|
I went through his post history, it was more than just Roku. Their stock tanked but not to 0
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 15:28 |
|
|
# ? May 18, 2024 19:22 |
|
quote:ser_name_IV Also led me to this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/7w6cq0/i_somehow_made_110k_this_morning_and_im_still_not/ posted:Yesterday at 4:10pm EST I sold the 266.50/266.00 put spread for a 2 cent credit. 1,000 of them. I guess at 4:14 or 4:15 before the option expired SPY must've dipped below 266.50 because I woke up the next morning before the market opened and saw my balance was up about $140k. I thought it was a glitch with the Etrade app at first but then looked at my portfolio and saw what happened. For some reason I was assigned only 863 of the 1000 put contracts I sold. That's 86,300 shares of SPY which is about $23,000,000 worth. I only had $50,000 in my account so I started panicking and wondering if Etrade would liquidate my account or something, so I put in a limit order of 268 (SPY was trading around 268.12 at the time), hoping the sale would go through immediately. After putting in the order a message popped up saying my order would be put through when the market opened, which I don't understand because I thought you could buy and sell stocks/ETFs during premarket hours. So anyway I was stuck staring at my phone's screen until 9:30 when the market opened. Immediately about half my shares sold for $268 each. The market seemed to be dropping so I lowered my limit for the rest to 267.60 and the rest of them sold for that price. After all that my balance was about $112k higher than it was yesterday. Does anyone know how much interest Etrade will charge me for holding 23 million dollars of SPY for these few hours? Proof: https://imgur.com/a/onEjU Which, if you don't know what that all means: quote:He sold contracts that said he had to buy the stock at expiration of the contracts if SPY were at a certain price. He thought they would expire worthless. 4 and 7 days before this post, he made threads titled "Options Question" and "SPY options question".
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 16:20 |
|
totalnewbie posted:Also led me to this post: Jesus christ, this guy wrote 1,000 SPY naked puts (100k shares)? How did etrade even let him do that? I feel like their margin algorithm needs tuning or this guy lied a lot about his assets.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 16:41 |
|
Craps is definitely the most fun game to win at. Thank you for bringing that hilarious subreddit to my attention by the way.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 17:08 |
|
totalnewbie posted:Also led me to this post: I don't really understand what these terms mean but apparently none of the people on that subreddit do either. Maybe I should wager my life savings?
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 17:35 |
|
I can't believe a dealer screwed them over! BMW Lease Gone Wrong- HELP! quote:Hello,
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 18:11 |
|
I can't even follow that. I know that's deliberate, but still. I love how all these posts include "negotiating the monthly payment down" as if a lower number is a win for then.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 18:32 |
|
Maybe they should stop leasing BMWs wint: no
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 18:54 |
|
leasing a new BMW and using the rebates to pay down the excessively large balance on your current BMW loan which is huge because you rolled your previous BMW loan into it I choose to believe the rebates being used for this specific purpose were a real selling point in this whole arrangement
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 19:36 |
|
That's amazing. The helpful dealer turned back the clock on her boyfriend's lease, and now she has to pay his lease payment for three years even though there were only 15 months left on the lease. It's almost as if car dealerships aren't acting in your best interest.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 19:38 |
|
Squinky v2.0 posted:leasing a new BMW and using the rebates to pay down the excessively large balance on your current BMW loan which is huge because you rolled your previous BMW loan into it Imagine four BMWs on the edge of a cliff. Say one BMW falls off the edge of the cliff and turns into a burning, crumpled-up wreck. The negative equity on that BMW will still be lower than the one on your new triple BMW lease. Financing works the same way.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 19:42 |
|
Enchanted Hat posted:Imagine four BMWs on the edge of a cliff. Say one BMW falls off the edge of the cliff and turns into a burning, crumpled-up wreck. The negative equity on that BMW will still be lower than the one on your new triple BMW lease.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 19:49 |
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 22:02 |
|
You're an angel sent from BWM heaven to deliver us from evil.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 22:07 |
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2018 22:27 |
|
Nice Update your loving thread though
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 00:06 |
|
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 00:08 |
|
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 00:19 |
|
Gifs Well Made
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 00:25 |
|
The link is for a building that I saw advertised and noticed potentially leaky features and water damage. Turns out in the disclosures it was a leaky building. The previous own has sold at a loss of almost $800k. https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/...vhIiqAa-7X3ZUJk
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 00:44 |
|
totalnewbie posted:Also led me to this post:
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 01:10 |
|
Should I finance my next iPhonequote:hi all quote:
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 02:33 |
|
Need help running numbers on a new carquote:Im going to buy a new car and am running numbers and have some discrepancy between 2 dealerships. The car above has a msrp of ~42k and im supposed to be getting an A Plan for it because of prior affiliating with Ford. Please let me know if these numbers make sense. quote:
quote:Was hoping for 72 months but the monthly is too high on that term
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 02:54 |
|
People keep explaining to him that he can't afford the car and he keeps on as if he can.quote:A good general guideline is "20/10/4". How about this rule for financing a car? quote:I think the 20/4/10 rule is dumb but the fact that you only have $3k down and are extending the payments to 84 months because you can't afford them on a 72 month plan indicates that you can't afford the car No, that financing rule is dumb. Oh btw you still can't afford the car.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 03:02 |
|
I'm kind of dreading the day a few years from now when a good book like "The Big Short:Inside the Doomsday Machine" or (classic) "The Smartest Guys in the Room" comes out, only it's about what's going on now with auto loans and how everyone should have seen the crash coming. I mean, I'll read it, but it'd be nice if it didn't need to be written. There will always be a huge number of consumers who will take whatever banks are willing to give them whether it's smart or not. That is nothing new. What's changed dramatically in the last couple decades is the willingness of the banking/finance industry to profit off and indeed flat out exploit that fact. Everything going on with auto loans, 84 month terms (72 is nearly the norm now!), rates, etc. reminds me of the lead up to the housing crisis where I had a number of (idiot) friends and co-workers buying overpriced houses on interest-only terms because housing prices just kept going up. At the time they were buying mini-mansions on ex-farmland in the prairie outside Denver - an area not known (then or now) for a shortage of real estate. Jesus.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 03:57 |
|
Thankfully interest only or negative amortizing auto loans don’t exist yet. Please no one tell me they exist if they do.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 04:08 |
|
Fitzy Fitz posted:Did he go all in on Roku...? Turns out he had a naked short on a company called Stitch Fix (think Blue Apron but for clothes): quote:[–]memecaptial[S] 179 points 1 day ago* For reference, the stock ran up to $53 after he shorted it before crashing below $25, so he was right but as the saying goes "the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 04:47 |
|
The only thing dumber than investing in poo poo that advertises on podcasts is shorting poo poo that advertises on podcasts
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 04:58 |
|
crazypeltast52 posted:Thankfully interest only or negative amortizing auto loans don’t exist yet. Please no one tell me they exist if they do. As with the housing calamity in 2007-2008 what matters is not the terms to the consumers, but how banks are packaging and selling the loans in the form of bonds or other financial instruments. You'd *think* they'd know better now but... All that matters on the consumer end is whether a large number of them start defaulting leaving pennies on the dollar for whoever ultimately ended up holding the bag of risk. It's a zero-sum game so someone is going to lose, and those losses can ripple far beyond their particular market segment. And cars hold value even worse than houses and also have almost no chance of improving over time; quite the opposite. That, and a large number of loans are starting to approach mortgage like levels - look what a loving Ford Raptor tricked out (to use a favorite example here) costs.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 05:06 |
|
Ixian posted:I'm kind of dreading the day a few years from now when a good book like "The Big Short:Inside the Doomsday Machine" or (classic) "The Smartest Guys in the Room" comes out, only it's about what's going on now with auto loans and how everyone should have seen the crash coming. There’s a subprime market for cars and it crashed in 2007 like housing, but it’ll never hold a candle to the shitstorm that was securitized mortgages. There just isn’t the same kind of exposure and automakers are already cutting production because the market is getting softer. They don’t have the same perverse incentives mortgage lenders and housing developers had, which meant home building was going balls deep right up to the cliff. Auto financing has pretty regular cycles and things like leases are popular for consistent chunks of time and then become regularly cursed when used car stock becomes too great and you’ve got tons of vehicles going off lease without anyone to buy them.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 05:18 |
|
The other thing about the next crisis is that even Lehman was solvent, just not liquid enough to handle the credit markets freezing up. So if intrabano lending can survive, it should be less bad than the last one. Edit: meant interbank, but interbano is too good to correct. crazypeltast52 fucked around with this message at 05:24 on Dec 13, 2018 |
# ? Dec 13, 2018 05:22 |
|
The financial product that will be a part of the Big Short 2 will be CLOs. It's not just auto loans, but credit card debt and student loans all rolled together. Rolled together like dung beetle poo poo. The theory is they all can't blow up at once. Of course the debts are in no way independent.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 06:39 |
|
Devian666 posted:The financial product that will be a part of the Big Short 2 will be CLOs. It's not just auto loans, but credit card debt and student loans all rolled together. Rolled together like dung beetle poo poo. I was going to guess student debt, but good to know it'll be even dumber than that.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 06:52 |
|
Most student loans are viewed as low risk because there are so few options to get out from under them but at the end of the day dollars need to cross the table and if they don't, people betting on them are hosed no matter what the various laws are, also if we learned anything from the crisis a decade ago it's that idiots making increasingly risky bets can explode all over the economy. As far as auto - I don't think auto loans themselves will be as bad overall as the housing market implosion was either but I do think they have the potential to gently caress things up pretty good regardless.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 08:51 |
|
Don't invest, spend everything, die young, leave a beautiful corpse. Maybe the grasshopper was the true GWM one all along
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 12:30 |
|
Student loans may not crash spectacularly, but they will continue to smother the economy as we all barely get by and feed most of our income into the pockets of landlords and banks.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 14:41 |
|
This one is asking for advice, but it's just so dumb I had to post it Am student. Would like to buy house instead of pay rent. Good idea? quote:I'm planning on getting my PhD somewhere in the US over the course of the next 5-7 years, and instead of paying rent, I thought it would be cool to buy a house instead and save that rent money in the form of property. Thing is, I'm 22 and have only a couple grand to my name (but no student loans, and I pay off cc every month, so credit score is good). I know I need some money for a down-payment, but what I'm wondering is just how feasible this idea is? What are some hurdles I don't even know about? When I think about how I would go about it, I would find maybe 4 other students, put together a down payment, pay about $1k/mo each in house-loan payments, and then have a house at the end of the 5-7 years. Even cooler would be if the other four students were my renters instead of co-owners, and I got to keep the house at the end! quote:
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 16:43 |
|
Inept posted:This one is asking for advice, but it's just so dumb I had to post it Hoooooly poo poo. Reminds me of a buddy who bought a house in 2006 that was 5 bedrooms, 2200 sq ft. He was unmarried, but had lots of friends which he let move in for exactly 1/5 of the mortgage cost each. He ended up badly upside down on the house and had to do a short sale so he could move back to Ohio. He lost well over 40k in that debacle.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 17:15 |
|
RIP anyone who bought in 2006.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 17:27 |
|
|
# ? May 18, 2024 19:22 |
|
FAUXTON posted:The only thing dumber than investing in poo poo that advertises on podcasts is shorting poo poo that advertises on podcasts How about investing with companies that advertise on podcasts? Yesterday this happened with Robinhood: quote:railfanespee[🍰] 8 points 43 minutes ago Robinhood chose today to launch their new checking account product (with 3% interest) and I found this out while looking at their Reddit to see if they could be trusted. I think I'll pass on this offer for now.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2018 17:36 |