Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
What regions belong in the Pacific Northwest?
Alaska, US
British Columbia, CA
Washington, US
Oregon, US
Idaho, US
Montana, US
Wyoming, US
California, US (MODS PLEASE BAN ANYONE VOTING FOR THIS OPTION TIA)
View Results
 
  • Post
  • Reply
George
Nov 27, 2004

No love for your made-up things.
We should be willing to kick them out while they're winning the world series.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

porkface
Dec 29, 2000

Capitalism is just a front for selective socialism.

Spergin Morlock
Aug 8, 2009

Schmeichy posted:

Goodspaceguy is old news. This guy was my favorite: https://weiapplets.sos.wa.gov/MyVot...e&group=Federal

"A little less conversation. A little more action.
Contact:
(844) 840-8800
info@screwbothparties.com
https://www.screwbothparties.com"

(To be clear, I did not vote for him)

I'm enjoying Alex Tsimerman's statement in the voter pamphlet, personally. What a lunatic.

FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting

DrNutt posted:

They could be staffed with literal saints and they still shouldn't get 180 million taxpayer dollars. Subsidization of professional sports is absurd at its most base level.

Yes.

RuanGacho
Jun 20, 2002

"You're gunna break it!"

What if we buy the local sports team and convert it into a player owned co-op with salary caps and the wealth extraction that normally occurs would go directly to capex and infrastructure investment?

Javid
Oct 21, 2004

:jpmf:
Seize and liquidate the entire franchise and hand the proceeds directly to the poor as cash. Dynamite the stadium sim city style and build a low income housing project so large as to be visible from orbit. The now-unemployed ballsports players can live in it, I guess.

DR FRASIER KRANG
Feb 4, 2005

"Are you forgetting that just this afternoon I was punched in the face by a turtle now dead?

RuanGacho posted:

What if we buy the local sports team and convert it into a player owned co-op with salary caps and the wealth extraction that normally occurs would go directly to capex and infrastructure investment?

Literally one sports franchise has done this and after it happened the league made sure no other teams would do it.

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

HEY NONG MAN posted:

Literally one sports franchise has done this and after it happened the league made sure no other teams would do it.

Green Bay Packers?

DR FRASIER KRANG
Feb 4, 2005

"Are you forgetting that just this afternoon I was punched in the face by a turtle now dead?
Yes. I mean, maybe there are other collectively owned teams on other continents but as far as MLB/NBA/NFL/NHL/MLS(LOL) goes, the packers are the only working example.

Jack2142
Jul 17, 2014

Shitposting in Seattle

Turn Safeco field into a giant execution stage and sacrifice homeless people to appease the creator Bezos.

OneMoreTime
Feb 20, 2011

*quack*


Honestly if there's at least one county in the US that's gonna call their bluff, it would be King county.

So I expect them to fold because they're scared to lose them like the Sonics or some poo poo.

DevNull
Apr 4, 2007

And sometimes is seen a strange spot in the sky
A human being that was given to fly

OneMoreTime posted:

Honestly if there's at least one county in the US that's gonna call their bluff, it would be King county.

So I expect them to fold because they're scared to lose them like the Sonics or some poo poo.

Just like we stood up to the bluff that Amazon would move away because of the head tax.

OneMoreTime
Feb 20, 2011

*quack*


DevNull posted:

Just like we stood up to the bluff that Amazon would move away because of the head tax.

Imagine if they did? Might actually be able to afford a house in King! ...Or at least in Everett. Or Marysville.

Mt. Vernon?

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

OneMoreTime posted:

Imagine if they did? Might actually be able to afford a house in King! ...Or at least in Everett. Or Marysville.

Mt. Vernon?

Houses in Marysville stay on the market for a week, tops. It's really crazy.

Peachfart
Jan 21, 2017

OneMoreTime posted:

Imagine if they did? Might actually be able to afford a house in King! ...Or at least in Everett. Or Marysville.

Mt. Vernon?

My best friend bought a house in Marysville a few years ago and even up there the prices have gone up over 50% since he bought the place. If you want cheap housing in the North end you are looking at somewhere like Stanwood or Mt Vernon.

Ham Equity
Apr 16, 2013

The first thing we do, let's kill all the cars.
Grimey Drawer

Peachfart posted:

My best friend bought a house in Marysville a few years ago and even up there the prices have gone up over 50% since he bought the place. If you want cheap housing in the North end you are looking at somewhere like Stanwood or Mt Vernon.

That is not the North end of Seattle, that is the North end of the U.S.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 13 hours!

Solkanar512 posted:

Green Bay Packers?

With all the Scandinavians here from the mid west that are familiar with the Packers, I bet one could that model in Seattle.

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum
I'd really like to see someone hold Ted Wheeler down and defend this decision https://twitter.com/wweek/status/1022957299499905024

Peachfart
Jan 21, 2017

Thanatosian posted:

That is not the North end of Seattle, that is the North end of the U.S.

Everything on the west side of the mountains in Washington is a suburb of Seattle.

Edit: Well, except maybe Bellingham and Vancouver.

KingFisher
Oct 30, 2006
WORST EDITOR in the history of my expansion school's student paper. Then I married a BEER HEIRESS and now I shitpost SA by white-knighting the status quo to defend my unearned life of privilege.
Fun Shoe

Javid posted:

Seize and liquidate the entire franchise and hand the proceeds directly to the poor as cash. Dynamite the stadium sim city style and build a low income housing project so large as to be visible from orbit. The now-unemployed ballsports players can live in it, I guess.

This but single family homes in Wallingford/Queen Anne/Madison Valley/West Seattle, or anyone who has ever complained about apodments.

George
Nov 27, 2004

No love for your made-up things.
My complaint about apodments is that they aren't actually cheap though.

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus

Peachfart posted:

Everything on the west side of the mountains in Washington is a suburb of Seattle.

Edit: Well, except maybe Bellingham and Vancouver.

Olympic Peninsula and the coast, also not suburbs of Seattle.

Teabag Dome Scandal
Mar 19, 2002


George posted:

My complaint about apodments is that they aren't actually cheap though.

What gave you the impression apodments were being built to be affordable instead of a better investment for the developer?

FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting

KingFisher posted:

This but single family homes in Wallingford/Queen Anne/Madison Valley/West Seattle, or anyone who has ever complained about apodments.

Apodments are vicious cash grabs by lovely developers. But I hope you get stuck in one for a long time.

Cactrot
Jan 11, 2001

Go Go Cactus Galactus





Love too live in a city with rising vacancy rates but without any relief on rent.

Accretionist
Nov 7, 2012
I BELIEVE IN STUPID CONSPIRACY THEORIES
The solution is large-scale public housing. Singapore, Vienna, etc. Plenty of models to look at.

It's a solved problem.

George
Nov 27, 2004

No love for your made-up things.
But this isn't Vienna, those solutions would never work herhfuhwgf9843gf5gu4vnv4434t4t

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 13 hours!

Accretionist posted:

The solution is large-scale public housing. Singapore, Vienna, etc. Plenty of models to look at.

It's a solved problem.

New York and Chicago hosed that up with racism / corruption and the federal government going welp ain't funding that any more (racism again) go gently caress yourselves cities certainly didn't help.

seiferguy
Jun 9, 2005

FLAWED
INTUITION



Toilet Rascal

George posted:

herhfuhwgf9843gf5gu4vnv4434t4t

:hmmyes:

Freakazoid_
Jul 5, 2013


Buglord
I personally would like to see apodments abolished. I hate them and it was clear from the start it was an excuse to charge the same for less.

twodot
Aug 7, 2005

You are objectively correct that this person is dumb and has said dumb things
Caring about apodments is a lazy half-step. Massively build public housing, rent it out at cost, if people still want to rent costly, lovely, tiny apartments from capitalists, I don't see any reason to stop them.

CongoJack
Nov 5, 2009

Ask Why, Asshole
You can get mad at apodments but when someone's options are one of those for 800 or a one bedroom for 1400 can you really blame them for wanting to save $600 a month?

KingFisher
Oct 30, 2006
WORST EDITOR in the history of my expansion school's student paper. Then I married a BEER HEIRESS and now I shitpost SA by white-knighting the status quo to defend my unearned life of privilege.
Fun Shoe

FRINGE posted:

Apodments are vicious cash grabs by lovely developers. But I hope you get stuck in one for a long time.

I lived in one for 2 years and it was fine. It was more affordable than any apartment, I didn't have to deal with a roommate and I could pay month to month.

Apodments are only unaffordable because we haven't allowed enough to meet demand, once the demand for entry level market rate housing has been met any additional supply will lower the cost.

KingFisher
Oct 30, 2006
WORST EDITOR in the history of my expansion school's student paper. Then I married a BEER HEIRESS and now I shitpost SA by white-knighting the status quo to defend my unearned life of privilege.
Fun Shoe

Accretionist posted:

The solution is large-scale public housing. Singapore, Vienna, etc. Plenty of models to look at.

It's a solved problem.

Agreed we should be building 50 story 1000 unit towers of mixed income multi-family housing around each light rail station. But instead we are building a 300 unit lowerise building in Capital Hill.

The people of the city don't want to fix the problem. They are racist and classist and want thier segregationist single family homes.

KingFisher
Oct 30, 2006
WORST EDITOR in the history of my expansion school's student paper. Then I married a BEER HEIRESS and now I shitpost SA by white-knighting the status quo to defend my unearned life of privilege.
Fun Shoe

Cactrot posted:

Love too live in a city with rising vacancy rates but without any relief on rent.

Imagine a future were the city changed the laws where there was so much excess capacity in housing that the landlord's had to fight tooth and nail to get you to choose to live in thier empty unit.

That's what we could have if we zoned properly and had a floor of publicly funded housing to keep the supply greater than demand.

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus
People are mad at apodments because the solution to affordable housing shouldn't be stuffing people into closet dwellings. Other places have solved affordable housing without dehumanizing as many people as possible.

Gerund
Sep 12, 2007

He push a man


Apodments literally only exist because of an arbitrage where one protection counted kitchens and the other counted bedrooms. There is no market for them otherwise.

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

DrNutt posted:

People are mad at apodments because the solution to affordable housing shouldn't be stuffing people into closet dwellings. Other places have solved affordable housing without dehumanizing as many people as possible.

This right here. Also whenever the issue of housing comes up, it always seems to assume that the people in need are folks with no spouses, children and so on.

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum
You should be mad at the city relaxing regulations to allow for apodments for the same reasons you'd be mad at relaxing regulations to allow for residential building too close to the waterfront, or next to the airport, or between a steel mill and a rendering plant. It's like how you should be mad that landlords are able to collect rent on buildings in disrepair, which is why Seattle recently passed that bill that restricts slumlords from increasing rent, which is a laughably tiny concession.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

KingFisher
Oct 30, 2006
WORST EDITOR in the history of my expansion school's student paper. Then I married a BEER HEIRESS and now I shitpost SA by white-knighting the status quo to defend my unearned life of privilege.
Fun Shoe

Solkanar512 posted:

This right here. Also whenever the issue of housing comes up, it always seems to assume that the people in need are folks with no spouses, children and so on.

Apodments aren't supoosed to be "affordable housing" they are entry level market rate housing units for people dont need all of the features of a studio or 1br.

"Affordable housing" specifically means rental units that have subsidized rents so people making less than 80% of AMI can afford rent.

Quit conflating them.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply