|
incoherent posted:https://twitter.com/SteveKornacki/status/1047794412577837056 gently caress Nunes, but I don't it should be understated how amazing that Hunter number is. The correct take there is "holy poo poo a Palestinian is within striking distance in that district."
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2018 00:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 16:13 |
|
|
lol about time the state dems gave up on the lost cause that was eggman's attempt's to unseat denham
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2018 00:36
|
|
|
Craptacular! posted:There sure are a lot of bad props, voted yes on 7/11/12. Okay after reading this thread I won’t vote yes on 11 either. There’s just so many props that are “outfit that would benefit from prop funds a prop”.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2018 00:42
|
|
|
Maybe we could add sponsor logos to the Voter's Guides for situations like that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2018 00:44
|
|
|
incoherent posted:https://twitter.com/SteveKornacki/status/1047794412577837056 Is this all voters, or likely voters? regardless, everything within like 4% is a statistical tie because of sampling errors. It does look like Nunes is going to win, though if it's a likely voter projection, enthusiasm may massively swing into the formulas this particular pollster is using to adjust their raw numbers. It's also worth pointing out the two polls (listed here) put Nunes up by 8 or 14 points, I suspect it's actually the same 8 point poll there in which case it's actually possibly as much as 14 points lead. Really though 8 points is not a very comfortable lead given turnout in midterms can swing by a lot. Midterm polling in general is hard.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2018 00:54
|
|
|
I can't believe Rohrabacher is the closest race, that piece of poo poo is hated. It makes me happy that Walters is getting slammed though, that's my home district, and Porter is awesome.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2018 01:04
|
|
|
Issa's old district looks like it's going blue, gently caress yeah
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2018 01:05
|
|
|
Infinite Karma posted:I can't believe Rohrabacher is the closest race, that piece of poo poo is hated. from what i read a lot of the closeness can be attributed to rohrabacher has a longstanding constituency among shithead hardliner old guard vietnamese refugees, and his district includes a good chunk of westminster/garden grove/fountain valley Jerry Manderbilt fucked around with this message at 02:49 on Oct 6, 2018 |
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2018 02:43
|
|
|
Craptacular! posted:Okay after reading this thread I won’t vote yes on 11 either. Sadly That's Politics. Basically it's insanely easy for moneyed interests just to buy signatures with misleading information and enough bugging people. Throw on a misleading enough title that's enticing to the mushy brained boombers, since you just need enough people to vote on title, and cha-ching! Easy pass. There are still sometimes decent propositions even outside of moneyed interests. At least this year, Prop 1, 7, 10, 12 are all pretty good. I agree with Pete's overall assessment http://www.peterates.com/props-1118.shtml, although I disagree with him on 8 I think. He claims it'll cause clinics to close, but sometimes poo poo has to get worse to get better if that does happen. I'll have to do more research myself but I'm still quite leaning towards yes. I still love the absolute steaming dump that Xavier Becerra pulled over 6, it's loving great. I wish he could have done the same to 11 
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2018 02:44
|
|
|
Does anyone have good resources on where to learn more about the District 1 justices that are up on the ballot this year? Specifically, I want to know more about James Richman & Peter Siggins (both appointed by Schwarzenegger), and Barbara Jones (can't find who appointed her). I'm leaning towards No on Richman & Siggins because they're GOP appointed, but I want to make sure.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2018 20:06
|
|
|
Dad Jokes posted:Does anyone have good resources on where to learn more about the District 1 justices that are up on the ballot this year? It's super hard to find any sort of mention of the judicial candidates at all - been looking them up on http://www.courts.ca.gov and looking for indications of their career arc - public defender good, appointed by Brown ok, GOP chief of staff not great, etc. Spite option: you could look them up on judgevoterguide.com and vote the opposite since it's created by some conservative shitheel who hates ~judicial activism~
|
|
#
?
Oct 8, 2018 21:19
|
|
|
It is a fair amount of work, but you can go to http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions-slip.htm?Courts=A or http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions-nonpub.htm?Courts=A for the appropriate district and get a listing of cases. Not all judges hear all cases, but you can pretty quickly open the pdf and search for their names to find ones they did rule on. Then you can read it and decide if you think they're being sane. (The one case I found for Richman in 30 secs of checking was him ruling that a trial court judge who improperly prompted the prosecutor to ask about some specific elements of a crime was a harmless error and the conviction should stand. The case was about a guy who rammed his truck into a women who turned him down for a date, then fled the scene and led the police on a chase. The question was about a forward facing red lamp specifically vs generic "lights and siren" for establishing the evading police charge (http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/A152474.PDF). You probably want to find something more controversial to base your opinion on)
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 04:53
|
|
|
I’m an overseas voter; got my ballot yesterday. This is probably a common question so I apologize, but can someone explain wtf is up with Prop 12? Does yes or no mean I hate chickens? Both?
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 08:04
|
|
|
Voting yes means chickens are required to be cage free. This greatly impacts the price (and quality) of the egg. Imma vote no, cuz early in my life I had first hand experience with chickens and they are hateful creatures who should be locked up. Also eggs are already expensive enough.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 08:40
|
|
|
Alternatively you should vote yes because we have the resources to both treat Chickens in a humane manner and not charge so much for eggs that lower income households can't afford them, greedy shitfuck agribusiness moguls not withstanding.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 09:14
|
|
|
Battery cages are banned in the EU. Eggs are still cheap.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 09:19
|
|
|
I can't bring myself to stop eating meat, but I'll gladly pay more/eat less if it means we can treat our livestock with even a shred of dignity.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 09:22
|
|
|
I just mean from what I’ve been reading both sides are saying the other actually wants cages and I don’t know enough about the issue to know which is right.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 09:33
|
|
|
KirbyKhan posted:Voting yes means chickens are required to be cage free. This greatly impacts the price (and quality) of the egg. Imma vote no, cuz early in my life I had first hand experience with chickens and they are hateful creatures who should be locked up. Also eggs are already expensive enough. modern chicken farming is a public health hazard dude
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 15:51
|
|
|
To concentrate chicken pop as we have been you must debeak ever single chicken in the pens. This is extremely painful for the birds and not having pinpoint accuracy when eating means a lot of feces is ingested aswell as feed. Its not just about cage free but all the other things you have to do to keep the chicken from killing each other due to the tight quarters. Vote yes today.
WAR CRIME GIGOLO fucked around with this message at 18:01 on Oct 9, 2018 |
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 17:25
|
|
|
KirbyKhan posted:Voting yes means chickens are required to be cage free. This greatly impacts the price (and quality) of the egg. Imma vote no, cuz early in my life I had first hand experience with chickens and they are hateful creatures who should be locked up. Also eggs are already expensive enough. This is one of the shittiest, stupidest posts I've ever seen on this dumb site.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 17:40
|
|
|
Yeah it's really dumb. "Chickens are dumb and mean so I'm going to torture them all their lives and also cover them in poo poo"
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 17:57
|
|
|
Megaman's Jockstrap posted:Yeah it's really dumb. "Chickens are dumb and mean so I'm going to torture them all their lives and also cover them in poo poo" *gets listeria*
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 17:59
|
|
|
I find something bleak about there being a proposition meant to ensure the health and happiness of every chicken (and as Raskolnikov38 points out, it's a good idea) in the state but there's gently caress all legislation with the same scope for human beings. I had the same reaction when the state passed both Prop 8 and that massive animal welfare proposition in the same election.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 18:07
|
|
|
KirbyKhan posted:Voting yes means chickens are required to be cage free. This greatly impacts the price (and quality) of the egg. Imma vote no, cuz early in my life I had first hand experience with chickens and they are hateful creatures who should be locked up. Also eggs are already expensive enough. Am I the only one who read the second part as a joke?
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 18:08
|
|
|
Driving past dozens of homeless people who can gently caress off and die so I can vote to save chickens.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 18:10
|
|
|
Skyscraper posted:Am I the only one who read the second part as a joke? No.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 18:10
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:Driving past dozens of homeless people who can gently caress off and die so I can vote to save chickens. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 18:21
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:*gets listeria* libs = owned
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 18:26
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:Driving past dozens of homeless people who can gently caress off and die so I can vote to save chickens. early in my life I had first hand experience with homeless and they are hateful creatures who should be locked up. Also eggs are already expensive enough.
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 20:51
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:early in my life I had first hand experience with homeless and they are hateful creatures who should be locked up. Aka i gave a homeless guy pennies and he threw them at me and screamed
|
|
#
?
Oct 9, 2018 20:52
|
|
|
if homeless people shat out an egg every day they'd all have nice comfy 4' by 4' by 2' cages to spend their lives in e. it'd have to be a big egg tho or else why have a homeless person instead of just a chicken
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 00:51
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:e. it'd have to be a big egg tho or else why have a homeless person instead of just a chicken Chickens have rights now
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 00:55
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:if homeless people shat out an egg every day they'd all have nice comfy 4' by 4' by 2' cages to spend their lives in They just get 5' by 10's for petty theft instead. Problem solved. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 01:21
|
|
|
I guess a hundred license plates is as good as a huge hobo egg e. or a few thousand, I dunno, however many are made per day
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 01:35
|
|
|
Prisoners save rich people's homes from fires. The circle of life is complete.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 03:04
|
|
|
ChickieNobs 2020
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 03:46
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:I guess a hundred license plates is as good as a huge hobo egg In jail they just sir around watching tv. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 05:24
|
|
|
So is yes on 12 yes on cages or is no on 12 yes on cages
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 05:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 16:13 |
|
|
Pirate Radar posted:So is yes on 12 yes on cages or is no on 12 yes on cages a yes on prop 12 sets physical dimension requirements for cages and pens instead of the vague "is able to stand and extend limbs" that the old proposition used. so a yes would be for bigger cages and pens
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2018 06:01
|
|