Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Moridin920
Nov 15, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Harry Potter on Ice posted:

that one streamer has spent 1.5 hours on the jumping puzzle and then just got mad and gave the controller to his friend and left

too bad he can't just tcl through that poo poo ahahaha

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Spacedad
Sep 11, 2001

We go play orbital catch around the curvature of the earth, son.
The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Video Graves > Fallout 1-76 : I don't want to set the world on fire, but I will for the drops

Glazius
Jul 22, 2007

Hail all those who are able,
any mouse can,
any mouse will,
but the Guard prevail.

Clapping Larry
Fallout 4 had some jumping puzzles in it. Not for quests that I hit, but for some bits of bonus loot here and there. A medkit and duffel bag on a fire escape near the oyster bar, a toolchest on a detached structure near an energy turbine, that kind of thing.

Of course, there you have power armor with a jet pack, and Jet, which slows down gravity but not your W key.

Wonder if you get moon boots or perk cards for jump height in 76. (From what I can grab of streams, everybody gets a set of core perk cards to pick from as they level, so everybody gets offered VATS body part aiming and lockpick and hacker and such. Card packs can include lockpick+ and hacker+ perks that widen the sweet spot or reduce lockout time.)

sharknado slashfic
Jun 24, 2011

Moridin920 posted:

too bad he can't just tcl through that poo poo ahahaha

I was really curious what the reward would be honestly, like a broom, some pre-war money and some toilet paper or what?

SwitchbladeKult
Apr 4, 2012



"The warmth of life has entered my tomb!"

Glazius posted:

Fallout 4 had some jumping puzzles in it. Not for quests that I hit, but for some bits of bonus loot here and there. A medkit and duffel bag on a fire escape near the oyster bar, a toolchest on a detached structure near an energy turbine, that kind of thing.

Of course, there you have power armor with a jet pack, and Jet, which slows down gravity but not your W key.

Wonder if you get moon boots or perk cards for jump height in 76. (From what I can grab of streams, everybody gets a set of core perk cards to pick from as they level, so everybody gets offered VATS body part aiming and lockpick and hacker and such. Card packs can include lockpick+ and hacker+ perks that widen the sweet spot or reduce lockout time.)

Actually, yeah! They mentioned a mutation card that let's you jump really high. I also suspect jetpacks will be in the game as well.

Frog Act
Feb 10, 2012



Spacedad posted:

So there's a weapon called the Vox Syringer that if you shoot animals with it, it apparently makes animals talk.

https://www.reddit.com/r/fo76/comments/9qvla4/theres_a_weapon_i_think_in_a_place_called_seneca/

Here's footage of someone chasing a talking Radstag who was hit with the syringer:

https://www.reddit.com/user/Ahsumara/comments/9qvu04/it_talked/

I contend that the tone they're going for with this game is 'new vegas with wild wasteland always on.'

seems appropriate the radstag is standing inside a giant rock that looks like its covered in streaks of gray paint

Rinkles
Oct 24, 2010

What I'm getting at is...
Do you feel the same way?
Thinking of doing a fresh playthrough of New Vegas, if I can manage to do a clean install.

Don't remember, are any of the dlc comfortably doable right out of the gate?

mp5
Jan 1, 2005

Stroke of luck!

Rinkles posted:

Thinking of doing a fresh playthrough of New Vegas, if I can manage to do a clean install.

Don't remember, are any of the dlc comfortably doable right out of the gate?

Honest hearts maybe

Siljmonster
Dec 16, 2005

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

2 hours of QA time, great job Bethesda youre doing awwesome

Agent355
Jul 26, 2011


I think it's weird how they keep calling it a beta and people are like 'well it's just a beta so they might fix stuff'.

It's 3 weeks to release, there isn't enough time to fix anything. This is the release version, like it or not. This is just a glorified publicity stunt/demo.

Donovan Trip
Jan 6, 2007
I was really excited about cryptids


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbUYipTg4YA

Hav
Dec 11, 2009

Fun Shoe

Siljmonster posted:

2 hours of QA time, great job Bethesda youre doing awwesome

It's not QA, it's streamer-bait.

Bardeh
Dec 2, 2004

Fun Shoe

lmao

they want $60 for this.

Space Cadet Omoly
Jan 15, 2014

~Groovy~


Spacedad posted:

So there's a weapon called the Vox Syringer that if you shoot animals with it, it apparently makes animals talk.

https://www.reddit.com/r/fo76/comments/9qvla4/theres_a_weapon_i_think_in_a_place_called_seneca/

Here's footage of someone chasing a talking Radstag who was hit with the syringer:

https://www.reddit.com/user/Ahsumara/comments/9qvu04/it_talked/

I contend that the tone they're going for with this game is 'new vegas with wild wasteland always on.'

This is a quality idea and I hope it one day makes it into a Fallout game I actually want to play.

LGD
Sep 25, 2004

Rinkles posted:

Thinking of doing a fresh playthrough of New Vegas, if I can manage to do a clean install.

Don't remember, are any of the dlc comfortably doable right out of the gate?

not to dissuade you from doing regular new vegas, but if you're going in clean why not try the just-released New California TC mod?


and I think most of New Vegas' DLC is recommended for level 15+, though I also agree that Honest Hearts can be done whenever

NeurosisHead
Jul 22, 2007

NONONONONONONONONO
I feel weird for defending this, but I remember a time when beta testing was exactly what Bethesda is doing here. Alpha testing you do internally in development. For the beta test a specific group of people is given access to a piece of software, generally for a specific period or amount of time, then the company takes a few days to compile data from that usage. Then you implement fixes, and then do it over again.

I'm not saying that using pre-orders for your selection pool is a good way to set up your beta - especially since "beta test" has become synonymous with "early access as a pre-order incentive". But in as far as what a beta test actually is supposed to be, I can't really fault Bethesda for the way they have structured this in intervals.

Donovan Trip
Jan 6, 2007
Doesn't really line up with the letter though, or them stating it'd be a full beta, then 4-8 hours a day, now a few hours every couple of days. I dunno it seems like there's some panic at Bethesda right now and they're trying to damage control, they don't want people bored and pissed off at the game pre launch

Spacedad
Sep 11, 2001

We go play orbital catch around the curvature of the earth, son.
Todd Howard said straight-up he wants the players to break the game as much as possible early after launch.

We're basically getting an early-access triple-A game here. If you know what you're getting into (like me) then go for it. Otherwise, you can always hold off until they patch the major problems.

For me I'm willing to put up with even game-breaking jank just to play a fallout bethesda game with pals.

Spacedad fucked around with this message at 21:38 on Oct 24, 2018

Gort
Aug 18, 2003

Good day what ho cup of tea

NeurosisHead posted:

I feel weird for defending this, but I remember a time when beta testing was exactly what Bethesda is doing here. Alpha testing you do internally in development. For the beta test a specific group of people is given access to a piece of software, generally for a specific period or amount of time, then the company takes a few days to compile data from that usage. Then you implement fixes, and then do it over again.

I'm not saying that using pre-orders for your selection pool is a good way to set up your beta - especially since "beta test" has become synonymous with "early access as a pre-order incentive". But in as far as what a beta test actually is supposed to be, I can't really fault Bethesda for the way they have structured this in intervals.

There's nowhere near enough time for them to do any proper fixes at this point. It's just a way to get people hyped for the game 'cause they didn't get enough time to play it until it started to grate.

LITERALLY MY FETISH
Nov 11, 2010


Raise Chris Coons' taxes so that we can have Medicare for All.

Spacedad posted:

Todd Howard said straight-up he wants the players to break the game as much as possible early after launch.

We're basically getting an early-access triple-A game here. If you know what you're getting into (like me) then go for it. Otherwise, you can always hold off until they patch the major problems.

For me I'm willing to put up with even game-breaking jank just to play a fallout bethesda game with pals.

he said that because then they'd already have all your money

you're paying full price for an early access game that won't get fixed

just fuckin lol

NeurosisHead
Jul 22, 2007

NONONONONONONONONO

Gort posted:

There's nowhere near enough time for them to do any proper fixes at this point. It's just a way to get people hyped for the game 'cause they didn't get enough time to play it until it started to grate.

I agree that there isn't time to actually fix (many) things, unless they rebuilt their code out of the spaghetti monster it always has been. But I think that given the limited amounts of time available, pattern of progression required to "expand", and expansiveness of the beta testing segment they could get really valuable data for what needs to be fixed in specific chunks of content. If that's what they're doing, I'd prefer the game be launched without needing an endless stream of bugfixes to make it playable as much as anybody. But I respect at least taking the right steps to support and refine the game when that's not the case.

Siljmonster
Dec 16, 2005

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Spacedad posted:

Todd Howard said straight-up he wants the players to break the game as much as possible early after launch.

We're basically getting an early-access triple-A game here. If you know what you're getting into (like me) then go for it. Otherwise, you can always hold off until they patch the major problems.

For me I'm willing to put up with even game-breaking jank just to play a fallout bethesda game with pals.

You got scammed

Bardeh
Dec 2, 2004

Fun Shoe
Todd Howard: alright, so the game's broken, it looks and plays like rear end, and we haven't finished it yet. $60 please.

Fallout fans:

mp5
Jan 1, 2005

Stroke of luck!

Spacedad posted:

Todd Howard said straight-up he wants the players to break the game as much as possible early after launch.

We're basically getting an early-access triple-A game here. If you know what you're getting into (like me) then go for it. Otherwise, you can always hold off until they patch the major problems.

For me I'm willing to put up with even game-breaking jank just to play a fallout bethesda game with pals.

I bought No Man's Sky on launch knowing what I was getting into

Being There When It Happens isn't worth it

Zelder
Jan 4, 2012

Spacedad posted:

Todd Howard said straight-up he wants the players to break the game as much as possible early after launch.

We're basically getting an early-access triple-A game here. If you know what you're getting into (like me) then go for it. Otherwise, you can always hold off until they patch the major problems.

For me I'm willing to put up with even game-breaking jank just to play a fallout bethesda game with pals.

drat dude, you really shouldn't let yourself get scammed so proudly

Donovan Trip
Jan 6, 2007

NeurosisHead posted:

I agree that there isn't time to actually fix (many) things, unless they rebuilt their code out of the spaghetti monster it always has been. But I think that given the limited amounts of time available, pattern of progression required to "expand", and expansiveness of the beta testing segment they could get really valuable data for what needs to be fixed in specific chunks of content. If that's what they're doing, I'd prefer the game be launched without needing an endless stream of bugfixes to make it playable as much as anybody. But I respect at least taking the right steps to support and refine the game when that's not the case.

All good reasons to buy in a year

NeurosisHead
Jul 22, 2007

NONONONONONONONONO

Donovan Trip posted:

All good reasons to buy in a year

Agreed, totally. Now that I see the structure of how they're rolling the game out and refining it basically as they go, I don't have the pre-order bug. I don't want to be hype for the game just because it's Fallout, but I want to give it a fair shake assuming that the developers are interested in making a good faith effort at making a game that I might have fun playing. I think that if you treat a pre-order or early purchase as investing in the development of the game and having the privilege to play before it's done it could be worth it (depending on how much you value your money and time).

Tempus Thales
May 11, 2012

Artwork by Tempus Thales

Mr Hootington posted:

Ps4 and PC only get 1hour 1 day. Microsoft paid for the extra day and hours.

Bethesda published in their forums an FAQ stating the PC Beta would start on the 30th of October, and but didn't state how long it was going to run for. I seriously doubt they will do the PC Beta just for 1 hour on the 30th.

They did state that all progress done during beta would carry over to game launch.

Tei
Feb 19, 2011

I think the real reason they have a very limited is to control the message. There can be other reasons, but I don't think thats the one here.

Same reason we have things like review embargos, they are not confident the game could survive mmo players having true free reign withouth that trigering some sort of controversy about some minutia.

They are not wrong, mmo players can do that and even more. But is probably not very good a game if they have so little confidence on it.
.

Tei fucked around with this message at 22:53 on Oct 24, 2018

LITERALLY MY FETISH
Nov 11, 2010


Raise Chris Coons' taxes so that we can have Medicare for All.

NeurosisHead posted:

Agreed, totally. Now that I see the structure of how they're rolling the game out and refining it basically as they go, I don't have the pre-order bug. I don't want to be hype for the game just because it's Fallout, but I want to give it a fair shake assuming that the developers are interested in making a good faith effort at making a game that I might have fun playing. I think that if you treat a pre-order or early purchase as investing in the development of the game and having the privilege to play before it's done it could be worth it (depending on how much you value your money and time).

Lol wtf why are goons so good at talking themselves into buying garbage

It’s not an investment, Bethesda isn’t some plucky fuckin indie dev who needs your $60 so they can eat tonight, and you won’t get returns on your money. It’s you talking yourself into giving money to a multimillion dollar company for a product that THEY hosed up because you have brain worms.

corn in the bible
Jun 5, 2004

Oh no oh god it's all true!

NeurosisHead posted:

I agree that there isn't time to actually fix (many) things, unless they rebuilt their code out of the spaghetti monster it always has been. But I think that given the limited amounts of time available, pattern of progression required to "expand", and expansiveness of the beta testing segment they could get really valuable data for what needs to be fixed in specific chunks of content. If that's what they're doing, I'd prefer the game be launched without needing an endless stream of bugfixes to make it playable as much as anybody. But I respect at least taking the right steps to support and refine the game when that's not the case.

I think it's hilarious you people are so willing to shill for this, myself

Donovan Trip
Jan 6, 2007

LITERALLY MY FETISH posted:

Lol wtf why are goons so good at talking themselves into buying garbage

It’s not an investment, Bethesda isn’t some plucky fuckin indie dev who needs your $60 so they can eat tonight, and you won’t get returns on your money. It’s you talking yourself into giving money to a multimillion dollar company for a product that THEY hosed up because you have brain worms.

Username/post combo

corn in the bible
Jun 5, 2004

Oh no oh god it's all true!
but if Fallout 76 does not make a billion dollars, Todd might have to release Skyrim again, do you want that on your conscience,

Psychotic Weasel
Jun 24, 2004

Bang! You're dead.
They seem to be doing a terrible job of controlling the message unless they were aiming for 'tepid, bordering on hostile' so I don't know of it's working... or maybe they were hoping that all those early access streams would pressure people into preordering as well since they have no will power.

I'm hoping once they do the PC beta people will be able to start pulling the game apart to see what's going on under the hood. Maybe we'll get some juicy tidbits of information then. Or we'll get really lucky and some group will figure out how to crack it first thing before the game even hits the market.

Agent355
Jul 26, 2011


Yeah my feeling on the short beta (running less than a month before launch) and even shorter hours of operation is it's probably to prevent people from really experiencing how bad the game is. They're trying to build hype by letting people play for 5 hours when the game is at it's best, shiny and new. If they played for 20 hours you'd realize there's really only 5 hours of entertainment value in radiant quests and empty worlds, but the people who play in the beta are going to have high hopes that 'wow I can't to see what I find!' at first.

Not to mention doing a beta for only pre-orders is self-selecting a group of players who are already excited for the game.

These are the people who are MOST likely to be 'wow this is awesome, I'm so hyped to play more', after all, they pre-ordered.

So, pick the people most likely to make positive buzz, don't let them play long enough to see how lacking the game is. Hope that generates enough positive feelings to move a million copies and don't allow returns. Maybe do some PR patches about how 'no really we haven't abandoned the game guys, look we fixed one bug!' post release and hope everybody forgets about it by the time fallout 5 shows up.

:negative: reality hurts

Psychotic Weasel posted:

They seem to be doing a terrible job of controlling the message unless they were aiming for 'tepid, bordering on hostile' so I don't know of it's working...


I think this combined with the points in the rest of my post is the most damning thing. This is the LITERAL BEST CASE SCENARIO for them to run a beta in with the best odds of getting people excited, and the reaction is STILL lukewarm to negative.

corn in the bible
Jun 5, 2004

Oh no oh god it's all true!
Love 2 buy broken unfinished game on a storefront with no refund support

Bardeh
Dec 2, 2004

Fun Shoe

NeurosisHead posted:

Agreed, totally. Now that I see the structure of how they're rolling the game out and refining it basically as they go, I don't have the pre-order bug. I don't want to be hype for the game just because it's Fallout, but I want to give it a fair shake assuming that the developers are interested in making a good faith effort at making a game that I might have fun playing. I think that if you treat a pre-order or early purchase as investing in the development of the game and having the privilege to play before it's done it could be worth it (depending on how much you value your money and time).

alternatively, the huge multi-billion dollar corporation could spend their huge profits on completing their game first and then charge for it. Bethesda is worth 3 billion dollars the game releasing like this is brazen greed

Spacedad
Sep 11, 2001

We go play orbital catch around the curvature of the earth, son.

LITERALLY MY FETISH posted:

he said that because then they'd already have all your money

you're paying full price for an early access game that won't get fixed

just fuckin lol

Yep. Yep. Yep. All correct. Guilty as charged.

I bought this game knowing full well about all of this. Like I said, I wanted to see how badly they hosed this up. And if there's some fun in there too or they manage to sufficiently fix things, good.

It's weird but I actually wasn't sold on this game until I heard a dev in a documentary about the game's making-of that they pretty much used the gamebryo engine but ripped out the parts that made the player's vision the center of the game engine's universe. I knew that would inevitably lead to a LOT of corner-cutting and jury-rigging in the game. So I decided to get it just to see how they hosed up or where they succeeded in backending this single-player engine for multiplayer.

Spacedad fucked around with this message at 23:05 on Oct 24, 2018

deathbagel
Jun 10, 2008

I only wish I could have given them the 200 before the Power Armor Edition sold out.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Paul Zuvella
Dec 7, 2011

Maybe if I buy the game at launch Todd Howard will be my friend!!!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply