Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.
When Obama runs for president in 2020 that's really going to hurt him.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Glad you acknowledge that won't really hurt Sanders.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

The Muppets On PCP posted:

lol he's not even selecting quotes, he's straight up fabricating them

for example this line


is from a budget committee debate from last november. the last two sentences appear nowhere in the official transcript nor the video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xa9PasV0Qoc&t=240s

LT2012 do you have anything to say about this?

Oh Snapple!
Dec 27, 2005

The only reason it was a dumb thing to say is that he made a statement on ingrained racism while being too :decorum: to actually refer to it as ingrained racism.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Nonsense posted:

Glad you acknowledge that won't really hurt Sanders.

I doubt it will hurt Sanders at all. But Obama's Special Olympics joke is different than Bernie's statement because one was a dumb wording of a joke and the other is about a political strategy/view of voters.

Either way, I doubt this has any real impact. But, it does "mean" more than Obama's comment because it is a statement of policy/strategy and not a joke.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Jaxyon posted:

That doesn't address what he said:

How does it not address what he said? Was he supposed to say, "The people who voted for these racist candidates are racist themselves?" Because that seems like a pretty politically dumb move.

quote:

It was a dumb thing to say.

It was indeed a dumb thing to say. I'm glad he clarified what he meant quickly and called those campaigns out for being racist.

ded redd
Aug 1, 2010

by Fluffdaddy

The Muppets On PCP posted:

lol he's not even selecting quotes, he's straight up fabricating them

Lightning Knight posted:

LT2012 do you have anything to say about this?

Sweet deja vu.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.
LOL if anyone Bernie said that several people would be losing their poo poo.

Also LOL at "if bernie wasn't an old pasty white guy" but he is.

He's doing the same thing as any other white dude who doesn't want to say that white people are racist, in the hopes of getting those white people to vote for him. He deserves to be criticized for it. It's a bad look.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Lightning Knight posted:

LT2012 do you have anything to say about this?

It was a copy and paste from https://ourfuture.org/ which is Bernie's PAC.

The other one was literally a twitter embed from Bernie Sanders' official twitter.

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 03:27 on Nov 9, 2018

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Majorian posted:

How does it not address what he said? Was he supposed to say, "The people who voted for these racist candidates are racist themselves?" Because that seems like a pretty politically dumb move.

I'm sure that apologizing for racist white people as an old white dude plays great with nonwhite people. I'm sure the people who were very upset about how Warren affected the electorally insignificant amount of indigenous voters are very concerned about this.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Jaxyon posted:

LOL if anyone Bernie said that several people would be losing their poo poo.

Also LOL at "if bernie wasn't an old pasty white guy" but he is.

He's doing the same thing as any other white dude who doesn't want to say that white people are racist, in the hopes of getting those white people to vote for him. He deserves to be criticized for it. It's a bad look.

Indeed, calling those voters a basket of deplorables is the smart move.

Jaxyon posted:

I'm sure that apologizing for racist white people as an old white dude plays great with nonwhite people. I'm sure the people who were very upset about how Warren affected the electorally insignificant amount of indigenous voters are very concerned about this.

Bri Gray seemed okay with his clarification. I know she doesn't represent all non-white people, but you seem to be the only person here who thinks this is a huge deal.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Majorian posted:

Indeed, calling those voters a basket of deplorables is the smart move.

No, it was also a dumb move, but by all means we need more Hillary chat in this thread.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.
Really, all I'm asking for is a clear "this was bad, I hope it doesn't hurt him and I hope he loving learns"

But people are double standardizing the poo poo out of this because it's Bernie.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Jaxyon posted:

No, it was also a dumb move, but by all means we need more Hillary chat in this thread.

I'm actually trying to get you to tell us what you think would have been the right way for Bernie to atone for his initial mistake. Clearly you're not happy with how he followed up.

Jaxyon posted:

Really, all I'm asking for is a clear "this was bad, I hope it doesn't hurt him and I hope he loving learns"

But people are double standardizing the poo poo out of this because it's Bernie.

Everyone here is acknowledging that it was bad. It's almost certainly not going to hurt him.:psyduck:

Oh Snapple!
Dec 27, 2005

*people consistently call it a dumb statement to make*

"God you people literally won't say anything negative."

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Majorian posted:

I'm actually trying to get you to tell us what you think would have been the right way for Bernie to atone for his initial mistake. Clearly you're not happy with how he followed up.

His mistake was saying that voters who didn't vote a black man because he was black weren't racist.

He apologized by saying the campaigns that were run against the black man was were racist.

I'd like him to apologize for trying to cover for white racism. I doubt it will happen. I'd still probably vote for Bernie, but a fuckup is a fuckup and trying to bring up Hillary and Obama to deflect is some weak sauce.

Oh Snapple!
Dec 27, 2005

He literally describes how they were racist.

The statement is, literally, "Ingrained Racism 101."

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
I think Bernie generally believes that his "color-blind" view of class/economics is right and he's spent 30+ years appealing to a 99% white electorate in Vermont.

I agree that if anyone else had said the same thing, that some of the same people would be flipping their poo poo. But, I don't think there is any genuine malice in Bernie's statement. Just normal political calculation and a gaffe.

People can make racist or racially insensitive statements out of ignorance, but without malice. But, it is still a very bad way to view/phrase it.

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 03:37 on Nov 9, 2018

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Oh Snapple! posted:

He literally describes how they were racist.

The statement is, literally, "Ingrained Racism 101."

“I think you know there are a lot of white folks out there who are not necessarily racist who felt uncomfortable for the first time in their lives about whether or not they wanted to vote for an African-American,”

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.
At the risk of agreeing with LT2012, yes Bernie has always been a "if we solve class we solve race" type. It's one of his weak points.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Jaxyon posted:

I'd like him to apologize for trying to cover for white racism.

How would he say that? "I apologize for trying to cover for white racism"? Too vague. "I was wrong, the people who voted for those candidates are racist"? Self-defeating.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Majorian posted:

How would he say that? "I apologize for trying to cover for white racism"? Too vague. "I was wrong, the people who voted for those candidates are racist"? Self-defeating.

Maybe by addressing the problematic thing he said in his apology?

I guess it's impossible to apologize for saying racist people aren't racist? That's neat.

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The idea is that giving through ActBlue instead of directly to a candidate's campaign is that ActBlue will create a "community" of small-dollar donors and allow smaller donors to easily make contributions to a wider variety of candidates. You can leverage small dollar donor contributions into something more impactful by having $11 million in contributions from small dollar donors spread out to multiple candidates.

https://blog.actblue.com/

They also have a bunch of psychological and marketing features to increase donations like:

- Saving payment information, so you can one-click donations to individuals or groups to increase "impulse" donations.
- Social media aspects where you can communicate with people and they can see how much you've given.
- People can make "groups" that spread donations out over multiple causes and candidates to attract like minded people.

ActBlue was a huge thing in the Daily Kos-era for getting people involved and fundraising from small donors.

kosmedia, a for-profit corp, used to have its actblue vig as 50 percent of political contributions, too, lol... till people kept pointing it out.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Jaxyon posted:

Maybe by addressing the problematic thing he said in his apology?

I guess it's impossible to apologize for saying racist people aren't racist? That's neat.

I'm not saying it's impossible; I'm just not seeing a way for him to say, "I'm sorry for calling racist voters not racist" that doesn't seriously hurt his chances of being elected. There's a reason why I brought up the "basket of deplorables" line - it wasn't to get a sick burn in on Hillary. The clarification he issued is pretty much the best thing you could hope for from a serious candidate.

The Muppets On PCP
Nov 13, 2016

by Fluffdaddy

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

It was a copy and paste from https://ourfuture.org/ which is Bernie's PAC.

The other one was literally a twitter embed from Bernie Sanders' official twitter.

caf isn't bernie's pac, it was founded in the mid-90s and the guy who wrote that article you quoted has no listed affiliation with sanders

and the phrase "kitchen table" has never appeared in any of sanders' tweets, unless you have access to deleted tweets which include the phrase

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

The Muppets On PCP posted:

caf isn't bernie's pac, it was founded in the mid-90s and the guy who wrote that article you quoted has no listed affiliation with sanders

and the phrase "kitchen table" has never appeared in any of sanders' tweets, unless you have access to deleted tweets which include the phrase

My bad. You are actually right.

I mixed up "Our Future" with "Our Revolution." Both of them are progressive political groups, use the same Bernie font and colors, and have transcripts of Bernie speeches.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Majorian posted:

I'm not saying it's impossible; I'm just not seeing a way for him to say, "I'm sorry for calling racist voters not racist" that doesn't seriously hurt his chances of being elected. There's a reason why I brought up the "basket of deplorables" line - it wasn't to get a sick burn in on Hillary. The clarification he issued is pretty much the best thing you could hope for from a serious candidate.

There's also the radical option of not saying that.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Jaxyon posted:

There's also the radical option of not saying that.

Yes, everyone here is in agreement that he should not have said that.

Oh Snapple!
Dec 27, 2005

I mean that's the actual problem - that he described ingrained racism while not actually calling it as such, because he literally can't as a national-level politician. Which is why he shouldn't have opened his mouth to begin with. His statement was broadly correct but it's a no-win situation. He either straight-up says that all white people carry ingrained racism, which no politician who ever wants to win anything again is gonna do, or goes the decorum route as he did here to try to make the point without causing offense and ends up annoying and deflating folks who correctly identify the described behavior as racist and want it acknowledged because, morally speaking, it deserves to be. It was an immensely dumb situation to put himself in. Something that can be recovered from, most likely, but still dumb.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Oh Snapple! posted:

I mean that's the actual problem - that he described ingrained racism while not actually calling it as such, because he literally can't as a national-level politician. Which is why he shouldn't have opened his mouth to begin with. His statement was broadly correct but it's a no-win situation. He either straight-up says that all white people carry ingrained racism, which no politician who ever wants to win anything again is gonna do, or goes the decorum route as he did here to try to make the point without causing offense and ends up annoying and deflating folks who correctly identify the described behavior as racist and want it acknowledged because, morally speaking, it deserves to be. It was an immensely dumb situation to put himself in. Something that can be recovered from, most likely, but still dumb.

Yeah, it's not going to affect his 2020 chances, he just needs to not do that again.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Oh Snapple! posted:

I mean that's the actual problem - that he described ingrained racism while not actually calling it as such, because he literally can't as a national-level politician. Which is why he shouldn't have opened his mouth to begin with. His statement was broadly correct but it's a no-win situation. He either straight-up says that all white people carry ingrained racism, which no politician who ever wants to win anything again is gonna do, or goes the decorum route as he did here to try to make the point without causing offense and ends up annoying and deflating folks who correctly identify the described behavior as racist and want it acknowledged because, morally speaking, it deserves to be. It was an immensely dumb situation to put himself in. Something that can be recovered from, most likely, but still dumb.

That's all I want.

How quickly this got brushed off in this thread versus if like, Biden had said it, doesn't sit well with me. Great Man hagiography helps nobody, I want people's flaws paid attention to.

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

You were just asking questions, that's all.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

not a cult posted:

You were just asking questions, that's all.

Yes I am secretly a Hillary shill deep embedded to besmirch the name of Bernie. No dissent can be tolerated.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Jaxyon posted:

That's all I want.

How quickly this got brushed off in this thread versus if like, Biden had said it, doesn't sit well with me.

That's because Biden's actual record on race relations is considerably worse than Bernie's.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

I'm glad that Bernie is the acknowledged front runner.

Piell
Sep 3, 2006

Grey Worm's Ken doll-like groin throbbed with the anticipatory pleasure that only a slightly warm and moist piece of lemoncake could offer


Young Orc
Bernie will would have won

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

Jaxyon posted:

Yes I am secretly a Hillary shill deep embedded to besmirch the name of Bernie. No dissent can be tolerated.

Dude, I remember your posting from previous threads, it's pretty obvious your "just asking questions" shtick is bullshit.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

not a cult posted:

Dude, I remember your posting from previous threads, it's pretty obvious your "just asking questions" shtick is bullshit.

Nope. Feel free to dig up previous posts. I say what I mean.

I voted for Bernie in the primary, I just don't like it when people are dumb about the people they like.

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

Then it's a good thing nobody's being dumb about him, except you, comparing him to Biden.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

Majorian posted:

How does it not address what he said? Was he supposed to say, "The people who voted for these racist candidates are racist themselves?" Because that seems like a pretty politically dumb move.

This isn't really an excuse; that just means he shouldn't have said anything at all. I would strongly steer clear of "he had no choice for political reasons" as an excuse for politicians, but it's usually a bad one.

Majorian posted:

Indeed, calling those voters a basket of deplorables is the smart move.

This is actually worse than the basket of deplorables thing, in that the stuff Hillary was saying during that quote was actually technically true and just sounded bad. In this case Sanders is actually just wrong when he tries to downplay people not voting for Abrams/Gillum based on race as "not being racist."

I mean, it's obviously not some disqualifying thing in context of 2020 candidates or anything, but it was definitely a bad thing to say.

Jaxyon posted:

At the risk of agreeing with LT2012, yes Bernie has always been a "if we solve class we solve race" type. It's one of his weak points.

This isn't really true; his views on this have changed over the years and he's now at least as good as any other Democrats on the issue.

Ytlaya fucked around with this message at 04:35 on Nov 9, 2018

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5