|
Discendo Vox posted:It'd actually be a huge reduction in CTE; it's the fuckton of minor (read, "minor", they're giving themselves mini-concussions) blows in practice, even with dummy blocks, that do the damage.
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 08:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 14:31 |
|
|
Yuns posted:As a former small school college football player I can confidently state that having brain damage doesn't keep you from becoming a partner at a law firm. Look you posted the abs but we're all still waiting on the bank account deets. PMs are open, as always.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 08:34
|
|
|
still mad I missed Yuns going full Bateman
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 13:22
|
|
|
Officially managed to pick up another government job, meaning I don't have to practice law. Come join us, it loving owns.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 13:51
|
|
|
Toona the Cat posted:The country doesn’t need another presidential blowjob from a Jewish girl scandal. Lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 13:54
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:this is loving pathetic I think they should replace the entire teams with those dummies and just drive them all over the field running into one another
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 13:55
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:I think they should replace the entire teams with those dummies and just drive them all over the field running into one another At [my favorite team’s rival that I hate] they already have.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 13:58
|
|
|
nm posted:
“Actively defended” is sort of a lol criticism to bring in the loving law thread.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 14:53
|
|
|
Toona the Cat posted:The country doesn’t need another presidential blowjob from a Jewish girl scandal. A return to normalcy, truly
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 14:53
|
|
|
Toona, think of it as squaring the circle. For America.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 15:12
|
|
|
uberkeyzer posted:“Actively defended” is sort of a lol criticism to bring in the loving law thread. No no, this is the regular law thread. The loving law thread is the legal questions megathread, it's full up with fucks.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 15:14
|
|
|
uberkeyzer posted:“Actively defended” is sort of a lol criticism to bring in the loving law thread. How so?
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 15:18
|
|
|
Toona the Cat posted:The country doesn’t need another presidential blowjob from a Jewish girl scandal. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 15:22
|
|
|
joat mon posted:How so? Well you see, you defend murderers and rapists, so the government is morally justified in defending a boot stamping on a human face forever.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 15:29
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1068442531887632384 if the current thread title wasn't so good I would demand that you make "very legal & very cool" the new thread title.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 16:03
|
|
|
Soothing Vapors posted:https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1068442531887632384 Look who unashamedly stole your idea This is copyright ifringement right, is your cease&desist in the mail?
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 16:10
|
|
|
uberkeyzer posted:“Actively defended” is sort of a lol criticism to bring in the loving law thread. I honestly have no idea who she is or what she did, but I'm always opposed to the idea that advocacy should be abandoned wherever it's not popular.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 16:11
|
|
|
There’s a difference between advocacy and prosecutorial discretion
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 16:16
|
|
|
Nice piece of fish posted:Look who unashamedly stole your idea vox you son of a bitch you better govern urself accordingly blarzgh posted:I honestly have no idea who she is or what she did, but I'm always opposed to the idea that advocacy should be abandoned wherever it's not popular. actually, it is cool and good for people to refuse to advocate for morally bankrupt social policy Soothing Vapors fucked around with this message at 16:22 on Nov 30, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 16:19
|
|
|
theres actually zero difference between punching up & punching down. you imbecile. you loving moron
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 16:33
|
|
|
Soothing Vapors posted:
Hm, would you say it's very legal and very cool??? I'm so loving jealous of that phrase right now
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 16:43
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:There’s a difference between advocacy and prosecutorial discretion Phil Moscowitz posted:Well you see, you defend murderers and rapists, so the government is morally justified in defending a boot stamping on a human face forever. If this is based on that Reason article It looks like her office shouldn’t have tried to make a couple of convictions stand up on appeal. And in 2010 they had a lovely Giglio procedure and got called out on it. uberkeyzer fucked around with this message at 17:07 on Nov 30, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 16:51
|
|
|
Soothing Vapors posted:actually, it is cool and good for people to refuse to advocate for morally bankrupt social policy Nah, I'd prefer an individual do their job instead of unilaterally decide which policies they like and don't like, unless its my County Tax Assessor Ron White who refuses to withhold vehicle registrations on account of red light camera tickets, their only possible means of enforcement, making them worthless pieces of paper in Tarrant County lol.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 17:02
|
|
|
Red light camera tickets are an affront to God and man and using paper on them is a crime against the world
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 17:06
|
|
|
blarzgh posted:I honestly have no idea who she is or what she did, but I'm always opposed to the idea that advocacy should be abandoned wherever it's not popular. A prosecutor has unique ethical obligations not to make bad arguments that are not shared by other lawyers.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 17:08
|
|
|
Anyone who is for red light cameras should have a govt monitoring camera follow them all day at all times and send them giant fines for doing things like not coming to a complete stop at an empty 4 way intersection, going 1mph over the speed limit, stepping onto a road, bumping into anyone on a sidewalk, etc
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 17:10
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:Red light camera tickets are an affront to God and man and using paper on them is a crime against the world Utah does a LOT of things wrong, but the state ban on red light cameras is not one of them.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 17:12
|
|
|
Like, I am all for the argument that people attacking criminal defense lawyers for doing their job should be shut down, but you can't discuss a prosecutor's decisions without recognizing that the government is not entitled to a lawyer to make bad arguments when it comes to criminal prosecution. A prosecutor has ethical obligations a defense attorney, or a commercial litigator, does not.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 17:12
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:A prosecutor has unique ethical obligations not to make bad arguments that are not shared by other lawyers. Prosecutors 100% have unique obligations but that doesn’t mean they can’t (vigorously!) appeal/contest unfavorable rulings. That said I have no idea why they appealed that fake transcript case, that sounds completely batshit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 17:13
|
|
|
uberkeyzer posted:Prosecutors 100% have unique obligations but that doesn’t mean they can’t (vigorously!) appeal/contest unfavorable rulings. That said I have no idea why they appealed that fake transcript case, that sounds completely batshit. They appealed a surprising number of those types of cases when she was AG. These were not edge cases and best I can tell, reflected a change from the previous administration.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 17:19
|
|
|
Thankfully , Harvey Weinstein is going to publicly demonstrate how prosecutorial misconduct is so common and the wave of support for him will sweep the nation and reform our system
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 17:22
|
|
|
uberkeyzer posted:Prosecutors 100% have unique obligations but that doesn’t mean they can’t (vigorously!) appeal/contest unfavorable rulings. That said I have no idea why they appealed that fake transcript case, that sounds completely batshit. they can, but they can fairly be criticized for those decisions in a way you can't fairly criticize defense attorneys or commercial litigators
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 17:43
|
|
|
uberkeyzer posted:Prosecutors 100% have unique obligations but that doesn’t mean they can’t (vigorously!) appeal/contest unfavorable rulings. That said I have no idea why they appealed that fake transcript case, that sounds completely batshit. Seems like you are getting it, good job.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 17:46
|
|
Soothing Vapors posted:vox you son of a bitch you better govern urself accordingly The record will show I posted almost a half hour before you. I have prior art.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 18:21
|
|
|
I am unfamiliar with this “fake transcript case”. Fill me in?
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 19:35
|
|
|
I'm talking about this: https://www.latimes.com/local/politics/la-me-lying-prosecutors-20150201-story.html But this is the transcript case which is part of the Brady issues I think everyone is talking about. https://observer.com/2015/03/california-prosecutor-falsifies-transcript-of-confession/ quote:But here’s another doozy: The People (of California) v. Efrain Velasco-Palacios. In this unpublished opinion from the Fifth Appellate District, the California Court of Appeal reveals that state prosecutors and California Attorney General Kamala Harris continue to be part of the problem. Kern County prosecutor Robert Murray committed “outrageous government misconduct.” Ms. Harris and her staff defended the indefensible—California State prosecutor Murray flat out falsified a transcript of a defendant’s confession.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 19:46
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1068536689977516032 thread
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 20:34
|
|
|
Wow. That was great.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 20:46
|
|
|
Lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 20:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 14:31 |
|
|
What the actual gently caress, California?????
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 21:14
|
|