|
xzzy posted:Are you sure the person asking the question isn't their dummy account getting used to trigger an excuse to brag about their equipment lineup? It’s a really small group in the UK and I can tell from looking at his profile he’s 100% legit.
|
#
?
Oct 26, 2018 19:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 10:05 |
|
|
Saw this guy spamming some of the groups I'm in, advertising/looking for more models. The photos themselves, "in context," aren't the worst in terms of technical skill, but holy poo poo everything else is just 100% creeper alert. Every alarm goes off, and I'm filled with cringe. Maybe he's a stand-up guy, but all I can think of is Terry Richardson and people like him. Warning some NSFW stuff, even though it's Instagram censored: https://instagram.com/777.studioscanada/
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 18:48
|
|
|
ianskate posted:Saw this guy spamming some of the groups I'm in, advertising/looking for more models. The photos themselves, "in context," aren't the worst in terms of technical skill, but holy poo poo everything else is just 100% creeper alert. Every alarm goes off, and I'm filled with cringe. Maybe he's a stand-up guy, but all I can think of is Terry Richardson and people like him. quote:My raw shots go (I say farewell to them) & weave a story. I review pizzas on YouTube (PizzaExpert) & catch child predators online- CreeperHunterTV.com    https://www.instagram.com/p/BoYOqOuHDG0/  Probably a serial killer: https://www.instagram.com/p/BoYOM1InsaQ/ Wow, good at both convincing women to do nude and/or fetish modeling shoots and catching pedos? This guy really is good at luring people in.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 21:13
|
|
|
pseudorandom posted:Probably a serial killer: It takes one to know one, I guess... so he knows who to call out when he sees it. I'm actually concerned that he might be worth reporting, but no clue what Canadian laws are like. He creates fake profiles of underaged girls and thinks it's creepy when people send them dick pics? I mean sure, yeah it is, but you're also a creep for doing it. Don't think two wrongs make a right... leave that to lawn enforcement. ianskate fucked around with this message at 22:03 on Oct 29, 2018 |
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 22:01
|
|
|
There are a number of vigilante "to catch a predator" types in canada that call themselves creep catchers. not sure why this guy is doing it, doesn't seem to want to report the offenders. says he creates the profiles "because it's an escape"???
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 22:27
|
|
|
polyester concept posted:There are a number of vigilante "to catch a predator" types in canada that call themselves creep catchers. not sure why this guy is doing it, doesn't seem to want to report the offenders. says he creates the profiles "because it's an escape"??? Interesting! I suppose that sort of thing makes sense in the northern areas where there are less people, not too many ways to prevent deviant behavior from popping up, so it's vigilante justice. Anyhow, his Instagram journey is terrifying when combined with what he does "for a living," aside from reviewing pizzas, which as a Canadian, his options must be limited somewhat.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2018 22:34
|
|
|
#impliednude (draws big rectangle over half the image). You keep using that word, I'm not sure that it means what you think it does.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2018 06:23
|
|
|
Don't be a knob. *Shoots pictures of doorknobs with out of focus model in the background*
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2018 20:41
|
|
|
Anyone interested in some old enlarging paper? Here's a photo of the packages. Not sure how fresh it is so selling as is.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2018 21:17
|
|
|
Must admit that took me a moment.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2018 23:54
|
|
|
That's why I always ask if I can open up the packages to inspect the paper before buying anything.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2018 06:02
|
|
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/photography/comments/9tw802/is_it_bad_to_turn_vibrance_all_the_way_up_in/
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2018 02:19
|
|
|
If even your mom says your pictures look fake then something is definitely off.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2018 03:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2018 05:28
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2018 10:45
|
|
|
 I'm the ghost.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 00:24
|
|
|
Hmm... I’m the car grill on the wall.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 00:31
|
|
|
I'm the willing to look up a technique on google but lacking the dedication to do it well.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 00:39
|
|
|
xzzy posted:I'm the willing to look up a technique on google but lacking the dedication to do it well. Don’t copy my style bro
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 01:37
|
|
|
 President Donald J. Trump Arrives at Joint Base Andrews by The White House, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 18:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 18:53
|
|
|
Doggles posted:
What the actual gently caress, how have they gotten even worse. What can we expect by the end of his presidency? Is the photographer actually an AI taking random photos trying to learn how build an algorithm to shoot like the average person with a cell phone?
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 20:11
|
|
|
Photographer probably just trying to keep their distance and avoid getting Acosta'd.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 21:47
|
|
|
The DOF in that picture looks weird to me, is it a fake phone pic?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 00:52
|
|
|
It’s the reality distortion field that potus emanates.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 00:53
|
|
|
There are so many terrible photos on that Flickr account. Hard to imagine they’re worse than shots I take. Crazy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 03:26
|
|
|
Thom12255 posted:The DOF in that picture looks weird to me, is it a fake phone pic? Now that I'm looking at it, is that door in the foreground fake? The opening is obviously much lower than the opened door in the background.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 06:42
|
|
|
pseudorandom posted:Now that I'm looking at it, is that door in the foreground fake? The opening is obviously much lower than the opened door in the background. I think it’s smaller cause it’s the emergency door over the wing
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2018 07:59
|
|
|
aricoarena posted:I think it’s smaller cause it’s the emergency door over the wing 
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2018 08:32
|
|
|
Doggles posted:
I love how all the perspective lines lead you right into the loving edge of the photo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2018 08:57
|
|
|
KinkyJohn posted:I love how all the perspective lines lead you right into the loving edge of the photo. The perspective lines are leading exactly where the viewer wants to look in this image though, which is away from this image somewhere else.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2018 14:59
|
|
|
KinkyJohn posted:I love how all the perspective lines lead you right into the loving edge of the photo. Those tiny helicopters were the real subject, the plane is just an OOF framing trick. Totally intentional, isn't it obvious? True fine art
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2018 15:07
|
|
|
poo poo. I feel so stupid now. We must never speak of this. Mods, please delete all posts having to do with the actually brilliant air force one picture. poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2018 15:19
|
|
|
It’s okay there are several back of head photos to redeem it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2018 19:15
|
|
|
KinkyJohn posted:I love how all the perspective lines lead you right into the loving edge of the photo. You are looking at it wrong. This is how the image should be viewed. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2018 02:40
|
|
|
I like to imagine that Shealah Craighead (the White House photog who seems to take most of the bad shots that get shared) just hates being a photographer for POTUS DJT and always goes for the lowest effort compositions as a passive protest. But recently the WH page has had more stuff by Andrea Hanks, who seems to try just ever so slightly harder...although she was the one who took the pictures of Melania in Giza, so still a mixed bag.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2018 04:00
|
|
|
So does anyone know why they have such bad photographers? Are they long time Trump favorites or tied to him in some way, or has somehow no one noticed how poo poo the photos are? I would think (and genuinely hope) that anyone could see the quality difference between what White House photographers have accomplished in the past and what is coming out now. I mean the most recent one, Pete Souza did great work and you could take the worst of his output next to the “best” of what is currently being taken and easily spot the difference.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2018 04:20
|
|
|
'Trump administration routinely hires people who are bad at their jobs' is a perennial headline for pretty much anything. As I understand it, the official photographers don't get any special access or any way to cut around the crowds, they are corralled off with the rest of the entourage and have to find whatever angles they can from the main crowd. Trump relies more on random staffers with phones to document the daily business of his administration instead. That's why you had those terrible photos of Melania's Christmas decorations last year, they were just iPhone snaps from her spokeswoman. ianskate posted:Those tiny helicopters were the real subject, the plane is just an OOF framing trick. Totally intentional, isn't it obvious? True fine art I don't know if you were being serious here, but this is actually true. The caption says "Marine One with President Donald J. Trump aboard approaches for a landing at Joint Base Andrews, Md. Thursday, Nov. 1, 2018, for President Trump’s Air Force One flight to Columbia, Mo. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)" So yes, those tiny helicopters were actually the subject and the huge, blurry aircraft taking up 80% of the frame is just there for 'context'.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2018 04:52
|
|
|
rio posted:So does anyone know why they have such bad photographers? Are they long time Trump favorites or tied to him in some way, or has somehow no one noticed how poo poo the photos are? I would think (and genuinely hope) that anyone could see the quality difference between what White House photographers have accomplished in the past and what is coming out now. I mean the most recent one, Pete Souza did great work and you could take the worst of his output next to the “best” of what is currently being taken and easily spot the difference. White House photographer is a 4/8 year gig at most unless you're Pete Souza, and while it is normally quite a feather in one's cap, I don't think the photographers of Pete Souza's caliber in the world were exactly lining up to have "collaborator for the Trump regime" stamped on their resumes for the rest of their life. Also as noted Trump limits access for the official photographer much more than previous presidents, and she's also probably smart enough to realize that Trump's orange skin is thin enough that anything that's not a bland mediocre photo - a photo that could possibly be perceived as casting him in a negative light - would get her instantly shitcanned. Luckily for her she seems to have the bland mediocre photography part down pat.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2018 06:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 10:05 |
|
|
I get your point, but would you rather be known as 'that poo poo photographer who worked for a nazi' or 'that great photographer who worked for a nazi?
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2018 21:45
|
|