|
It seems incredibly likely that Trump will declare the national emergency. It doesn't sound like it has any real downsides for him, and it avoids the massive downsides of compromising or letting this shutdown continue. I'm expecting it before the end of the month.
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 00:37 |
|
|
we prob could destroy china's nuclear armament while only losing a third of US population
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:45
|
|
|
you'll have to excuse the sewer duck he was imprinted to a nuke at birth
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:45
|
|
|
Addamere posted:I am legit convinced that if ever the U.S. gets its nose bloodied in a meaningful way we're just going to say gently caress this and kill the world. remember when one of our buildings got blown up so we killed a million people in a country that didn't have anything to do with it and literally tortured them in hell prison
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:46
|
|
|
Reality Winter posted:use xhamster 
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:46
|
|
|
Jalumibnkrayal posted:It seems incredibly likely that Trump will declare the national emergency. It doesn't sound like it has any real downsides for him, and it avoids the massive downsides of compromising or letting this shutdown continue. I'm expecting it before the end of the month.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:46
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:awesome wasn't China building scale replicas of our carriers to test on? I think even if it's 50/50 that's basically the end times for the world as if we lose our carrier dominance we'll just launch all the nukes anyway, nuke or salvo is irrelevant because some tape memory system in a mountain in the Urals will trigger the doomsday switch as soon as it sees the launch
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:46
|
|
|
dads friend steve posted:aircraft carriers are outdated tech and will be owned by over-the-horizon missiles if it ever come sto that. we should probably build many more tho the 1960 called they want their threat profile back
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:46
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:we prob could destroy china's nuclear armament while only losing a third of US population wtf how is barry goldwater posting from beyond the grave
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:47
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:we prob could destroy china's nuclear armament while only losing a third of US population I don't think Russia would recognize the distinction
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:47
|
|
|
Reality Winter posted:He's right about one thing, no one should have to use xhamster I don't even watch pornography
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:47
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:wasn't China building scale replicas of our carriers to test on? I think even if it's 50/50 that's basically the end times for the world as if we lose our carrier dominance we'll just launch all the nukes lol yeah deadhand is real and will kill us all if climate change doesn't
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:47
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:the 1960 called they want their threat profile back we just haven't fought anyone with decent missiles and a targeting network yet
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:47
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:we prob could destroy china's nuclear armament while only losing a third of US population middle third of the country. please
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:47
|
|
|
Flavius Aetass posted:remember when one of our buildings got blown up so we killed a million people in a country that didn't have anything to do with it I do remember that! Now imagine if instead of us just suffering a symbolic sucker punch that ultimately amounted to nothing more than statistical noise we actually got punched in the dick we've been waving around for decades as proof of our invincibility.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:47
|
|
|
baloogan you literally cannot have a child with a nuke it doesn't even make any sense
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:47
|
|
|
Parity warning posted:if made ik i promise to probate fools and losers and my monitor will always be on Same but my monitor will be off
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:48
|
|
|
a few DRUNK BONERS posted:I don't even watch pornography then how did u know what it was 
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:48
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/paprbckparadise/status/1080987085366996992 Ah, 2020, the year he has to eat his dick because he bet bitcoin would be $1 million by then. I see his desperation plan is to become president and make dick eating illegal.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:48
|
|
|
watch any of those youtube videos where ducks follow around weird sad people
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:48
|
|
|
china's not going to be attacking any carriers. might lose one in the persian gulf though but i'm not betting on it
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:49
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:the 1960 called they want their threat profile back satellite tech is much better these days
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:49
|
|
|
Addamere posted:I do remember that! Boopa da Snoot
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:49
|
|
|
the entire POINT of our insanely expensive carrier and above water fleet is to secure markets for capital, if it can't do that anymore we need to fall back on what would then become massively limited air superiority, and after that the nukes if we ever fight a country with anti-air we'll basically be BTFO in a week
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:49
|
|
|
http://remix.kwed.org/files/RKOfiles/trv%20-%20Sanxion%20Loader%20(Acoustic).mp3
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:49
|
|
|
dads friend steve posted:aircraft carriers are outdated tech and will be owned by over-the-horizon missiles if it ever come sto that. we should probably build many more tho CIWS is actually very good at blowing up missiles by the amazingly high-tech tactic of shooting so many bullets in so short a time as to effectively construct a solid wall for the missile to hit some distance away from the ship
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:49
|
|
|
calling bullshit on this one
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:49
|
|
|
Duscat posted:watch any of those youtube videos where ducks follow around weird sad people buddy you're in one
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:50
|
|
|
PostNouveau posted:https://twitter.com/paprbckparadise/status/1080987085366996992 The president doesn't write laws, unconstitutional! He would have to pardon his dick.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:50
|
|
|
lmao
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:50
|
|
|
Dead hand switch is great because it already accepts that we lost hard if it gets used but instead of gracefully conceding we basically rigged ourselves up like The Predator.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:50
|
|
|
Bert Roberge posted:https://twitter.com/StephenKing/status/1083124082705616896 Click to see the creator of Stranger Things' epic tweet against Trump that broke the internet!
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:50
|
|
|
Macafee is going to make trump eat his dick instead
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:51
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:the entire POINT of our insanely expensive carrier and above water fleet is to secure markets for capital, if it can't do that anymore we need to fall back on what would then become massively limited air superiority, and after that the nukes lol, no
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:51
|
|
|
Jalumibnkrayal posted:It seems incredibly likely that Trump will declare the national emergency. It doesn't sound like it has any real downsides for him, and it avoids the massive downsides of compromising or letting this shutdown continue. I'm expecting it before the end of the month. so you're saying I'll have to go back to work? I'm not even clear if declaring an emergency means that the shutdown would end
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:51
|
|
|
Log082 posted:lol yeah deadhand is real and will kill us all if climate change doesn't hell yeah. I should see if the buzzer has done anything interesting lately
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:51
|
|
|
Solarin posted:holocaust centers i thought he said, centaurs
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:51
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:the entire POINT of our insanely expensive carrier and above water fleet is to secure markets for capital, if it can't do that anymore we need to fall back on what would then become massively limited air superiority, and after that the nukes At any point in the last century we could have probably cut the bullshit, retooled the American economy for war, and had a re-run of World War 2. But nowadays we've closed down and outsourced so much infrastructure and institutional knowledge, could we even do a war economy anymore?
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 00:37 |
|
|
Addamere posted:CIWS is actually very good at blowing up missiles by the amazingly high-tech tactic of shooting so many bullets in so short a time as to effectively construct a solid wall for the missile to hit some distance away from the ship yeah it's pretty much invincible against a single non-hypersonic missile
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:51
|
|