|
Rhyno posted:So is there just one hell for the entire multiverse then? and only one Mojoverse
|
# ? Sep 1, 2018 07:29 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 23:05 |
|
Archie comics, being weird.
|
# ? Sep 1, 2018 23:15 |
|
Maybe we just need an out of context panel thread.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 00:15 |
|
I think this is what people did before Vicks Vapo-rub existed.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 00:17 |
|
Goose fat. Mustard. Horseradish. Toads. All sorts of poo poo.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 00:22 |
|
X-O posted:Maybe we just need an out of context panel thread. To be fair, most old Archie is pretty strange in context by today's eyes.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 00:26 |
|
X-O posted:Maybe we just need an out of context panel thread. The Say Nothing's Funny Panels Thread
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 00:41 |
|
X-O posted:Maybe we just need an out of context panel thread. I was thinking about a comic book fan art thread? Good or bad idea?
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 01:13 |
|
Say Nothing posted:I was thinking about a comic book fan art thread? Good or bad idea? The pro commissions thread just got archived so maybe one that mixed pro and fan would be good to replace it. Teenage Fansub fucked around with this message at 01:22 on Sep 2, 2018 |
# ? Sep 2, 2018 01:20 |
|
I asked about it but I don't want to handle the pressure of creating a new thread, go for it Say Nothing
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 01:22 |
|
Half of that run of the Flintstones belongs in this thread, it was too pure for this world
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 03:00 |
|
Samuringa posted:I asked about it but I don't want to handle the pressure of creating a new thread, go for it Say Nothing MAKE THE NEW THREAD
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 09:43 |
|
Cool/Funny/Awesome Fan Art Thread... https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3867606
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 10:29 |
|
Red Lanterns Annual Atrocitus clearly trying to make his cat angrier I guess
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 20:13 |
|
TwoPair posted:Red Lanterns Annual I mean that seems like a good idea for the Red Lanterns. Want your teammates as pissed off as possible at all times.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 20:27 |
|
Zil posted:I mean that seems like a good idea for the Red Lanterns. Want your teammates as pissed off as possible at all times. "From now on, we are all practicing Straight Edging."
|
# ? Sep 2, 2018 23:33 |
|
The Question IRL posted:"From now on, we are all practicing Straight Edging." And we will watch Blues Brothers 2000 once a month
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 00:49 |
|
El Gallinero Gros posted:And we will watch Blues Brothers 2000 once a month too soon.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 02:10 |
|
El Gallinero Gros posted:And we will watch Blues Brothers 2000 once a month He said pissed off, not dancing.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 02:15 |
I found the rest of the scene:
|
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 02:56 |
|
Lex's avatar is Mr Clean. That is perfect.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 03:03 |
|
If Lex wanted to be really grammatically accurate (since he's using 'whom' instead of 'who'), shouldn't it be "you have no idea with whom you're messing"? I'm honestly curious.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:23 |
davidspackage posted:If Lex wanted to be really grammatically accurate (since he's using 'whom' instead of 'who'), shouldn't it be "you have no idea with whom you're messing"? I'm honestly curious. People on the internet don't use "whom" to be grammatically correct, they use it because they're arrogant assholes.
|
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:28 |
|
davidspackage posted:If Lex wanted to be really grammatically accurate (since he's using 'whom' instead of 'who'), shouldn't it be "you have no idea with whom you're messing"? I'm honestly curious. "You should never end a sentence with a preposition" is one of those Miss Thistlebottom rules that has been long since overridden by actual usage (like the one about never splitting infinitives). But you're right, if Lex is a stickler he wouldn't be ending a sentence with "with."
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:33 |
|
If I recall correctly, ending a sentence with a preposition is perfectly valid English. But it became "a thing" because of the French influence on the language following the Norman invasion. Romance languages don't end sentences with prepositions, but Germanic languages, which English mainly is, can. So yeah, do either. Both are good. English is a hosed up mutt language.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:40 |
|
The only time you're using incorrect grammar in English is if whomever you're communicating with doesn't understand you. There's parts of England where "tin tin tin" is a perfectly valid sentence with meaning.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:46 |
|
It's nothing at all to do with ending the sentence in a preposition - the form 'whom' is an object and needs a verb or preposition to act on it. In the sentence "Do you have any idea BLANK you are messing with?" the BLANK is the subject of the sentence and the correct form is who. To make it an object you have to put a transitive verb or preposition next to it.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:48 |
|
You use "whom" if a possible answer to the question is "him."
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:59 |
|
A whom is where babies are made.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 09:09 |
|
Selachian posted:"You should never end a sentence with a preposition" is one of those Miss Thistlebottom rules that has been long since overridden by actual usage (like the one about never splitting infinitives). But you're right, if Lex is a stickler he wouldn't be ending a sentence with "with." Logical? Is it? To a dictionary, perhaps. Yes, a soulless book might make that deduction. But not Lex Luthor. He knows better! He knows that grammar is what you make of it. And how you say words that sound good, not what some dumb book says. Such words are to be used to threaten ducks over the internet! You have failed Lex, Miss Thistlebottom. This conclusion is utterly useless. Remove it from this thread at once! Lex Luthor has no use for people who cannot see the obvious.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:08 |
TwoPair posted:Red Lanterns Annual "What if I didn't mate for love? What if it was Hate loving?"
|
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:23 |
|
I swear I've had that exact same conversation with my own cat when he went out.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:28 |
|
The Question IRL posted:Logical?
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:30 |
Tin Can Hit Man posted:I swear I've had that exact same conversation with my own cat when he went out. No mating for love? Only hate gently caress?
|
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:31 |
|
Was Dex-Starr originally a stray or from a shelter? because that's a lovely loving shelter if they're giving out cats that haven't been fixed.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:43 |
|
why do you think he's so mad?
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:44 |
|
Skwirl posted:Was Dex-Starr originally a stray or from a shelter? because that's a lovely loving shelter if they're giving out cats that haven't been fixed. He was a stray kitten who was taken in by a lonely single woman. She was robbed and murdered and I think they tossed him in the river when the ring came to him.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:45 |
|
Infinitum posted:No mating for love? Only hate gently caress? Either or. I can't afford to pay child support for my neighbor's litter.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:46 |
|
Rhyno posted:He was a stray kitten who was taken in by a lonely single woman. She was robbed and murdered and I think they tossed him in the river when the ring came to him. Then yeah, that cat wants to gently caress.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:47 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 23:05 |
Skwirl posted:Was Dex-Starr originally a stray or from a shelter? because that's a lovely loving shelter if they're giving out cats that haven't been fixed. Shelter Also cats can't be desexed until they're around 6 months old. I adopted my little nightmare from a shelter when she was only 2 months old, so she's only just recently been desexed. Shelter was pretty cool and gave a free desexing certificate So Dex-Starr's owner probably got murdered before she could get him desexed
|
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:50 |