Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
What regions belong in the Pacific Northwest?
Alaska, US
British Columbia, CA
Washington, US
Oregon, US
Idaho, US
Montana, US
Wyoming, US
California, US (MODS PLEASE BAN ANYONE VOTING FOR THIS OPTION TIA)
View Results
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Cicero
Dec 17, 2003

Jumpjet, melta, jumpjet. Repeat for ten minutes or until victory is assured.

cheetah7071 posted:

I'm sympathetic to and fundamentally agree with "democrats don't go far enough" but if you still think democrats and republicans are the same, in 2018, you're probably just a moron
hey now, you could also just be startlingly ignorant of all current events and political issues

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum

cheetah7071 posted:

I'm sympathetic to and fundamentally agree with "democrats don't go far enough" but if you still think democrats and republicans are the same, in 2018, you're probably just a moron
I'm willing to admit that the closer you get to smaller, local elections, the likelihood of a difference in policy approaches 1.

Teabag Dome Scandal
Mar 19, 2002


its clearly the thousands upon thousands of people that vote every years fault for not falling into line instead of the few hundred candidates being incapable of not being lovely. did u hold their feet to the fire? well, what do u expect dummies

Peachfart
Jan 21, 2017

Oh good, it's the 2016 election. Again.

HashtagGirlboss
Jan 4, 2005

ElCondemn posted:

When I first started caring about politics I started looking at voting records of the people in office, at all levels, and it was immediately clear to me that there's no such thing as a "left wing". Republican and Democrat are basically the same. On a good day a handful of Democrats sometimes vote progressive/liberal, but only sometimes, mostly they're just voting in line with Republicans. Independents are just Republicans who are ashamed to call themselves that.

The problem, in my eyes, is that the people who want to be in office are fundamentally lovely people. It takes a real rear end in a top hat to want to "lead", at least the way we currently do politics. The way it should work is like jury duty, the people making decisions should be picked not because they campaigned but because they're forced to. We could still hold elections but the candidates shouldn't make their living/career out of being in politics.

I used to think this, but at some point I started to realize it's not the politicians, it's the people who elect the politicians, and I don't mean the 'hold your nose voters' or the 'third party voters,' I mean that great giant mass of American suburban monoculture. The people who will mostly just tell you they don't follow politics or don't care, but if you corner them have a mish-mash of beliefs that seem to line up really well with the democratic party. They don't like overt racism but they're fine with not noticing it. They don't like overt cruelty (border separation/physical violence) but they don't mind systemic cruelty that they can ignore. I could go on.

It's this weird political framework where they vaguely want things to be better but they don't want to be the slightest inconvenienced by making it better. You aren't changing the democratic party from the left until you figure out how to reach those people. The problem is, they are really loving hard to reach, they plead ignorance, don't even know the name of their senators despite being able to run off names of the entire coaching staff of the loving Ducks.

HashtagGirlboss fucked around with this message at 22:42 on Oct 12, 2018

ElCondemn
Aug 7, 2005


xrunner posted:

I used to think this, but at some point I started to realize it's not the politicians, it's the people who elect the politicians, and I don't mean the 'hold your nose voters' or the 'third party voters,' I mean that great giant mass of American suburban monoculture. The people who will mostly just tell you they don't follow politics or don't care, but if you corner them have a mish-mash of beliefs that seem to line up really well with the democratic party. They don't like overt racism but they're fine with not noticing it. They don't like overt cruelty (border separation/physical violence) but they don't mind systemic cruelty that they can ignore. I could go on.

Sure, I would agree that what's going on in this country is representative of what the average person wants. I'm just saying there's no "left party", there is no party that aligns with what I want. Even the furthest "left" parties that exist in this country aren't pushing big ideas like basic income or public housing solutions.

Doorknob Slobber
Sep 10, 2006

by Fluffdaddy
the republicans and democrats only differ in tactics not in goals so gently caress them both. democrats gently caress you from behind and take credit for any of the tiny amount of good you can accomplish while republicans gently caress you from the front.

HashtagGirlboss
Jan 4, 2005

ElCondemn posted:

Sure, I would agree that what's going on in this country is representative of what the average person wants. I'm just saying there's no "left party", there is no party that aligns with what I want. Even the furthest "left" parties that exist in this country aren't pushing big ideas like basic income or public housing solutions.

Right. There isn't anything close to that party. But that's also because those ideas have no traction with the electorate. You can push and advocate stuff all you want but if people aren't listening and are actively conditioned to ignore your advocacy what do you expect to happen? Public housing is a great example. For better or worse public housing as done in the United States mid-twentieth century was a loving disaster. It's entered the popular mindset that it was a disaster. You can't get through to these people because they're locked down on it was a disaster and no amount of talking, evidence, passion, or logic is going to sway them. It's nearly impossible to change peoples' minds on this issue. They just shut down and refuse to listen to anything that isn't "public housing projects in Chicago..." I don't know. I'm maybe hopeless. But I've started to think that the reason the democratic party doesn't move to the left is that there just aren't that many leftists.

There's not a leftest version of the silent majority out there waiting for the right party to come along and tap the enthusiasm. If anything, there's a huge mass of silent center rightests ready to pounce and undo your works if you ever start to get traction.

Dungeon Ecology
Feb 9, 2011

ElCondemn posted:

there is no party that aligns with what I want.

i mean i guess thats the 2 party system. does that mean you take your ball and go home or try to push the party that's closer to where you want to be and dig in to make meaningful votes to help push the boulder?

Doorknob Slobber posted:

the republicans and democrats only differ in tactics not in goals so gently caress them both. democrats gently caress you from behind and take credit for any of the tiny amount of good you can accomplish while republicans gently caress you from the front.

show us on the bernie doll where hillary touched you

Doorknob Slobber
Sep 10, 2006

by Fluffdaddy
Here in the PNW the classic example of democrats being poo poo is the seattle city council not support a $15 minimum wage until socialist activists literally forced them to.

Dungeon Ecology posted:

show us on the bernie doll where hillary touched you

my friend, bernie ran as a democrat

TheDeadlyShoe
Feb 14, 2014

Doorknob Slobber posted:

Here in the PNW the classic example of democrats being poo poo is the seattle city council not support a $15 minimum wage until socialist activists literally forced them to.

One weird trick to being politically relevant: voting in sufficient numbers

Doorknob Slobber
Sep 10, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

TheDeadlyShoe posted:

One weird trick to being politically relevant: voting in sufficient numbers

except the seattle city council had was all democrats and they still said no until activists got the measure on the ballot and the only reason they decided to go with it was because they were so scared of what their donors would think of a not phased in approach

what was the democrat solution again? a five year phase in for $15 and by the time it phased in all the way the cost of living in seattle had risen so much the benefits of $15 an hour were vastly negated

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

xrunner posted:

I used to think this, but at some point I started to realize it's not the politicians, it's the people who elect the politicians, and I don't mean the 'hold your nose voters' or the 'third party voters,' I mean that great giant mass of American suburban monoculture. The people who will mostly just tell you they don't follow politics or don't care, but if you corner them have a mish-mash of beliefs that seem to line up really well with the democratic party. They don't like overt racism but they're fine with not noticing it. They don't like overt cruelty (border separation/physical violence) but they don't mind systemic cruelty that they can ignore. I could go on.

It's this weird political framework where they vaguely want things to be better but they don't want to be the slightest inconvenienced by making it better. You aren't changing the democratic party from the left until you figure out how to reach those people. The problem is, they are really loving hard to reach, they plead ignorance, don't even know the name of their senators despite being able to run off names of the entire coaching staff of the loving Ducks.

I blame this on the idea that it's "rude to talk about politics". Once you start having conversations, you start changing minds and solidifying better and more consistent beliefs.

anthonypants posted:

You're correct; a revolution would result in better outcomes than a reformation.

You're smarter than this, accelerationism is never the answer.

TheDeadlyShoe posted:

If you are still posting poo poo like that after two years of trump i dont know what to tell you.

e: Dino Rossi ran for governor of WA. Is he the same as the (D)s that ran? I submit not.

D and R are coalitions and represent a range of interests and attitudes. The overall attitude of the D party more reflects the most politically advantageous positions amongst the coalition than anything else; the influence of left or progressive votes is directly correlated with the left's willingness and ability to influence elections. The Democrats drifted right in the 90s because thats what won elections after several curbstomps running lefty candidates. Now they are drifting left.

Note that those who whine and dont vote have no influence whatsoever.

Look at all the good poo poo that was passed in the state legislature this year once it flipped. The transparency thing was again really loving lovely but when pressed they changed it immediately. Is there more poo poo to do? Always. Do these representatives need to be kept under pressure? Yes, of course. But holy poo poo will I take the results from the past year over the obstructionism of the recent past.

Teabag Dome Scandal
Mar 19, 2002


Doorknob Slobber posted:

except the seattle city council had was all democrats and they still said no until activists got the measure on the ballot and the only reason they decided to go with it was because they were so scared of what their donors would think of a not phased in approach

what was the democrat solution again? a five year phase in for $15 and by the time it phased in all the way the cost of living in seattle had risen so much the benefits of $15 an hour were vastly negated

Wasn't it 7 year phase in?


You know what else the dems in washington passed? that loving terrible mccleary fix that didn't fix poo poo. but progress I guess! :downs:

Teabag Dome Scandal fucked around with this message at 23:11 on Oct 12, 2018

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum

TheDeadlyShoe posted:

One weird trick to being politically relevant: voting in sufficient numbers
Some people on the internet have this really weird obsession of shaming people over voting. Voting doesn't stop politicians from going back on campaign promises, it doesn't coerce politicians into adopting or reconsidering policies they've rejected, and as long as you people believe there are only two parties, voting doesn't provide a sufficient means of deterrence against bad policy or bad politicians.

Solkanar512 posted:

You're smarter than this, accelerationism is never the answer.
...what do you think accelerationism is

Solkanar512 posted:

Look at all the good poo poo that was passed in the state legislature this year once it flipped. The transparency thing was again really loving lovely but when pressed they changed it immediately. Is there more poo poo to do? Always. Do these representatives need to be kept under pressure? Yes, of course. But holy poo poo will I take the results from the past year over the obstructionism of the recent past.
What consequences should the city council face for reversing course on that housing tax?

Teabag Dome Scandal posted:

Wasn't it 7 year phase in?
Not only does Washington state already provide the highest minimum wage in the country, which means the leap to $15 is the smallest concession out of any state to make, but within the city of Seattle it was $15 beginning on January 1, 2017. In Oregon, it won't be $15.52 in Portland until 2022.

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

Teabag Dome Scandal posted:

Wasn't it 7 year phase in?


You know what else the dems in washington passed? that loving terrible mccleary fix that didn't fix poo poo. but progress I guess! :downs:

Holy poo poo, you found a single piece of legislation that wasn't perfect, you got me! You totally win!

Of course, folks like you refuse to look at the body of legislation as a whole, and of course you forget the years of obstruction. My brother, a high school teacher, didn't forget about the years of pay freezes, but you did.

Teabag Dome Scandal
Mar 19, 2002


anthonypants posted:

Not only does Washington state already provide the highest minimum wage in the country, which means the leap to $15 is the smallest concession out of any state to make, but within the city of Seattle it was $15 beginning on January 1, 2017. In Oregon, it won't be $15.52 in Portland until 2022.

I'm so loving pissed those cowards in DC unlegislated their minimum wage increase. loving Demorats!

Solkanar512 posted:

Holy poo poo, you found a single piece of legislation that wasn't perfect, you got me! You totally win!

Of course, folks like you refuse to look at the body of legislation as a whole, and of course you forget the years of obstruction. My brother, a high school teacher, didn't forget about the years of pay freezes, but you did.

lol a single piece of legislation

HashtagGirlboss
Jan 4, 2005

Solkanar512 posted:

I blame this on the idea that it's "rude to talk about politics". Once you start having conversations, you start changing minds and solidifying better and more consistent beliefs.

Do you? I've found mostly resistance, or sometimes placation. A good portion of the time they just listen and smile and nod and agree because they don't want to be rude or to get into a conflict with somebody they like (assuming you're using these tactics on friends/family). Then the next time you see them it's the same old poo poo. I'm not an accelerationist, accelerationism scares me because I'm not confident that the forces of good win out and shape whatever emerges, but I am hopeless. I wish we could figure this poo poo out without a major crisis well beyond 2008, but more and more I think it's pretty much impossible. This country is too rich and comfortable and confident in its worldview.

Dungeon Ecology
Feb 9, 2011

xrunner posted:

wish we could figure this poo poo out without a major crisis well beyond 2008, but more and more I think it's pretty much impossible. This country is too rich and comfortable and confident in its worldview.

yeah this is my belief as well. :smith::hf::smith:

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

xrunner posted:

Do you? I've found mostly resistance, or sometimes placation. A good portion of the time they just listen and smile and nod and agree because they don't want to be rude or to get into a conflict with somebody they like (assuming you're using these tactics on friends/family). Then the next time you see them it's the same old poo poo. I'm not an accelerationist, accelerationism scares me because I'm not confident that the forces of good win out and shape whatever emerges, but I am hopeless. I wish we could figure this poo poo out without a major crisis well beyond 2008, but more and more I think it's pretty much impossible. This country is too rich and comfortable and confident in its worldview.

If you're feeling this hopeless, take a break. Make sure you vote, but take a break. There's no shame in ignoring the news for a bit and doing whatever you do to chill out.

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum

Solkanar512 posted:

xrunner posted:

This country is too rich and comfortable and confident in its worldview.
If you're feeling this hopeless, take a break. Make sure you vote, but take a break. There's no shame in ignoring the news for a bit and doing whatever you do to chill out.
lmao

Ham Equity
Apr 16, 2013

The first thing we do, let's kill all the cars.
Grimey Drawer

Solkanar512 posted:

Look at all the good poo poo that was passed in the state legislature this year once it flipped. The transparency thing was again really loving lovely but when pressed they changed it immediately. Is there more poo poo to do? Always. Do these representatives need to be kept under pressure? Yes, of course. But holy poo poo will I take the results from the past year over the obstructionism of the recent past.
Can you list some things? Because other than the McCleary fix... I got nothin'. In fact, the first thing they tried to do (and very nearly succeeded at) was gutting ST3, either forcing it to take its funding from much more regressive sources than car tab fees, or just flat cutting its funding. They just barely failed.

State-level Democrats in Washington are loving garbage. National level Democrats are loving garbage. The leadership hamstrings leftists candidates in primaries whenever possible, and even when the leftists manage to win in spite of every effort made by the national party/DCCC, they pull out all their funding, support, and access, and sometimes even endorse Republicans, and then when they're done ratfucking the candidate, have the audacity to say "oh, look, leftists can't win elections!" loving Joe Crowley kept his name on the ballot, nobody from the leadership went after him for it; the leadership chose Bob Menendez over Lisa McCormick in New Jersey, when the correct choice was literally anyone other than Bob Menendez. Cory loving shitpiece Booker even loving endorsed him. They don't even bother to loving lie about it. Donna Brazile is still in the loving leadership of the party. Voting for leadership-endorsed Democrats is as bad--if not worse--than voting for Republicans; they are more effective at stopping progressive change than Republicans are.


Solkanar512 posted:

If you're feeling this hopeless, take a break. Make sure you vote, but take a break. There's no shame in ignoring the news for a bit and doing whatever you do to chill out.
If you're not feeling that hopeless, you're not paying attention.

Doorknob Slobber
Sep 10, 2006

by Fluffdaddy
I think the best way to feel like you're accomplishing something right now is organizing outside the system like the various city assemblies are doing. All sorts of cool poo poo is happening that you won't hear about unless you're organizing like them. The dream of building a new society in the dying corpse of the old is happening in a bunch of ways and its the only thing that gives me any hope.

Where I live one of the democrats on city council owns with his family a realty company and through that company they hired a private security firm to harass homeless people at night. Democrats are so progressive.

Doorknob Slobber fucked around with this message at 23:52 on Oct 12, 2018

TheDeadlyShoe
Feb 14, 2014

anthonypants posted:

Would you like to start? You can start by discussing why you disagree with the points in this post:

quote:

Also as a reminder, just like all those idiots who voted in trump are responsible for all the terrible poo poo he and the rest of his lovely party does, when you vote in democrats you're responsible for deporting more people than any president previously and drone striking american citizens without a trial. every election cycle the left has to deal with the liberal guilt trip of, 'but the other guy is SO bad you will be responsible for all that bad' but they(liberals) never hold themselves meaningfully accountable for voting in their own candidate(s) that are also so bad

idk, maybe because it's idiocy? Anyone who's spent 10 seconds googling the deporting thing knows better than that. Not a good start if anyone's trying to have a good faith argument.

Politics is a struggle for control between interests and that's not just between the D and R but within the parties at every level. To get literally anywhere you need to make alliances with people you disagree with. To win you will need to make alliances with people you really disagree with. That's what both the Democrats and Republicans are - a bunch of people who disagree with eachother less than the other party - and if you refuse to accept that you arn't beating the system. You're just not in the game. You have to deal with the liberal guilt trip every election cycle because it's fact. If you refuse to join in you are tacitly responsible for the results, and at the very least signaling you're okay with it. And the people most free to be purity ponies are almost without fail people whose lives won't actually be materially impacted by Trumpism or the Republican agenda.

Doorknob Slobber posted:

I think the best way to feel like you're accomplishing something right now is organizing outside the system like the various city assemblies are doing. All sorts of cool poo poo is happening that you won't hear about unless you're organizing like them. The dream of building a new society in the dying corpse of the old is happening in a bunch of ways and its the only thing that gives me any hope.

Where I live one of the democrats on city council owns with his family a realty company and through that company they hired a private security firm to harass homeless people at night. Democrats are so progressive.

oh wow huge slam did you know that there are selfish assholes in politics and some of them are democrats? True story. Surely in a leftist society (that someone else will build, I'm too busy) there will be no selfish assholes in politics.

TheDeadlyShoe fucked around with this message at 00:44 on Oct 13, 2018

Doorknob Slobber
Sep 10, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

TheDeadlyShoe posted:

oh wow huge slam did you know that there are selfish assholes in politics and some of them are democrats? True story. Surely in a leftist society (that someone else will build, I'm too busy) there will be no selfish assholes in politics.

the problem is that that kind of hypocrisy is the norm among democrats. Claiming to be progressive mainly to get into a position of power to protect their own interests. I'm just bringing up examples that I specifically know about from first hand experience with in the places I've participated in politics. Letting Trump appoint 15 more lifetimes judges without a fight so that they can instead go home and campaign on an issue they will never be able to win with like gun control is another current good example of how garbage democrats are.

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum

TheDeadlyShoe posted:

idk, maybe because it's idiocy? Anyone who's spent 10 seconds googling the deporting thing knows better than that. Not a good start if anyone's trying to have a good faith argument.
Ten seconds of googling would lead to figuring out that the immigrant child prisons started under Obama's term, and that the Obama administration deported more people than any previous administration up to that point. It would be fair to say that post-9/11, post-GWB, that's just the direction the country was headed in, but that would seem to prove the point that Democrats and Republicans are the same.

Doorknob Slobber
Sep 10, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

anthonypants posted:

Ten seconds of googling would lead to figuring out that the immigrant child prisons started under Obama's term, and that the Obama administration deported more people than any previous administration up to that point. It would be fair to say that post-9/11, post-GWB, that's just the direction the country was headed in, but that would seem to prove the point that Democrats and Republicans are the same.

The sad thing is that the attitude he has concerning democrats is exactly the same attitude republicans have with trump and its exactly what I meant when I said that liberals refuse to take any meaningful responsibility for how lovely their candidates are. Republicans have straight up proven that no you do not need to work with the other side to get poo poo done and in fact being an unrepentant rear end in a top hat with strong convictions is probably the best way to win elections.

anthonypants
May 6, 2007

by Nyc_Tattoo
Dinosaur Gum

Doorknob Slobber posted:

The sad thing is that the attitude he has concerning democrats is exactly the same attitude republicans have with trump and its exactly what I meant when I said that liberals refuse to take any meaningful responsibility for how lovely their candidates are. Republicans have straight up proven that no you do not need to work with the other side to get poo poo done and in fact being an unrepentant rear end in a top hat with strong convictions is probably the best way to win elections.
For the past eight years the left has been saying we need a Tea Party of our own, and the past decade of Democrat losses has only proven that they simply need to appeal to Republicans more.

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

Thanatosian posted:

Can you list some things? Because other than the McCleary fix... I got nothin'. In fact, the first thing they tried to do (and very nearly succeeded at) was gutting ST3, either forcing it to take its funding from much more regressive sources than car tab fees, or just flat cutting its funding. They just barely failed.

State-level Democrats in Washington are loving garbage. National level Democrats are loving garbage. The leadership hamstrings leftists candidates in primaries whenever possible, and even when the leftists manage to win in spite of every effort made by the national party/DCCC, they pull out all their funding, support, and access, and sometimes even endorse Republicans, and then when they're done ratfucking the candidate, have the audacity to say "oh, look, leftists can't win elections!" loving Joe Crowley kept his name on the ballot, nobody from the leadership went after him for it; the leadership chose Bob Menendez over Lisa McCormick in New Jersey, when the correct choice was literally anyone other than Bob Menendez. Cory loving shitpiece Booker even loving endorsed him. They don't even bother to loving lie about it. Donna Brazile is still in the loving leadership of the party. Voting for leadership-endorsed Democrats is as bad--if not worse--than voting for Republicans; they are more effective at stopping progressive change than Republicans are.

I'm not going to defend the DCCC and related orgs because they're poo poo, this is the PNW thread so I figured we're talking about fairly local stuff when I made my other posts.

As far as this year, there was net neutrality, bump stock ban (yeah, I know it's useless), gender pay equity, voting rights act (allows 16 and 17 yr olds to register to vote), three different bills making it easier for employees to be protected against harassment on the job (one prevents employees from being blocked from publicly speaking about what happened, another secured the right to file claims while the third developed model practices to prevent sexual harassment in the first place) and outlawed housing bias from landlords based on source of income.

Not to mention that we have a fairly consumer protecting AG that also sue the Trump administration for pretty much every loving thing they can.

And as I said before, you don't stop pushing, and you don't stop primarying. But if you think a deadlocked or Republican legislature would be doing this, you're sadly mistaken.

im on the net me boys
Feb 19, 2017

Hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhjjhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhjhhhhhhjhhhhhhhhhjjjhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh cannabis
I got the Voters' Pamphlet for Washington in the mail today. The initiative on taxing pollution seems good. Initiative 1634, which bans new local taxes on food seems to be a bald-faced attempt to disallow local taxation on soda... 1639 is a gun control one that I'm categorically against, but I bet most in the thread would be keen on. 940 is to make cops learn deescalation, good. Anyone else get theirs yet/know which way they're going to vote?

Thaddius the Large
Jul 5, 2006

It's in the five-hole!

Solkanar512 posted:

If you're feeling this hopeless, take a break. Make sure you vote, but take a break. There's no shame in ignoring the news for a bit and doing whatever you do to chill out.

You understand that the causes people are talking about aren’t something you can “take a break from”, right? People can’t take a break from making too little per hour to cover their ever increasing cost of living, or from their uncovered medical expenses sending them further into crippling debt? Housing, wages, and healthcare aren’t some poo poo leftists just care about on principle, for too many people it’s literally all they can see. Maybe you’re privileged enough to just shut that out, but for plenty it’s what they have to face whether they want to or not.

Reene
Aug 26, 2005

:justpost:

can we at least agree that anyone that voted green party/jill stein or god forbid libertarian is a god drat idiot regardless of anything about splitting the vote

Goast
Jul 23, 2011

by VideoGames

Solkanar512 posted:

If you're feeling this hopeless, take a break. Make sure you vote, but take a break. There's no shame in ignoring the news for a bit and doing whatever you do to chill out.

just take a break from all the bills you gotta pay that works right

poo poo now im homeless

im on the net me boys
Feb 19, 2017

Hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhjjhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhjhhhhhhjhhhhhhhhhjjjhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh cannabis

Reene posted:

can we at least agree that anyone that voted green party/jill stein or god forbid libertarian is a god drat idiot regardless of anything about splitting the vote

Jill was literally the least bad candidate

Peachfart
Jan 21, 2017

im on the net me boys posted:

Jill was literally the least bad candidate

lol

seiferguy
Jun 9, 2005

FLAWED
INTUITION



Toilet Rascal

im on the net me boys posted:

Jill was literally the least bad candidate

Yowza that's a spicy one.

Christoph
Mar 3, 2005
Question: so I'm in Oregon and I'm on the home confinement leg of a federal prison sentence. Technically, I am still in federal custody (I switch to normal probation in December).

Can I vote?

RuanGacho
Jun 20, 2002

"You're gunna break it!"

im on the net me boys posted:

Jill was literally the least bad candidate

Jack2142
Jul 17, 2014

Shitposting in Seattle

im on the net me boys posted:

Jill was literally the least bad candidate

:dogbutton:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

im on the net me boys
Feb 19, 2017

Hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhjjhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhjhhhhhhjhhhhhhhhhjjjhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh cannabis
Didn't expect this reaction but I respect it

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply