|
Krispy Wafer posted:Is it too detailed or small? Did they pick some web 2.0 gradient monstrosity with reflections and poo poo? It's a color that doesn't translate at all for some reason, its purple on the monitor and the hex code is purple but it prints out blue like deep ocean blue. The director insists on it being purple by the by LionYeti fucked around with this message at 20:41 on Jul 26, 2018 |
# ? Jul 26, 2018 20:38 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 21:55 |
|
LionYeti posted:It's a color that doesn't translate at all for some reason, its purple on the monitor and the hex code is purple but it prints out blue like deep ocean blue. It's better down where it's wetter under the sea...
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 20:42 |
|
My CFO has now coined the team "culturally fit" as his term for "not fat" and the recruiter now hate his guts. Its not even clever.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 20:42 |
|
CFO sounds like he's a workplace discrimination case away from the breadline...
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 20:43 |
|
Vargatron posted:CFO sounds like he's a workplace discrimination case away from the breadline... Yeah he is gonna get the pants sued off him at some point.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 20:44 |
|
LionYeti posted:It's a color that doesn't translate at all for some reason, its purple on the monitor and the hex code is purple but it prints out blue like deep ocean blue. The director insists on it being purple by the by Can you change it to another shade of purple for printing? How many color printers have you tried this on?
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 20:46 |
|
Vargatron posted:Can you change it to another shade of purple for printing? How many color printers have you tried this on? We're gonna work with the logo people on the shade but we use one kind of major printer in the office and at fedex office it prints mostly fine.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 20:50 |
|
The images you use for printing should all be CMYK anyway, where you would have full control of how thing print and can go as far as only working in pantone colours. You're probably sending RGB to a printer and it's having to figure out what that's meant to be. Your branding people should really be all over this
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 20:54 |
|
LionYeti posted:The new logo that we spent megabux on commissioning does not print properly on any printer in the building. This is affecting reproduction!
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 20:56 |
|
LionYeti posted:It's a color that doesn't translate at all for some reason, its purple on the monitor and the hex code is purple but it prints out blue like deep ocean blue. The director insists on it being purple by the by try using a jpeg
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:00 |
|
Just insist that its really purple and that your director is color blind.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:01 |
|
Bob Morales posted:try using a jpeg We did same issue
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:03 |
|
Just switch to purple paper
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:04 |
|
Redesign your logo monochrome and have it printed in the only color that matters: the dark red of your enemy’s life blood as it spills upon the battlefield.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:05 |
Methanar posted:Just insist that its really purple and that your director is color blind. If users are always the root of the problem, maybe just this once they can be the solution instead.
|
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:32 |
|
LionYeti posted:It's a color that doesn't translate at all for some reason, its purple on the monitor and the hex code is purple but it prints out blue like deep ocean blue. The director insists on it being purple by the by You can't fax glitter.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:35 |
|
bull3964 posted:You can't fax glitter. but you should definitely try that fax machine will become everyone's friend immediately
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:38 |
|
LionYeti posted:It's a color that doesn't translate at all for some reason, its purple on the monitor and the hex code is purple but it prints out blue like deep ocean blue. The director insists on it being purple by the by This doesn't at all seem like the type of thing you should need to steel yourself to tell people.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:44 |
|
Thanks Ants posted:The images you use for printing should all be CMYK anyway, where you would have full control of how thing print and can go as far as only working in pantone colours. You're probably sending RGB to a printer and it's having to figure out what that's meant to be. Turns out its almost certainly this, Thanks for the help I got a good job from my Senior VP when I gave him the data
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 21:58 |
|
Tell business you need funds to upgrade all printers to be compatible with purple. Buy ultrawides for your department instead.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 22:04 |
|
After having started doing some Docker tutorials during lunch: HOLY poo poo WE’RE IN THE SCI-FI FUTURE. NOW WE JUST SEE IF A KUBERNETES IMPLEMENTATION BECOMES SKYNET!
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 22:04 |
|
Atlassian discontinues HipChat/Stride, sells assets to Slack: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ialflow-organic
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 22:29 |
|
Vargatron posted:CFO sounds like he's a workplace discrimination case away from the breadline... Outside of a few edge cases(MI, San Francisco, and a few other cities, or if it is the direct result of a certain health problems) being overweight is not a protected status in the US, or most of the rest of the world. It is also a grey area to direct recruiters to spend more of their time trying to hire people of a protected status as long as there is no discrimination between those that apply. It is unlikely that they would investigate unless someone was fired because their weight was the result of an ADA or ADA AA recognized disability. Even if the EEOC acts on reports it is unlikely that the CFO would be fired, the penalties are relatively minor for this type of discrimination, and more likely they would just have to implement an anti-harassment policy. Look at what happened with Victoria Hospital in TX, they were already being investigated for racial discrimination and enacted a policy not to hire high BMI individuals. There was no penalty for them, they only reversed the policy because of bad publicity. Really it would be best for everyone to prevent this problem before it starts, and meet with HR about implementing an anti-harassment policy before the CFO does something stupid
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 22:34 |
|
Wouldn’t mind a pm to the discord/slack group (if that exists).
|
# ? Jul 26, 2018 23:51 |
|
22 Eargesplitten posted:Yes, but that’s unrelated to containers. I finally got the joke
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 02:45 |
|
lampey posted:Outside of a few edge cases(MI, San Francisco, and a few other cities, or if it is the direct result of a certain health problems) being overweight is not a protected status in the US, or most of the rest of the world. It is also a grey area to direct recruiters to spend more of their time trying to hire people of a protected status as long as there is no discrimination between those that apply. It is unlikely that they would investigate unless someone was fired because their weight was the result of an ADA or ADA AA recognized disability. Even if the EEOC acts on reports it is unlikely that the CFO would be fired, the penalties are relatively minor for this type of discrimination, and more likely they would just have to implement an anti-harassment policy. Look at what happened with Victoria Hospital in TX, they were already being investigated for racial discrimination and enacted a policy not to hire high BMI individuals. There was no penalty for them, they only reversed the policy because of bad publicity. Wasn't this also the company that had an employee in tears because they were making her wear a skimpy outfit in a promotional video and she was uncomfortable with it? Or I am mixing it up with a different story?
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 02:46 |
|
LochNessMonster posted:Wouldn’t mind a pm to the discord/slack group (if that exists).
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 02:57 |
|
Re: Working in IT 3.0: You can't fax glitter.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 03:36 |
|
Aunt Beth posted:Re: Working in IT 3.0: You can't fax glitter. Not with that attitude.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 03:40 |
|
Aunt Beth posted:Re: Working in IT 3.0: You can't fax glitter.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 03:40 |
|
bull3964 posted:Not with that attitude. This title suggestion has me jonesing for a chick parm.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 03:42 |
|
cheque_some posted:Wasn't this also the company that had an employee in tears because they were making her wear a skimpy outfit in a promotional video and she was uncomfortable with it? Or I am mixing it up with a different story? I'm pretty sure it's the same CFO as a matter of fact.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 04:10 |
|
LochNessMonster posted:Wouldn’t mind a pm to the discord/slack group (if that exists).
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 04:11 |
|
If the discord/slack group doesn't exist. Shall we just create one?
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 09:27 |
Use IRC as a proper neckbeard.
|
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 09:51 |
|
Chat will lower the quality of discussion. And I can't handle another chat.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 10:32 |
|
At least use Slack so I look like I’m working.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 11:55 |
|
Virigoth posted:At least use Slack so I look like I’m working.
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 12:03 |
|
nielsm posted:Use IRC as a proper neckbeard. Not emptyquoting
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 13:17 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 21:55 |
|
Sefal posted:If the discord/slack group doesn't exist. Shall we just create one? Last time I asked about a Discord group I got dogpiled on because "why do we need one" lol
|
# ? Jul 27, 2018 13:27 |