|
VitalSigns posted:wow ok good luck with that ignore-everything-but-star-power strategy, seems to be working out well in France, Macron hasn't completely burned down Paris yet after all Who's Macron? Is he some local politician in your county?
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 02:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 04:01 |
|
|
joepinetree posted:Jesus Christ. Kamala Harris and her stance on truancy was one of the most talked about and contentious issues when she was AG. It was widely covered in California (you know, that tiny invisible state) for years: Stop spreading secret Russian lies, you shill.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 02:53
|
|
|
lmao what loving "projects" are Howard Schultz from, these people are absolutely vile. So at what point do we get to burn Silicon Valley to the ground and salt the Earth where it stood?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 02:56
|
|
|
How can people disagree that Hillary's emails are an important issue? Republicans have held thousands of hours of hearings about it? Is anyone really surprised that it's come back and is being spammed on all social networks? I mean, come on. Let's all just get a handle on this. -This has been your 2016 Glenn Greenwald timetravel interstitial. We now return you to Fun Times for Republican Crimes! Sponsored by Blackwater and The Church of Latter Day Saints!
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 02:57
|
|
|
Themagicalgoat posted:You don't understand. The broken internet leftists that post in this forum have only their faith. They want saints, not politicians. And failing to find the holiness they seek in the world, they will create their own martyrs. And then they will praise them when they are safely dead. There's wanting saints and then there is wanting someone who didn't try to lock up a single mom working two jobs while homeless and loving over trans people and sex workers
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 02:58
|
|
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:I think we all mostly agree that there should be more services to help people combat poverty, homelessness, hunger, and other principal problems that contribute to kids missing school. Still, some people are service resistant. what. the. gently caress. You must be someone who had never had to navigate the lovely hellscape of what passes for a "safety net" in this country.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 02:58
|
|
|
kidkissinger posted:The fact that your rat-brain immediately labelled it "hit-piece" and started trying to unearth the conspiracy behind it is hilarious. Man you aren't familiar with Tibalt, are you? Not a troll, but a master of extremely pointed language to prove a point. And yeah, get a reaction. KickerOfMice fucked around with this message at 03:01 on Jan 29, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 02:59
|
|
|
i hear they've got brain lasers in Cuba, too. official story is that it turned out it was just crickets and people having headaches, but isn't that just what the Russians would want you to think?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 02:59
|
|
|
Themagicalgoat posted:How can people disagree that Hillary's emails are an important issue? Republicans have held thousands of hours of hearings about it? Is anyone really surprised that it's come back and is being spammed on all social networks? I, too, think that breaking up families, imprisoning the parents, and ruining the lives of their children over school truancy is as unimportant as Hillary's emails.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 02:59
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/johndingell/status/1090056548217425920?s=21
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 02:59
|
|
|
Herstory Begins Now posted:There's wanting saints and then there is wanting someone who didn't try to lock up a single mom working two jobs while homeless and loving over trans people and sex workers Good luck finding that perfect person to run for president. I can't even locate them in theory. But maybe you can.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 02:59
|
|
|
1glitch0 posted:Not prison for the children and parents. I understand however that isn’t answering my question. Again, after all attempts to accommodate addressing while a child is not attending school, after both the school and social services are involved, and the children are still not attending school, what do you do? For the example in the video, and looking at the law, there was to be multiple meetings between the school and the family before the DAs got involved for that homeless mother. That’s the thing that maybe is missed here. Given that the law on CA’s truancy page states that by the time the courts are involved something like a mother being homeless should have been known.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:00
|
|
|
Family Values posted:I wouldn't have expected my side to be agreeing with conservatives on the 'parents should have the right to opt their kids out of public school' issue. This post was reported, and in lieu of putting you on probation, this terrible loving take should instead be relentlessly mocked.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:00
|
|
|
Themagicalgoat posted:Good luck finding that perfect person to run for president. I can't even locate them in theory. But maybe you can. No one here is asking for perfection. We're asking for a basic level of humanity at this point.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:00
|
|
|
Themagicalgoat posted:Good luck finding that perfect person to run for president. I can't even locate them in theory. But maybe you can. Look, poor people need to be brutalized! If you can't handle authoritarianism, your standards for politics are just too high.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:01
|
|
|
Majorian posted:I, too, think that breaking up families, imprisoning the parents, and ruining the lives of their children over school truancy is as unimportant as Hillary's emails. How many parents were in prisoner for truancy?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:01
|
|
|
Bless that man, hahahahahaha.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:02
|
|
5
|
Majorian posted:I, too, think that breaking up families, imprisoning the parents, and ruining the lives of their children over school truancy is as unimportant as Hillary's emails. Just to be clear--I think that handling classifed emails is important. I also think that broken window policing is a problem. I also don't think that anything that a woman of color did in the past is disqualifying as long as they're doing what I generally agree with. Maybe you've got some wonderful candidate you love. I'd vote for Zombie hItler against a Republican. But I would definitely vote for a WoC against almost anyone because of the representative precedent it sets. And if you're worried about Obama not being liberal enough, I've got a solution. NEVER LET REPUBLICANS WIN A NATIONAL ELECTION EVER AGAIN. It might take 20 years, but eventually we'll stumble on an actual satisfying whatever-you're-looking for. But it ain't gonna happen if you let Republicans have a single inch ever in any arena.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:02
|
|
|
Themagicalgoat posted:Good luck finding that perfect person to run for president. I can't even locate them in theory. But maybe you can. this is just such a perfect encapsulation of the mindset someone getting existentially depressed that, in a presidential primary, people are suggesting there are candidates with stances they find disqualifying. because if you treat politics as anything more than a game- as if it's something that actually has life and death consequences, where compromises are ultimately measured in human lives, and where the entire point is trying to find the person who comes closest to approximating your views- that takes all the fun out of it for him
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:03
|
|
|
friendbot2000 posted:It doesn't matter at all. Kamala's program was inhumane and grotesque. I am curious to know who is bringing this all up though. There is some impressive shivs being sharpened. Shivs of truth, but still shivs. lmao good lord did Hillary pre-clearing the field in 2016 make everyone forget what it's like to run for President?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:03
|
|
|
Themagicalgoat posted:I also don't think that anything that a woman of color did in the past is disqualifying as long as they're doing what I generally agree with. In what way does her being a woman of color enter into this conversation?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:04
|
|
|
Kamala Harris is currently the only Democrat running for President. You are not allowed to say mean things about her!
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:05
|
|
|
Majorian posted:No one here is asking for perfection. We're asking for a basic level of humanity at this point. She has a D next to her name. Jesus Christ, you people are never satisfied, what more do you want?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:05
|
|
|
Themagicalgoat posted:Just to be clear--I think that handling classifed emails is important. I also think that broken window policing is a problem. pop quiz, what happened the last time you allowed yourself to be compromised into a candidate who stood for nothing, to nobody, on the grounds that giving up on ever actually accomplishing anything constituted Pragmatic Centrism i seem to recall it didn't go so great
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:05
|
|
|
ozmunkeh posted:She has a D next to her name. Jesus Christ, you people are never satisfied, what more do you want? I can't tell what level of irony we're operating on anymore.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:05
|
|
|
Themagicalgoat posted:How can people disagree that Hillary's emails are an important issue? Republicans have held thousands of hours of hearings about it? Is anyone really surprised that it's come back and is being spammed on all social networks? So remind me, how did insisting that every single criticism of Hillary was a nothingburger work out again? Themagicalgoat posted:Just to be clear--I think that handling classifed emails is important. I also think that broken window policing is a problem. So remind me, how did the Obama years work out WRT republicans not winning any elections again?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:05
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/WalkerBragman/status/1090056741688131584?s=19 Three padlocks. On her front door.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:06
|
|
|
Wistful of Dollars posted:Bless that man, hahahahahaha. If I'm right, and I'm pretty sure, lady. That's the lead penciller of "Y the last man." (Yes I am a giant nerd.) E- Oh, Dingell. nm! KickerOfMice fucked around with this message at 03:10 on Jan 29, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:07
|
|
|
OhDearGodNo posted:I understand however that isn’t answering my question. Again, after all attempts to accommodate addressing while a child is not attending school, after both the school and social services are involved, and the children are still not attending school, what do you do? I mean that sure sounds like those meetings weren't very productive. Maybe we could make sure that social services are easily accessible by people that need them when they need them, and not have them jump through a billion hoops to satisfy some neolib concept of fairness.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:08
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:I can't tell what level of irony we're operating on anymore. My good dude, this is a feature not a bug.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:10
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:I can't tell what level of irony we're operating on anymore. Irony was a mistake and satire doesn't work.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:10
|
|
|
DrNutt posted:lmao what loving "projects" are Howard Schultz from, these people are absolutely vile. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayview_Houses
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:11
|
|
|
Tibalt posted:Hey, a speech that has been public knowledge for a while suddenly becomes the subject of conversation immediately in the aftermath of Harris announcing her campaign. Is this really saying "increased scrutiny paid to past statements of person who just launched presidential campaign" is evidence of some kinda social media conspiracy lmao
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:11
|
|
|
DrNutt posted:lmao what loving "projects" are Howard Schultz from, these people are absolutely vile. Canarsie Bayview in Brooklyn. Howard Schultz is a FYGMer who shouldn't be trusted but he really did grow up poor.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:11
|
|
|
Is it possible for primary chat to be segregated into that thread? Or are we to have two primary threads, this one being "primary PLUS"?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:12
|
|
|
joepinetree posted:Jesus Christ. Kamala Harris and her stance on truancy was one of the most talked about and contentious issues when she was AG. It was widely covered in California (you know, that tiny invisible state) for years: You're just scraping the surface. Any one of her many controversial stances/actions as AG disqualifies her from becoming president, here's a long list compiled: https://twitter.com/Copmala/status/1085688776381419520 I mean, poo poo i don't even think a bog standard republican AG would try to loving cover for one of his subordinates who created a fraudulent confession. She (and her subordinate) should have been disbarred for that alone. How the hell is she even in discussion for being POTUS. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/03/08/justice-honesty-government-prosecutor-column/24611623/
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:13
|
|
|
I stand corrected but otoh that only makes him even more a piece of poo poo. Kind of like someone in this thread right now 
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:13
|
|
|
Themagicalgoat posted:And if you're worried about Obama not being liberal enough, I've got a solution. NEVER LET REPUBLICANS WIN A NATIONAL ELECTION EVER AGAIN. Okay, but how do you accomplish that? Here's an idea: run candidates and policies that are more appealing than Republicans -- do that, instead of relying on scolding people into voting for your suck-rear end candidate. If you run candidates who loving suck, then you risk losing to Republicans. That's the entire point of this primary, and any primary that ends up electing a vortex of suck risks losing to the Republicans. Let's not repeat the same goddamn mistake we made in 2016. Kamala Harris's past actions and refusal to take responsibility for it or to recant it is unacceptable.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:13
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:I can't tell what level of irony we're operating on anymore. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vmn9asN-8AE
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 04:01 |
|
|
OhDearGodNo posted:How many parents were in prisoner for truancy?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:14
|
|