Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Young Freud posted:

Rest of the world, not so much...

I really need to stop working on dystopian fiction. It always seems to foreshadow the real world a little too closely...


This is pretty cool imo. Does NEU also control North Africa?

e:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


chuck todd is worse than useless. that clip with elijah cummings was coming else.

edit: probably linked already but hoo boy is he a piece of poo poo dumbass.

https://twitter.com/mattshuham/status/1066772199124684801

Phi230
Feb 2, 2016

by Fluffdaddy
Whoo boy who thought that the mask would slip this fast and in such a racist direction

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

Squalid posted:

Well then I guess it’s a good thing Trump is bringing heavy industry back to America!

this is remarkably demonstrative of the pathology at play.

the idea is not that "these jobs can be done safely." the technocrat assumes, inherently, that -someone- has to die in order to maintain the current pricing regime. to him, the only question is who we're going to kill to keep his slacks cheap.

and the best defense he can offer is smugly offering "well, what if we started killing white people instead, huh, smart guy?"

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

Fulchrum posted:

So your problem is that it isn't addressing the very real possibility of China once more finding the monkey king who will provide all the wealth they need?

...what? The state of China and other Asian countries today is directly due to fuckery by European empires and the United States, and today we benefit from modern colonialism in the form of cheap sweatshop labor. If you look at that and say "well it technically has increased their standard of living" and not "wow this is super hosed up we should do something to make sure nobody has to be poor anymore" maybe you're a bad person.

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything

1glitch0 posted:

Dude has been terrible for like 15 years. He was writing dumb trash before the Iraq invasion.

His tweeting has gotten a lot better recently.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


didn't matty y delete all his tweets cuz he got doxed? kind of a weird reaction. it's not like that undoxes you.

Phi230
Feb 2, 2016

by Fluffdaddy

Lightning Knight posted:

...what? The state of China and other Asian countries today is directly due to fuckery by European empires and the United States, and today we benefit from modern colonialism in the form of cheap sweatshop labor. If you look at that and say "well it technically has increased their standard of living" and not "wow this is super hosed up we should do something to make sure nobody has to be poor anymore" maybe you're a bad person.

I'm thinking here that his random racist tirade very thinly masked as criticism of people to his left is a pretty big signal of this tbh

volts5000
Apr 7, 2009

It's electric. Boogie woogie woogie.
Great! Ana Maria Salazar was just on CNN and stated, matter of factly, that the caravan that's at the border was obviously funded by "a man who has aligned himself against the president" but didn't say Soros. Wasn't questioned on it at all!

volts5000 fucked around with this message at 23:21 on Nov 25, 2018

Calibanibal
Aug 25, 2015

Fulchrum posted:

So your problem is that it isn't addressing the very real possibility of China once more finding the monkey king who will provide all the wealth they need?


Lemme guess, this is going to end with you saying that the lesser jungle asians are dominating the superior Han groups?

an interesting little piece of projection here lol

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

volts5000 posted:

Great! Ana Maria Salazar was just on CNN and stated, matter of factly, that the caravan that's at the border was obviously funded by "a man who has aligned himself against the president". Wasn't questioned on it at all!

The fact that an actual Nazi murdered nearly a dozen Jewish people at worship and still nobody bats an eye at antisemitic conspiracy mongering by Republicans indicates that nothing will make the media question them.

Yinlock
Oct 22, 2008

volts5000 posted:

Great! Ana Maria Salazar was just on CNN and stated, matter of factly, that the caravan that's at the border was obviously funded by "a man who has aligned himself against the president". Wasn't questioned on it at all!

corporate media is insanely horny for war at all times

remember when trump did that staged missile strike and cnn couldn't stop jacking off about how great missiles were

Lightning Knight posted:

The fact that an actual Nazi murdered nearly a dozen Jewish people at worship and still nobody bats an eye at antisemitic conspiracy mongering by Republicans indicates that nothing will make the media question them.

trump isn't actually wrong when he calls the media the enemy of the people(though he's wrong about why)

The Glumslinger
Sep 24, 2008

Coach Nagy, you want me to throw to WHAT side of the field?


Hair Elf

Yinlock posted:

corporate media is insanely horny for war at all times

remember when trump did that staged missile strike and cnn couldn't stop jacking off about how great missiles were

That day was the day Trump became President :colbert:

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


Yinlock posted:

corporate media is insanely horny for war at all times

remember when trump did that staged missile strike and cnn couldn't stop jacking off about how great missiles were

or when he used a widow (that he created unnecessarily in a raid that also killed a little girl) as a prop during a speech and that was the moment he truly became president.

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything

Groovelord Neato posted:

didn't matty y delete all his tweets cuz he got doxed? kind of a weird reaction. it's not like that undoxes you.

He tweeted that he didn't feel bad for Tucker Carlson.

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

quote:

It also shows that poverty is getting worse, not better, with nearly 353 million more people impoverished today than in 1981. With China taken out of the equation, that number shoots up to 852 million

If math isn't your strong suit, that means that China accounts for 499 million people lifted out of poverty.


Lightning Knight posted:

...what? The state of China and other Asian countries today is directly due to fuckery by European empires and the United States, and today we benefit from modern colonialism in the form of cheap sweatshop labor. If you look at that and say "well it technically has increased their standard of living" and not "wow this is super hosed up we should do something to make sure nobody has to be poor anymore" maybe you're a bad person.

Once again, you are presenting "it SHOULD be" as if it were an effective argument, and completely ignoring everything else. You seem to think that just cause you like an option, no matter how outlandish, that makes it a valid option, without actually factoring in the reality surrounding it.

If you were to go up to the average Chinese person, and say "don't worry, we're going to get rid of these jobs, and will just hope really hjard that something better takes their place", they aren't going to be grateful.

Also, China's problems have a lot more to do with the Great Leap Forward than anything that America did to them.

Fulchrum fucked around with this message at 23:26 on Nov 25, 2018

Mr.Unique-Name
Jul 5, 2002

Yinlock posted:

corporate media is insanely horny for war at all times

Because it gets ratings because people watch it, either out of morbid excitement, fascination, or fear. Money is the driving factor behind everything.

Ban companies from making profit that is not immediately paid as wages to employees (not disbursements to owners) or reinvested into the company for purposes of growth and bringing on more employees.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

Fulchrum posted:

Once again, you are presenting "it SHOULD be" as if it were an effective argument, and completely ignoring everything else. You seem to think that just cause you like an option, no matter how outlandish, that makes it a valid option, without actually factoring in the reality surrounding it.

Also, China's problems have a lot more to do with the Great Leap Forward than anything that America did to them.

Better things aren't possible, etc. Also the fact that China was in a position where the Great Leap Forward occurred was directly because of how they were treated by imperial powers, particularly Britain, and because we looked the other way and even assisted while Japan poo poo all over them.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Fulchrum posted:

What exactly is the average standard of living in China today versus 30 years ago?

would you like to work in one of foxconn's suicide factories?

Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

Ice Phisherman posted:

They actually don't benefit more than the foundry owners. Wages haven't gone up for them. There were talks of a strike that were big in September. Not sure if that was resolved or not.

I'm not for Trump's tariffs. They're awful and he has no end goal for getting a better deal save for himself.

Being anti-free trade doesn't mean being pro-protectionism. It's not an on-off switch and you're either misunderstanding me or being disingenuous.

There's obvious a lot of nuance in this issue. I think it is important though to establish and maintain the principle that trade is good, because there are lots of people of all political stripes who continue to deny this. Free trade is basically always better than the alternative, but that doesn't mean we don't have to manage the disruption it can cause. The absolute nonsense around the TPP debate illustrates why this is important.


Lightning Knight posted:

...what? The state of China and other Asian countries today is directly due to fuckery by European empires and the United States, and today we benefit from modern colonialism in the form of cheap sweatshop labor. If you look at that and say "well it technically has increased their standard of living" and not "wow this is super hosed up we should do something to make sure nobody has to be poor anymore" maybe you're a bad person.

What do you propose the US government do "to make sure nobody has to be poor anymore"?

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

Squalid posted:

What do you propose the US government do "to make sure nobody has to be poor anymore"?

I mean, socialism? Like I know that's considered this crazy ridiculous notion but we're also all going to die to global warming fairly soon so smugly declaring that nothing except for mediocre incrementalism is the path forward is almost comical.

Mr.Unique-Name
Jul 5, 2002

Lightning Knight posted:

Better things aren't possible, etc. Also the fact that China was in a position where the Great Leap Forward occurred was directly because of how they were treated by imperial powers, particularly Britain, and because we looked the other way and even assisted while Japan poo poo all over them.

What do you argue we do, now, to improve things for impoverished Chinese workers? This question is also directed at Fulchrum and everybody else arguing with him.

Seriously, it looks like all of you are arguing 2 different subjects that are related enough that they seem like they're the same and just getting angrier and angrier at one another.

Edit:

Lightning Knight posted:

I mean, socialism? Like I know that's considered this crazy ridiculous notion but we're also all going to die to global warming fairly soon so smugly declaring that nothing except for mediocre incrementalism is the path forward is almost comical.

So establish a socialist state in the US and begin backing socialist factions in other countries? I can get behind that.

Fulchrum
Apr 16, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Lightning Knight posted:

Better things aren't possible, etc. Also the fact that China was in a position where the Great Leap Forward occurred was directly because of how they were treated by imperial powers, particularly Britain, and because we looked the other way and even assisted while Japan poo poo all over them.

We JUST had a loving 12 page derail about how America dropping the atomic bomb on Japan was the worst thing evar (loving tankie Weebs), and America should have just allowed Japan to hold onto its conquered areas of China and Korea rather than fight. Now you come out with poo poo that America didn't do enough to stop them? Seriously?

Phi230
Feb 2, 2016

by Fluffdaddy

Lightning Knight posted:

I mean, socialism? Like I know that's considered this crazy ridiculous notion but we're also all going to die to global warming fairly soon so smugly declaring that nothing except for mediocre incrementalism is the path forward is almost comical.

There's no convincing people like Squalid on this issue. Scum like him value profits over people's lives.

Yinlock
Oct 22, 2008

Squalid posted:

What do you propose the US government do "to make sure nobody has to be poor anymore"?

maybe use some of the trillions of dollars they give to themselves

it would be insanely easy to stop poverty entirely

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

Fulchrum posted:

Once again, you are presenting "it SHOULD be" as if it were an effective argument, and completely ignoring everything else. You seem to think that just cause you like an option, no matter how outlandish, that makes it a valid option, without actually factoring in the reality surrounding it.

Son, we live in a world that has rapidly fattening men, and those men's gunts have to be covered up by men in sweatshops. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for Bangladesh and you curse free trade. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know; that pulverizing three hundred people in order to save money on building codes, while tragic, probably saved me ten bucks. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, *saves money*. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me in that sweatshop. You need me in that sweatshop. We use words like pragmatism, efficiency, inevitability. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending nothing. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very cheap fabrics that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide them! I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and gun down a striking worker. Either way, I don't give a *drat* what you think you are entitled to!

Young Freud
Nov 26, 2006

Failed Imagineer posted:

This is pretty cool imo. Does NEU also control North Africa?

e:



Not sure at this point, the NEU's world order (get it) is largely U.S., Russia, China, and a bunch of vassal states. The logo is more to make the NEU some sort of nega-UN, with America largely the frontrunner, imposing it's will on lesser nations (much Europe, Africa, South America).

The other thing is that this project is that it's a Christapocapunk dystopia, which, if you've been following the FATAL and Friends thread, was this genre of '90s games based around religious apocalypse. The NEU is basically the Beast from Revelations.

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

Fulchrum posted:

We JUST had a loving 12 page derail about how America dropping the atomic bomb on Japan was the worst thing evar (loving tankie Weebs), and America should have just allowed Japan to hold onto its conquered areas of China and Korea rather than fight. Now you come out with poo poo that America didn't do enough to stop them? Seriously?

Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki wasn't necessary to extract an unconditional surrender from Japan, which we needed to do. I do not see how these are inconsistent positions. We also didn't need to supply Japan oil when they were invading China.


Mr.Unique-Name posted:

So establish a socialist state in the US and begin backing socialist factions in other countries? I can get behind that.

I mean yes but also more broadly, taking money away from the rich in the developed world and using it to alleviate poverty in the developing world, and redesigning trade policy to be equitable and fair to workers rather than capital.

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Lightning Knight posted:

Better things aren't possible, etc. Also the fact that China was in a position where the Great Leap Forward occurred was directly because of how they were treated by imperial powers, particularly Britain, and because we looked the other way and even assisted while Japan poo poo all over them.

i am pretty sure it was directly because mao was super full of poo poo and magical thinking and he believed stalin era Lysenko "science" and then added his own dumb ideas to it like killing all the sparrows and trying to have peasants make steel and surrounding himself with lickspittles who faked results for food surpluses.

the qing could have been a world power if they had gotten their poo poo together and done major reforms and embraced technology. instead like the reactionaries they were, they clung to their power until it was too late and they got hosed by everyone.

Dapper_Swindler fucked around with this message at 23:38 on Nov 25, 2018

Kobayashi
Aug 13, 2004

by Nyc_Tattoo

Fulchrum posted:

So your problem is that it isn't addressing the very real possibility of China once more finding the monkey king who will provide all the wealth they need?


Lemme guess, this is going to end with you saying that the lesser jungle asians are dominating the superior Han groups?

Nice casual racism.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!! posted:

Son, we live in a world that has rapidly fattening men, and those men's gunts have to be covered up by men in sweatshops...

Marvellous

Phi230
Feb 2, 2016

by Fluffdaddy

Mr.Unique-Name posted:


Edit:


So establish a socialist state in the US and begin backing socialist factions in other countries? I can get behind that.

REAL trotsky hours who tf UP???

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


Lightning Knight posted:

Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki wasn't necessary to extract an unconditional surrender from Japan, which we needed to do. I do not see how these are inconsistent positions. We also didn't need to supply Japan oil when they were invading China.


I mean yes but also more broadly, taking money away from the rich in the developed world and using it to alleviate poverty in the developing world, and redesigning trade policy to be equitable and fair to workers rather than capital.

imagine if we used the trillions we waste on planes that can barely fly on fighting global poverty instead

oh well, guess we have to uplift people by exploiting them with sweatshops so terrible the sweatshops have nets installed to prevent embarassing suicides

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe
What is it with the hardcore centrist fanboy brigade members constantly outing themselves as defenders of literal loving sweatshops?

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

Dapper_Swindler posted:

i am pretty sure it was because mao was super full of poo poo and magical thinking and he believed stalin era Lysenko "science" and then added his own dumb ideas to it like killing all the sparrows and trying to have peasents make steel and surrounding himself with lickspittles who faked results.

I mean yes, Mao was pretty bad, but the question is why Mao was able to come to power, which brings us back to Japan's invasion of China, the partitioning of China under the imperial powers, the Opium Wars, etc. He didn't just magically plop down one day and declare the PRC from nothing.

Uglycat
Dec 4, 2000
MORE INDISPUTABLE PROOF I AM BAD AT POSTING
---------------->

GreyjoyBastard posted:

I was actually curious what you thought on the topic, as the only goon I know of who actually goes out and engages in direct action rather than just posting about how great it is on the internet.

I have friends that punch nazis. I've never told them not to, I've just asserted my own pledge to radical pacifism and then mumbled about diversity of tactics. But, as I've said, I've since revised my position.

I helped remove some Constantina wire at standing rock. Late night, throw chain across river, hooking the wire, attach to trucks tow bar - and drive.

I've stood off with national Guard, knowing they cannot shoot me or arrest me.

I've caught a lung full of tear gas. I've been pepper sprayed - naked and in a passive pose - by a line of riot cops.

I wish I could be in tijuana right now. I feel for those humans so hard.

Phi230
Feb 2, 2016

by Fluffdaddy

Cerebral Bore posted:

What is it with the hardcore centrist fanboy brigade members constantly outing themselves as defenders of literal loving sweatshops?

Well you already know the answer

Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

Lightning Knight posted:

I mean, socialism? Like I know that's considered this crazy ridiculous notion but we're also all going to die to global warming fairly soon so smugly declaring that nothing except for mediocre incrementalism is the path forward is almost comical.

I find this answer a bit hard to interpret as many of the countries criticized for sweatshop labor like China and Vietnam are already socialist. I mean like what does this mean in practice? I admit I'm a bit skeptical of the idea that if we give ownership of the means of production to Pennsylvania steelworkers they are going immediately seek to transfer billions of their new found wealth to the Chinese. Just giving people stuff doesn't necessarily improve conditions anyway if local elites can steal it. We want create domestic industry and build human capital, and that's hard.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Elephant Ambush
Nov 13, 2012

...We sholde spenden more time together. What sayest thou?
Nap Ghost

Lightning Knight posted:

...what? The state of China and other Asian countries today is directly due to fuckery by European empires and the United States, and today we benefit from modern colonialism in the form of cheap sweatshop labor. If you look at that and say "well it technically has increased their standard of living" and not "wow this is super hosed up we should do something to make sure nobody has to be poor anymore" maybe you're a bad person.

His argument is also either/or in terms of "sweatshop capitalism is the only way living conditions could have ever improved" which is obviously wrong and btw I really don't understand how you haven't banned him yet for being an obvious bad faith liar. I know you think it's useful for people to see counter arguments to his trash posts but there are plenty of other trash posters who aren't arguing in bad faith we could reply to.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Cerebral Bore posted:

What is it with the hardcore centrist fanboy brigade members constantly outing themselves as defenders of literal loving sweatshops?

Fishook theory

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply