Cricket This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Blackface in crowd | 129 | 55.36% | |
References to Lord of the Rings | 104 | 44.64% | |
Total: | 233 votes |
|
kingturnip posted:I was watching the highlights of Laxman's Test the other day and - aside from Laxman being god-tier for 4 days - the other thing that struck me was the officiating. Couldn't possibly be any more blatant than Daryl Harper so gently caress Australia. edit: and this run chase in the Hawke Cup isn't going great for Otago Country: https://scoring.nzc.nz/livescoring/match191ddfd8-61c4-4aee-9244-1abf567005d2/scorecard.aspx, 9/8 just coming out of a quadruple wicket maiden including a hatrick. Must be an absolute shitter of a pitch looking at the scorecard Smorgasbord fucked around with this message at 03:06 on Jan 13, 2019 |
# ? Jan 13, 2019 03:04 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 17:33 |
|
kingturnip posted:I was watching the highlights of Laxman's Test the other day and - aside from Laxman being god-tier for 4 days - the other thing that struck me was the officiating.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2019 08:05 |
|
Hahah did anyone see that bloke in the crowd wipe himself out trying to take a catch near the sightscreen. The ball almost hit him in the head (Heat/renegades game)
|
# ? Jan 13, 2019 09:34 |
|
Burn Down Canberra posted:Hahah did anyone see that bloke in the crowd wipe himself out trying to take a catch near the sightscreen. Yeah he must've thought the tarp or whatever it was covering the seats next to the sightscreen was solid so would've racked himself on those chairs pretty badly. Good stuff.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2019 12:45 |
|
Burn Down Canberra posted:Hahah did anyone see that bloke in the crowd wipe himself out trying to take a catch near the sightscreen. He put in a solid effort - link
|
# ? Jan 13, 2019 13:10 |
|
quote:Dwarshuis to Klinger, OUT, is this a wicket off a miscounted seventh ball, it's been taken a third man! Short outside off, upper cut and O'Keefe takes it very low to the ground. It's certainly carried. They check it with the third umpire and it's given out on the big screen thats just godawful umpiring
|
# ? Jan 13, 2019 13:43 |
|
pakistan's bowling has managed to keep them in the match and all they need to do now is make like the 5th highest run chase in test history in a series where they've barely been able to score above 200 in an innings
|
# ? Jan 13, 2019 15:09 |
|
Charles 2 of Spain posted:The Gilchrist dismissal for Harby's hattrick is my personal fave. Found it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHH5Qss73WM And lol. They even referred the 3rd wicket (Warne out, caught) to the 3rd Umpire who gave it out without checking the second camera angle which showed Warne hitting the ball into the ground.
|
# ? Jan 14, 2019 01:36 |
|
Burn Down Canberra posted:That was the 1000th international win for Australia. NZ on a paltry 487 Yeah but how many of those wins were us padding our stats beating poo poo teams like New Zealand?
|
# ? Jan 14, 2019 01:37 |
|
Astonishingly, more than a fifth of those wins were under Ponting. Which I guess is a combo of a strong side and the proliferation of ODI cricket in the modern era. Would be interesting to see number of wins and number of matches for all teams - though you'd suspect that Australia's wins/matches ratio would be high through their 90s/00s dominance (not to mention their strong sides of the past).
|
# ? Jan 14, 2019 08:44 |
|
Paul.Power posted:Astonishingly, more than a fifth of those wins were under Ponting. Which I guess is a combo of a strong side and the proliferation of ODI cricket in the modern era. Weren’t the 90s (pre Ponting as skipper) the heyday of ODI series? I recall there’d usually be a tri series after the tests which would involve a heap of games followed by a best of three finals series.
|
# ? Jan 14, 2019 10:36 |
|
gay picnic defence posted:Weren’t the 90s (pre Ponting as skipper) the heyday of ODI series? I recall there’d usually be a tri series after the tests which would involve a heap of games followed by a best of three finals series. And the most popular Australia A team of all time
|
# ? Jan 14, 2019 11:08 |
|
not a big wade fan but the way the selectors keep screwing players over and making up reasons why they're not being selected must be very frustrating http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/25757277/test-snub-does-not-make-lot-sense-matthew-wade
|
# ? Jan 14, 2019 16:07 |
|
BAT IN THE TOP 4! OH NO! NOT AT 4 WE MEANT 3! NEVER PLAY AGAIN!"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111
|
# ? Jan 14, 2019 17:25 |
|
Trevor Hohns is the devil
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 02:30 |
|
Seams posted:not a big wade fan but the way the selectors keep screwing players over and making up reasons why they're not being selected must be very frustrating I’m usually in favour of leaving organisations like sports clubs alone do their thing because it’s highly likely that there’s a lot going on behind closed doors that the public or even the media don’t know about that affects their decision making. However we’re now at a stage where not even the state sides or players have any confidence in the selectors and the explanations provided by the selectors are completely inconsistent with decisions they’ve made in the extremely recent past. I’m starting to suspect that the selectors have got it in their heads that by dropping the Marshes they’ll be calling into question those selections for the last however many years, and as a result they’re under pressure to keep picking them in the hope they come good and the million second chances will be vindicated. I don’t know much about the situation with the talent pathways CA has set up but I wouldn’t be shocked if the selectors are under pressure to give priority to players from those systems to justify the investment CA has made. Maybe the panel is just a boys club stacked with good blokes who needed a job and a mate inside CA was able to help them out. I’m not normally a fan of wholesale changes to a body because you can lose a lot of useful institutional knowledge that way, but I think something like that is needed here because I don’t think CA can afford to lose the players’ trust in the selection panel like this.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 03:55 |
|
That's hosed, it essentially means an aspiring number 5 or 6 test batsman has to agitate in his state side to bat out of position in the top 4 to justify a place batting 5 or 6 in the test side, bugger what that means for your state side's balance or harmony or the specialists 3 & 4 also trying to make their own way.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 04:13 |
|
Finch poo poo, so what
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 04:53 |
|
If Marsh had spent the last 10 years just being an ODI specialist, that could have produced a good career maybe
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 06:01 |
|
Scylo posted:If Marsh had spent the last 10 years just being an ODI specialist, that could have produced a good career maybe I've never been against picking him for ODI's. His difference in form between ODI's and Tests is like night and day. Edit: Lol, the one time Handscomb isn't virtually standing on his stumps he gets stumped. Fanatic fucked around with this message at 06:17 on Jan 15, 2019 |
# ? Jan 15, 2019 06:12 |
|
One hundred runs to Shaun Marsh, how long until a test squad recall lol
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 07:15 |
|
Considering marsh doesn’t wear sunscreen when he bats because it’s unlucky he must be quite cooked out there
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 07:24 |
Burn Down Canberra posted:Considering marsh doesn’t wear sunscreen when he bats because it’s unlucky he must be quite cooked out there So he's extremely thick then, this clears some things up.
|
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 07:25 |
|
Burn Down Canberra posted:Considering marsh doesn’t wear sunscreen when he bats because it’s unlucky he must be quite cooked out there this must be a recent thing right or he'd be dead. he probably forgot to put sunscreen on during the last ashes and decided his poo poo test career was the sunscreens fault
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 07:36 |
|
It was during the last ashes where his wife dobbed him in. Shaun will probably kill me for saying this, he has a batting superstition of not wearing sunscreen when batting," Bec revealed to the Nine Network on Sunday. ______ So yeah he’s just very dumb
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 07:50 |
|
Who's this generic club cricketer. Oh it's Siddle.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 09:33 |
|
They finally figured out a useful angle for that wired camera, that shot looking down on the striker was pretty interesting
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 10:32 |
|
Why is siddle playing in this. He is so past it
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 11:34 |
|
put both hands in posted:Why is siddle playing in this. He is so past it He looked old and tired 5 years ago
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 11:40 |
|
Another classic Dhoni batting slow and putting the pressure on the other batsman dismissal
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 11:42 |
|
lolstralia
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 12:13 |
|
I feel like India could have made 350 there, they didn't even need to take any risks to make 300.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2019 12:16 |
|
I can't believe they made the big bash longer 6/66 Hail Satan
|
# ? Jan 16, 2019 10:19 |
|
They should make it better instead
|
# ? Jan 16, 2019 10:37 |
|
Scylo posted:They should make it better instead Longer IS better, just like bigger.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2019 22:28 |
|
Unimpressed posted:Longer IS better, just like bigger. I agree, we need to bring back timeless tests.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2019 23:26 |
|
213/19 is a classic warm up score
|
# ? Jan 17, 2019 00:40 |
|
Renshaw out for 7, Burns out for 4, Labuschagne out for 6 in the CA XI match. Sure would be good if players would make some runs when given a chance
|
# ? Jan 17, 2019 05:02 |
|
Scylo posted:Renshaw out for 7, Burns out for 4, Labuschagne out for 6 in the CA XI match. Sure would be good if players would make some runs when given a chance Pucovski & Sangha out cheaply too
|
# ? Jan 17, 2019 06:54 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 17:33 |
|
It’s almost a decade since the Argus review. In that time period we have produced pretty much no test batsmen
|
# ? Jan 17, 2019 07:09 |