|
Rarity posted:Am I reading this wrong or are they forcibly restarting people's payment? That is precisely what they are doing and if they don’t get their pants sued off, they’re still going to go bankrupt after Visa and company cut them loose. Platystemon has issued a correction as of 13:41 on Oct 2, 2018 |
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 13:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 02:47 |
|
|
Well, poo poo. I had an account with them that I cancelled, but the email was under a domain I no longer own, and I deleted the entry from my password manager. Guess I need to watch my statements and do a chargeback if it shows up 
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 13:36
|
|
|
What a sad company. Sounds like they're trying to artificially get their numbers up for the upcoming earnings call as well as reduce the average number of movies watched per subscriber. They've been in dire straits for a while now, diluting their stock to an absurd degree to raise money.
Lambert has issued a correction as of 13:45 on Oct 2, 2018 |
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 13:39
|
|
|
Charge your phone dude
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 13:44
|
|
|
 from the top of reddit, which means many tens or perhaps hundreds of thousands of people saw this and thought "yeah makes sense' in the context of "getmotivated" sharks don't have jobs
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 13:52
|
|
|
Frog Act posted:sharks don't have jobs This is bullshit My dentist is a shark
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 14:11
|
|
|
teaching sharks the concept of the workweek to own the libs
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 14:12
|
|
|
The Bloop posted:This is bullshit  I’ve never met an attorney who wasn’t.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 14:19
|
|
|
they don't sleep in the human sense either but that's neither here nor there
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 14:19
|
|
|
All they do is swim and eat and make surplus value for their employer
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 14:21
|
|
|
can we all at least agree on the fact that sharks do keep a 7 day week calendar and are aware of the concept of mondays?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 14:36
|
|
|
Plank Walker posted:can we all at least agree on the fact that sharks do keep a 7 day week calendar and are aware of the concept of mondays? They have a very different interpretation of BEACH WEEK
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 14:48
|
|
|
Evilreaver posted:They have a very different interpretation of BEACH WEEK also Shark Week, probably. Either one.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 14:56
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:As far as I know its about Instagram users being bought by rich men, and how it can be "empowering", which is a very American view on what boils down to reproducing exploitation, power inequities and toxic social attitudes. Even if individuals get ahead in particular transactions, they just reinforce the norms that keep millions oppressed, from both the gender and class point of view. They just make the oppression seem aspirational.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 14:59
|
|
|
rich old men buying access to the bodies of young women and men is loving gross. it still should be legal and protected by the law because what the gently caress else are you going to do
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 15:07
|
|
|
destroy rich old men
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 15:09
|
|
|
Poniard posted:destroy rich old men This. The problem with that scenario isn't prostitution, it's massive wealth inequality and power disparity
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 15:12
|
|
|
in a truly socialist society there would be no need for anyone to prostitute themselves to make a living and only people who legitimately enjoy it would do it, making the entire point moot, sure but in the meantime we have a system that only benefits sex traffickers and rich old men who can afford high end services
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 15:21
|
|
|
Old men, running the world
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 15:24
|
|
|
People that can only see women as victims and without any ageny are doing so because they have internalized patriarchal views of women as property The truth us that ALL non-1%ers are property
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 15:47
|
|
|
StashAugustine posted:Old men, running the world are they electronic
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 15:50
|
|
|
Sentient Data posted:People that can only see women as victims and without any ageny are doing so because they have internalized patriarchal views of women as property This is some "higher labor law standards would nullify the agency of sweatshop workers" oped level analysis.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 15:59
|
|
|
good job not reading the post?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 16:08
|
|
|
Frog Act posted:sharks don't have jobs i thought they lent money out
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 16:11
|
|
|
Sentient Data posted:People that can only see women as victims and without any ageny are doing so because they have internalized patriarchal views of women as property Man those spaces were bugging me.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 16:20
|
|
|
Good brains educated in economic justice: Money corrupts the natural relationship between peoples, and is used by the unjust in order to swindle the common man. Also good brains educated in economic justice: Because it is impossible to completely solve the problem of prostitution we should instead enshrine the exchange of money for sexual favors as a natural right. I've also noticed that single mothers have been having a hard time of it lately, so I've cooked up a little bit of a modest proposal that'll help them cash in on some of the resources they've been investing in those kids of theirs.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 16:31
|
|
|
qkkl posted:prostitution should be heavily regulated with very high standards for working conditions, and be single-payer. in exchange it would be illegal for prostitutes to discriminate based on race, nationality, age, financial status, social status, height, and posting ability. nationalize the prostitutes and redistribute them equitably but seriously, providing a ubi would be the best way to reduce the need some women feel to sell their body efb got any sevens has issued a correction as of 16:42 on Oct 2, 2018 |
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 16:40
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:This is some "higher labor law standards would nullify the agency of sweatshop workers" oped level analysis. The analogy would be 'higher labor law standards' vs 'ban manufacturing altogether' With the follow-on argument of, "workers must be protected exploitation by manufacturers," followed by, "what if they want to work in manufacturing," followed by, "you just want gross old men to be able to tell young, fit workers that they have to give up the cartilage between their lumbar vertebrae in exchange for food and shelter," follo-- edit: got any sevens posted:nationalize the prostitutes and redistribute them equitably Agreed. The issue is Demand Inelasticity for income superseding health. edit 2: Look at coal workers happily knocking decades off their lives for $80,000/year right out of high school and poo poo. Accretionist has issued a correction as of 18:24 on Oct 2, 2018 |
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 18:04
|
|
|
Do cats complain about Mondays? Yes. Keep them away from your lasagna (401k)
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 18:17
|
|
|
Sentient Data posted:Well, poo poo. I had an account with them that I cancelled, but the email was under a domain I no longer own, and I deleted the entry from my password manager. Guess I need to watch my statements and do a chargeback if it shows up MoviePass is scummy enough that I'd watch out (I am!), but if you actively cancelled your account you should personally be ok - my understanding is that it's not quite as bad as charging everyone who gave them credit-card information at any point, and instead the people they're forcibly enrolling in a plan are those who never cancelled but also didn't choose to migrate to one of the terrible new plan options they implemented and just let things lapse as their old plan was discontinued
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 18:44
|
|
|
it’s almost like men are ridiculously averse to any system that might deny them sex regardless of the required mental gymnastics required, hmmmm I wonder why there aren’t more women at your meetings, maybe they see your political values as conveniently self serving
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 18:58
|
|
|
Take ur meds pls
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 19:01
|
|
|
might as well just said “Rosemary Kennedy any woman who politically disagrees with me”, lmao cool left wing you’ve got there
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 19:08
|
|
|
I don't think you're really talking about prostitution
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 19:11
|
|
|
I promise you the oxycontin will make this whole issue blow over
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 19:12
|
|
|
it’s almost like extremely obvious levels of male sexual entitlement so pervade these spaces that, for example, suburban women actually don’t have a strong foundation for preferring any particular slice of the American political spectrum on that basis
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 19:16
|
|
|
Accretionist posted:I don't think you're really talking about prostitution I think Pick probably shouldn't be engaged with in good faith. If nothing else because of how much insanity she has leaked onto the forums. Pick posted:it’s almost like men are ridiculously averse to any system that might deny them sex regardless of the required mental gymnastics required, hmmmm I wonder why there aren’t more women at your meetings, maybe they see your political values as conveniently self serving Pretty sure the women outnumber the men both in our slack and at our meetings for my branch of DSA. Part of it is probably because of our chapter having the racial justice and LGBTQ+ groups as it's core.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 19:17
|
|
|
🐘 “women aren’t free to sleep with anyone but me” 🐴 “that’s terrible! all women should be available for purchase!”
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 19:18
|
|
|
What are you even talking about
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 19:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 02:47 |
|
|
Larry Parrish posted:What are you even talking about Her chip on her shoulder? Maybe she ran out of wheelchair porn to masturbate to and wants to try venting her spleen by rotating through subforums.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2018 19:21
|
|