Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
spacetoaster
Feb 10, 2014

ate all the Oreos posted:

I like the papier mâché B-2 bomber, really adds that extra zing so you have no doubt that this is the Northrup Grumman that makes nuclear apocalypse murder machines and not like, the division that just makes satellite components or w/e

But they like gay people though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSBFTKI-zIM&t=4s

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FeculentWizardTits
Aug 31, 2001

HugeGrossBurrito posted:

Healthcare $0
Education $0
Infrastructure $0
Offshore Bank Accounts $21,000,000,000,000
Welfare $0
someone who is good at the economy please help me budget this. my country is dying

Spend more on defense

Meme Poker Party
Sep 1, 2006

by Azathoth

Communist Walrus posted:

Spend more on defense

You know I always thought there was a perverse irony in the fact that during the time period in which the US actually had to (sometimes) defend itself, it was called the Department of War. Then right around the time it became obvious that there was no realistic scenario in which we could be invaded, and that most/all conflicts would be abroad and probably instigated by us, it became the Department of Defense.

Is there any way I can blame capitalism for that?

HugeGrossBurrito
Mar 20, 2018

Chomp8645 posted:

You know I always thought there was a perverse irony in the fact that during the time period in which the US actually had to (sometimes) defend itself, it was called the Department of War. Then right around the time it became obvious that there was no realistic scenario in which we could be invaded, and that most/all conflicts would be abroad and probably instigated by us, it became the Department of Defense.

Is there any way I can blame capitalism for that?

Military industrial complex my dude

Shame Boy
Mar 2, 2010

Y'all reminded me of this recent EIT:

https://vimeo.com/271688732

God bless Hughes and their wonderful missiles :911:

Graphic
Sep 4, 2018

It's like Lenin said

The Bloop posted:

this is dumb and you know it


They aren't left wing enough by a fair bit, and maybe not by some arbitrary academic ruler you want to impose, but in the US they represent the only organized left.


I hope DSA changes them from within for the better

the democrats are directly comparable to the british conservative party lmao

BeanpolePeckerwood
May 4, 2004

I MAY LOOK LIKE SHIT BUT IM ALSO DUMB AS FUCK



The Bloop posted:

this is dumb and you know it


They aren't left wing enough by a fair bit, and maybe not by some arbitrary academic ruler you want to impose, but in the US they represent the only organized left.


I hope DSA changes them from within for the better

It's not dumb, and EVERYBODY knows it, even if they can't articulate such. The democratic party is a dead-center business party that couches their moral vacuity in rhetoric about personal liberty and human rights while simultaneously concentrating wealth among the elite, emboldening the security state, and despoiling the biosphere.

They don't need to be changed from within by DSA, they need to be thrown overboard.

The Bloop
Jul 5, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
My point was that left/right in a two party system is relative and the Dems are what passes for "left" in America. That's all, and it doesn't belong in this image thread anyway so I apologize and back out if the derail. Full Communism Now


BeanpolePeckerwood
May 4, 2004

I MAY LOOK LIKE SHIT BUT IM ALSO DUMB AS FUCK



The Bloop posted:

Full Communism Now

lol that's the spirit. I dunno what belongs in this thread anymore, I had no idea it would take off like it did. I'm happy that it's facilitating good convo and the occasional horrifying image.

Siljmonster
Dec 16, 2005

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
This thread needs more bootlickers defending Capitalism for me to yell at

feller
Jul 5, 2006


capitalism is not as bad as the holocaust. there I said it

BeanpolePeckerwood
May 4, 2004

I MAY LOOK LIKE SHIT BUT IM ALSO DUMB AS FUCK



Siljmonster posted:

This thread needs more bootlickers defending Capitalism for me to yell at

It's the only release I have

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WTBkj8gFfI

BeanpolePeckerwood
May 4, 2004

I MAY LOOK LIKE SHIT BUT IM ALSO DUMB AS FUCK



Senor Dog posted:

capitalism is not as bad as the holocaust. there I said it

Only registered members can see post attachments!

Jel Shaker
Apr 19, 2003


isn’t the infallible McDonald’s actually failing in Vietnam ?

spacetoaster
Feb 10, 2014

Siljmonster posted:

This thread needs more bootlickers defending Capitalism for me to yell at

Paging Nancy Pelosi to the thread

BeanpolePeckerwood
May 4, 2004

I MAY LOOK LIKE SHIT BUT IM ALSO DUMB AS FUCK



Senor Dog posted:

capitalism is not as bad as the holocaust. there I said it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust

Graphic
Sep 4, 2018

It's like Lenin said

Senor Dog posted:

capitalism is not as bad as the holocaust. there I said it

capitalism caused the holocaust

BeanpolePeckerwood
May 4, 2004

I MAY LOOK LIKE SHIT BUT IM ALSO DUMB AS FUCK



Graphic posted:

capitalism caused the holocaust

yyes but but but the most pious capitalist jew factory slaves were saved by oskar schindler because they demonstrated their fealty unto Mammon and were deemed worthy and valuable

the little girl in the red dress was a lazy socialist obviously

Owlbear Camus
Jan 3, 2013

Maybe this guy that flies is just sort of passing through, you know?



https://twitter.com/WalkerBragman/status/1041797176609914887

Does this count as content?

I feel like this should absolutely count.

starkebn
May 18, 2004

"Oooh, got a little too serious. You okay there, little buddy?"

Owlbear Camus posted:

https://twitter.com/WalkerBragman/status/1041797176609914887

Does this count as content?

I feel like this should absolutely count.

people don't end up with a net worth of $45 million buy just helping everyone in their social circles with money problems buddy

SplitSoul
Dec 31, 2000

Senor Dog posted:

capitalism is not as bad as the holocaust. there I said it

lol, the Nazis were supported by German capitalists and supplied them with slave labour. They also literally invented the term "privatisation" and abolished all unions. Capitalism was integral to the Holocaust.

Duscat
Jan 4, 2009
Fun Shoe

SplitSoul posted:

lol, the Nazis were supported by German capitalists and supplied them with slave labour. They also literally invented the term "privatisation" and abolished all unions. Capitalism was integral to the Holocaust.

this is a dumb as gently caress take

look to the nordic states for capitalism tempered by a strong social democratic government and you'll see the one goddamn loving way humanity has out of this mess that doesn't involve gigadeaths

ziasquinn
Jan 1, 2006

Fallen Rib
that tweet or joke that’s like “i’m socially liberal but fiscally conservative so while the problems are very bad but the reasons for the problems are very very good”

Ardent Communist
Oct 17, 2010

ALLAH! MU'AMMAR! LIBYA WA BAS!

Duscat posted:

this is a dumb as gently caress take

look to the nordic states for capitalism tempered by a strong social democratic government and you'll see the one goddamn loving way humanity has out of this mess that doesn't involve gigadeaths

LOL, and he's talking about dumb as gently caress takes. Capitalism and a strong social democratic government can't co-exist for very long. See those exact states, which are sliding into fascism over immigration. That's because capitalism can only survive by constantly expanding, and every chucklefuck business owner who has his power limited by government is going to rail against it and scheme to bring it down in search of greater profits.

Duscat
Jan 4, 2009
Fun Shoe

Ardent Communist posted:

LOL, and he's talking about dumb as gently caress takes. Capitalism and a strong social democratic government can't co-exist for very long. See those exact states, which are sliding into fascism over immigration. That's because capitalism can only survive by constantly expanding, and every chucklefuck business owner who has his power limited by government is going to rail against it and scheme to bring it down in search of greater profits.

no

Captain Billy Pissboy
Oct 25, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo
College Slice

yes

Duscat
Jan 4, 2009
Fun Shoe

oh captain my captain

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
👏liberalism 👏 is 👏 conservative 👏 ideology 👏

arguably this includes social democrats especially with how they cooperate with reactionaries to maintain power historically

Ardent Communist
Oct 17, 2010

ALLAH! MU'AMMAR! LIBYA WA BAS!

Larry Parrish posted:

👏liberalism 👏 is 👏 conservative 👏 ideology 👏

arguably this includes social democrats especially with how they cooperate with reactionaries to maintain power historically

bingo. plenty of (dumb) people like to rail against the communists for not allying with the social democrats against Hitler. And, yeah, taken in a vacuum, it was a poor decision. But then you remember that during the revolution in Germany, the social democrats took power and hired proto-fascist veteran's groups to massacre them, killing two of their leaders (Rosa and Karl) and allowing the maintenance of capital. In fact, it's one of the biggest betrayals ever, since if Germany went red, then the Soviet Union would not have been alone and had to resort to cruel and unusual methods merely to survive.

Duscat
Jan 4, 2009
Fun Shoe

Ardent Communist posted:

bingo. plenty of (dumb) people like to rail against the communists for not allying with the social democrats against Hitler. And, yeah, taken in a vacuum, it was a poor decision. But then you remember that during the revolution in Germany, the social democrats took power and hired proto-fascist veteran's groups to massacre them, killing two of their leaders (Rosa and Karl) and allowing the maintenance of capital. In fact, it's one of the biggest betrayals ever, since if Germany went red, then the Soviet Union would not have been alone and had to resort to cruel and unusual methods merely to survive.

let's do that again i guess

Platystemon
Feb 13, 2012

BREADS

Larry Parrish posted:

👏liberalism 👏 is 👏 conservative 👏 ideology 👏

arguably this includes social democrats especially with how they cooperate with reactionaries to maintain power historically

Conservatism is opposition to change.

Liberalism seeks to change things for the worse.

MODS CURE JOKES
Nov 11, 2009

OFFICIAL SAS 90s REMEMBERER
Liberalism was left wing for like, 10 months in the early stages of the French Revolution. They've been over their heads since.

Ardent Communist
Oct 17, 2010

ALLAH! MU'AMMAR! LIBYA WA BAS!

Duscat posted:

let's do that again i guess

lol, just lol, if you think that despite the hard place it was put in by being the only revolutionary state to survive till the 1920s, that the Soviet Union didn't result in an overall improvement for workers worldwide, by providing resources and education to class conscious workers (especially from colonies), and forcing capitalist states to make concessions to their workers lest them themselves be overthrown.
That's just internationally, you could debate the effects their government had on their citizens, but I would just point out how the life expectancy in both the Soviet Union and Mao's China, as well as education metrics, improved vastly quicker than their neighbours.

Duscat
Jan 4, 2009
Fun Shoe

Ardent Communist posted:

lol, just lol, if you think that despite the hard place it was put in by being the only revolutionary state to survive till the 1920s, that the Soviet Union didn't result in an overall improvement for workers worldwide, by providing resources and education to class conscious workers (especially from colonies), and forcing capitalist states to make concessions to their workers lest them themselves be overthrown.
That's just internationally, you could debate the effects their government had on their citizens, but I would just point out how the life expectancy in both the Soviet Union and Mao's China, as well as education metrics, improved vastly quicker than their neighbours.

TRUMP

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.
Capitalism is the ideology of ripping the copper out of the walls to sell for drugs.

Duscat
Jan 4, 2009
Fun Shoe

Ghost Leviathan posted:

Capitalism is the ideology of ripping the copper out of the walls to sell for drugs.

lol

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Ardent Communist posted:

lol, just lol, if you think that despite the hard place it was put in by being the only revolutionary state to survive till the 1920s, that the Soviet Union didn't result in an overall improvement for workers worldwide, by providing resources and education to class conscious workers (especially from colonies), and forcing capitalist states to make concessions to their workers lest them themselves be overthrown.
That's just internationally, you could debate the effects their government had on their citizens, but I would just point out how the life expectancy in both the Soviet Union and Mao's China, as well as education metrics, improved vastly quicker than their neighbours.

People talked about what a regressive police state the USSR was but even the shittiest periods of Stalinism after the civil war sounds a lot better to me since it involves not worrying about whether I'll make enough money to eat

slippery doc
Jan 17, 2006

kill the boy,
save the man

Ardent Communist posted:

bingo. plenty of (dumb) people like to rail against the communists for not allying with the social democrats against Hitler. And, yeah, taken in a vacuum, it was a poor decision. But then you remember that during the revolution in Germany, the social democrats took power and hired proto-fascist veteran's groups to massacre them, killing two of their leaders (Rosa and Karl) and allowing the maintenance of capital. In fact, it's one of the biggest betrayals ever, since if Germany went red, then the Soviet Union would not have been alone and had to resort to cruel and unusual methods merely to survive.

not to mention the part where there wouldn't have been a world war which killed like everybody in the USSR to recover from

The Protagonist
Jun 29, 2009

The average is 5.5? I thought it was 4. This is very unsettling.

Duscat posted:

this is a dumb as gently caress take

look to the nordic states for capitalism tempered by a strong social democratic government and you'll see the one goddamn loving way humanity has out of this mess that doesn't involve gigadeaths

Hey. Hey get this.















There's no way out.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

slippery doc
Jan 17, 2006

kill the boy,
save the man

soviet union: *sacrifices everything to single-handedly save the world from facism*

USA: see that's what communism gets ya

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply