|
Bioshock taught me that a lot of close quarters problems are solved with a shotgun.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 01:08 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 14:37 |
|
Queen Combat posted:Bioshock taught me that a lot of close quarters problems are solved with a shotgun. A lot of problems can be solved with a shotgun.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 01:18 |
|
Queen Combat posted:Bioshock taught me that a lot of close quarters problems are solved with a shotgun. Though you'd think that in a deep water habitat with lots of windows that would also cause exciting new problems at the same time.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 01:39 |
|
Wingnut Ninja posted:Though you'd think that in a deep water habitat with lots of windows that would also cause exciting new problems at the same time.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 01:42 |
|
Syrian Lannister posted:A lot of problems can be solved with a shotgun. ~Kurt Cobain
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 01:44 |
|
Powershift posted:~Kurt Cobain Alternatively
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 01:50 |
|
LifeSunDeath posted:Alternatively This looks amazing
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 01:53 |
|
Syrian Lannister posted:
It is
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 01:56 |
|
Syrian Lannister posted:
Watch the gently caress out of this movie immediately. It is highly OSHA thread relevant.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 02:00 |
|
Syrian Lannister posted:
It's on Amazon Prime I think, well worth watching.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 02:03 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GI9gLFTC-s It’s spraying out two cubic centimetres of castor oil every second.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 02:07 |
|
You're making GBS threads me!
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 02:09 |
|
Megillah Gorilla posted:You're making GBS threads me! One of the best ways to combat the effects of castor oil was brandy. WW1 was full of drunk af barnstorming. And also a lot of pouncing on the enemy by hiding in front of the sun shooting them before they even saw you and heading home for tea and medals.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 02:46 |
|
EvilJoven posted:
Or not making it home, depending on who was better... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_April
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 03:10 |
|
chitoryu12 posted:Actually the trench warfare involved a ton of beating people with clubs. I had the great pleasure of visiting the Imperial War Museum last year. In one part of their WW1 zone they displayed a wall full of trench clubs / maces / stabby things. It was absolutely horrifying to see all these medieval weapons. These were the tools of my Grandfathers generation.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 03:51 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUmjLLXl8Y4 Shots fired at 2:50 onward.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 04:38 |
|
The Lone Badger posted:The americans were big on shotguns for intra-trench warfare. Yep.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 06:13 |
|
Megillah Gorilla posted:You're making GBS threads me! i bet you thought those pretty white scarves were for wiping their goggles
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 07:17 |
|
Syrian Lannister posted:A lot of problems can be solved with a shotgun.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 09:59 |
|
quote:Pedestrian Bridge Collapse In Moscow's Gorky Park Injures 13 https://www.rferl.org/a/29686321.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcPT9T4duv4
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 10:12 |
|
This reminds me of Outland starring Sean Connery. The main character spends a good five to ten minute sequence of that film hiding shotguns around a space station.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 11:09 |
|
We had a pretty OSHA new year in the Netherlands. Turns out that it's not a good idea to build two 50 meter high wooden towers and set them on fire when the wind is blowing toward a city. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0Lrn_aBfvQ It made pretty fire tornadoes (and set a bunch of wildfires and burnt a few cars and a house down).
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 11:52 |
|
NihilismNow posted:We had a pretty OSHA new year in the Netherlands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsyvOYcWgcg&t=26s Cable Guy fucked around with this message at 12:06 on Jan 1, 2019 |
# ? Jan 1, 2019 12:03 |
|
Cable Guy posted:While you might be right in saying the fire generated a couple of whirlwinds, they're not fire-tornadoes. They would be actually flaming if they were... It's what the news calls them, but you're right that looks a lot worse. In the video it almost looks like they are flaming but on closer inspection they are not. E: https://twitter.com/stefandijkstra9/status/1079898781485879298 These are flaming at least a few meters before they turn into regular whirlwinds. NihilismNow fucked around with this message at 12:13 on Jan 1, 2019 |
# ? Jan 1, 2019 12:07 |
|
Cthulu Carl posted:LOL, it was suggested to the Canadian Minister of Defense by his secretary. Canadian procurement is special. Imagine all of the stuff that makes US procurement awful. Combine this with every project being a political football. And a tendency to be cheap in really stupid ways. You get used subs catching fire, pre-bugged military headquarters, airplanes that like being lawn darts and a whole list of just WTF.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 12:42 |
|
Thomamelas posted:Canadian procurement is special. Imagine all of the stuff that makes US procurement awful. Combine this with every project being a political football. And a tendency to be cheap in really stupid ways. You get used subs catching fire, pre-bugged military headquarters, airplanes that like being lawn darts and a whole list of just WTF. You left out “actively kills the end-user”, so it’s already better than the Air Force (F-35) or Marine’s (Osprey) methods.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 15:43 |
|
Platystemon posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GI9gLFTC-s I'm sure the neighbors were thrilled to have their cars/homes/yards/shrubbery/digestive tracts coated with laxative. And I thought running a brush chipper nearby was a pain in the rear end.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 16:10 |
|
Icon Of Sin posted:You left out “actively kills the end-user”, so it’s already better than the Air Force (F-35) or Marine’s (Osprey) methods. The F-35 hasn't killed any pilots yet. The oxygen issues weren't really unique to the F-35. It's basically an issue across the board with most aircraft in the Air Force and Navy that use the onboard oxygen generation system. There is some sort of issue there that affected a ton of planes, including the A-10. But in defense of my statement Canada acquired 235 CF-104s. And lawn darted 110 of them. It wasn't a great plane for a lot of reasons but when you look at it, the last thing you imagine using it for was close air support. It was prone to all kinds of flight issues, and it had a tiny payload for CAS stuff. However a lot of NATO countries thought it was a great idea. Or the large brief cases full of cash that the Lockheed reps brought convinced them of that. Except Canada. Who didn't get the bribes but did adopt it as a close air support airplane.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 16:17 |
|
The F-104 wasn't inherently a bad plane -- it was just a bunch of different factors coming together at the wrong time. - it was designed exclusively as a high-speed interceptor and high-altitude dogfighter, roles at which it excelled - as a result, it was unforgiving at low speeds (tiny wings) and low altitudes (needed lots of space to recover from errors) - it was heavily marketed and sold around the world and a number of US allies with small militaries bought it - for many air forces, this was their first high-speed jet, so their pilots had only trained on propeller planes or subsonic jets with straight wings, and weren't ready for the new demands - these small cheap air forces also tried to repurpose the F-104 as a ground-attack plane, increasing its wing loading (already high) and forcing pilots to fly missions at low level - the combination of inexperienced pilots, an unforgiving plane, and a dangerous mission led to lots of losses. So basically it was equivalent to buying a brand new ferrari for a 16-year-old who'd only driven mom's station wagon, and then making him drive to school on a snowy mountain road through a deer habitat. My uncle was in the RCAF for nearly 40 years and got a familiarization ride in an F-104 in the 60s, and says it is still the fastest and rawest airplane he's ever experienced.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 16:50 |
|
Was the also the plane that required a long runway due to its tiny wings and we sold them to countries with short runways in the hills?
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 17:02 |
|
here is the f-104's engine-out landing procedure - 12,000 feet minimum altitude to start - fly the whole approach at 280mph - descent rate of 7,000ft/min (i.e. you're falling to the ground at 80mph, in addition to your forward velocity) - you have a specific 5 second window in which to drop the gear; too soon and you'll pancake at 125mph straight down, too late and you'll land on the belly
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 17:36 |
|
whatever, no biggie... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyBDEG9dg-Q Nevermind the others who died doing this and how pretty much every air force banned this maneuver.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 18:05 |
|
Sagebrush posted:- it was heavily marketed and sold around the world and a number of US allies with small militaries bought it That's a very euphemistic way of putting it
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 18:11 |
|
If by "heavily marketed" you mean "bribed government officials" then sure.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 18:19 |
|
Still not the plane's fault. Poor F-104 just wanted to fly fast and high
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 18:32 |
|
Thomamelas posted:But in defense of my statement Canada acquired 235 CF-104s. And lawn darted 110 of them. Wikipedia calls those crashes "teething problems" and "compares [the accident rate] favourably to its predecessor."
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 18:34 |
|
Sagebrush posted:The F-104 wasn't inherently a bad plane -- it was just a bunch of different factors coming together at the wrong time. teething problems
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 18:39 |
|
When your aircraft has a concept album produced in honor of its deep-seated desire to kill its pilot, you know you done good. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_Lockheed_and_the_Starfighters?wprov=sfla1
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 19:12 |
|
Weird how they are playing the "Hunt for the Red October" soundtrack there.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 19:20 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 14:37 |
|
withak posted:Weird how they are playing the "Hunt for the Red October" soundtrack there.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2019 19:54 |