Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Aeolius
Jul 16, 2003

Simon Templeman Fanclub

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

the economic base of society and its social relations are what ultimately shape the political superstructure, because politics are ultimately an expression of class power. so to have a political system that has just distribution of social production, you have to overthrow the underlying class relations of dominance and submission.

careful in equating politics with superstructure in a necessary way, though — that's the static sort of error the analytical marxists fell into, and one i will also cop to having made a number of times

this is not to dispute that different underlying economic forms can encourage different political forms, and these will reciprocally affect one another. but the base as employed by marx is the economic structure of society, which consists of the sum of relations of production, and political relations become productive relations to the extent that they impact, or even steer, production. as always, marx's method shouldn't be taken as a doctrine so much as "a guiding thread" that only really comes into its own when it underlabors empirical investigation of what is playing what role within the totality

superstructure thus shouldn't be thought of as a substantially separable order of material structures, but rather "the ideal form in which the totality of material relations which make up the 'base' itself are manifested to consciousness" — the forms that comprise the way a society conceives of itself

for a thorough discussion of these matters, i recommend Derek Sayer's "The Violence of Abstraction"

Aeolius fucked around with this message at 06:48 on Dec 18, 2018

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Aeolius
Jul 16, 2003

Simon Templeman Fanclub
quote != edit

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

ShriekingMarxist posted:

yup yup yup, the GOP has been playing the long game on the culture (class) war for over a decade and it's disgusting fruits are starting to blossom

supercut of every thirdway clintonian progressive either in the government or media field talking about how RvW is settled business, never going anywhere, we need to broker compromises with pro-life candidates and america, blah blah blah, and look where we are now lmfao. if you ever think of compromising yourself to "win" something with or from democrats, simply gaze upon the WILD SUCCESSES they've achieved with compromise lol

The one thing you gotta hand to reactionaries is that they've always understood that "compromise" is an erosion of dominant class power. Which is why never compromising and just killing all agitators worked so well for millenia until modernity leveled the field when it comes to class violence.

Question Friend
Aug 3, 2018

by FactsAreUseless

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

I like what Felix Biederman called a "psychotic culture of productivity," where libs think the job of a congressperson is to do something, and that if you can't pass bills then that means you're not doing your job. The job of a representative is to represent their district, so passing tons of garbage is never going to be as good as getting nothing passed but never giving up on your political agenda. Tea Partiers sabotaged Obama's compromise on social security reform because they knew that pushing the country more towards psychotic reaction would pay off in more dividends than passing legislation that everyone would hate. Libs just don't get politics anymore because they've spent too long at the top.

Well in the longer term, and let's be real we're mostly talking about older people here, they've spent about half the time at the top. Y'know every eight years we switch

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

The one thing you gotta hand to reactionaries is that they've always understood that "compromise" is an erosion of dominant class power. Which is why never compromising and just killing all agitators worked so well for millenia until modernity leveled the field when it comes to class violence.

if you're not starting from the position that a capitalist and capital are completely unnecessary things to exist and their interests are irrelevant, then it's easy to see how they might be "due" some kind of concession or compromise lol

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
"well, I *guess* we can tack on some defense contracts to this food stamp bill, because a bunch of people who 'own literally everything' somehow SHOULD have some of their desires seen to!"

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Question Friend posted:

Well in the longer term, and let's be real we're mostly talking about older people here, they've spent about half the time at the top. Y'know every eight years we switch

Except we don't switch every eight years. John Dingell has served in the House since 1955. Power passes over whole generations because of institutional gerontocracy, and there's never a meaningful transfer of power from the old to the young because seniority is always favored over leadership.

Question Friend
Aug 3, 2018

by FactsAreUseless

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Except we don't switch every eight years. John Dingell has served in the House since 1955. Power passes over whole generations because of institutional gerontocracy, and there's never a meaningful transfer of power from the old to the young because seniority is always favored over leadership.

I assumed you were talking about the presidency specifically because that's where Dems had been in power the longest

A Big Fuckin Hornet
Nov 1, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

She's gonna do some lovely things because that's part of the compromise that has to be made with the system as it is. She's already done more than 99% of seated congressmen by exposing the bourgeois dictatorship, even if she doesn't have a really revolutionary agenda.

When right wingers say, "socialists winning elections is just one step towards communism" they're not wrong.

I only use her as an example of how there is still pushback from the left for even the mildest of criticisms. she is super popular and attractive with good opinions so as far as celeb idolatry goes you could do much worse, but gently caress it makes me pessimistic to hear demsocs defend her with the same poo poo we have heard libs defend obama/hillary with.

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

A Big Fuckin Hornet posted:

I only use her as an example of how there is still pushback from the left for even the mildest of criticisms. she is super popular and attractive with good opinions so as far as celeb idolatry goes you could do much worse, but gently caress it makes me pessimistic to hear demsocs defend her with the same poo poo we have heard libs defend obama/hillary with.

Ace of Baes is pretty bad about this. Giving people grief for compromising on poo poo like Palestine isn't throwing the baby out with the bathwater, calm your balls.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

Question Friend posted:

I assumed you were talking about the presidency specifically because that's where Dems had been in power the longest

Dems held Congress for something like 40 years right up until the death of the New Deal coalition right around the Clinton era

and the Presidency AFAIK has also not been held by the Dems for significantly longer amounts of time than the Republicans, depending on how far back you look.

A Big Fuckin Hornet
Nov 1, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo
If anything shitposting at AOC from the left has worked. now she supports BDS and i dont recall any GHWB death tweet

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

A Big Fuckin Hornet posted:

If anything shitposting at AOC from the left has worked. now she supports BDS and i dont recall any GHWB death tweet

once again the misogynists in the dirtbag left silence women voices

https://twitter.com/virgiltexas/status/1033541213809455105?lang=en

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Ace of Baes is pretty bad about this. Giving people grief for compromising on poo poo like Palestine isn't throwing the baby out with the bathwater, calm your balls.

If anything, it's to hold these folks responsible as we ought and should and to ensure that not only are they making good on the promises made, but are also open to future decisions based on the framework they've laid down with those promises.

though I still like that everyone was proudly clapping themselves on the back when she had won the primary

Impermanent
Apr 1, 2010
i mean the primary thing makes some sense because she's in like a D+a lot district. What's funny to me is that the DSA clapped themselves on the back despite the fact that there's no real indication, on any front, and the DSA themselves have ever been a significant boost to any electoral campaign at all, and has merely hitched its wagon to people who proceeded to win or fail without its help. Even supposed "DSA alderman" carlos rosa in chicago is widely known in any political circle here to be primarily supported by the national nurses united bloc, which is primarily responsible for the formation of his aldermanic ward booster group and has pushed many other union-friendly city-level politicans entirely without the help of the dsa.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

Victory Position posted:

though I still like that everyone was proudly clapping themselves on the back when she had won the primary

I don't really see anything wrong with having considered AOC to be a lock for elected office as soon as she won the primary, considering the district she was in

Emmideer
Oct 20, 2011

Lovely night, no?
Grimey Drawer
i love this thread, no irony

Grand Prize Winner
Feb 19, 2007


Impermanent posted:

aldermanic ward booster group

he consorts with sorcerers and still won the election? dang

Impermanent
Apr 1, 2010
You'd get surprised how hard it is to win an election in Chicago WITHOUT the sorcerers.

GunnerJ
Aug 1, 2005

Do you think this is funny?

ShriekingMarxist posted:

it's for sure a man made of straw, but recently awakened rose emoji and dirtbag left dudes are so sensitive to their freshly minted woke credentials being revoked and canceled by uppity minorities and marginalized people that really low effort baiting like this makes them go apoplectic and need rallying behind by more bonafide commies

:hmmyes:

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
do not hmmyes me you bastard, you scuM! i've seen meltdowns you wouldn't believe, over the most trifling poo poo imaginable!! though a lot of it is probably just the result of the types of broken brains that inhabit the brackish waters of incredibly online and incredibly leftist spaces......

also i think I had an important thought and I need to bounce it off commies;

i think one of the main reasons technology and apps are Ill suited to be revolutionary tools is because basically all of tech, apps and etc are designed as tools to facilitate targeted, market based consumption and spread commodity fetish, which are themselves ways of being exploited by capitalism, thus, it's then very easy to see how insidious totalitarian privacy erosion for the sake of marketing can be easily adapted to fascist ends (singling out target populations, spreading propaganda messages to the right people etc)

when i say tech I'm kinda drawing a circle around gadget tech and media, there are valid tech advances for production obviously! harvester combines and, fukken, blast furnaces. though, I think there's enough casual evidence that shows consumer tech being a useful tool for oppressive governments, mostly by gatekeeping data, and tracking / propagandizing people. you CAN hijack some aspects tech for revolutionary ends, but it's a lot of culture jamming, or, taking your life into your own hands (trusting in encryption and whatnot to keep your secrets)

the extent of which the liberal state is already entwined with and at the root of mass media kinda shows they knew what the impact would be right away and got control of it early (the FCC, zoning for running cable and fiber, etc)

please read my future medium piece Literally Just Set Your Cell Phone On Fire And Never Touch Another Again

platzapS
Aug 4, 2007

Important notice from Red Guards Austin:

Red Guards Austin website posted:

This project has reached its conclusion, we are no more.

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

platzapS posted:

Important notice from Red Guards Austin:

100000000% cops

coathat
May 21, 2007

They fear the swamp

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
this is the most hilarious possibly end to the whole RGA thing

GunnerJ
Aug 1, 2005

Do you think this is funny?
F

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Social fascism is going to take over Austin now

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

platzapS posted:

Important notice from Red Guards Austin:

:rip: to a real one

apropos to nothing
Sep 5, 2003
lol

big business man
Sep 30, 2012

Chairman Gonzalo will have his revenge

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
He’s done it again folks

https://twitter.com/getfiscal/status/1074707309543260160?s=21

coathat
May 21, 2007

My favorite is retweeting labour party calls for more police

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

platzapS posted:

Important notice from Red Guards Austin:

THS
Sep 15, 2017

platzapS posted:

Important notice from Red Guards Austin:

hahahaha

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


so I'm assuming there is some kind of yet untold interpersonal drama at the core of this, yes?

GunnerJ
Aug 1, 2005

Do you think this is funny?

Mr. Lobe posted:

so I'm assuming there is some kind of yet untold interpersonal drama at the core of this, yes?

Nah just Austin PD tightening the belt, shouldn't have handed them a blank check for their pig head budget.

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


GunnerJ posted:

Nah just Austin PD tightening the belt, shouldn't have handed them a blank check for their pig head budget.

I mean, the drama COULD be cops. their composition have been a combination of dupes and cops, and perhaps one of the dupes found out just enough to realize someone else was a cop, and things just escalated from there. it invites a lot to the imagination, to think too much about that group. which probably should not be done in any case

especially now lol

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MngxESKvBRQ&t=221s

smarxist
Jul 26, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
I'm gonna put my chips down on RGD being an insane 4chan puppet theater for showcasing the LOONY LEFT

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

ShriekingMarxist posted:

I'm gonna put my chips down on RGD being an insane 4chan puppet theater for showcasing the LOONY LEFT

Red Guards Dallas are a bunch of filthy imperialist running dogs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5