
Wow that "chart" is actually running inside a NYT story. What editor allowed that monstrosity.
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 04:52
|
|
|
I'm either too dumb or too smart to understand it. Can someone translate it into smart/stupid for me?
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 06:20
|
|
|
Electronics reddit found this one where charging batteries and capacitors sends them back in time.
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 20:34
|
|
|
ol qwerty bastard posted:Electronics reddit found this one where charging batteries and capacitors sends them back in time. Surely only flux capacitors. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 20:40
|
|
|
Profit and loss.
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 21:49
|
|
|
Outrail posted:I'm either too dumb or too smart to understand it. Can someone translate it into smart/stupid for me? The makeup of the specific senate seats up for re-election next are such that it will be very very difficult for the democrats to regain control of the senate. Even if lots more people vote democratic than normal.
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 22:18
|
|
|
Patrick Spens posted:The makeup of the specific senate seats up for re-election next are such that it will be very very difficult for the democrats to regain control of the senate. Even if lots more people vote democratic than normal. There's also the fact that only 1/3 of the senate seats are up for election every two years, and the current crop of seats up for election are the wave of dems that got elected with Obama's second term, meaning that there are very few Republican seats up for election and a lot of Democratic ones for the Dems to potentially lose. This limits the damage a potential blue-wave can do to the Republican control of the senate. The graph/animation is still utterly incomprehensible.
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 22:33
|
|
|
Patrick Spens posted:The makeup of the specific senate seats up for re-election next are such that it will be very very difficult for the democrats to regain control of the senate. Even if lots more people vote democratic than normal. Which completely ignores the huge number of House seats that are potentially available and is what the "blue wave" actually refers to. So yeah, it's a real dumb chart.
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 22:34
|
|
|
And this is what I get for not reading the drat article before pontificating. They're not talking about the senate. They are talking about the house. The jist of the article is that there are very few Republican seats in democratic leaning areas, up for re-election. But yeah, chart bad.
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2018 22:59
|
|
|
ol qwerty bastard posted:Electronics reddit found this one where charging batteries and capacitors sends them back in time.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2018 00:43
|
|
|
Zamujasa posted:Profit and loss. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2018 01:29
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Dan_Livingstone/status/1020739628381474817
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2018 05:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 16:46 |
|
|
Oh, we're past "work for exposure" now, good to know.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2018 06:44
|
|
