|
im shocked that the prosecutor doesnt know how to operate in good faith
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 02:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 11:58 |
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:Wow this thread sure seems to have multiple personalities! Don’t you have a litter box to clean?
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 02:26
|
|
|
ActusRhesus posted:Edit: double post. Yeah, so? Also, capitalism is immoral. Also also, I want to get paid all the money and other people to be poors. E: goddamnit you made me quote the one you fixed
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 02:26
|
|
|
I make no money. But I have BCBS and get to have free time. So it works. Plus window.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 02:31
|
|
|
ActusRhesus posted:Don’t you have a litter box to clean? I'm obviously at work.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 02:42
|
|
|
I'm a prosecutor and took the week off to visit my parents in Florida. My office secretary fought me when I gave her a forwarding phone number because I shouldn't be doing work on my vacation.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:20
|
|
|
ActusRhesus posted:I make no money. I have BCBS and haven't worked since 12/21/2018. Good times.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 03:49
|
|
|
You know what law school didn't prepare me for OTHER than being a lawyer? Having to observe urine tests. It's really getting old. I think I like my job in theory, but the actual day-to-day mechanics of it have really lost their charm. There's probably a version of my job somewhere that I could unambiguously enjoy, but the list of gripes gets longer every day. The ennui has really set in; I think I've gone back to the "Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow" speech from Macbeth (5.5.17-27) every day this week.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 04:51
|
|
|
lol this new 101 guidance is so plainly facially wrong but whatever it means less work for me I've already left a comment on how it clearly contradicts binding federal circuit precedent, and they've told us it's mandatory to implement already even though the public comment period just started heckuvajob
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 06:39
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:lol this new 101 guidance is so plainly facially wrong but whatever it means less work for me They've been hyping it up since last fall about how it would reduce 101 rejections a lot.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 07:26
|
|
|
Meatbag Esq. posted:They've been hyping it up since last fall about how it would reduce 101 rejections a lot. Iancu deeply deeply hates modern 101. In theory the 112 guidance would cover most of the applications that would have been rejected under 101... but let’s be honest, most examiners are going to take the WJ approach and say “gently caress that I’m lazy.”
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 07:33
|
|
|
Alaemon posted:You know what law school didn't prepare me for OTHER than being a lawyer? Having to observe urine tests.. wait what how is this part of your job
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 11:55
|
|
|
Soothing Vapors posted:wait what how is this part of your job No no, it's just his hobby, for kicks you know. He's just complaining that law school didn't prepare him for it, which I don't really know why it would unless you were into water sports.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 12:12
|
|
|
Like if your that into pee, go to Trump University or something. Jeez.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 12:12
|
|
|
Soothing Vapors posted:wait what how is this part of your job I have been asking the same question for quite some time, and the answer is "because you are being told to do it." (Despite it not being in my job description, the revised job description, the pay scale, etc.)
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 13:40
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:lol this new 101 guidance is so plainly facially wrong but whatever it means less work for me
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 14:38
|
|
|
gvibes posted:Link? https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/01/07/2018-28282/2019-revised-patent-subject-matter-eligibility-guidance
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 15:05
|
|
|
Kalman posted:Iancu deeply deeply hates modern 101. The 112 guidance is dumb because it doesn't help with novel applications of routine and conventional functionality
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 15:09
|
|
|
Like before, if the claim merely recited "categorizing a document using a naive Bayes classifier" the office is going to find it to be patent-eligible, but the courts would clearly hold it to be patent ineligible
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 15:12
|
|
|
I'm trying to wrap my mind about why the attorney is the pecker checker regardless of where you work.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 15:47
|
|
|
Shouldn't have put "really good at looking at penis" on your resume, its your own fault, really
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 16:02
|
|
|
Definitely shouldn't have listed it as one of your greatest strengths in your interview
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 16:07
|
|
|
That isn't what I meant by birdwatching!
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 16:09
|
|
|
Law Megathread: How is watching another dude take a piss part of your job.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 16:27
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:The 112 guidance is dumb because it doesn't help with novel applications of routine and conventional functionality Yeah, but 99% of the time those applications fail to actually disclose how they do what they do anyway. (This is not to say the guidance is good. It is not.)
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 16:53
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:I'm trying to wrap my mind about why the attorney is the pecker checker regardless of where you work. Never lose sight of your dreams.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 17:14
|
|
|
Alaemon posted:I have been asking the same question for quite some time, and the answer is "because you are being told to do it." Lol are you a JAG officer or something?
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 17:28
|
|
|
I’ve been a Jagofficer since I was 12
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 17:29
|
|
|
Ale Man did whoever told you these inspections were part of your job also tell you that every once in a while you gotta give it a lil kiss
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 17:30
|
|
|
Soothing Vapors posted:Ale Man did whoever told you these inspections were part of your job also tell you that every once in a while you gotta give it a lil kiss The s comes before the z.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 17:36
|
|
|
lolllllllllll
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 17:41
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 17:47
|
|
|
Soothing Vapors posted:Ale Man did whoever told you these inspections were part of your job also tell you that every once in a while you gotta give it a lil kiss Lmao ActusRhesus posted:The s comes before the z. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 17:52
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:Serving capital/corporate interests isn't exclusively a "V20 biglaw" thing, it's pretty much a "private sector employment of almost any type" thing, particularly for lawyers. Private equity is morally no different than a bank or Google or Nestle or a sovereign wealth fund or any of the 10,000 legal forms that capital may assume. They're all rapacious by definition. You're right that serving capital interests is not exclusively a big law thing, but the difference is big law builds and enforces the structures that regular people have to exist in. V20 big law bears more responsibility for growing wealth inequality, destruction of organized labor and the increasing financialization of the economy than a mid level director at Caterpillar, Google, Nestle or whatever. We build the tax advantaged structures that allow for things like PE funds and MLPs to avoid taxation. When mortgage backed securities were being created, it was V20 lawyers doing the leg work to put them together (e.g., building the actual securities line by line). It's impossible to separate what high level corporate attorneys do from the larger macro level trends in the country and handwave it away by just being like "I'm basically the same thing as a Target manager so whatevs".
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2019 19:17
|
|
|
Sab0921 posted:You're right that serving capital interests is not exclusively a big law thing, but the difference is big law builds and enforces the structures that regular people have to exist in. i get paid to shuffle money between hedge funds based on who was smart enough to hire me, its p. good
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2019 01:26
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:lol this new 101 guidance is so plainly facially wrong but whatever it means less work for me Got any inside info on how much longer the USPTO can hold out? Wonder what I'm supposed to do about the first action interview I have that I need to schedule soon.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2019 02:00
|
|
|
gret posted:Got any inside info on how much longer the USPTO can hold out? Wonder what I'm supposed to do about the first action interview I have that I need to schedule soon. "20-ish days" from like Wednesday? although I don't know if that's calendar or business. Apparently Iancu said something about it at the beginning of the shutdown? I think you just need to put in the request for interview within the month in order to stay in FAI WhiskeyJuvenile fucked around with this message at 04:29 on Jan 12, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2019 04:25
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:i get paid to shuffle money between hedge funds based on who was smart enough to hire me, its p. good So you’re why I have to verify 50 different funds for the same investment manager
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2019 15:05
|
|
|
Toona the Cat posted:So you’re why I have to verify 50 different funds for the same investment manager no the shuffling of money is very acrimonious and between unrelated funds
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2019 15:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 11:58 |
|
|
Also historically, the firm that did the most if the early securitization work wasn't prestigious and is dead. (And a lot of the firms that picked up from that weren't the V20 either. It was crappy work.)
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2019 20:23
|
|
