Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Powerful Two-Hander
Mar 10, 2004

Mods please change my name to "Tooter Skeleton" TIA.


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/30/japanese-bullet-train-company-calls-halt-to-scary-safety-drill

quote:


Standing on a platform as a bullet train hurtles past at top speed can be an unnerving experience.

Spare a thought, then, for the dozens of new employees of West Japan Railway forced to squat in a trough between two sets of tracks as shinkansen trains whoosh by at speeds of up to 187mph (300km/h).

Future trainees can count themselves lucky after the firm agreed to halt the exercise following pressure from a rail workers’ union.

Instead, from next month, employees will watch the trains pass from behind a trackside fence outdoors.

The exercise – introduced in 2016 to raise safety awareness among carriage inspectors – required groups of employees, dressed in hard hats and goggles, to enter a tunnel and crouch inside a narrow maintenance ditch between two sets of tracks located a metre away on either side.

The aim, according to company officials, was to give workers a greater appreciation of the force generated by trains traveling at maximum speed.

I mean, sounds like it would work and they were wearing goggle so what's the problem?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Memento
Aug 25, 2009


Bleak Gremlin

That owns. I want to sign up for Bones-sama's wild ride

jobson groeth
May 17, 2018

by FactsAreUseless

DrPossum
May 15, 2004

i am not a surgeon

:confused: but that works so well in cartoons?

schmug
May 20, 2007

https://twitter.com/rianru/status/1057143813100236800

BBC News - Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov damaged by crane
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46030113

SelenicMartian
Sep 14, 2013

Sometimes it's not the bomb that's retarded.

The dock is not so dry any more.

schmug
May 20, 2007

SelenicMartian posted:

The dock is not so dry any more.

the whole ship is an OSHA tragedy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaR0fC1ncPo

taskandpurpose.com posted:

Russia’s only aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, is one of the five worst carriers in the world, according to The National Interest.

In October 2016, the Kuznetsov was sailing to Syria through the English Channel on a combat deployment when it was spotted belching thick clouds of black smoke.

“The main problem with the ship is that is has a very problematic propulsion system,” Dmitry Gorenburg, a senior research scientist at the Center for Naval Analyses, previously told Business Insider. “It’s just unreliable.”

Before it was sent back to the yards for repairs, the Kuznetsov was always accompanied by a special tugboat in case it broke down, and the plumbing was said to be so bad that most of its toilets didn’t work.

It’s being refitted at Russia’s 35th Ship Repairing Yard in Murmansk and won’t be ready to return until 2021.
https://taskandpurpose.com/russian-aircraft-carrier-admiral-kuznetsov/


"Before it was sent back to the yards for repairs, the Kuznetsov was always accompanied by a special tugboat in case it broke down"

schmug fucked around with this message at 14:43 on Oct 30, 2018

RandomPauI
Nov 24, 2006


Grimey Drawer
Here is a photo of what the inside of the dock looks like, with a typhoon ssbn in it for scale.

GotLag
Jul 17, 2005

食べちゃダメだよ

quote:

Russia’s only aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, is one of the five worst carriers in the world, according to The National Interest.

Are there even 5 non-US carriers?

RandomPauI
Nov 24, 2006


Grimey Drawer
Yes, but most can only handle helicopters.

schmug
May 20, 2007

RandomPauI posted:

Yes, but most can only handle helicopters.

and most were built for WW2. This one was built in the 80's lol

RandomPauI
Nov 24, 2006


Grimey Drawer
Edit: we don't even classify all of our carriers as carriers! We have 20 or so amphibious assault vessels that also launch helicopters, ospreys, and f-35s.

schmug
May 20, 2007

RandomPauI posted:

Here is a photo of what the inside of the dock looks like, with a typhoon ssbn in it for scale.


So I'm guessing they sink it, and then raise it? Article said the power failed to the ballast pumps. That is a serious amount of displacement wtf.

here's a better article:
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/24547/huge-floating-dry-dock-holding-russias-only-aircraft-carrier-has-accidentally-sunk

"Update: 4:00am PST—

The official story, at least as it sits now, is that the pump system that controls the dry dock's buoyancy suddenly lost power causing its ballast tanks to flood with water far past the intended point. As the dry dock quickly submerged, cranes came crashing down onto the Kuznetsov's deck (see below). Supposedly all this happened during a refloating operation for the carrier."




"It's worth noting that Russia has a track record of not admitting the scope of shipyard accidents."

no way!

schmug fucked around with this message at 15:24 on Oct 30, 2018

RandomPauI
Nov 24, 2006


Grimey Drawer
Yeah, the dock takes in water to sink. Then ships sail into the dock. The dock refloats itself by pumping out all the water.

Blackchamber
Jan 25, 2005

schmug posted:

the whole ship is an OSHA tragedy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaR0fC1ncPo

https://taskandpurpose.com/russian-aircraft-carrier-admiral-kuznetsov/


"Before it was sent back to the yards for repairs, the Kuznetsov was always accompanied by a special tugboat in case it broke down"

Iran has a submarine that is the exact same way, and they have to have two tender boats follow it around... so anytime you want to know where their sub is look for them. They've had to be rescued and pulled back to port a couple times. A few years ago they threatened to 'park it off the coast of america'... good luck making it there.

duz
Jul 11, 2005

Come on Ilhan, lets go bag us a shitpost


Blackchamber posted:

Iran has a submarine that is the exact same way, and they have to have two tender boats follow it around... so anytime you want to know where their sub is look for them. They've had to be rescued and pulled back to port a couple times. A few years ago they threatened to 'park it off the coast of america'... good luck making it there.

"Here, you throw this away"

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal
Does the UK still have those ski-jump carriers for launching Harriers?

RandomPauI
Nov 24, 2006


Grimey Drawer
It has two carriers, but one is permanently mothballed and they both were built without catapults so they can only launch helicopters and f-35b's.

They were supposed to have catapults but the Royal Navy didn't think to write the contract to make sure that the carriers would have to be built with them.

Edit: the one carrier is getting mothballed because it was cheaper to build it and let it rot than to cancel the contract or to build and fully staff it.

Skippy McPants
Mar 19, 2009

GotLag posted:

Are there even 5 non-US carriers?

If by the carrier you mean "can do something other than Harriers and Helicopters," then nope! There are only four that can launch and recover non-STVOL planes. One each from France, China, Russia, and India. And of those, only France's Charles de Gaulle has catapults allowing it to launch heavier aircraft and do the whole "force projection" thing. The others are limited to lighter planes and payloads which restrict them to mostly doing air-superiority.

Edit: not that there even need to be more than five, mind you. Bluewater navies are crazy expensive, and not only are carriers the biggest ticket item, but they also don't offer a lot unless you're a major strategic power. Like, carriers are a huge waste of money unless you want to put on a show of being a Big Boy Navy and/or have a huge hardon for bombing brown people in faraway places. It's much easier to just buy a few submarines.

Skippy McPants fucked around with this message at 15:58 on Oct 30, 2018

BlankIsBeautiful
Apr 4, 2008

Feeling a little inadequate?

schmug posted:

and most were built for WW2. This one was built in the 80's lol

And, doesn't it actually still burn coal for the turbines?

RandomPauI
Nov 24, 2006


Grimey Drawer
Not coal, the bunkiest bunker fuel they could fine. It's been refined but not by very much.

Skippy McPants
Mar 19, 2009

Called Mazut apparently. Wiki article says it's basically lovely diesel.

Yawgmoth
Sep 10, 2003

This post is cursed!

BlankIsBeautiful posted:

And, doesn't it actually still burn coal for the turbines?


That is likely the "very problematic propulsion system" mentioned.

Skippy McPants
Mar 19, 2009

Yawgmoth posted:

That is likely the "very problematic propulsion system" mentioned.

lovely construction all around, it seems,

quote:

Furthermore, Admiral Valentin Selivanov said, “From the very beginning, poor quality pipes were installed in her boilers.” The same admiral then went onto describe the Kuznetsov's 1990s sea trials. Due to the problems with the pipes, not all boilers could run at full capacity all the time, and they would often break down. Sometimes the ship was reduced to operating on one boiler, giving it a speed of around 4 knots. These same reliability problems lead to the Russian Navy sending tugs to accompany the Kuznetsov during its 2016 trip to the Syrian coast.

RandomPauI
Nov 24, 2006


Grimey Drawer

Skippy McPants posted:

Called Mazut apparently. Wiki article says it's basically lovely diesel.

That's putting it lightly. It's a step above asphalt, and needs to be heated up in order to flow as a fuel.

SelenicMartian
Sep 14, 2013

Sometimes it's not the bomb that's retarded.

Skippy McPants posted:

Called Mazut apparently. Wiki article says it's basically lovely diesel.
The new regulations on marine fuel sulphur content are going to gently caress Russian "refineries" making this poo poo :allears:

wesleywillis
Dec 30, 2016

SUCK A MALE CAMEL'S DICK WITH MIRACLE WHIP!!

Well good, finally it wasn't the carrier's lovely design at fault.

FuturePastNow
May 19, 2014


https://twitter.com/makhnytskyy/status/798288175487746048

wesleywillis
Dec 30, 2016

SUCK A MALE CAMEL'S DICK WITH MIRACLE WHIP!!
I grew up near the Welland Canal and like history stuff.

I've got at least three direct ancestors, possibly more, that worked on the construction of the fourth (current) canal. Two great grandfathers, one of whom was killed in a construction accident, and one grandfather. Possibly more worked on it, that I don't know about. Also some indirect ancestors worked on it as well.
During construction of the current canal, there were many fatalities. 137 total.
I think that ended up working out to an average of 1 death every two weeks of construction.
One accident, the collapse of one of the lock gates claimed the lives of 10 men.

Here are the stories of a few of the men who died during construction:
https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/news-story/8196392-fallen-workers-last-victim-of-gate-collapse/

https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/news-story/8195300-fallen-workers-worker-died-at-lock-6-gate-collapse/

https://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/news-story/8318740-fall-at-lock-2-results-in-fatal-injury/

http://www.pressreader.com/canada/the-welland-tribune/20171202/281771334516183

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

the PLN did a good job chroming that up

Kith
Sep 17, 2009

You never learn anything
by doing it right.


why are cellphone videos so goddamn large these days

Lurking Haro
Oct 27, 2009


It looks quite safe when it's not running at double speed.

Zopotantor
Feb 24, 2013

...und ist er drin dann lassen wir ihn niemals wieder raus...

Blackchamber posted:

Iran has a submarine that is the exact same way, and they have to have two tender boats follow it around... so anytime you want to know where their sub is look for them. They've had to be rescued and pulled back to port a couple times. A few years ago they threatened to 'park it off the coast of america'... good luck making it there.

They could just just send the two tenders...

cakesmith handyman
Jul 22, 2007

Pip-Pip old chap! Last one in is a rotten egg what what.

Zopotantor posted:

They could just just send the two tenders...

Retire the submarine and just self pairs of tenders in random directions

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

schmug posted:

BBC News - Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov damaged by crane

They came back for a revenge

SLOSifl
Aug 10, 2002


Nenonen posted:

They came back for a revenge

I love the idea of a bird landing on the carrier and it just sinking instantly.

Blackchamber
Jan 25, 2005

Zopotantor posted:

They could just just send the two tenders...

cakesmith handyman posted:

Retire the submarine and just self pairs of tenders in random directions

And then how would the world know how great Iran's navy is? They are trying to build 'stealth subs' now, and they have over 30 other submarines but like... who knows how many of those work?

EDIT: We encountered it on deployment and I had to keep asking our aircraft to please leave it alone as it was inside territorial waters of a mutually neutral friendly-ish country. We routinely photograph other nations naval ships etc. but they were just doing donuts around the three ships and overflying it.

Blackchamber fucked around with this message at 22:04 on Oct 30, 2018

Azathoth
Apr 3, 2001

SLOSifl posted:

I love the idea of a bird landing on the carrier and it just sinking instantly.

Crane lands on the side of the carrier, settles down to take a nap. Ship begins to slowly list in that direction until a crew member notices and frantically runs to the opposite side to counterbalance, but goes too far and the ship starts listing the other way. Eventually, most of the crew is running back and forth trying to keep the ship from rolling over as the captain frantically shouts directions over the ship's intercom.

Splicer
Oct 16, 2006

from hell's heart I cast at thee
🧙🐀🧹🌙🪄🐸

Azathoth posted:

Crane lands on the side of the carrier, settles down to take a nap. Ship begins to slowly list in that direction until a crew member notices and frantically runs to the opposite side to counterbalance, but goes too far and the ship starts listing the other way. Eventually, most of the crew is running back and forth trying to keep the ship from rolling over as the captain frantically shouts directions over the ship's intercom.
The bird gets annoyed and leaves, which if anything makes things worse.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Phanatic
Mar 13, 2007

Please don't forget that I am an extremely racist idiot who also has terrible opinions about the Culture series.

Skippy McPants posted:

Called Mazut apparently. Wiki article says it's basically lovely diesel.

Not really.

quote:

For shipment purposes, this product is considered a ”dirty oil” product, and because viscosity drastically affect whether it is able to be pumped, shipping has unique requirements. Mazut is much like Number 6 Oil (Bunker C), and is part of the products left over after gasoline and lighter components are evaporated from the crude oil.

It's heavy fuel oil, it's like diesel in that both of them are petroleum products and that's about it. The stuff's more like pitch than like diesel, it doesn't even pump right unless you heat it to 35-40C.



Here's how it pours on a good day:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnwSua-IGTs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply