|
Dylan16807 posted:Oh and for bonus points if you put that in a file (or compress it to one line) you get a different result, because all instances of "1000" compiled at the same time will share the same object. Ahah that's great, and maybe more of a horror
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2018 21:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 00:48 |
|
|
taqueso posted:Ahah that's great, and maybe more of a horror Not really? It is pretty silly to test for reference equality of instances of things like integers or strings. If you write non-toy code that does that I think you deserve what you get. Same would hold true in other languages that do this sort of thing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2018 21:57
|
|
|
yeah, there’s nothing wrong with reusing instances for immutable objects when you can cheaply identify duplicates but also constructing new copies when it would be expensive to find one to reuse
|
|
#
?
Nov 29, 2018 22:09
|
|
|
LOL https://twitter.com/mgdm/status/1068245785941286919
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 02:56
|
|
|
PHP changelog: changed "not for production use" to "for production use"
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 04:26
|
|
|
Lie down with dogs, etc.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 15:07
|
|
|
I find it far fetched that both a php lambda exists and that someone also decided to use it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 15:34
|
|
|
Khorne posted:I find it far fetched that both a php lambda exists and that someone also decided to use it. Lambda is basically overcomplicated, expensive CGI, so that makes perfect sense. I also don't know why someone decided to use it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 15:36
|
|
|
xtal posted:Lambda is basically overcomplicated, expensive CGI, so that makes perfect sense. I also don't know why someone decided to use it. Jokes aside, there are some legitimate uses. I'm not even sure how most places use Lambda. Where I've worked, it's largely used to perform cron style tasks or to trigger on certain conditions that often wouldn't be desirable or possible on a node itself. There's also a convenience factor at times. With all that said, I'm not sure why you'd write anything like that in PHP. And I don't even hate PHP or anything. I'd take a job writing PHP if the compensation and fit were right, but I've yet to see one of those. Khorne fucked around with this message at 15:47 on Nov 30, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 15:38
|
|
|
Lambda doesn't support PHP directly - they're bootstrapping it in some other language then running it. It's like a strip from fairly early in Schlock Mercenary where they explain that the law is to just straight-up execute people for drunk driving starships because you have to be stupid and irresponsible enough to install the ability to drive one by hand and additionally stupid enough to fly it drunk at ~hundredths of c.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 18:45
|
|
|
Munkeymon posted:Lambda doesn't support PHP directly - they're bootstrapping it in some other language then running it. https://www.schlockmercenary.com/2002-08-29 Still one of the best footnotes ever. quote:...It's the fact that you deliberately made such an irresponsible act POSSIBLE by putzing around with your ride. You know those signs that say "don't putz around with this system -- serious injury or death could result?" Well, they were talking about YOUR death, and it is now resulting.
|
|
#
?
Nov 30, 2018 19:19
|
|
|
Hah, that's pretty decent.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2018 00:11
|
|
|
https://christine.website/blog/experimental-rilkef-2018-11-30
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2018 15:08
|
|
|
OSS is the horror. If you don't want people to make money off of your work, don't release it for free? Or if you don't want malicious code put into the libs you use, maybe you could do it yourself? There's a reason the big box places ~embrace~ OSS and then ask you to show what you've been wasting your life doing on github if you want to eat. My favorite part of ESR's essay book is when he realized that he would have to charge for distribution after quitting his position at MIT for the sake of 'free software'. Free software is never free.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2018 12:32
|
|
|
dougdrums posted:If you don't want people to make money off of your work, don't release it for free? just use the GPL
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2018 02:25
|
|
|
RPATDO_LAMD posted:just use the GPL somebody get red hat on the line
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2018 03:43
|
|
|
Actually, this is the best free license.quote:The CrimethInc. N©! license is a share-alike anarchist public copyright license with restrictions of use based on anti-statism and anti-corporatism. The license allows any person acting in good faith to use the content in any way to better the world. It expressly prohibits the work to be used by any corporation or government body.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2018 03:01
|
|
|
what the gently caress good is an anarchist license supposed to do, oh gee i sure do hope that society becomes a place where this is completely unenforceable???
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2018 07:08
|
|
|
Yea
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2018 15:24
|
|
|
Most independent developers probably do not have the means to practically enforce a software license.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2018 17:11
|
|
|
The license I use for my code is licensed under every license that is not licensed under itself.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2018 19:36
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:what the gently caress good is an anarchist license supposed to do, oh gee i sure do hope that society becomes a place where this is completely unenforceable??? I think it's what the kids call 'irony' OP
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2018 20:45
|
|
|
Munkeymon posted:I think it's what the kids call 'irony' OP I get the sense that it's not meant to be ironic though
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2018 22:12
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:what the gently caress good is an anarchist license supposed to do, oh gee i sure do hope that society becomes a place where this is completely unenforceable??? This isn’t that ridiculous. There are loads of charities/non-profits that exist to do work that government should ostensibly do. In an ideal world those organizations don’t exist, but this isn’t an ideal world, so you make do. If the world went anarchist then there’s no need for the license.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2018 23:44
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:I get the sense that it's not meant to be ironic though
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 00:03
|
|
|
xtal posted:Actually, this is the best free license.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 06:13
|
|
|
Magissima posted:"Punishable under natural law" seems sincere to you? that's some brokebrain poo poo but the world is full of idiot brokebrain people so yeah, I think it easily could be like you can't seriously tell me that anyone who voted for Ron Paul wouldn't sincerely write that phrase, you just can't
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 07:16
|
|
|
I'm just having trouble reading "introduction as evidence in court ... [is] strictly prohibited and punishable under natural law" without thinking that nobody could actually write that sincerely without realising how ridiculous they sound. They'd have to have realised that you cannot prohibit a court from exercising its function and thought "aha, well if I say it's punishable under natural law then I retain the moral high ground", or something, and I just can't picture the person who would do that and then nod in satisfaction that they've achieved something worthwhile. So I feel like it must be intended to be that ridiculous.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 10:51
|
|
|
Sounds like someone hasn't been introduced to the sovereign citizen movement yet.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 13:01
|
|
|
Next time you're in traffic court try to convince the judge he's presiding over an admiralty court on account of the fringes on the US flag in the room and therefore has no authority over you.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 13:30
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:I get the sense that it's not meant to be ironic though Sure, but what's the "law" where you can't tell if someone is kidding or actually just that stupid/crazy/far up their own rear end? I feel like that's at play here.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 14:49
|
|
|
I think there is an element of humor in there, but I'm curious as to what "natural law" entails. "Dog eat dog" and various other Mad Max fantasies aren't laws. Perhaps they mean gravity? Violate this and you'll fall down?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 15:30
|
|
|
Ola posted:I think there is an element of humor in there, but I'm curious as to what "natural law" entails. "Dog eat dog" and various other Mad Max fantasies aren't laws. Perhaps they mean gravity? Violate this and you'll fall down?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 15:34
|
|
|
Ola posted:I think there is an element of humor in there, but I'm curious as to what "natural law" entails. "Dog eat dog" and various other Mad Max fantasies aren't laws. Perhaps they mean gravity? Violate this and you'll fall down? 
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 16:14
|
|
|
I should know how to Google better, but I am free to leave it be.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 16:18
|
|
|
Hammerite posted:I'm just having trouble reading "introduction as evidence in court ... [is] strictly prohibited and punishable under natural law" without thinking that nobody could actually write that sincerely without realising how ridiculous they sound. They'd have to have realised that you cannot prohibit a court from exercising its function and thought "aha, well if I say it's punishable under natural law then I retain the moral high ground", or something, and I just can't picture the person who would do that and then nod in satisfaction that they've achieved something worthwhile. So I feel like it must be intended to be that ridiculous. You ever hear of Sovereign Citizens? Or Freemen on the Land?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 22:56
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:You ever hear of Sovereign Citizens? Or Freemen on the Land? I, ::paul:: of-the-family ::atreides::, the flesh and blood man
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2018 23:29
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:I, ::paul:: of-the-family ::atreides::, the flesh and blood man That's not how namespaces work
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2018 01:10
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JlxuQ7tPgQ
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2018 11:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 00:48 |
|
|
Those were the days
|
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2018 11:30
|
|
