|
Instant Sunrise posted:The sacrificial lamb republicans in deeply democratic districts are some of the most absolute balls out crazy motherfuckers. I can confirm from prior experience that Republican candidates in purple states are oftentimes just as crazy. It turns out that conspiracy theorizing racist wingnuts make up a large fraction of the GOP, and this is true across the country.
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2018 06:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 20:07 |
|
|
 On the 91, paying for Fastrak, in a Prius. With a Yes on 6 sticker. Aeka 2.0 fucked around with this message at 03:14 on Nov 2, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 03:12
|
|
Have you seen my apex seals? I seem to have lost them.
|
I still don't get why people black out identifying info. The guy's in a public location with a big bumper sticker. gently caress him.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 03:27
|
|
|
Sundae posted:I still don't get why people black out identifying info. The guy's in a public location with a big bumper sticker. gently caress him. I had the same thought, but some motherfucker somewhere may drill down and may doxx. What I'm saying is Derek Smart spooked me a bit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 03:56
|
|
|
There's not much you can do with someone's plate, either. And yet you'll hand your credit card to wait staff who then walk off somewhere with it. Maybe let them see your ID, too.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 04:05
|
|
|
Maybe because some people actually respect others privacy even if they disagree with them And people thought republicans were the ones trying to eradicate privacy
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 04:10
|
|
|
Your license plate is not private. It's on the outside of your car!
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 04:12
|
|
|
LeoMarr posted:Maybe because some people actually respect others privacy even if they disagree with them heh, so much for the tolerant left. take that libs. also Leperflesh posted:Your license plate is not private. It's on the outside of your car!
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 04:13
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:Your license plate is not private. It's on the outside of your car! your address is also outside so that means its okay post it on the internet right
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 04:13
|
|
|
In general it's best practice to edit out personally identifying information, since there's always the chance that some unhinged lurker will put on their internet detective hat and start harassing someone. I doubt anyone gives that much of a poo poo about a prius' bumper sticker, but it's best to err on the side of caution.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 04:18
|
|
|
LeoMarr posted:your address is also outside so that means its okay post it on the internet right It is 100% legal to take a picture of a house, complete with address, and publish it. Note: google maps does this for virtually every address in the world. Addresses, like license plates, are public information.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 05:12
|
|
|
Just because something is legal doesn’t mean it is ethical.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 05:30
|
|
|
Why is Lowtax running for LA County Assessor?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 05:49
|
|
|
Doxxing is poo poo, don't do it. Sign them up for embarrassing poo poo or mail them a glitter surprise instead
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 05:50
|
|
|
oh sorry I must have missed where that car photo had the owner's name, or even a picture of their face, or any other identifying information A picture of a car with the plate showing is not doxxing someone, nor is a photo of a house with the street number. And there's really nothing unethical about it either. What exactly do you think you can do with a random car's plate? I guess you could file a false police report, which will slightly waste someone's time?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 05:58
|
|
|
ponzicar posted:In general it's best practice to edit out personally identifying information, since there's always the chance that some unhinged lurker will put on their internet detective hat and start harassing someone. This. I targeted this car. If I took a pic of myself and there were visible plates behind me I would not black them out. Nuances. Really though, that freeway sucks and is getting project funds from sb1, then having a Prius where they wont feel the tax along with being part of the shortfall problem of road funding by not buying enough gas. It's just weird, man. Oh and death to prop 13. Aeka 2.0 fucked around with this message at 06:15 on Nov 2, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 06:11
|
|
|
ponzicar posted:In general it's best practice to edit out personally identifying information, since there's always the chance that some unhinged lurker will put on their internet detective hat and start harassing someone. Who the gently caress cares? Let them deal with the consequences of being horrible humans in public. Last time I checked, nobody puts a bumper sticker on their car for personal enjoyment in the quiet of their home. Goddamned Leomarr posted:Maybe because some people actually respect others privacy even if they disagree with them How are you so regularly such a complete poo poo-for-brains? The mind boggles. quote:Oh and death to prop 13. Something we can all agree on. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 06:55
|
|
|
OH MY GOD https://www.google.com/search?q=traffic&tbm=isch looook at all these doxxed people!!! Someone should sue google, this is monstrous a bunch of those photos are from newspapers! Ok OK I'll leave it alone, and I'm sorry for being such a dick about it. It's not unreasonable to blur a plate just to be polite or something, but I also think if your personal info is traceable from your license plate (and it more or less is limited to a name and address, depending on the state and whether you're willing to pay an agency and/or lie on a form) then that ship has sailed because you drive around and everyone can see it, and the only remedy is to make the government keep that info private. So it's unnecessary, and if you don't blur you have not transgressed legally or really ethically unless you are also specifically calling for people to find this person for nefarious or harrassment reasons.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 07:17
|
|
|
Leperflesh, quit being pedantic. Disseminating the personal information of people you don't like, regardless of general availability, is harassment and it's lovely and it's immoral. Anyone who does it is a 100% certified fuckface. In this day and age pretty much every imaginable fact about you is accessible to someone, regardless of whether you realized you were making that information "public" or not, and Internet privacy is a serious concern. There's a huge difference between driving behind someone in traffic and taking a picture of their car to show to people who hate them.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 07:23
|
|
|
In other news, every Yes on 6 jackass I've talked to complains about the extra $50 it's gonna take to fill their tank each year. Then they complain about the bullet train.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 08:15
|
|
|
Glass of Milk posted:In other news, every Yes on 6 jackass I've talked to complains about the extra $50 it's gonna take to fill their tank each year. Then they complain about the bullet train. yeah its obvious the next thing on 2020 ballot is republican funded prop to defund bullet train and ~fund roadzz with it~ they are already working on that, so its gunna be on it since money can buy whatever. just a question if it'll pass and well, it's possible since the train didn't miraculously materialize in 10 years ergo its a boondoggle that must be stopped.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 09:25
|
|
|
What is it about that project that makes conservatives poo poo themselves in anger at the mere mention of it?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 15:14
|
|
|
Instant Sunrise posted:What is it about that project that makes conservatives poo poo themselves in anger at the mere mention of it? It's a large government expense that requires a lot of eminent domain of property that runs through a very conservative and agrarian area. All for the purpose of linking a bunch of liberal urban areas together. It plays to their base incredibly well to throw a fit about it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 15:47
|
|
|
Also, I just paid $89,000 for this lifted crew cab F-350 that gets 9.2mpg so my tax dollars should go to building me more roads to drive on, not some candyass hippie train
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 15:50
|
|
|
yeah the plans are already in motion and will definitely show up 2020, since again, money can buy any signature for anything (see we had that prop for parental notification of abortions like 6 years in a row that just kept getting shot down, fundies eventually gave up tho) https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2018/09/25/high-speed-rail-2020-ballot-measure-gas-tax-repeal-supporters/
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 15:53
|
|
|
Instant Sunrise posted:What is it about that project that makes conservatives poo poo themselves in anger at the mere mention of it? defunding trains triggers the libs
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 16:40
|
|
|
quote:The 2020 plan is the next step in their effort. It would change the state Constitution to require revenue from existing gas taxes be spent only for road and bridge work, not transit, bicycle infrastructure or planning. The Republican Party is a death cult. E: https://mobile.twitter.com/Rep_Hunter/status/1052271841782505472 The Wiggly Wizard fucked around with this message at 16:50 on Nov 2, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 16:48
|
|
|
Shear Modulus posted:defunding trains triggers the libs Ironically I think most liberals in California’s thought about the project is “huh. that’s neat.” and then go on with their lives. It’s the conservatives who never stop being angry about trains for some reason. Tbh though at this point I’m basically supporting the project to trigger republicans.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:02
|
|
|
I'm really super disappointed in Kevin De Leon, that fucker just gave up and stopped campaigning. Still voted for him but JFC, he was not the right candidate for the job.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:03
|
|
|
Could we run a "actually even more money for more trains" ballot initiative for the same election as they run the "cut money for trains" initiative, just to really shove trains down their loving throats?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:07
|
|
|
Megaman's Jockstrap posted:I'm really super disappointed in Kevin De Leon, that fucker just gave up and stopped campaigning. Still voted for him but JFC, he was not the right candidate for the job.  he came out of the primary with a ton of momentum and then did absolutely nothing with it. He was always a long shot but he torpedoed any slim chance he might have had via apathy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:08
|
|
|
Let's try to make every single proposition about trains in 2020. Where will they go? How fast will they get there? Who will fund them? All good questions, that can be answered by a very confusingly-worded series of propositions that are written with the intent to include the word "trains" as many times as possible. Proposition 17: Train-to-Train Transfers via High Speed Railway (Trains!)
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:09
|
|
|
Instant Sunrise posted:What is it about that project that makes conservatives poo poo themselves in anger at the mere mention of it? Conservatives are anti social rejects
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:09
|
|
|
Megaman's Jockstrap posted:Let's try to make every single proposition about trains in 2020. Where will they go? How fast will they get there? Who will fund them? All good questions, that can be answered by a very confusingly-worded series of propositions that are written with the intent to include the word "trains" as many times as possible. Proposition 17: Train-to-Train Transfers via High Speed Railway (Trains!) I will sponsor and begin signature collection on the "replace every road with a train" initiative, which will write into the California constitution that effective immediately, every road is now a right-of-way for rail, and the state shall allocate all funding necessary to tear up every inch of asphalt and replace it with gleaming, shiny rails from border to border. I think making it an unfunded mandate makes it even more fun.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:13
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:I will sponsor and begin signature collection on the "replace every road with a train" initiative, which will write into the California constitution that effective immediately, every road is now a right-of-way for rail, and the state shall allocate all funding necessary to tear up every inch of asphalt and replace it with gleaming, shiny rails from border to border. Streetcars everywhere? Sign me up. Toot-toot!
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:15
|
|
|
This new proposition helps rehabilitate our underfunded public transportation AND soothes my autism!!! win-win bitch!!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:18
|
|
|
I'm a big ol' lefty and I still think the bullet train is kinda dumb
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:20
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:I think making it an unfunded mandate makes it even more fun. Nah you write that it'll be funded by the state seizing the means of production from the capitalist bourgeois pigs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:20
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:I will sponsor and begin signature collection on the "replace every road with a train" initiative, which will write into the California constitution that effective immediately, every road is now a right-of-way for rail, and the state shall allocate all funding necessary to tear up every inch of asphalt and replace it with gleaming, shiny rails from border to border. As long as you make the official state board game "Ticket To Ride" you have my vote.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 20:07 |
|
|
Leperflesh posted:I will sponsor and begin signature collection on the "replace every road with a train" initiative, which will write into the California constitution that effective immediately, every road is now a right-of-way for rail, and the state shall allocate all funding necessary to tear up every inch of asphalt and replace it with gleaming, shiny rails from border to border. Ah, the SimCity 1 strategy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2018 19:22
|
|
