Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."

Dalris Othaine posted:

re: Wizard Hitler, wasn't there an entire movie out about that recently?

Kinda, the big twist was that it was actually about Wizard Hitler.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

End of Shoelace
Apr 5, 2016
Renegade Cause is pretty good, except Tonks is an author-pet pedophile :/

quote:

"Well, besides that, it's a spell that's got a manageable area of effect, and is ridiculously easy to cast to boot – the perfect spell to handle Dark wizards. Not to mention that it's a blast at parties." Tonks winked provocatively. "And during sex."

Harry went red.

(note: harry is 15 years old here. theres tons of stuff like this from tonks to harry)
and it also has quality characters like gang weeder Peeves:

quote:

"You see, insanity's a bit like a sexually transmitted disease – now that's a term you don't hear too often at Hogwarts!", Peeves said.

(after this he makes a reference to catching 'em all and cakes being lies)

Circular Reasoning is pretty fun in the sense of cold war British dystopian fantasies, like Judge Dredd.

EDIT: lmao

quote:

Harry glared at Tonks, but she only laughed. So, awkwardly holding the sheet around him, he pulled down his boxers and tossed them with the rest of his clothes.

"What now?"

"Now we proceed to have kinky sex on top of the desk, which I will transfigure into a bed for good measure," Tonks replied primly, keeping a completely straight face. "Turns out the whole simulamancy thing was a very well conceived plan just to get you in bed with me."

"Tonks!"

"Of course, I'm kidding," Tonks continued with a wink. "Nah, just get up onto the table and lie flat on your back. Keep all parts of your body as still as possible – and that includes your –"

End of Shoelace fucked around with this message at 14:11 on Aug 6, 2018

90s Cringe Rock
Nov 29, 2006
:gay:
Christ just write your story where adult Harry or your own adult self insert gets to gently caress tonks, you don't have to have kids loving even if you are writing Harry Potter fanfic. There are adults in the setting!

Cardiovorax
Jun 5, 2011

I mean, if you're a successful actress and you go out of the house in a skirt and without underwear, knowing that paparazzi are just waiting for opportunities like this and that it has happened many times before, then there's really nobody you can blame for it but yourself.

Qwertycoatl posted:

Then Herminone dies and it's suddenly totally reasonable to try to bring the dead back to life because he really wants to.
It's a standard transhumanist power fantasy to assume that once the magic computer god is born, it will be able to just spontaneously piece the brains of everyone who has ever died back together from residual information and raise them from the dead, Christian "resurrection of the body" style. Because, you know, it can just do that.

The part where the human brain starts to irreparably decay after at the very most four minutes of being unoxygenated, meaning that information is permanently lost in an unrecoverable "taking a magnet to a VHS tape" way, is usually lost on those people. Incidentally, this means that all those people who had their heads put in liquid nitrogen after substantially more than four minutes? Might as well have gotten themselves incinerated for all the good it will do them, because the best they can hope for is getting resurrected for an eternal afterlife as a complete vegetable, if even that much were possible.

Did I mention Yudkowsky is a desperate believer in cryonics? Because Yudkowsky is a desperate believer in cryonics and has already paid in advance for getting his noggin' frozen at some point.

:stare:

Cardiovorax fucked around with this message at 16:26 on Aug 6, 2018

End of Shoelace
Apr 5, 2016
more good bits from renegade cause:

- tonks basically grooms harry constantly. so far she has also disguised as a hufflepuff 4th grader girl to lure harry into a closet and french kiss him
- harry and tonks need to kill the wife of an education board member to get harry an audience/interrogation with no members on the opposition. they also need a corpse for a blood magic rite to transfer harrys consciousness into it so he can travel outside hogwarts to gain further allies. tonks tells harry she wouldnt mind bending his naked ladycorpse over a table. NOTE: HE IS FIFTEEN YEARS OLD
- harry growls something in anger about 500 times
- harry uses avada kedavra on a person he doesnt know because he is remorseless and world-wise
- snape says "gently caress"
- peeves is pretty much the ghost of joker from the killing joke, and works for a mysterious hidden darkness. he quotes green day and is truely insane™
- the entire story happens because harry refused to surrender his wand to the ministry after saving dudley from dementors. instead, he blinds ministry officials by blowing up a mirror. he runs away from ministry "hit wizards" on his broom and four of them die after they crash into an airplane. harry is worried hes in trouble and angry at people freaking out at him
- one of the dead is the brother of the hit wizard head chief. he slowly goes nuts with grief, and after harry kills him in a duel hes relieved the terror to himself is finally over
- the author accidentally uses a first person pronoun, referring to himself, when writing harry during an erotic situation with tonks

renegade cause presents the story of a manipulative psychopath harry, in which he acts as an almost fantastical trope of an "abusive victim". simultaneously being exploited, yet taking advantage of his surrounding plight constantly. its contrasted with harrys distrust of people, until a pedophile develops a sexually charged relationship with him. none of the ethics are put under question by the writer.

im guessing the author does not come from a very healthy place to write stuff like this.

The Iron Rose
May 12, 2012

:minnie: Cat Army :minnie:
The Harry Tonks thing was probably less disturbing to me because that's a common pairing in Harry Potter fanfics in general but lol i completely missed that I typo the first time around yeesh

90s Cringe Rock
Nov 29, 2006
:gay:

End of Shoelace posted:

more good bits from renegade cause:

- snape says "gently caress"
nice.

Fajita Queen
Jun 21, 2012

End of Shoelace posted:

more good bits from renegade cause:

- tonks basically grooms harry constantly. so far she has also disguised as a hufflepuff 4th grader girl to lure harry into a closet and french kiss him
- harry and tonks need to kill the wife of an education board member to get harry an audience/interrogation with no members on the opposition. they also need a corpse for a blood magic rite to transfer harrys consciousness into it so he can travel outside hogwarts to gain further allies. tonks tells harry she wouldnt mind bending his naked ladycorpse over a table. NOTE: HE IS FIFTEEN YEARS OLD
- harry growls something in anger about 500 times
- harry uses avada kedavra on a person he doesnt know because he is remorseless and world-wise
- snape says "gently caress"
- peeves is pretty much the ghost of joker from the killing joke, and works for a mysterious hidden darkness. he quotes green day and is truely insane™
- the entire story happens because harry refused to surrender his wand to the ministry after saving dudley from dementors. instead, he blinds ministry officials by blowing up a mirror. he runs away from ministry "hit wizards" on his broom and four of them die after they crash into an airplane. harry is worried hes in trouble and angry at people freaking out at him
- one of the dead is the brother of the hit wizard head chief. he slowly goes nuts with grief, and after harry kills him in a duel hes relieved the terror to himself is finally over
- the author accidentally uses a first person pronoun, referring to himself, when writing harry during an erotic situation with tonks

renegade cause presents the story of a manipulative psychopath harry, in which he acts as an almost fantastical trope of an "abusive victim". simultaneously being exploited, yet taking advantage of his surrounding plight constantly. its contrasted with harrys distrust of people, until a pedophile develops a sexually charged relationship with him. none of the ethics are put under question by the writer.

im guessing the author does not come from a very healthy place to write stuff like this.

:stonk:

Jazerus
May 24, 2011


End of Shoelace posted:

more good bits from renegade cause:

- tonks basically grooms harry constantly. so far she has also disguised as a hufflepuff 4th grader girl to lure harry into a closet and french kiss him
- harry and tonks need to kill the wife of an education board member to get harry an audience/interrogation with no members on the opposition. they also need a corpse for a blood magic rite to transfer harrys consciousness into it so he can travel outside hogwarts to gain further allies. tonks tells harry she wouldnt mind bending his naked ladycorpse over a table. NOTE: HE IS FIFTEEN YEARS OLD
- harry growls something in anger about 500 times
- harry uses avada kedavra on a person he doesnt know because he is remorseless and world-wise
- snape says "gently caress"
- peeves is pretty much the ghost of joker from the killing joke, and works for a mysterious hidden darkness. he quotes green day and is truely insane™
- the entire story happens because harry refused to surrender his wand to the ministry after saving dudley from dementors. instead, he blinds ministry officials by blowing up a mirror. he runs away from ministry "hit wizards" on his broom and four of them die after they crash into an airplane. harry is worried hes in trouble and angry at people freaking out at him
- one of the dead is the brother of the hit wizard head chief. he slowly goes nuts with grief, and after harry kills him in a duel hes relieved the terror to himself is finally over
- the author accidentally uses a first person pronoun, referring to himself, when writing harry during an erotic situation with tonks

renegade cause presents the story of a manipulative psychopath harry, in which he acts as an almost fantastical trope of an "abusive victim". simultaneously being exploited, yet taking advantage of his surrounding plight constantly. its contrasted with harrys distrust of people, until a pedophile develops a sexually charged relationship with him. none of the ethics are put under question by the writer.

im guessing the author does not come from a very healthy place to write stuff like this.

for all of the poo poo a person can give bland-but-competent fics like the arithmancer

well

it's still a top-tier fic, because below the top 0.1% there's a lot of stuff like renegade cause

Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'

End of Shoelace posted:

- the author accidentally uses a first person pronoun, referring to himself, when writing harry during an erotic situation with tonks

I love it.

Liquid Communism
Mar 9, 2004

коммунизм хранится в яичках

I had to go look it up. She's supposed to be in her mid-20's. :psyduck:

Mad Hamish
Jun 15, 2008

WILL AMOUNT TO NOTHING IN LIFE.



It just crossed my mind that a side-by-side examination of HPMOR and My Immortal would probably be as educational as it would be terrible.

Xander77
Apr 6, 2009

Fuck it then. For another pit sandwich and some 'tater salad, I'll post a few more.



Chapter 100: Precautionary Measures, Pt 1

Draco and Tracey have detention for arbitrary reasons. They're assigned to hunt the unicorn killer in the Forbidden Forest with Hagrid and a couple of cameos.

quote:

Draco's eyes narrowed, before he caught himself. As a Silvery Slytherin he wasn't supposed to be Prejudiced against any sentient being, especially not where other people might see him.

...

"Bah," said the foreign boy. "In Durmstrang we learn to fight Buchholz hydra. Unimaginably more tedious to fight! I mean literally, cannot imagine. First-years not believe us when we tell them winning is possible! Instructor must give second order, iterate until they comprehend."
As you can imagine, this is a thing:
http://googology.wikia.com/wiki/Buchholz_hydra

I have literally no idea what any of that means though.

quote:

"Unicorn's blood," Hagrid said. The huge man's voice was sad.

In a clearing ahead, visible through the tangled branches of a great oak, they saw the fallen creature, splayed beautiful and sad upon the ground, the dirt around her shining moon-silver with pooled blood. The unicorn was not white, but pale blue, or appearing so beneath the moon and night sky. Her slender legs stuck out at odd angles, obviously broken, and her mane spread across the dark leaves, green-black but with a sheen like pearls. On her flank was a small white shape like a starburst, a center surrounded by eight straight rays. Half her side had been ripped away, the edges ragged like the marks of teeth, bones and inner organs exposed.

A strange choking sensation rose in Draco's throat.

"That's 'er," Hagrid said, his sad whisper as loud as a normal man's voice. "Just where I found 'er this mornin', dead as a dead doorknob. She is - was - the first unicorn I e'er met in these woods. I called 'er Alicorn, not that it matters ter 'er any more, I s'pose."

"You named a unicorn Alicorn," said the older girl. Her voice was a bit dry.

"But she doesn't have wings," Tracey said.

"An alicorn's a unicorn's horn," Hagrid said, now louder. "Don't know where yeh all started thinking it meant a unicorn with wings, 'ere's no such thing I ever heard."
1. So yeah, the unicorn is My Little Pony. My eyes, they are rolling straight out of my head.

2. https://mygeekwisdom.com/2012/12/01/you-can-kill-a-vampire-however-the-gently caress-you-want-because-vampires-dont-loving-exist

"I have the CORRECT understanding of made up bullshit, while you have incorrect understanding" is just the dumbest loving thing. You can tell exactly just how stupid a wannabe smart director / screenwriter is by how much time he spends sneering at "our vampires aren't like OTHER movie vampires". (If you're a complete imbecile, like the person who does the Dresden Files, you'll first sneer about movie vampires, then do a version of vampires that is painfully loving traditional)

Edit - and any one of these people would probably happily go on a tirade about how stupid doctrinal differences in actual religions are.

quote:

"Even if most Dark Wizards are from Slytherin, very few Slytherins are Dark Wizards. There aren't all that many Dark Wizards, so not all Slytherins can be one." Or as Father had said, while any Malfoy should certainly know much of the secret lore, the more... costly rituals were better left to useful fools like Amycus Carrow.

"So yeh're saying," Hagrid said, "that most Dark Wizards are Slytherins... but..."

"But most Slytherins are not Dark Wizards," Draco said. He had a weary feeling they'd be at this a while, but like fighting a hydra, the important thing was to not give up.
It's a true mathematicians answer that completely fails to deal with the actual point of the question - that Slytherin ideology is all about spawning and supporting Dark Wizards.

quote:

"You two wait here!" Hagrid shouted. "Stay where yeh are, I'll come back for yeh!"

Before Draco could say a word, Hagrid spun and crashed away through the undergrowth.

Draco and Tracey stood looking at each other, until they heard nothing but the rustling of leaves around them. Tracey looked scared, but trying to hide it. Draco was feeling more annoyed than anything else. Apparently Rubeus Hagrid, when he had formed his plans for tonight, had not spent even five seconds visualizing the consequences if something actually went wrong.

...

Tracey was holding her wand now, saying things like "Prismatis" and "Stupefy" but nothing was happening.

Then the seething outline rose up, like a man rising to his feet only not so; and it seemed to scuttle forward, moving with a strange half-jump across the dying unicorn's legs, approaching the two of them.

Tracey tugged at his sleeve and then turned to run, run from something that could hunt down unicorns. Before she could take three steps there came another terrible hiss, burning his ears, and Tracey fell to the ground and did not move.

Somewhere in the back of his mind, Draco knew that he was about to die. Even if the Auror checked his mirror this very instant, there was no way anyone could get here fast enough. There was no time.

Running hadn't worked.

Magic hadn't worked.

quote:

Then a blazing silver ball of light plunged out of the night sky and hung there, illuminating the forest as bright as daylight, and the seething outline leapt backwards, as though in horror of the light.

Four broomsticks plunged out of the sky, three Aurors with bright multicolored shields and Harry Potter holding his wand aloft, seated behind Professor McGonagall within a larger shield.

"Get out of here!" roared Professor McGonagall -

- an instant before the seething thing gave forth another terrible hiss, and all the shielding spells winked out. The three Aurors and Professor McGonagall fell off their broomsticks and dropped heavily to the forest floor, lying motionless.
Naturally, Harriezer is here thanks to time bullshit, and is left conscious for a conversation with Quirrelmort:

quote:

Harry didn't answer. The sense of doom was as strong as Harry could ever remember feeling it, a feeling of power in the air so great that it was almost tangible. Some part of him was still viscerally shocked at how fast the shields surrounding the Aurors had been torn apart. He almost hadn't been able to see the successive lashes of color which had torn away the shields like tissue paper. It made the duel Professor Quirrell had fought against the Auror in Azkaban look like a mockery, a child's game - though Professor Quirrell had claimed, then, that if he'd fought for real the Auror would have been dead in seconds; and Harry knew now that this was also true.

Just how high did the power ladder go?

"I take it," Harry said, managing to keep his voice steady, "that your eating unicorns has something to do with why you'll get fired from the Defense Professor position. I don't suppose you'd care to explain in considerable detail?"

Professor Quirrell looked at him. The almost tangible sense of power in the air seemed to diminish, drawing back into the Defense Professor. "I shall indeed explain myself," the Defense Professor said. "I need to cast a few Memory Charms first, and then we may go off and discuss it, for it would not be wise for me to stay. You will return to this time later, as I know."

Harry willed himself to be able to see through the Cloak he had mastered; and knew that another Harry stood beside him, hidden by his own Deathly Hallow. Harry then told his Cloak to hide himself from himself once more, and it did; being able to perceive your future self meant having to match the memory later.

Harry's own voice said, then, sounding strange in present-Harry's ears, "He has a surprisingly good explanation."

...

"Ah," Professor Quirrell said. "As to that…" The man hesitated. "I was drinking the blood of unicorns, not eating them. The missing flesh, the ragged marks upon the body - those were to obscure the case, to make it seem like some other predator. The use of unicorn's blood is too well-known."

"I don't know it," Harry said.

"I know you do not," the Defense Professor said sharply. "Or you would not be pestering me about it. The power of unicorn's blood is to preserve your life for a time, even if you are on the very verge of death."

There was a stretch of time when Harry's brain claimed to be refusing to process the words, which was of course a lie, because you couldn't know the meaning you weren't allowed to process, without having already processed it.

A strange sense of blankness overtook Harry, an absence of reaction, maybe this was what other people felt like when someone went off-script, and they couldn't say or think of anything to do.

Of course Professor Quirrell was dying, not just occasionally ill.

Professor Quirrell had known he was dying. He'd volunteered to take the Defense Professor position at Hogwarts, after all.

Of course he'd been getting worse the whole school year. Of course illnesses which kept getting worse had a predictable destination at their end.

Harry's brain had surely known already, somewhere in the safe back of his mind where he could refuse to process things he'd already processed.

Cardiovorax
Jun 5, 2011

I mean, if you're a successful actress and you go out of the house in a skirt and without underwear, knowing that paparazzi are just waiting for opportunities like this and that it has happened many times before, then there's really nobody you can blame for it but yourself.

quote:

(If you're a complete imbecile, like the person who does the Dresden Files, you'll first sneer about movie vampires, then do a version of vampires that is painfully loving traditional)
Honestly, I've met a lot of people who don't really like the Dresden Files and I understand why they wouldn't, but I think this may be the first time I've heard it said with that much vitriol. I thought they were rather entertaining, creative and cleverly written for urban fantasy - and certainly especially so for something that started out as an intentional attempt to take as many noir and horror clichés as possible while still making an interesting and successful novel of it.

I mean, I'll admit I may just not be as familiar with vampire stories as you are, but "Mayan bat monsters who hide inside human-looking flesh sacks" isn't what I'd call a traditional depiction of vampires, painfully or otherwise. I'm not sure how that spells 'complete imbecile.'

Tiggum
Oct 24, 2007

Your life and your quest end here.


Yudkowsky posted:

Just how high did the power ladder go?
I'm pretty sure that in the original books everyone's pretty much using the same spells. There's none of this "higher level magic" that just beats lower level spells like it's a video game. That's why Molly Weasley is able to kill Bellatrix. If "power levels" existed then Mrs Weasley secretly being powerful enough to defeat one of the most feared bad guys would be absurd. Her best spells would just bounce off or do nothing.

Liquid Communism
Mar 9, 2004

коммунизм хранится в яичках

Cardiovorax posted:

Honestly, I've met a lot of people who don't really like the Dresden Files and I understand why they wouldn't, but I think this may be the first time I've heard it said with that much vitriol. I thought they were rather entertaining, creative and cleverly written for urban fantasy - and certainly especially so for something that started out as an intentional attempt to take as many noir and horror clichés as possible while still making an interesting and successful novel of it.

I mean, I'll admit I may just not be as familiar with vampire stories as you are, but "Mayan bat monsters who hide inside human-looking flesh sacks" isn't what I'd call a traditional depiction of vampires, painfully or otherwise. I'm not sure how that spells 'complete imbecile.'

Jim Butcher used to be a Vampire: The Masquerade LARPer.

This informs his work heavily.

Cardiovorax
Jun 5, 2011

I mean, if you're a successful actress and you go out of the house in a skirt and without underwear, knowing that paparazzi are just waiting for opportunities like this and that it has happened many times before, then there's really nobody you can blame for it but yourself.

Tiggum posted:

I'm pretty sure that in the original books everyone's pretty much using the same spells.
In the books, "magical power" is directly proportional to how many spells you know and how well and how creatively you're able to use them. Fanfics like to make it out as if magic is like a muscle you can train and with which some people are just stronger than others. In the books, though, it's very much a skill. Dumbledore is a powerful wizard because he's incredibly intelligent, very studious and in the possession of oodles of obscure and specialized knowledge that most people never bother to learn. Voldemort is the same way. It doesn't take any endurance to keep casting either - at most, you'll get a sore arm from all the stick-wiggling.

Liquid Communism posted:

Jim Butcher used to be a Vampire: The Masquerade LARPer.

This informs his work heavily.
I'm passingly familiar with the game, but honestly, I wouldn't have been able to tell. "Vampire LARPer" makes me think "Anne Rice wannabe," which isn't really the impression the Dresden Files gave me. Then again, it worked out to a fun read for me, so I suppose it wouldn't matter either way.

Cardiovorax fucked around with this message at 14:56 on Aug 7, 2018

Xander77
Apr 6, 2009

Fuck it then. For another pit sandwich and some 'tater salad, I'll post a few more.



Cardiovorax posted:

Honestly, I've met a lot of people who don't really like the Dresden Files and I understand why they wouldn't, but I think this may be the first time I've heard it said with that much vitriol. I thought they were rather entertaining, creative and cleverly written for urban fantasy - and certainly especially so for something that started out as an intentional attempt to take as many noir and horror clichés as possible while still making an interesting and successful novel of it.

http://www.dragon-quill.net/category/books/dresden-files/

I don't agree with everything, but yeah.

Cardiovorax
Jun 5, 2011

I mean, if you're a successful actress and you go out of the house in a skirt and without underwear, knowing that paparazzi are just waiting for opportunities like this and that it has happened many times before, then there's really nobody you can blame for it but yourself.
Eh. Like I said, I can see why people don't like it, but I think I'll pass on reading more of that. "[I've read the first chapter and] from where I'm standing, it looks like it'll be poo poo all the way down" doesn't put me in mind of something that will focus on reasonable criticism. I've seen enough internet reviews of the type where someone decides up-front that they're not going to like something (and then make a point of finding reasons to prove themselves right) that I can tell where this is going. "The protagonist has character flaws and bad habits, therefore the author is a shithead" is what I'd call probably the worst type of these and really just spite when you get down to it.

Then again, maybe I'm just more inured to the general awfulness of fantasy as a genre. :shrug: When you put the worst parts of the Dresden Files next to the best parts of Sword of Truth, the flaws barely even register anymore.

Cardiovorax fucked around with this message at 15:48 on Aug 7, 2018

Mazerunner
Apr 22, 2010

Good Hunter, what... what is this post?

Tiggum posted:

I'm pretty sure that in the original books everyone's pretty much using the same spells. There's none of this "higher level magic" that just beats lower level spells like it's a video game. That's why Molly Weasley is able to kill Bellatrix. If "power levels" existed then Mrs Weasley secretly being powerful enough to defeat one of the most feared bad guys would be absurd. Her best spells would just bounce off or do nothing.

yeah there's 'advanced' spells or knowledge, but it just means complex. Like you learn it later in school or in self-study/experimentation. It's difficult to perform, but has flashier or more specialized effects, or might take an opponent by surprise or they might not know how to counter it. People who can consistently use those complex spells are dangerous- you never know what exactly they're trying to do. However, someone using simple spells that are quick, easy and they can do consistently can match them, like you said.

It's like a martial art- doing a spinning flying triple kick is awesome, and when it works it works, but 99.99% of the time you are better off just sticking to the basic punches and grapples.

Pvt.Scott
Feb 16, 2007

What God wants, God gets, God help us all
From quick skimming, nothing on that Dresden criticism seems particularly beyond the pale for sci-fi/fantasy novels.

Xander77
Apr 6, 2009

Fuck it then. For another pit sandwich and some 'tater salad, I'll post a few more.



Cardiovorax posted:

Eh. Like I said, I can see why people don't like it, but I think I'll pass on reading more of that. "[I've read the first chapter and] from where I'm standing, it looks like it'll be poo poo all the way down" doesn't put me in mind of something that will focus on reasonable criticism.
What are you doing in this thread?

Some things that are hard to argue with:

Dresden is a bullying rear end in a top hat who has a boatload of issues with women even by noir multiplied by fantasy standards. Which would have been interesting, if only the author ever became aware that he IS in fact writing a misogynistic bullying rear end in a top hat, rather than a Philip Marlowe with magic powers.

Dresden wins his fights not because he's smart (the ideal way of writing conflict) or lucky (the old genre standby) or because his enemies are stupid (what the average hack resorts to) but because he's straight up overpowered, to the point that he only starts encountering enemies that can stand up to his magic 4-5 books in. The author is constantly talking about Dresden being on his last leg and about to drop from exhaustion and lack of magic power, but since his magic power stems from emotion / motivation, there's always "just" enough.

The worldbuilding is terribly poorly thought out. The white council supposedly enforces the masquerade, but Dresden gets to advertise his services as a wizard openly - he can't just conjure up a flame to convince any skeptics, but CAN use magic out in the open. "Wizard powers mess with new technology" is hilariously arbitrarily applied.

Not even talking about a Chicago in which the first black character is a Russian knight who appears 5 books in and the first gay character appears never. Or the terrible treatment of sex workers - both of these are probably par the course for 90's pulp fantasy.

There's more, but I think the point is made.

Edit - also, if this bullshit is par the course for modern fantasy, then it's worth having a look at the problems with modern fantasy, neh?

Xander77 fucked around with this message at 20:15 on Aug 7, 2018

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012

Xander77 posted:

What are you doing in this thread?

Some things that are hard to argue with:

Dresden is a bullying rear end in a top hat who has a boatload of issues with women even by noir multiplied by fantasy standards. Which would have been interesting, if only the author ever became aware that he IS in fact writing a misogynistic bullying rear end in a top hat, rather than a Philip Marlowe with magic powers.

There’s a difference?

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

Xander77 posted:

What are you doing in this thread?

Some things that are hard to argue with:

Dresden is a bullying rear end in a top hat who has a boatload of issues with women even by noir multiplied by fantasy standards. Which would have been interesting, if only the author ever became aware that he IS in fact writing a misogynistic bullying rear end in a top hat, rather than a Philip Marlowe with magic powers.

You mean like including a part where Dresden reflects to himself that if he hadn't been a chauvinistic rear end in a top hat in the second book it'd have been wrapped up in about three chapters without anyone getting murdered?

quote:

Dresden wins his fights not because he's smart (the ideal way of writing conflict) or lucky (the old genre standby) or because his enemies are stupid (what the average hack resorts to) but because he's straight up overpowered, to the point that he only starts encountering enemies that can stand up to his magic 4-5 books in. The author is constantly talking about Dresden being on his last leg and about to drop from exhaustion and lack of magic power, but since his magic power stems from emotion / motivation, there's always "just" enough.
it is a bit formulaic that he spends the first 90% of most novels constantly getting dunked on, yeah

quote:

The worldbuilding is terribly poorly thought out. The white council supposedly enforces the masquerade,
No, they don't. Not sure where you got that idea?


Like the sexy vampires are pretty cringey I agree but there's no need to invent problems with the series lol

Ccs
Feb 25, 2011


Cardiovorax posted:

In the books, "magical power" is directly proportional to how many spells you know and how well and how creatively you're able to use them. Fanfics like to make it out as if magic is like a muscle you can train and with which some people are just stronger than others. In the books, though, it's very much a skill. Dumbledore is a powerful wizard because he's incredibly intelligent, very studious and in the possession of oodles of obscure and specialized knowledge that most people never bother to learn. Voldemort is the same way. It doesn't take any endurance to keep casting either - at most, you'll get a sore arm from all the stick-wiggling.

I'm passingly familiar with the game, but honestly, I wouldn't have been able to tell. "Vampire LARPer" makes me think "Anne Rice wannabe," which isn't really the impression the Dresden Files gave me. Then again, it worked out to a fun read for me, so I suppose it wouldn't matter either way.

So the thing in the movies, where Voldemort's green beam of light would hit Harry's red beam and they would crackle against each other, is that a normal wizard thing? Like you can block an Avada Kedavra with an Expelliamus as long as you time it right? Or was that a trick of Harry's wand being connected to Voldemorts?

If you can't normally block magic, I don't understand why Voldemort ever bother using any other spell. Like just keep shooting the Avada Kedavras. Why mess around with giant snakes made of fire when the spell that will kill your enemy instantly unless they hide behind a stone wall is at your disposal?

Same with the good guys. Other wizards as useless without their wand to just go for the disarming spell. Why bother with anything else in a battle?

Xander77
Apr 6, 2009

Fuck it then. For another pit sandwich and some 'tater salad, I'll post a few more.



Tunicate posted:

No, they don't. Not sure where you got that idea?
Reading the books.

...

In other news, did anyone reviewing the earlier chapters ever get into how Yud is completely incapable of getting metaphors and connecting wizard world justifications for pureblood superiority with RL "scientific" racism?

Pvt.Scott
Feb 16, 2007

What God wants, God gets, God help us all

Xander77 posted:

Edit - also, if this bullshit is par the course for modern fantasy, then it's worth having a look at the problems with modern fantasy, neh?

Yes

Cardiovorax
Jun 5, 2011

I mean, if you're a successful actress and you go out of the house in a skirt and without underwear, knowing that paparazzi are just waiting for opportunities like this and that it has happened many times before, then there's really nobody you can blame for it but yourself.

Tunicate posted:

You mean like including a part where Dresden reflects to himself that if he hadn't been a chauvinistic rear end in a top hat in the second book it'd have been wrapped up in about three chapters without anyone getting murdered?
Yeah, that's one of the things that I can't really consider a legitimate criticism of the series. Dresden the character is, like, really sexist. Not misogynist, but sexist in that chauvinistic "women are precious, fragile dolls who must be protected at all costs" kind of way.

He also constantly gets poo poo for it from everyone and everything around him. It's pretty blatantly obvious that it's an intended character flaw and meant to be acknowledged as a personal flaw by the reader, not as an expression of the author's own hangups. He also habitually describes himself as a "magical thug," who wins by being able to punch harder than the other guy, but who ultimately pays for not being able to fight smarter rather than harder. By, say, starting wars with an entire vampire court.

It's certainly not something everyone should or needs to tolerate from a character in a series they want to enjoy, which is why I can understand that people don't like it, but if you think that giving your main character actual flaws and failures (that the author doesn't share) makes a writer a "complete imbecile," I think you may have misunderstood how character writing works.

To answer the other question, the reason I read this thread is that Yudkowsky genuinely is the kind of person who can't distinguish between the opinions of his characters and his own like that, which makes it fun to poo poo on him.

quote:

So the thing in the movies, where Voldemort's green beam of light would hit Harry's red beam and they would crackle against each other, is that a normal wizard thing? Like you can block an Avada Kedavra with an Expelliamus as long as you time it right? Or was that a trick of Harry's wand being connected to Voldemorts?
The latter. It only works because the wands are somehow mystically on the same wavelength or something and therefore repel each other when they normally wouldn't. As to the rest, the thing about the killing curse is that you really need actively to hate someone to death to be able to use it - it's a requirement, and one that most people can't really pull casually out of their arses. HPMOR didn't make that part up. Voldemort already throws them around them around like they were candy, because he genuinely does hate everyone that much, but I suppose there might be a degree of emotional exhaustion involved.

Plus, in a straight-up one on one fight, repeatedly doing the same thing over and over gets you killed. Spells move slowly enough that you can see them coming and dodge, unlike bullets. Makes for more dramatic fight scenes, I guess.

OctaviusBeaver
Apr 30, 2009

Say what now?

Ccs posted:

So the thing in the movies, where Voldemort's green beam of light would hit Harry's red beam and they would crackle against each other, is that a normal wizard thing? Like you can block an Avada Kedavra with an Expelliamus as long as you time it right? Or was that a trick of Harry's wand being connected to Voldemorts?

If you can't normally block magic, I don't understand why Voldemort ever bother using any other spell. Like just keep shooting the Avada Kedavras. Why mess around with giant snakes made of fire when the spell that will kill your enemy instantly unless they hide behind a stone wall is at your disposal?

Same with the good guys. Other wizards as useless without their wand to just go for the disarming spell. Why bother with anything else in a battle?

The answer is that JK Rowling started writing childrens books for children and never thought of anything better. At the end of THBP it kind of hints that there is more to it when Snape blocks Harry's spells before he can say them by reading his mind but nothing ever comes of it and in the next book they go right back to shouting the same 3 spells and dodging. There is no reason to use anything but Avada Kedavra if you can but that spell is still worse than a regular old gun in pretty much every way so w/e.

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."
You can normally block magic though. It happens more in the movies than the books but it's definitely a thing.

Cardiovorax
Jun 5, 2011

I mean, if you're a successful actress and you go out of the house in a skirt and without underwear, knowing that paparazzi are just waiting for opportunities like this and that it has happened many times before, then there's really nobody you can blame for it but yourself.
Yeah, the killing curse is an explicit exception there, in that it can be blocked by natural physical objects, but by nothing made of or from magic.

End of Shoelace
Apr 5, 2016
i like that rowling is humble enough in her writing to say that a prepared muggle with a gun would kill a wizard any time of day. its easy to make magic omnipotent in your own fantasy.

Jazerus
May 24, 2011


Ccs posted:

So the thing in the movies, where Voldemort's green beam of light would hit Harry's red beam and they would crackle against each other, is that a normal wizard thing? Like you can block an Avada Kedavra with an Expelliamus as long as you time it right? Or was that a trick of Harry's wand being connected to Voldemorts?

If you can't normally block magic, I don't understand why Voldemort ever bother using any other spell. Like just keep shooting the Avada Kedavras. Why mess around with giant snakes made of fire when the spell that will kill your enemy instantly unless they hide behind a stone wall is at your disposal?

Same with the good guys. Other wizards as useless without their wand to just go for the disarming spell. Why bother with anything else in a battle?

giant snakes made of fire can attack on non-linear vectors and do area damage; it's kind of like asking why you'd ever use a grenade when you've got a gun. the advantage that voldemort and dumbledore have over other people is that they know all sorts of weird poo poo that will surprise their opponents, which means that you can't fight them as though they're just a guy with a gun that shoots slow bullets, unlike someone who only knows the linear line of sight spells like killing/stunning/disarming

the good guys usually use the stunning spell because, well, a wizard might be useless without their wand, but what if they're not? just knock them out instead and you don't need to worry about it.

Crespolini
Mar 9, 2014

End of Shoelace posted:

i like that rowling is humble enough in her writing to say that a prepared muggle with a gun would kill a wizard any time of day. its easy to make magic omnipotent in your own fantasy.

She never said this, but it's kinda interesting how it's survived as a 'fact' for years and years because people enjoy the idea that she must have done , and keep repeating it

21 Muns
Dec 10, 2016

by FactsAreUseless

Crimpolioni posted:

She never said this, but it's kinda interesting how it's survived as a 'fact' for years and years because people enjoy the idea that she must have done , and keep repeating it

It also makes extremely little sense, whether she said it or not.

Xander77
Apr 6, 2009

Fuck it then. For another pit sandwich and some 'tater salad, I'll post a few more.



Cardiovorax posted:

Yeah, that's one of the things that I can't really consider a legitimate criticism of the series. Dresden the character is, like, really sexist. Not misogynist, but sexist in that chauvinistic "women are precious, fragile dolls who must be protected at all costs" kind of way.
Yeah, no. The author may think that's what he's writing, and if you somehow pay absolutely no attention you may concur, but Dresden REALLY loving hates women.

DACK FAYDEN
Feb 25, 2013

Bear Witness

Crimpolioni posted:

She never said this, but it's kinda interesting how it's survived as a 'fact' for years and years because people enjoy the idea that she must have done , and keep repeating it
I figure people misremember the scene from 3 where they say they told the public that Sirius Black has a gun, a “kind of Muggle wand”, and human memory does the rest.

Cardiovorax
Jun 5, 2011

I mean, if you're a successful actress and you go out of the house in a skirt and without underwear, knowing that paparazzi are just waiting for opportunities like this and that it has happened many times before, then there's really nobody you can blame for it but yourself.

Xander77 posted:

Yeah, no. The author may think that's what he's writing, and if you somehow pay absolutely no attention you may concur, but Dresden REALLY loving hates women.
Guess I'll have to second Tunicate on that, then: the series has enough real problems without inventing things to complain about.

Cardiovorax fucked around with this message at 10:05 on Aug 8, 2018

Xander77
Apr 6, 2009

Fuck it then. For another pit sandwich and some 'tater salad, I'll post a few more.



Cardiovorax posted:

Guess I'll have to second Tunicate on that, then: the series has enough real problems without inventing things to complain about.
I've provided a link to a fairly lengthy critique which supports my argument. You can either engage with it, or stop talking. You don't get to avoid reading it, then claim the argument has no basis in the text.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

End of Shoelace
Apr 5, 2016
magnum opus

quote:

They stopped kissing and looked at the bed – only to see a rather bemused Sirius Black sitting at the end of it, a hint of a smirk on his face.

"Oh, sorry," Tonks panted, a hint of a grin returning to her face. "Sirius, this is Clarissa Desdame, the lawyer who saved your doggy rear end tonight."

"And you're going to return the favour by letting her do you – doggy style," Sirius replied wryly, complete with an inappropriate hand gesture that left nothing to Harry's imagination.

"Sirius!"

"You know, I thought doggy style was somewhat of my thing –"

"Oh good god –"

"Does this mean you're a lesbian now, or bisexual?" Sirius asked frankly. "Because, since we're all in the mood, if you're open to a threesome –"

note: clarissa desdame is harrys new ladycorpse. tonks and black are cousins

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply