|
So exactly what is AI good for you guys
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2018 23:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 10:49 |
|
|
Doggles posted:Be careful what you say about Elon Musk. He might contact your boss and threaten to sue. yes this is normal for a CEO to be doing and not indicative of a mental breakdown
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2018 23:52
|
|
|
Dinosaurtrain posted:So exactly what is AI good for you guys https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEHNvuRvo7M
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2018 23:55
|
|
|
Dinosaurtrain posted:So exactly what is AI good for you guys Well we're gonna try to make it guess on if you have a tumor or not based on a single image and turn that image into a full explorable 3d image
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2018 23:59
|
|
|
Doggles posted:Be careful what you say about Elon Musk. He might contact your boss and threaten to sue. Japolik is full of poo poo bcuase the real story is closer to this as one poster there points out quote:Fossi is the lawyer and director for Stewart Rahr’s tax avoidance foundation. Rahr made his billion by scamming the American medical system through overcharging for drugs.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 00:23
|
|
|
CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:Japolik is full of poo poo bcuase the real story is closer to this as one poster there points out So he's basically doing a Barry Minkow special?
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 00:29
|
|
|
Siljmonster posted:Well we're gonna try to make it guess on if you have a tumor or not based on a single image and turn that image into a full explorable 3d image O Rly
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 03:02
|
|
|
Dinosaurtrain posted:So exactly what is AI good for you guys
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 03:05
|
|
|
Siljmonster posted:Well we're gonna try to make it guess on if you have a tumor or not based on a single image and turn that image into a full explorable 3d image Then after that, well get it to detect cancer based on your social media/instagram posts.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 03:06
|
|
|
Neon Noodle posted:Capital formation oh so poo poo that is worthless at the swipe of a pen in bruxelles great
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 03:12
|
|
|
CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:
Ok so my takeaway here is that tesla fans are weirdos obsessed with Ethics in Automotive Journalism
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 04:32
|
|
|
Dinosaurtrain posted:So exactly what is AI good for you guys Racism
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 08:33
|
|
|
Slanderer posted:Ok so my takeaway here is that tesla fans are weirdos obsessed with Ethics in Automotive Journalism no? the takeaway is there are competing capitalist mafias, and one tried to damage the other while claming to be a good guy
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 08:59
|
|
|
Dinosaurtrain posted:So exactly what is AI good for you guys Spam filters work reasonably well.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 12:56
|
|
|
Facebook down 20% , says privacy is bad for profits and nobody likes Stories. quote:Facebook's stock plunged 20% Thursday morning after the company said it expects revenue growth to slow as it "puts privacy first" and rethinks its product experiences.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 15:37
|
|
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:Wehner said the company will invest "billions of dollars per year" improving safety and security No, they won't actually do that.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 17:41
|
|
|
Goa Tse-tung posted:no? the takeaway is there are competing capitalist mafias, and one tried to damage the other while claming to be a good guy The guy could've tweeted a photo of himself at the gas station and Teslagaters would show this as "proof" that all the (veritably true) poo poo he's posted is FUD from Big Oil. The post is literally LOOK AT ALL THIS IRRELEVANT poo poo ABOUT HIS EMPLOYERS. All of which is irrelevant, by the way, if you believe all the other comments talking about how his boss loves is Tesla and was an early adopter and Of Course He Should Be Fired For Insulting His Boss's Car!!! This rear end in a top hat literally posted all his stuff in full disclosure of having a short position lol, and Elon Must called his boss to complain. Tesla's legal department probably declined to do so because it was so loving ridiculous Slanderer fucked around with this message at 21:39 on Jul 26, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2018 21:32
|
|
|
Slanderer posted:The guy could've tweeted a photo of himself at the gas station and Teslagaters would show this as "proof" that all the (veritably true) poo poo he's posted is FUD from Big Oil. It wasn't irrelevant and nor was it irrelevant that you had the basics of a "short and distort" scam going on. And nor was it irrelevant the person in question had a history of abusing others that exposed his posts as bullshit. Which was also pointed out and you chose to ignore.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 00:32
|
|
|
CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:It wasn't irrelevant and nor was it irrelevant that you had the basics of a "short and distort" scam going on. And nor was it irrelevant the person in question had a history of abusing others that exposed his posts as bullshit. Which was also pointed out and you chose to ignore. Apparently accurately reporting Tesla's many failures and zero successes is "distortion" lmao.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 00:40
|
|
|
Whew, I was worried they had taken on CN debt that was coming due soon that would wreck cash flow, thank god it was just a capitalist mafia fable!
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 00:55
|
|
|
CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:It wasn't irrelevant and nor was it irrelevant that you had the basics of a "short and distort" scam going on. And nor was it irrelevant the person in question had a history of abusing others that exposed his posts as bullshit. Which was also pointed out and you chose to ignore. Lmao, you're right, the guy who publicized his short position was definitely pulling a fast one. He put that deadly secret in the one place he thought no one would ever look--in the text of his posts
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 03:27
|
|
|
Given how quickly bazingas respond to insults to Musk, putting it actually in the post probably is the best place to hide something from them.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 15:47
|
|
|
Marijuana posted:No, they won't actually do that. They will! They will spend billions hiring grossly overpaid programmers to live in silicon Valley and try and determine and algorithm to spot "fake news" They will fail Instead of actually just getting people to check and clamp down in things, because Silicon Valley hates the idea of just using people to solve a problem.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 16:57
|
|
|
Nothingtoseehere posted:They will! They will spend billions hiring grossly overpaid programmers to live in silicon Valley and try and determine and algorithm to spot "fake news" They will fail Instead of actually just getting people to check and clamp down in things, because Silicon Valley hates the idea of just using people to solve a problem. You can't have disruption if you aren't undermining labor and thwarting regulation.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 17:09
|
|
|
Silicon Valley loves people when they’re claiming to have an AI because Mechanical Turks are cheaper than coding and who wants to waste money up front?
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 19:51
|
|
|
Nothingtoseehere posted:They will! They will spend billions hiring grossly overpaid programmers to live in silicon Valley and try and determine and algorithm to spot "fake news" They will fail Instead of actually just getting people to check and clamp down in things, because Silicon Valley hates the idea of just using people to solve a problem. "We can just have people do it, no duh" seems like the sort of plan someone would naively come in to a company thinking they had figured out the magic bullet solution that everyone else was too dumb to see then realizing that 8000+ tweets go up per second, 100,000 facebook statues and 300 hours of youtube per minute and any "we can just hire people to handle it!" is totally unworkable on any large social network. Especially on some plan we will subjectively have people eyeball and use judgement to classify things to do it better than a computer.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 22:29
|
|
|
Too big to moderate? Really? Not to mention that's an irrelevant claim. How many bodies would it take to ban Infowars? Is Infowars putting up 100k statuses a minute? Is it wholly impossible to not provide a platform for Infowars?
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 22:34
|
|
|
Just make free social network accounts illegal. That'd make it harder to run bots and weed out the chaff just like the  does here.That said, nothing is too big to moderate, you just need to throw more people at the problem. That said, it can be too big to moderate with the level of profit their making off ads, in which case, make em charge a fee or find some way of covering the cost. It's not societies job to make sure that the right thing is profitable. If social networks can't stay afloat with out paying for a lot of people to babysit them, or broken 'AI's that will never come, then maybe we as a society don't actually need them in the first place.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 22:51
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:They don’t make you install apps though. The kindle is an android tablet with no google apps that has bing as default search. They don’t make you install anything. Only if you want the play store do you need to install all the google stuff. It's because people don't want Android phones without the Play Store.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 22:59
|
|
|
Killer-of-Lawyers posted:
It's not too big to moderate but it is why a dumb "we just gotta hire enough people!" is naive. Even a million full time moderators would barely make a dent trying to watch every youtube video, and that is why community and automated tools need to be a part of a large thing like youtube or facebook.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 23:06
|
|
|
The Trump administration should develop filters for acceptable opinions for Facebook and YouTube.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 23:11
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:It's not too big to moderate but it is why a dumb "we just gotta hire enough people!" is naive. Even a million full time moderators would barely make a dent trying to watch every youtube video, and that is why community and automated tools need to be a part of a large thing like youtube or facebook. Moderating stuff as a full time job also literally gives people PTSD. I forget where I read it but apparently Facebook actually hires a few councilors for the moderators they do have as people can't seem to help but upload abhorrent things on the reg. That job basically requires that you stare at the worst of humanity all day.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2018 23:12
|
|
|
After the Italian Elon Musk debacle, His Boringness got Twitter to crack down on accounts with his name on them, so for a very short while have a bunch of national stereotype joke accounts: https://twitter.com/FMusque/status/1023014332894982145  https://twitter.com/DvonMusk/status/1023028762689110019  Edit: gently caress me, I missed the Irish one: https://twitter.com/GodOfAnxiety/status/1022762105425080320 
Absurd Alhazred fucked around with this message at 03:56 on Jul 28, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2018 03:40
|
|
|
https://www.businessinsider.com/moviepass-outage-caused-by-company-temporarily-running-out-of-cash-2018-7quote:"The $5.0 million cash proceeds received from the Demand Note will be used by the Company to pay the Company's merchant and fulfillment processors," the filing said. "If the Company is unable to make required payments to its merchant and fulfillment processors, the merchant and fulfillment processors may cease processing payments for MoviePass, Inc. ('MoviePass'), which would cause a MoviePass service interruption. Such a service interruption occurred on July 26, 2018." e: Holy poo poo their stock dropped 71% today Moatman fucked around with this message at 04:52 on Jul 28, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2018 04:48
|
|
|
Moatman posted:https://www.businessinsider.com/moviepass-outage-caused-by-company-temporarily-running-out-of-cash-2018-7 Yeah well there's not much worse for your stock price than "we literally have no money"
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2018 05:47
|
|
|
Since when does moderating mean you have to look through every post made on a platform? Do you think mods on SA look at every post?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2018 06:43
|
|
|
corn in the bible posted:Yeah well there's not much worse for your stock price than "we literally have no money" I'm honestly amazed it isn't more then that. "Our business model has unambiguously failed, we had to take out a steep loan just to stay operational for a day" is, uh, pretty apocalyptic. Andrast posted:Since when does moderating mean you have to look through every post made on a platform? Do you think mods on SA look at every post? Yeah, people aren't expecting the moderators on these sites to be loving precogs or whatever, just to take actual, serious action when something is reported.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2018 07:20
|
|
|
Killer-of-Lawyers posted:Just make free social network accounts illegal.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2018 14:54
|
|
|
Andrast posted:Since when does moderating mean you have to look through every post made on a platform? Do you think mods on SA look at every post? I look at all the reported D&D posts but surprisingly that’s like 30 a day max. Some people have very low bars for reporting poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2018 16:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 10:49 |
|
|
Random rear end in a top hat posted:I'm honestly amazed it isn't more then that. "Our business model has unambiguously failed, we had to take out a steep loan just to stay operational for a day" is, uh, pretty apocalyptic.  so nasdaq wouldn't delist them.Random rear end in a top hat posted:Yeah, people aren't expecting the moderators on these sites to be loving precogs or whatever, just to take actual, serious action when something is reported. That's really all I want, too. I'm not 100% convinced it could actually happen with a full human team because of the sheer volume (30 reports is what? 1% of the D&D post volume? Facebook has like a million total posts a minute or something like that, 1% of that is still 10k posts/minute to go through so they'd need 834 employees on duty around the clock at minimum if they can somehow fully process 1 report every 5 seconds). But even trying and failing is better than the present situation
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2018 23:36
|
|