|
Nyn posted:Choke on a dick and die. ooh, homophobia. Who would have guessed
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 04:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 01:52 |
|
|
Bilirubin posted:ooh, homophobia. Who would have guessed Navyman only able to think of dicks, news at 11 Also suicide requests are verboten
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 04:59
|
|
|
FAT32 SHAMER posted:Also suicide requests are verboten do super cool edge lords still skirt that rule by appending "(in game)"?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 05:03
|
|
|
nah they just say skill urself
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 05:54
|
|
|
Nyn posted:Choke on a dick and die. For a lifer you soft like johnson & johnson.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 08:09
|
|
|
Hexel posted:nah they just say skill urself are they still throwing 1488's out there like it aint no thing? It isn't REAL eve unless its lowkey nazi and casually racist.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 08:10
|
|
|
BL is back and in POG form! I keep hoping israd throws their hat into the BL ring. I think if I got black listed from BL I would legit have a big black doughnut lmao!
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 10:32
|
|
|
Nyn posted:Choke on a dick and die. These are all rookie mistakes and clear signs of J4G. In the olden days when this forum was absolutely crazy buzzing we would have people joining and immediately asking to join all the big guilds. These people come under the J4G or Just 4 Game status and were usually ban on discovery. I am not going to do that, but I do implore you to not post in this manner because I still will hand out probations. This thread has a specific way of talking with each other and is more laxed than others, so lurking for a while and understanding is what any newbie should do before joining in and at least not be combative right off the bat! 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 11:27
|
|
|
i always thought j4g stood for "join 4 guild" perhaps i was the j4g all along
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 15:50
|
|
|
Johnny Five-Jaces posted:i always thought j4g stood for "join 4 guild" Guess what, I have been saying it wrong all this time and I am completely wrong here. Many apologies.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 15:59
|
|
|
You kids these days...
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 15:59
|
|
|
Video Graves posted:Guess what, I have been saying it wrong all this time and I am completely wrong here. you're too nice to have had this shitbird thread as your jump off to modding
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 16:03
|
|
|
join4goop
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 16:16
|
|
|
I thought the G stranded for "goons"
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 16:23
|
|
|
FruitNYogurtParfait posted:you're too nice to have had this shitbird thread as your jump off to modding Though, if VG can manage this poo poo stack with verve and elan like he has, then he can handle anything. So, well done.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 17:05
|
|
|
Something something assumed gender something something.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 19:03
|
|
|
Please do not assume the gender of a kirby
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 19:18
|
|
|
Just saw Naz's post in r/Eve, and I kind of like his idea. Rather than nerf capitals, buff something that should be dangerous to capitals (in his example, T2 battleships).
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 19:45
|
|
|
I would unironically love a reason to train marauders
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 19:47
|
|
|
Bilirubin posted:I would unironically love a reason to train marauders
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 20:07
|
|
|
Bilirubin posted:I would unironically love a reason to train marauders I already trained Marauders and I want a reason to use my millions of wasted SP
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 20:20
|
|
|
cruiser sized stealth bombers that devour the hell out of caps/supers duh
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 20:22
|
|
|
FruitNYogurtParfait posted:cruiser sized stealth bombers that devour the hell out of caps/supers duh This because anything bigger than cruisers would just get blapped by the capitals they're supposed to be "countering".
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 20:30
|
|
|
FruitNYogurtParfait posted:cruiser sized stealth bombers that devour the hell out of caps/supers duh Force Recons that can fling bombs would be a nice touch! 💣
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 20:40
|
|
|
Shut the gently caress up.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 20:56
|
|
|
Reddit really is going all in on the idea that not being able to solo a multi-billion isk capital ship with a multi-million isk nano frigate is a "problem" that needs to be solved.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 21:30
|
|
|
Xae posted:Reddit really is going all in on the idea that not being able to solo a multi-billion isk capital ship with a multi-million isk nano frigate is a "problem" that needs to be solved. Wonder what the Venn Diagram would look like between redditors saying that, and redditors saying things like "I should be able to solo entire small gangs by myself in my super, since it's so expensive" 2 or 3 years ago.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 21:33
|
|
|
The only thing to counter capital ships is even bigger capitals. We need a level above super capitals, super-dooper capitals that cost 1 trillion isk each and can solo a hundred Titans at once.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 21:33
|
|
|
Xae posted:Reddit really is going all in on the idea that not being able to solo a multi-billion isk capital ship with a multi-million isk nano frigate is a "problem" that needs to be solved. Show them this picture 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 21:34
|
|
|
Xae posted:Reddit really is going all in on the idea that not being able to solo a multi-billion isk capital ship with a multi-million isk nano frigate is a "problem" that needs to be solved. It's how EVE used to be, really. You could kill a battleship with a frigate and battleships used to be stupid expensive compared to how much you could earn. Bigger didn't always mean better.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 21:39
|
|
|
Rutibex posted:The only thing to counter capital ships is even bigger capitals. We need a level above super capitals, super-dooper capitals that cost 1 trillion isk each and can solo a hundred Titans at once. I still think the Palantine Keepstar should be mobile and mannable by like 50 people and can blap titans
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 21:42
|
|
|
Rutibex posted:The only thing to counter capital ships is even bigger capitals. We need a level above super capitals, super-dooper capitals that cost 1 trillion isk each and can solo a hundred Titans at once. ludicrous capitals!
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 21:42
|
|
|
FAT32 SHAMER posted:I still think the Palantine Keepstar should be mobile and mannable by like 50 people and can blap titans this reminds me of some fanfest way back where they teased POS with jump drives i was losing my poo poo at the time because you could stuff a POS completely full of CHAs and use it move mountains in one jump
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 21:59
|
|
|
Is this guy actually Pups (Пупс) in disguise 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 22:09
|
|
|
jiggerypokery posted:Shut the gently caress up. I like how this is directed at absolutely nobody but I agree. I agree. I cant find my golem loss but I was all ready to be the sub cap support of my dreams. I finally get to use this boss ship. Gonna plop down and be unkillable. loving overkill drop by shadowcartell(??) and Im the first off the field. I never bought another golem after that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 22:47
|
|
|
Ynglaur posted:Just saw Naz's post in r/Eve, and I kind of like his idea. Rather than nerf capitals, buff something that should be dangerous to capitals (in his example, T2 battleships). I've always liked the idea of specifically-tuned subcapital ships (Super HACs, in a way) that are designed to mount capital class weaponry (only two guns/launchers, max) with a movement or accuracy penalty, depending on the target.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2018 00:01
|
|
|
BIG HEADLINE posted:I've always liked the idea of specifically-tuned subcapital ships (Super HACs, in a way) that are designed to mount capital class weaponry (only two guns/launchers, max). So larger bombers
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2018 00:02
|
|
|
BIG HEADLINE posted:I've always liked the idea of specifically-tuned subcapital ships (Super HACs, in a way) that are designed to mount capital class weaponry (only two guns/launchers, max) with a movement or accuracy penalty, depending on the target. FruitNYogurtParfait posted:cruiser sized stealth bombers that devour the hell out of caps/supers duh
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2018 00:47
|
|
|
BIG HEADLINE posted:I've always liked the idea of specifically-tuned subcapital ships (Super HACs, in a way) that are designed to mount capital class weaponry (only two guns/launchers, max) with a movement or accuracy penalty, depending on the target. gwrtheyrn posted:So larger bombers FruitNYogurtParfait posted:cruiser sized stealth bombers that devour the hell out of caps/supers duh Cruiser hull capable of fitting citadel torpedoes, and maybe some gimmick module to make it all but immune to fighters specifically so it can still be easily tracked by other subcapitals but not get eaten by fighter swarms.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2018 00:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 01:52 |
|
|
Is anyone here interested in Highsec structure shooting? (I know you are, it's the best part of Eve, right?) I haven't played in a while, and just recently got into the game again. A couple of dudes and I decided to try Highsec wardecs again, and now we kind of sort of ended up in a situation where we threatened to kill a large Upwell structure and may or may not be able to, depending on how things develop until it comes out for the structure timer. It's a silly, unimportant little scuffle, but perhaps some of you guys would be willing to lend a hand?
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2018 00:53
|
|
