Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Perestroika
Apr 8, 2010

Einbauschrank posted:

Idg the hate. "Wer nicht arbeitet, soll auch nicht essen" is a staple of the left. As is the "Recht auf Arbeit" which was proudly written into the Menschenrechtscharta.

The BGE (emphasis on the "B") seems like a cool idea, but I've never read a good paper on its Effekt bei flächendeckender Einführung: Will more People work or less? Will GDP rise or fall? Will it lead to a Kapitalflucht or not ? Only thing most papers agree on is the fact that it should lead to an increase of the inflation rate.

Other macroeconomic effects cannot be predicted and therefore make implementation risky. The Gegenfinanzierung isn't on a sound ground either. It's either "eat the rich" or "tax the robbits", either of which opens a bunch of other cans of worms.

It should be acknowledged that the SPD resisted the populist lure of promising a wet brainfart in exchange for the votes of gulllible people. This sense of responsibility is the difference between staatstragende Sozialdemokratie and the populist left.

As Nahles has voiced this opinion before (in November and as a reaction to Habeck's vague Garantiesicherung) it should be added that even Habeck doesn't propose a BGE ...

It's not even about the BGE in particular, but the messaging as a whole. It's becoming increasingly apparent that the traditional idea of just making sure everybody has a nice full-time job to live off is simply no longer feasible. Even now a massive amount of the employed are in Prekärbeschäftigung, and the trend of increasing efficiency and automation isn't looking to reverse anytime soon. Parties will need to figure out a concept how to handle this issue*. And now here's the SPD, who is supposed to be specifically looking out for those most threatened and worried by this development, and them rolling up with basically CDU-level rhetoric along the lines of "more work is the answer, welfare bad and for lazy moochers" is... not inspiring, to say the least.

*Whether that might be a mincome, sozialer Arbeitsmarkt, the FDP's "just teach everyone to code and do startups and trust the ~*~free market~*~, or something else entirely is a separate issue.

Perestroika fucked around with this message at 13:35 on Dec 31, 2018

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Randler
Jan 3, 2013

ACER ET VEHEMENS BONAVIS
Die SPD ist das Berlin der deutschen Parteilandschaft.

GABA ghoul
Oct 29, 2011

Make sausage out of everyone who can't code and sell the sausage using automated sausage shops :hai:

System Metternich
Feb 28, 2010

But what did he mean by that?

Smirr posted:

staatstragende drywall

Lord Stimperor
Jun 13, 2018

I'm a lovable meme.

Libluini posted:

Apparently "staatstragend" is code for "only idiots vote for them", considering how the SPD is bombing in elections so far

Besides, the entire BGE discussion is kind of confusing for me, we are already giving people Hartz IV, after all. The BGE is basically the same, just with less bureaucracy and set on a slightly higher level of "income". I'm fairly sure if we just give everyone a slightly higher, renamed Hartz IV but bulldoze the gigantic bureaucratic machine behind Hartz IV, the state would come out on top.

And I'm speaking here as someone who lived many years under Hartz IV and has relatives living under Hartz IV right now, so I know fairly well what a bureaucratic Kindergarten Hartz IV. The wastage of effort and money is enormous.


The problem with the tweet isn't that the blurb by Nahles is factually incorrect, it's that it's incredibly tone-deaf.

You rightly point out that a universal basic income would just be another welfare scheme in a sugar coat, with macro-economic uncertainties attached. But right now, welfare schemes carry exceptionally bad stigmata. There are tons of people who can't work due to disability and illness, who are stuck in the health and welfare systems. There are segments of working age population who couldn't work in anything but state-subsidized small time employment in toxic jobs at businesses that wouldn't be competitive without state aid. Others are driven to become 'self-employed' delivery drivers, which is just the same kind of state aid to the parental company except with more poo poo. It's my impression that the state has nothing to offer to these people except derision and contempt. If you're working and can't make rent because you're still treated as a Sozialschmarotzer and Bittsteller.

Now I agree that a universal basic income would probably not help these people a terrible lot. Maybe it'll be a bit more for some, but less for others. There's the danger that individual needs and hardships that exceed the BGE will not be covered. Maybe it does save the state a little work (and employment, ha) to process the BGE compared to the current system. But to act as though society right now is an egalitarian utopia where everyone can pull themselves up by their bootstraps isn't helping. Maybe it is time we acknowledged people's struggles. Maybe it's also time to realize that increasing spending to a group that uses 99% of their money at the supermarket next door is an easy way to ease their problems while stimulating consumption in meager years (I mean isn't Germany's lack of a consumer market one of her biggest economical weaknesses anyway?).


So Nahles reflects on all this, then looks at the history of Social Democracy across Europe and in Germany. She realizes that as a Social Democrat she's in the game to stand up for the disenfranchised and create a healthy economy for everyone. Nah gently caress it she goes all :bahgawd: and :smuggo: about it.






I mean, really, who is the SPD trying to appeal to anymore?

Pand
Apr 1, 2011

Jogi Maldito

Smirr posted:

staatstragende drywall

:discourse:

Lord Stimperor
Jun 13, 2018

I'm a lovable meme.

Smirr posted:

staatstragende drywall

:dadjoke:

Libluini
May 18, 2012

I gravitated towards the Greens, eventually even joining the party itself.

The Linke is a party I grudgingly accept exists, but I've learned enough about DDR-history I can't bring myself to trust a party that was once the SED, a party leading the corrupt state apparatus ...
Grimey Drawer

Lord Stimperor posted:

The problem with the tweet isn't that the blurb by Nahles is factually incorrect, it's that it's incredibly tone-deaf.

You rightly point out that a universal basic income would just be another welfare scheme in a sugar coat, with macro-economic uncertainties attached. But right now, welfare schemes carry exceptionally bad stigmata. There are tons of people who can't work due to disability and illness, who are stuck in the health and welfare systems. There are segments of working age population who couldn't work in anything but state-subsidized small time employment in toxic jobs at businesses that wouldn't be competitive without state aid. Others are driven to become 'self-employed' delivery drivers, which is just the same kind of state aid to the parental company except with more poo poo. It's my impression that the state has nothing to offer to these people except derision and contempt. If you're working and can't make rent because you're still treated as a Sozialschmarotzer and Bittsteller.

Now I agree that a universal basic income would probably not help these people a terrible lot. Maybe it'll be a bit more for some, but less for others. There's the danger that individual needs and hardships that exceed the BGE will not be covered. Maybe it does save the state a little work (and employment, ha) to process the BGE compared to the current system. But to act as though society right now is an egalitarian utopia where everyone can pull themselves up by their bootstraps isn't helping. Maybe it is time we acknowledged people's struggles. Maybe it's also time to realize that increasing spending to a group that uses 99% of their money at the supermarket next door is an easy way to ease their problems while stimulating consumption in meager years (I mean isn't Germany's lack of a consumer market one of her biggest economical weaknesses anyway?).

If I had political power, I would just set a basic income at a round, easy to process 1k Euro (of course, every year automatically adjusted for inflation, so it wouldn't stay that way for long). I would set the basic income up in a way so it wouldn't interfere with people getting money from the healthcare system and other sources, if they need it. It can't be set lower without the need to adjust a lot of laws anyway: In Hannover, Wohngeld needs a minimum income of ca. 900+ Euro, so a lower basic income would make you ineligible. Tough, if your basic income can't cover your rent but thanks to the local situation there are no cheaper apartments available.

To keep things simple (and because I'm incredibly cynical), only adults over the age of 18 would be eligible for the Grundeinkommen, and only half of it if they choose to sit down at home instead of getting their own place to live. To incentivize people living together instead of alone in some lonely hovel, there will be no reductions if you live in a Wohngemeinschaft.

Problems would probably arise by people in debt, as the Lohnpfändungsgrenze would probably need adjustment if the Lohnpfändungsgrenze is not adjusted automatically by inflation, as otherwise the basic income would sooner or later grow over the LPG, causing problems if Pfändung of basic income is allowed. I would probably disallow it, but I don't know if the Lohnpfändungsgrenze covers every source of possible income, or if things like Wohngeld, the new basic income, etc. could be / are already excluded.

Now I would obviously get into trouble if it turns out the new system costs as much to run as the old one, as then I would need a source of money to cover this. The solutions I've come up so far:

-Turning the rich into sausage to feed the poor, steal all their money for the state: Probably not enough money.
-Raise taxes on both the rich, the mediocre and the poor: Enough money, but probably causes Kapitalflucht and Revolution.
-Implement a post-scarcity economy really fast: Money isn't needed anymore, but probably causes an American intervention and my decapitation by American soldiers.
-Dissolve the Rentensystem, as old people die soon anyway: Enough money, but probably causes my decapitation by a mob of angry senior citizens
-Dissolve the army: Gets enough money for about 1 sandwich per month per citizen, tops. Suboptimal. Also generates more costs thanks to everyone having to learn Russian after the inevitable invasion. Probably ends up generating negative money after the Russians steal our entire industry for themselves.

Man, this poo poo is hard

bronin
Oct 15, 2009

use it or throw it away

Libluini posted:

-Dissolve the army: Gets enough money for about 1 sandwich per month per citizen, tops. Suboptimal. Also generates more costs thanks to everyone having to learn Russian after the inevitable invasion. Probably ends up generating negative money after the Russians steal our entire industry for themselves.

:allears:

pidan
Nov 6, 2012


Libluini posted:

If I had political power, I would just set a basic income at a round, easy to process 1k Euro (of course, every year automatically adjusted for inflation, so it wouldn't stay that way for long). I would set the basic income up in a way so it wouldn't interfere with people getting money from the healthcare system and other sources, if they need it. It can't be set lower without the need to adjust a lot of laws anyway: In Hannover, Wohngeld needs a minimum income of ca. 900+ Euro, so a lower basic income would make you ineligible. Tough, if your basic income can't cover your rent but thanks to the local situation there are no cheaper apartments available.

To keep things simple (and because I'm incredibly cynical), only adults over the age of 18 would be eligible for the Grundeinkommen, and only half of it if they choose to sit down at home instead of getting their own place to live. To incentivize people living together instead of alone in some lonely hovel, there will be no reductions if you live in a Wohngemeinschaft.

Problems would probably arise by people in debt, as the Lohnpfändungsgrenze would probably need adjustment if the Lohnpfändungsgrenze is not adjusted automatically by inflation, as otherwise the basic income would sooner or later grow over the LPG, causing problems if Pfändung of basic income is allowed. I would probably disallow it, but I don't know if the Lohnpfändungsgrenze covers every source of possible income, or if things like Wohngeld, the new basic income, etc. could be / are already excluded.

Now I would obviously get into trouble if it turns out the new system costs as much to run as the old one, as then I would need a source of money to cover this. The solutions I've come up so far:

-Turning the rich into sausage to feed the poor, steal all their money for the state: Probably not enough money.
-Raise taxes on both the rich, the mediocre and the poor: Enough money, but probably causes Kapitalflucht and Revolution.
-Implement a post-scarcity economy really fast: Money isn't needed anymore, but probably causes an American intervention and my decapitation by American soldiers.
-Dissolve the Rentensystem, as old people die soon anyway: Enough money, but probably causes my decapitation by a mob of angry senior citizens
-Dissolve the army: Gets enough money for about 1 sandwich per month per citizen, tops. Suboptimal. Also generates more costs thanks to everyone having to learn Russian after the inevitable invasion. Probably ends up generating negative money after the Russians steal our entire industry for themselves.

Man, this poo poo is hard

Fully agree with this analysis, except for your baffling plan to let all babies starve.

Randler
Jan 3, 2013

ACER ET VEHEMENS BONAVIS

pidan posted:

Fully agree with this analysis, except for your baffling plan to let all babies starve.

Having kids is ALWAYS a selfish act, always. There is no other reason for having kids than selfish reasons (besides religious reasons).

Mithaldu
Sep 25, 2007

Let's cuddle. :3:
Please don't reward the loving Faden-Nazi by even reading his poo poo past the first sentence if the very first sentence already is an extremely clear lie of the type of "THE NAZIS WERE ACTUALLY SOCIALIST U GUYS"

Duzzy Funlop posted:

That's not even a "Rasenmähermotor", that's a mass-produced DIY conversion for bikes, and the manual usually includes a big ol' "COMPLY WITH LOCAL LAW AND REGULATION, YOU DINGUS" warning



loving NRW-Polizei and their clickbait :mad:
I shouldn't be surprised that the police clickbaits, but i am. :(

Lord Stimperor posted:

The problem with the tweet isn't that the blurb by Nahles is factually incorrect
Assuming basic income would come with the rescinding of all other types of aids is either very stupid, or very far-sighted, depending on whether you assume that's what people for it actually want, or whether you believe the politicians would implement it as badly and cruelly as they can.

Mithaldu fucked around with this message at 14:21 on Dec 31, 2018

GABA ghoul
Oct 29, 2011

While we are making suggestions for post-revolutionary Germany, please put this on the list too

- people should literally own the means of production, as the great Carl Marx envisioned. Citizens will own 2% of all companies that have their seat in Germany and be entitled to the same rights as all other stock holders. Dividends are distributed equally among all citizens, everyone has one vote.

Foreign companies will pay dividends to German citizens on their German revenue as if 2% was owned by them, they can book that as tax expenses

Duzzy Funlop
Jan 13, 2010

Hi there, would you like to try some spicy products?

Mithaldu posted:

Please don't reward the loving Faden-Nazi by even reading his poo poo past the first sentence if the very first sentence already is an extremely clear lie of the type of "THE NAZIS WERE ACTUALLY SOCIALIST U GUYS"

Wait, who?

GABA ghoul
Oct 29, 2011


The man who saw Nazis smearing their cum over the hotel curtains and was seriously intrigued

Mithaldu
Sep 25, 2007

Let's cuddle. :3:

Einbauschrank is responsible for the thread title by telling the above story in here. He keeps stopping by and saying nazi things.

GABA ghoul
Oct 29, 2011

The progression on this is kinda interesting. First Riso was the Fadenanzi and he was actually a bonafide national socialist. After he got run out of town, GC was the new Fadenanzi but he was just a soulless, amoral materialist and not actually a nazi. Now Einbauschrank is the new Fadenanzi and he is simply some milquetoast 17 year old FDP edge lord. I wonder who is next

Also, Cingulate. He was just some milquetoast academic

oliwan
Jul 20, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo
I loving love Rotkäppchen.

You drink it pre-party as a cheap festive drink, then on the party when you want an alcoholic palate cleanser from all the cigarette smoke, and then at the after-party for the same reasons when you are coming down of the drugs and more cigarettes. Of course it's not a good wine ffs, that's the whole point.

Peggotty
May 9, 2014

Wait, riso and GC are two different people?

This stuff is hard to keep track of, randlers deutschgoons.xlsx should be on a public Google drive imo.

Peggotty fucked around with this message at 15:00 on Dec 31, 2018

Mithaldu
Sep 25, 2007

Let's cuddle. :3:

Raspberry Jam It In Me posted:

The progression on this is kinda interesting. First Riso was the Fadenanzi and he was actually a bonafide national socialist. After he got run out of town, GC was the new Fadenanzi but he was just a soulless, amoral materialist and not actually a nazi. Now Einbauschrank is the new Fadenanzi and he is simply some milquetoast 17 year old FDP edge lord. I wonder who is next

Also, Cingulate. He was just some milquetoast academic

What did GC get cut for?

Also, really, there's no point in making a favourable distinction between a *believing* nazi and an "edge lord shitposter who does it for the lulz". If anything the latter is even worse because they don't believe they're doing anything good, they just want to see people hurt.

Randler
Jan 3, 2013

ACER ET VEHEMENS BONAVIS

Mithaldu posted:

What did GC get cut for?


Link

Randler fucked around with this message at 15:10 on Dec 31, 2018

Mithaldu
Sep 25, 2007

Let's cuddle. :3:
I didn't have any recall of him being a nazi, but i guess getting banned for messing with an israel thread puts that question to bed.

Einbauschrank
Nov 5, 2009

Mithaldu posted:

Einbauschrank is responsible for the thread title by telling the above story in here. He keeps stopping by and saying nazi things.

This was a perfectly reasonable discussion among adults until you butted in. Please do what you were trained to do and touch a computer for money rather than straining your mental faculties by trying to form a political thought. It regurlarly leads to you coming across as creep. And as I told you before nobody takes you seriously that way.

Torrannor
Apr 27, 2013

---FAGNER---
TEAM-MATE
I don't think Einbauschrank is a nazi. He may have some imho reprehensible conservative opinions, but please point me to the post that shows him being a nazi.

Libluini
May 18, 2012

I gravitated towards the Greens, eventually even joining the party itself.

The Linke is a party I grudgingly accept exists, but I've learned enough about DDR-history I can't bring myself to trust a party that was once the SED, a party leading the corrupt state apparatus ...
Grimey Drawer
If you want to see real Nazis, I could go and invite them from the Climate Change thread. There you have guys genuinely thinking we can only be saved by establishing a dictatorship and/or killing billions of people. Also some of the posters are seriously mentally ill. If you remember this weird Nazi-obsession with planting trees, there's basically no difference anymore

Duzzy Funlop
Jan 13, 2010

Hi there, would you like to try some spicy products?

Mithaldu posted:

What did GC get cut for?

Also, really, there's no point in making a favourable distinction between a *believing* nazi and an "edge lord shitposter who does it for the lulz".

If anything the latter is even worse because they don't believe they're doing anything good, they just want to see people hurt.

In lieu of Oliwanposting, I'm gonna be serious and say I kinda think there really, really is a point in distinguishing between actual Neonazis that are a danger to our democracy and humanity-at-large, and idiots with dumb opinions trolling on some forum.
Because the worst the latter do is inconvenience a bunch of other people on said forum, and they can be run out of town relatively easily. Defeating actual Neonazis requires exponentially more effort, and that effort needs to be sustained, almost none of which can be done exclusively on some forum.

So blurring the lines between trolls and actual Neonazis (along with everything in between on that spectrum, like racist grandpas, CSU Politiker, AfD Politiker, etc) seems extremely counter-productive to me.

I think I made an effort-post to that extent in this very Faden before, but I'd really just prefer if we didn't casually call people Nazis in here unless they are the real deal. Edgelord-Racists? Run them out of town. Trolls posting racist poo poo? Run them out of town.
But don't throw around Nazi at a new person every couple of months. (Not addressing you here, mind)

Hell, I'm pretty sure Randler was unironically referred to as the Fadennazi more than once.

Mithaldu
Sep 25, 2007

Let's cuddle. :3:
Frankly, i find the point worth discussing, even if i see it a bit differently than you. What you say has merit on its own, but i worry that it leaves out the effects large amounts of "ironic shitposters" have on the people who truly believe and are easily swayed into actually acting out horrible poo poo.

That said, i'm not against addressing various kinds of detriment to humanity in more exact ways, but i fully admit that i'm a little too lazy to do it consistently and am not yet convinced that it's counter-productive, since for most of those the actual end product on the ground is the same, even if the reach of some is weaker and around some corners.


Torrannor posted:

I don't think Einbauschrank is a nazi. He may have some imho reprehensible conservative opinions, but please point me to the post that shows him being a nazi.
Only pulling this up because it was very recent: https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?action=showpost&postid=490442624

Lord Stimperor
Jun 13, 2018

I'm a lovable meme.

Duzzy Funlop posted:

In lieu of Oliwanposting, I'm gonna be serious and say I kinda think there really, really is a point in distinguishing between actual Neonazis that are a danger to our democracy and humanity-at-large, and idiots with dumb opinions trolling on some forum.
Because the worst the latter do is inconvenience a bunch of other people on said forum, and they can be run out of town relatively easily. Defeating actual Neonazis requires exponentially more effort, and that effort needs to be sustained, almost none of which can be done exclusively on some forum.

So blurring the lines between trolls and actual Neonazis (along with everything in between on that spectrum, like racist grandpas, CSU Politiker, AfD Politiker, etc) seems extremely counter-productive to me.

I think I made an effort-post to that extent in this very Faden before, but I'd really just prefer if we didn't casually call people Nazis in here unless they are the real deal. Edgelord-Racists? Run them out of town. Trolls posting racist poo poo? Run them out of town.
But don't throw around Nazi at a new person every couple of months. (Not addressing you here, mind)

Hell, I'm pretty sure Randler was unironically referred to as the Fadennazi more than once.

I get what you are saying. But 10 years ago I thought people on 4chan were being edgy and ironic and using Nazi taboos for humor. Similarly I thought people on the internet were making jokes about women in an unfunny but harmless way. They were not making an awkward attention at humor.

Lord Stimperor
Jun 13, 2018

I'm a lovable meme.

Btw regarding NYE drinks, I got myself a dark Belgian beer that I'll be sipping for an hour or so.

Peggotty
May 9, 2014

Duzzy Funlop posted:

In lieu of Oliwanposting, I'm gonna be serious and say I kinda think there really, really is a point in distinguishing between actual Neonazis that are a danger to our democracy and humanity-at-large, and idiots with dumb opinions trolling on some forum.
Because the worst the latter do is inconvenience a bunch of other people on said forum, and they can be run out of town relatively easily. Defeating actual Neonazis requires exponentially more effort, and that effort needs to be sustained, almost none of which can be done exclusively on some forum.

So blurring the lines between trolls and actual Neonazis (along with everything in between on that spectrum, like racist grandpas, CSU Politiker, AfD Politiker, etc) seems extremely counter-productive to me.


Obviously the word Nazi us overused, but that line you don't want to blur doesn't really exist (anymore). We have seen in the last few years that edgy internet Nazis do go out and murder people. That's not a theory anymore, that's what's actually happening.

Mithaldu
Sep 25, 2007

Let's cuddle. :3:

Lord Stimperor posted:

Btw regarding NYE drinks, I got myself a dark Belgian beer that I'll be sipping for an hour or so.

You're a person of culture.

Also a good point to strongly recommend to the faden gueuze and fruit beers from belgium.

Drone
Aug 22, 2003

Incredible machine
:smug:



RIP that Discord

frankenfreak
Feb 16, 2007

I SCORED 85% ON A QUIZ ABOUT MONDAY NIGHT RAW AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS LOUSY TEXT

#bastionboogerbrigade

Drone posted:

RIP that Discord
It's still "alive"! https://discord.gg/k7mbqt

frankenfreak
Feb 16, 2007

I SCORED 85% ON A QUIZ ABOUT MONDAY NIGHT RAW AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS LOUSY TEXT

#bastionboogerbrigade
In actual RIP news, RIP VIVA.

Duzzy Funlop
Jan 13, 2010

Hi there, would you like to try some spicy products?
Scheisse ist beginnend zu gehen runter in München

Mithaldu
Sep 25, 2007

Let's cuddle. :3:

frankenfreak posted:

In actual RIP news, RIP VIVA.
Wait really?

That'd be nice revenge for the poo poo they did to viva 2.

oliwan
Jul 20, 2005

by Nyc_Tattoo
My local Edeka just now :cheers:


Simply Simon
Nov 6, 2010

📡scanning🛰️ for good game 🎮design🦔🦔🦔
Driving into the city rn, party with a bunch of old buddies and their (and my) partners. Everyone was putting on a big "woo getting drunk like old times" show and now I got a "uh I might not last until 5 AM can I join you in bailing early and crash at your place instead" call, lol

Sekt: I like it, but only for events. Got a lot of it recently because we keep celebrating academic achievements at my institute in Sweden. Coincidentally, I rarely have opportunity to drink because little social life + very expensive alcohol, so it's double welcome.

Wife wanted to make sure we have at least one bottle so I'm bringing Freixenet from my mother's basement. I do not have opinions on brands and/or the bouginess thereof.

frankenfreak
Feb 16, 2007

I SCORED 85% ON A QUIZ ABOUT MONDAY NIGHT RAW AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS LOUSY TEXT

#bastionboogerbrigade

oliwan posted:

My local Edeka just now :cheers:



Considering how cleared out my local REWE was an hour ago, I suspect that's the only thing left. :v:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sulla Faex
May 14, 2010

No man ever did me so much good, or enemy so much harm, but I repaid him with ENDLESS SHITPOSTING
i was also in an edeka today looking at booze and thinking "oh, should i get sekt? it is tradition, after all" then i remembered that sekt is terrible and some traditions can happily die, z.B. most of them

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply