Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





Ideology is the most important thing about any candidate for any office, with authenticity being a close second. AOC probably places in the top five for ideology in the House, if not the winner, and while we haven't had much of a chance to gauge her authenticity yet, all indications are she's going to be pretty solid on that front as well. If you're "well actually"ing about experience or whatever else given the current state of things and what "experience" has actually gotten us then gently caress completely off.

Get this woman in the White House the instant she's Constitutionally eligible, or sooner if we can get away with it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

plogo
Jan 20, 2009
William Pitt was prime minister at 24. I tend to think aoc could benefit from more experience, but there are plenty of historical counter examples of young people doing well in politics.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

twice burned ice posted:

I certainly can see how removing gendered words and instead using gender-neutral terms is useful.

I don't really understand how abandoning a gender-specific term for another gender-specific term achieves anything though.


Essentially, renaming firemen and firewomen to firefighters or even firepersons makes sense to me, but using waiter to refer to both male and female waitstaff does not.

Now do comedian/comedienne and aviator/aviatrix

E: No, do waiter/waitroon, "it gives us more information what's the problem?!"

thin blue whine
Feb 21, 2004
PLEASE SEE POLICY


Soiled Meat

Electric Bugaloo posted:

To add to what everybody else has been saying, it’s increased because these people are constantly being told by the media, their echo chambers, and actual politicians that they are actively embroiled in a culture war against a deep state-affiliated Left/brown/Muslim horde that has broken hot now that Trump is trying to MAGA. It’s the same reason why domestic terrorists are going after media offices and shooting up synagogues at the behest of psychotic conspiracy threads.

The messaging is that their Leader is under attack by illegitimate socialist interests who seek to undermine and usurp the country with the help of Antifa, the Media, and the Establishment.

And because Trump and CHUDism engender actual, coordinated, vocal opposition they can look at stuff like the Women’s March, #resistance messaging, pushback on alternative facts/Trump brainfarts/fascist policy from mainstream organizations, the midterms, etc and feed their persecution narrative.

These guys think they are preparing for the day when they’ll have to fight Soros-funded Antifa shock troopers in the streets and storm the halls of congress to reclaim the government from Dictator Hillary. They think they’re training for Civil War 2.0, or staving it off by showing force like a display ‘training exercise’ aimed at some unspecified Hispanics.

On a related note, anybody remember that Sean Hannity comic from years ago where he was like this Cable-esque resistance fighter working to stop a world government takeover by the UN? Was that officially sanctioned or a fan piece? Did I dream it up in a nightmare sometime?

I also am pretty sure this is, in part, being pushed by foreign actors. Since before Trump got elected there was a lot of speculation that states like Russia were instigating militias like the 3% and were even trying to see how far they could get them to go. When the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge Occupation happened there was some theories that, on top of the usual right wing idiots being idiots, that they had been backed by Russians.

StrangersInTheNight
Dec 31, 2007
ABSOLUTE FUCKING GUDGEON
If someone as inexperienced as Trump can make it through 4 years of a presidency, AOC will be fine

It's funny how our obsession with experience is heightened when it comes to female politicians and POC

How about let AOC show what she can do instead of revealing how you pretty clearly think those who do serving work are of a lower social class that needs to have their hands held for them, despite the fact that actually THEY are actually the ones holding your dumb spoiled hand and are just good enough at their jobs you didn't realize it.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


Two Top Conservative Judges Offer Plan to End Discovery for Most Litigants

quote:

Thomas Hardiman, a judge on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, made what should have been viewed as a shocking declaration for a federal judge. Hardiman told the crowd at the 2018 Federalist Society Convention: “If I were able to do something unilaterally, I would probably institute a new federal rule that said that all cases worth less than $500,000 will be tried without any discovery.” The audience applauded. A fellow panelist, Judge Amul Thapar of the 6th Circuit, chimed in, “Can I say amen?” Thapar later repeated his endorsement of the idea.

The Federalist Society is the conservative organization that for decades has had outsized influence in grooming and promoting conservative lawyers for the federal judiciary. It most famously helped prepare a list of potential Supreme Court nominees for President Trump that included Brett Kavanaugh as well as Hardiman and Thapar. This is an organization with a frighteningly strong track record of accomplishing what it says it will.

The panel on which the judges spoke dealt with far ranging and important topics: the slow pace and high expense of litigation, people’s desire to have a day in court, the plummeting number of disputes resolved by full trials. In this midst of this high-minded and interesting discussion, it was telling to suddenly hear a proposal to end discovery for cases of less than $500,000. The proposal, the amen, and the applause, provide a window into the thinking of these two judges and their audience, showing a disdain for modest-dollar cases, which include many cases involving important rights, as well as cases affecting small businesses, middle-income, and low-income people. This depreciation reveals a worldview in which many, many people would not merit meaningful access to the full range of tools in federal court. And remember: The comments came from sitting appellate judges—one wonders how it will feel in the future to be a litigant with a modest-dollar case in front of their courts.

This is not an insignificant liberty these judges are seeking to curtail. In our legal system, discovery is the process by which both sides gather evidence before trial. It allows everyone to understand the often complicated facts underlying their case, and, as the American Bar Association explains, to avoid “trial by ambush” in which one side presents new evidence at trial, when the opponent can no longer gather evidence in response. Commonly used methods of discovery include taking depositions, or sworn testimony, ahead of time; requests or court-issued subpoenas to obtain documents; and interrogatories, which are lists of questions the recipients must answer.

Discovery is a key element of our current adversarial system. Often, it’s how people get evidence of legal violations, via admissions in sworn testimony, or smoking-gun documents, or memos demonstrating wrongdoing. Discovery is especially critical in today’s economic marketplace, where deception and predatory conduct are likely to be papered over. Discovery is needed to level the playing field to help ordinary plaintiffs have access to information that large corporations may bury. For example, discovery would be necessary to determine that a car dealer had packed an agreement with predatory fees or that an employer shaved hours of employees’ time. In other words, discovery is critical to our civil justice system and especially crucial for everyday Americans affected by complex forms of wrongdoing.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/12/federalist-society-meeting-cap-discovery-claims.html

skylined!
Apr 6, 2012

THE DEM DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON

WoodrowSkillson posted:

yes, so explain how she already has the knowledge and judgement to correctly discern shucksters from valued advisors in the biggest den of snakes on the planet when does not even know how reps are onboarded yet.

just because shes better than trump, does not mean this is ideal we should be shooting for when say, Ilhan Omar has actually worked in state level govt, Rashida Tlaib has been in state level govt for a decade, and Andrew Gillium has ran a city of almost 200k people. All of them has resumes that much better allow yo ut oascertain how they will actually govern, compared to someone who you are taking on faith.

Equating ‘Able to pick out a con artist’ and ‘has insider knowledge on something she has previously not had access to’ is pretty disingenuous.

She seems pretty capable at sizing people up so far.

Shimrra Jamaane
Aug 10, 2007

Obscure to all except those well-versed in Yuuzhan Vong lore.
I’m intensely interested in seeing the general reaction to the first time AOC does something to disappoint people.

The Super-Id
Nov 9, 2005

"You know it's what you really want."


Grimey Drawer

Marlows posted:


...she hasn't even done anything yet.

She's un-apologetically spoken up about the right issues (and people are listening) and she's also not an old white dude. Just because of this she has already done more for me than pretty much any other politician. Though I will get more excited for her as a potential president when that potential passes more into the realm of possibility.

twice burned ice
Dec 29, 2008

My stove defies the laws of physics!

Crow Jane posted:

Most places go with "server"

:doh:

Duh. That makes sense.



VitalSigns posted:

Now do comedian/comedienne and aviator/aviatrix

E: No, do waiter/waitroon, "it gives us more information what's the problem?!"

You're telling me aviatrix is a word and we're going to get rid of it before I've even had an opportunity to use it?



I should have expected that vital signs wouldn't be able to pass up an opportunity to condescend and feel smug, even as someone is making a good-faith effort to use language more responsibly.


twice burned ice fucked around with this message at 20:27 on Dec 6, 2018

Critical
Aug 23, 2007

AOC is great. She also cannot be president at this point it time. Some of y'all are broke brained and throwing ice cubes at the sun. Have some dip and hail Satan.

skylined!
Apr 6, 2012

THE DEM DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON

pookel posted:

If we are going to talk about getting a woman of color from a working class background into the White House, can we at least look at Stacey Abrams too? She's already old enough, she has a law degree, she has a ton of public policy experience, & she's been an activist since she was in high school.

I’d vote for her in a heartbeat again.

Stexils
Jun 5, 2008

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

I’m intensely interested in seeing the general reaction to the first time AOC does something to disappoint people.

that already happened when she walked back her remarks calling israel firing on civilians a massacre.

KickerOfMice
Jun 7, 2017

[/color]Keep firing, assholes![/color]

Spaceballs the custom title.
Fun Shoe

Critical posted:

AOC is great. She also cannot be president at this point it time. Some of y'all are broke brained and throwing ice cubes at the sun. Have some dip and hail Satan.

:devil:

InnercityGriot
Dec 31, 2008

Marlows posted:

You might want to look in the mirror. Its incredibly gross to reduce AOC to: is "killer" at "looking good for the camera."

I think the whole debate is silly, given that she is not yet constitutionally qualified and a few years can be an eternity in politics, and even I think that was a creepy remark. Give it a few years, she might turn out awesome but she hasn't even done anything yet.

I think for me at least, the "she hasn't done anything yet" reads more like, "she hasn't fulfilled enough time doing things we typically associate with presidents" and I couldn't give less of a poo poo about the latter.

eke out
Feb 24, 2013



VitalSigns posted:

aviator/aviatrix

to be fair, this is the one cool-sounding declension, ie the executrix of an estate

skylined!
Apr 6, 2012

THE DEM DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON

eke out posted:

i don't think this makes a lot of sense given that the AG doesn't really affect high-level political pardons in any way, apart from being someone the president might consult

nobody in any position will meaningfully change whether or not trump pardons people, the key question is will they actively obstruct justice for Trump, and a conservative institutionalist like Barr is certainly far less likely than proposed candidates like Kris Kobach or Pam Pondi

It’s Bondi but if we want to start butchering her name like Tammy Loren I’m real excited to do that.

theblackw0lf
Apr 15, 2003

"...creating a vision of the sort of society you want to have in miniature"
I love AOC, but as an activist I have met so many incredible individuals who I think are just as smart, charismatic, and eloquent as AOC, and I think who would make outstanding political figures.

This isn't a knock on AOC. It's more about how frustrating it is that the system rarely allows people like AOC to have positions of power.

eke out
Feb 24, 2013



skylined! posted:

It’s Bondi but if we want to start butchering her name like Tammy Loren I’m real excited to do that.

that was a typo but i will never apologize to Bam Pondi

Brony Car
May 22, 2014

by Cyrano4747

KickerOfMice posted:

Red Hot Chili Peppers vs. Trump administration

Directed by Michael Bay

:rock:

The song "Give it Away" is communist propaganda that rails against the idea of private property or the accumulation of wealth. It is anti-aspirational.

InnercityGriot
Dec 31, 2008

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

I’m intensely interested in seeing the general reaction to the first time AOC does something to disappoint people.

She got dragged for the Israel massacre comment retreat and her Mccain twitter response, I don't think lefties are afraid to yell at their politicians.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

I’m intensely interested in seeing the general reaction to the first time AOC does something to disappoint people.

She disappoints me not knowing how our government works!!!

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


she was also wrong on the pentagon waste thing.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

eke out posted:

to be fair, this is the one cool-sounding declension, ie the executrix of an estate

I actually agree, we should pick the feminine as the nongendered noun in these cases.

Senatrix Bernard Sanders

KickerOfMice
Jun 7, 2017

[/color]Keep firing, assholes![/color]

Spaceballs the custom title.
Fun Shoe

Brony Car posted:

The song "Give it Away" is communist propaganda that rails against the idea of private property or the accumulation of wealth. It is anti-aspirational.

Yet Flea strides upon the ruins, wallowing in a sad but kickass lament.

BarbarianElephant
Feb 12, 2015
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.
AOC will disappoint you all, because your standards are perfection, and perfection is defined as being a Marxist revolutionary.

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

Groovelord Neato posted:

she was also wrong on the pentagon waste thing.

yeah, but for the most parts its been minor slip ups and getting raked over the coals for saying something slightly wrong. she'll get way better as time goes on, especially now that she can fully devote herself to governing and becoming an expert on these topics.

EwokEntourage
Jun 10, 2008

BREYER: Actually, Antonin, you got it backwards. See, a power bottom is actually generating all the dissents by doing most of the work.

SCALIA: Stephen, I've heard that speed has something to do with it.

BREYER: Speed has everything to do with it.

This is a dumb article written about some dumb comment by a judge that would never happen and wasn't even seriously endorsed by the crowd (if you watch the video there's almost no reaction, and people only laugh at the amen comment) but its pretty funny that slate brings up three high profile criminal trials when talking about discovery in civil cases

Unoriginal Name
Aug 1, 2006

by sebmojo

KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD posted:

Okay, well it's now becoming clear that people ITT don't have a solid sense of what being President actually involves, so I guess I understand why you might see her as qualified to be President on those terms.

if only she was a WASP

theblackw0lf
Apr 15, 2003

"...creating a vision of the sort of society you want to have in miniature"

Groovelord Neato posted:

she was also wrong on the pentagon waste thing.

That Nation article was fairly confusing though so it's understandable how she came to that conclusion.

Many activist friends I know who are whip-smart reached a similar conclusion.

What's important though is that she acknowledges she made a mistake.

InnercityGriot
Dec 31, 2008

BarbarianElephant posted:

AOC will disappoint you all, because your standards are perfection, and perfection is defined as being a Marxist revolutionary.

You keep politicians in line by getting disappointed and angry when they do something bad, this is how it works, not just be happy with what you get and demonstrate no critical faculty.

KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD
Jul 7, 2012

TulliusCicero posted:

Instead of playing this totally cool "gotcha" game with the whole thread, why don't you tell us what makes someone qualified to be President? You clearly are far more knowledgeable on the subject than us :jerkbag:

KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD posted:

Hmm, perhaps it's some combination of having the right morals, institutional knowledge, preexisting legislative relationships, executive experience, management, negotiation, and relationship building skills? Nah gently caress it, let's hand the nuclear codes and the Situation Room chair to whomever puts out the wokest tweets.
And just to add to that a bit: Presidents are not mere political figureheads with the power to recruit for executive agencies who operate with and through their advisors. Your advisors advise you, but that only goes so far, and there's only so much you can delegate to them, as Eisenhower quickly discovered – also the EOP, to say nothing of the executive branch overall and the interbranch relations which will consume a lot of your time, are infinitely more complex and frustrating than they were in the 50's. Actually, personnel is perhaps the most heavily delegated of all Presidential responsibilities. Aside from Cabinet-level secretaries, who are generally chosen in the West Wing, pretty much everything under that either gets done in the White House Presidential Personnel Office across West Exec in the EEOB, or by the agencies themselves when they have authorization to make that determination on their own. The President will sign off on appointments, but his or her day to day job is very rarely going to involve the selection of officials, that's why you pick an Assistant to the President to head PPO.

Ogmius815
Aug 25, 2005
centrism is a hell of a drug


Yeah but have you considered that it doesn't matter who wins elections because democrats are bad and anything less than making AOC president tomorrow is a worthless bow to :decorum:

Who needs discovery tools in small-dollar cases anyway? That black lady who just got fired because of her west-African accent can just find a new job. I'm the best loving leftist.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

twice burned ice posted:

You're telling me aviatrix is a word and we're going to get rid of it before I've even had an opportunity to use it?



I should have expected that vital signs wouldn't be able to pass up an opportunity to condescend and feel smug, even as someone is making a good-faith effort to use language more responsibly.

I'm not intending to condescend, I was just somewhat jocularly pointing out that you already have dropped female endings for a bunch of formerly gendered occupational names in your everyday speech, so isn't it a bit weird that one more is somehow an affront to the language? If you don't go out of your way to pick a noun form to specify whether a stand-up comic has a vagina maybe it's not that important to make sure your waiter's sexual organs are specifically implied?

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


EwokEntourage posted:

This is a dumb article written about some dumb comment by a judge that would never happen and wasn't even seriously endorsed by the crowd (if you watch the video there's almost no reaction, and people only laugh at the amen comment) but its pretty funny that slate brings up three high profile criminal trials when talking about discovery in civil cases

ok.

BarbarianElephant posted:

AOC will disappoint you all, because your standards are perfection, and perfection is defined as being a Marxist revolutionary.

aoc seems to be further left than i am so nah.

Rinkles
Oct 24, 2010

What I'm getting at is...
Do you feel the same way?
Another Butina update (again, cool if someone could explain)

https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/1070761650163204097

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

BarbarianElephant posted:

AOC will disappoint you all, because your standards are perfection, and perfection is defined as being a Marxist revolutionary.

Oh okay I guess I'll support Trump then since there's no reason to ask for better, apparently

Crow Jane
Oct 18, 2012

nothin' wrong with a lady drinkin' alone in her room
I've never been terribly interested in flying planes, but I kinda want to be able to call myself an aviatrix

Eggplant Squire
Aug 14, 2003


I don't know how you look at our Congress full of dumbfucks, our idiot president, the SCOTUS full of dinorsaurs making ludicrous judicial judgements based on talking to ghosts or fictional TV characters when they aren't just drunken, rapist, gambling addicts and think yeah the age thing is really working out great as a gatekeeping mechanism.

Frankly "experience" is a detriment since as it stands our system is designed so that political experience is easier for rich, connected people to aquire and those people are fundementally unable to understand any issue that affects the majority of the country. Just look at what AOC posted today where the work experience she was gaining was just propoganda from CEOs and Wall Street guys.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

tbh aviatrix sounds way cooler than aviator and we should move to that as the default word because than we can talk about "aviatrices" as the collective and that would own too

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply