|
YASB is updated yall let's get building.
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 23:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 19:04 |
|
|
thespaceinvader posted:YASB is updated yall let's get building. launch bay next is already updated!
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 00:06
|
|
|
thespaceinvader posted:2 Bros and 4LOM with D crew is gonna be good I think. 4LOM only gained 2 points if you're not using 000. 4Lom is definitely a better wingman for them, but it's Guri yo!
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 00:15
|
|
|
Guri can't get the crew, but she's definitely a strong choice.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 00:56
|
|
|
Boo, the list I played twice and liked is too expensive now.  EDIT: I guess it's still possible it just loses the Collision Detectors that I rather liked. I can work with that. Strobe fucked around with this message at 01:16 on Jan 29, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 01:11
|
|
|
Since I’m losing Darth on Whisper, I’m thinking she’s getting 5th Brother instead. That means Duchess gets less usefull. I’m actually thinking of swapping in Turr Phennir and have 2 interceptors. Maybe not optimal, but I love Interceptors.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 02:15
|
|
|
I'm looking forward to testing out this new and unique archetype that is really going to shake up the meta: Major Vermeil (49) Juke (5) Darth Vader (14) “Whisper” (54) Juke (5) Fifth Brother (9) Captain Kagi (48) Admiral Sloane (10) Total: 194 View in Yet Another Squad Builder 2.0
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:05
|
|
|
KongGeorgeVII posted:I'm looking forward to testing out this new and unique archetype that is really going to shake up the meta: gently caress aces, check this poo poo out: New Squadron (42) Drea Renthal (2) Dorsal Turret Points 44 (31) Crymorah Goon (6) Veteran Turret Gunner (2) Dorsal Turret Points 39 (31) Crymorah Goon (6) Veteran Turret Gunner (2) Dorsal Turret Points 39 (31) Crymorah Goon (6) Veteran Turret Gunner (2) Dorsal Turret Points 39 (31) Crymorah Goon (6) Veteran Turret Gunner (2) Dorsal Turret Points 39 Total points: 200
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 03:52
|
|
|
hoiyes posted:gently caress aces, check this poo poo out: Daaaaaaamn that's a hot list
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 04:23
|
|
|
The Gate posted:RIP in peace Supernatural Reflexes. And good riddance. Neat
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 04:51
|
|
|
hoiyes posted:gently caress aces, check this poo poo out: If anyone ever put that down on a table across from me I may vomit. Oh hey, I heard you hated 4 tlt y-wing in 2.0. I bet we can make it worse. Raged fucked around with this message at 07:57 on Jan 29, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 07:54
|
|
|
That doesnt let you double tap out the front does it?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 08:15
|
|
|
It sure as poo poo does.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 08:22
|
|
|
I hear Han YOLO calling to me in my dreams. I want to play this in hyperspace sooo bad. Han Solo (Resistance) (76) Trick Shot (2) Rose Tico (9) Perceptive Copilot (8) Nien Nunb (55) Heroic (1) R4 Astromech (2) Integrated S-Foils (0) Pattern Analyzer (5) Black One (2) L’ulo L’ampar (38) Heroic (1) Total: 199 View in Yet Another Squad Builder 2.0
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 08:51
|
|
|
Raged posted:If anyone ever put that down on a table across from me I may vomit. I think I would vomit too. That list is disgusting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 09:04
|
|
|
Raged posted:If anyone ever put that down on a table across from me I may vomit. Nah it's more like 5 autoblasters, it's a one trick pony.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 09:32
|
|
|
It's a pretty good trick, though. Red dice are stronk this edition.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 15:00
|
|
|
hoiyes posted:gently caress aces, check this poo poo out: I'm not nearly as worried about this in Extended format as I would be if it worked in Hyperspace, but that's still a lot of beefy red dice. Range control is gonna be everything here.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 16:18
|
|
|
It might suck, but I'm tempted to go back to trying a thematic Ghost list. Kanan Jarrus (84) Heightened Perception (3) Dorsal Turret (2) Magva Yarro (8) Perceptive Copilot (8) Ghost (0) AP-5 (32) Phoenix Squadron Pilot (30) Phoenix Squadron Pilot (30) Total: 197 View in Yet Another Squad Builder 2.0
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 20:11
|
|
|
Kids, don't make the same mistake I did, when flying against a large ship full of force crew; the ship regenerates one force, period, during end phase, not one force per force-granting upgrade card. Time for me to reread all the bits in the rulebook that cover stuff I don't normally use.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 20:12
|
|
|
TheCenturion posted:Kids, don't make the same mistake I did, when flying against a large ship full of force crew; the ship regenerates one force, period, during end phase, not one force per force-granting upgrade card. Uh.....I could swear you are wrong, and every card with the little arrow regens that force. Also, I think c-3p0 is gonna be the only crew in all three time periods.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 20:14
|
|
|
bunnyofdoom posted:Uh.....I could swear you are wrong, and every card with the little arrow regens that force. Nope, they are correct. Those little regen arrows don't stack you only regen one force per ship per turn regardless.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 20:18
|
|
|
bunnyofdoom posted:Uh.....I could swear you are wrong, and every card with the little arrow regens that force. Force goes into a common pool. The pool regens one per round in the end phase, no matter how many force effects you have and whether or not those force effects regenerate force. There are currently no effects that change the number of force tokens you regen at the end of the round. There are some force upgrades that let you regen at other times (like Maul), but right now, no matter how many you have, you only get one back per round at the end of the round. This is different from effects with Charges where each card is its own pool and regens separately.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 20:19
|
|
|
....Holy poo poo. I need to rewrite some lists right now/
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 20:22
|
|
|
A lot of my lists tend to consist of an ace with Inty escorts since I love Interceptors so much. Usually two, but this one can fit three! Even better. Saber Squadron Ace (40) Juke (5) Saber Squadron Ace (40) Juke (5) Saber Squadron Ace (40) Juke (5) “Echo” (50) Juke (5) Fifth Brother (9) Total: 199 View in Yet Another Squad Builder 2.0
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 20:25
|
|
|
On the topic of game etiquette, does anyone get a little ticked when you win a game, and your opponent basically tells you they would have one if it wasn’t for a particular bad dice roll or a particular move? It is almost like they are saying that I didn’t play well. Sure there are deciding rolls/moves that wins or loses a game, but its kind of a lovely thing to say IMO. I usually just respond “Nah, I just outplayed you…” If I get beat, I try to always say how they played really well. lazerus06 fucked around with this message at 20:35 on Jan 29, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 20:32
|
|
|
lazerus06 posted:On the topic of game etiquette, does anyone get a little ticked when you win a game, and your opponent basically tells you they would have one if it wasn’t for a particular bad dice roll or a particular move? It is almost like they are saying that I didn’t play well. Sure there are deciding rolls/moves that wins or loses a game, but its kind of a lovely thing to say IMO. I mean I usually will say a particularly pivotal roll decided things, win or lose. Like if I get my Interceptors behind a particularly important wounded ship and they blank out I'll be like "that's where things went wrong" or whatever. But usually there will have been a certain maneuver decision that decided things I'll notice.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 20:43
|
|
|
My response depends on what they say. If they say "I would have won if it wasn't for this mistake I made", I'll talk about why it was a mistake and how they could have prevented it and help them learn from it and become a better player. If they say "I would have won if it wasn't for this roll of the dice" (and it wasn't some absurdly bad luck where I feel bad for them), I'll disagree and say "Nah, this is what your mistake was" and pick some random thing they intended to do. Not necessarily an actual mistake they made, but something that wasn't random.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 21:57
|
|
|
I rarely comment on dice, only when really unlikely results come to the point of absurdity. I had a focus. I rolled two blanks on defense, and used Heroic to reroll them into two blanks. C'mon, that's funny. Whenever people try to console me by saying my dice were bad I tell them the problem was that I didn't roll the red ones as often as I needed to and had to roll the green ones more than I wanted to.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 22:08
|
|
|
Depends. If the guy's a dick who just can't accept criticism, I just brush it off and move on. But most of the time, they're looking at the game tactically (short term, individual dice rolls) rather than strategically (long term, how they laid out rocks, approached, etc). In those circumstances, I like to talk about how if I ever put myself in a position where a single die roll cost me the game, then I'd already lost. I lost when I made the decisions that put me in the position where a single die roll cost me the game. It's totally fine to be sad if you just had bad luck (or happy if you had good luck) with every important roll of the dice, but...that's rare. It usually averages out. And if it averaged out...why did you really lose/win?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 22:26
|
|
|
I usually only talk about dice when I win a close game. I might point out a particularly bad roll they had as a "well played, if that roll goes different you probably win," "you rolled six hits that turn and I only lost one shield, usually it would be far worse for me" or something similar. When I lose I usually try to pinpoint mistakes and also try to pick one or two things I did well that I wanted to focus on that game.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 22:26
|
|
|
canyoneer posted:I had a focus. I rolled two blanks on defense, and used Heroic to reroll them into two blanks. C'mon, that's funny. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 22:28
|
|
|
I instantly blame my dice, accuse my opponent of cheating, and kick them in the dick.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 22:37
|
|
|
I'm kind of guilty of that, though i have enough of a track record of lovely dice luck that my regular opponents started commenting on it, and telling me I do alright, I just can't roll to save my life.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 22:38
|
|
|
I always say my opponent flew well and ask them what they think I could have done better. I don't mention dice since if they were horrid my opponent will usually comment on them. I will bitch about any boneheaded stuff I have done.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2019 23:34
|
|
|
lazerus06 posted:On the topic of game etiquette, does anyone get a little ticked when you win a game, and your opponent basically tells you they would have one if it wasn’t for a particular bad dice roll or a particular move? It is almost like they are saying that I didn’t play well. Sure there are deciding rolls/moves that wins or loses a game, but its kind of a lovely thing to say IMO. Whether I win or lose I'd rather not hear commentary from some rando at the game store. Good game is good enough.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2019 00:31
|
|
|
I don't talk to my X-Wing tournament opponents post-game, win, lose or draw. They're a zero and I'm a hero.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2019 00:40
|
|
|
just lol if you aren't playing x-wing to the death
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2019 00:43
|
|
|
alg posted:Whether I win or lose I'd rather not hear commentary from some rando at the game store. Good game is good enough. I love you man never change
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2019 00:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 19:04 |
|
|
So, my list that helped my rear end at the tourney Sat is now too expensive. What I did is drop the blacks to red, gave em HLCs instead of torps, and gave Poe a pattern analyzer. Shoudl I bump em up to blacks again, and take away the pattern? Poe Dameron (68) Heroic (1) R4 Astromech (2) Integrated S-Foils (0) Pattern Analyzer (5) Black One (2) Hardpoint: Torpedo (0) Proton Torpedoes (12) Red Squadron Expert (48) Heroic (1) R4 Astromech (2) Integrated S-Foils (0) Hardpoint: Cannon (0) Heavy Laser Cannon (4) Red Squadron Expert (48) Heroic (1) R4 Astromech (2) Integrated S-Foils (0) Hardpoint: Cannon (0) Heavy Laser Cannon (4) Total: 200 View in Yet Another Squad Builder 2.0
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2019 00:49
|
|