|
and it's pretty much a certainty at this point the EU tells her to gently caress off?
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 19:21 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 18:43 |
|
Ramrod Hotshot posted:and it's pretty much a certainty at this point the EU tells her to gently caress off? Literally one second after it passes: https://twitter.com/jessicaelgot/status/1090308741591900160
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 19:23 |
|
I think the BBS also quoted somebody from the ERG saying "Just because we vote for the amendment now doesn't mean we have to vote for the final deal, if the EU actually agrees... ".
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 19:26 |
|
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-nireland-blast/ira-claims-responsibility-for-londonderry-car-bomb-idUKKCN1PN1L0quote:'IRA' claims responsibility for Londonderry car bomb welp
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 19:52 |
|
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/jan/29/discovery-of-biggest-uk-gas-field-in-a-decade-glengorm-north-seaquote:A Chinese-led consortium has discovered the UK’s biggest gas field in more than a decade Brexit hard and welcome the Chinese overlords.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 19:57 |
|
I'm getting so loving confused at all this brexit twisting and turning. This latest thing they're now voting on, its an amendment to her existing deal to.... remove... the backstop? From it? The backstop which was supposed to make sure no borders would be in ireland? But enough tories don't like that because... it still means free movement, or staying in the economic sphere or... something? And anything without that will of course be immediately rejected by the EU? I don't know, I'm loving stumped. I think I lost the plot like, 5 brexit votes ago.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 20:16 |
|
It's is not an amendment to the deal. It is a rejection of the current deal that acts as a counter-offer. I'm not sure the MPs grasp the difference.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 20:18 |
|
why do they think brussels gives a poo poo if its “their fault”
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 20:20 |
|
The EU being at fault is intended for domestic consumption. If it were prehistoric times where people couldn't easily look at other media they might be able to get that story to stick.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 20:23 |
|
as an outsider looking in it seems like the entire philosophy of the tory party has been to avoid ever being responsible for anything, so that's probably their prime concern when formulating any kind of strategy and because conservatives seem to lack a theory of mind they assume everyone else has the same aversion to responsibility as they do
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 20:27 |
|
Drunkboxer posted:why do they think brussels gives a poo poo if its “their fault” if they keep this up britain is gonna leave
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 20:46 |
|
They think Hobbes was prescriptive rather than descriptive.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 20:48 |
|
COMRADES posted:https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-nireland-blast/ira-claims-responsibility-for-londonderry-car-bomb-idUKKCN1PN1L0 None of you will be allowed to sleep soundly.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 20:53 |
|
Randler posted:It's is not an amendment to the deal. Ok, so May is gearing up her coalition to vote down her agreement? I remember her getting blown out of the water on her agreement, then I remember talk about amending her agreement to get rid of the backstop or something, which the EU would reject. So they're voting down the old agreement? Or an agreement from the EU? Or is this something about the automatic measure to implement the agreement in the event of no deal? Or they've got 2 agreements up, the old one and the amended one and they're voting down the old one again? My head hurts, I don't know how anyone follows this.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 21:16 |
|
N / Brady passes 317-301, so this very clearly means, um,
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 21:42 |
|
I've been busy with my dumb country recently, so I hjaven't been able to follow along with the recent UK dumb stuff. What's happened since May's Brexit bill lost? I cant really figure it out from a quick perusal
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 21:45 |
|
CactusWeasle posted:N / Brady passes 317-301, so this very clearly means, um, Springfield's getting a monorail
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 21:45 |
|
Randler posted:Springfield's getting a monorail but brexit's still all cracked and broken
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 21:50 |
|
I've negotiated exit deals with Brockway, Ogdenville and Westminster
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 21:51 |
|
https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1090350275913748480?s=19
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 21:52 |
|
that thread is wild what the gently caress WHY DO THE LEAVERS THINK THEY GET TO KEEP 39 BILLION POUNDS
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 21:57 |
|
How...the backstop is non-negotiable right, everyone...literally everyone has said and is saying it's non-negotiable...is this the Tories thinking that because they can unilatiraly decide to revoke article 50 that pertains to all their negotiations with the EU?
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 21:59 |
|
An insane mind posted:How...the backstop is non-negotiable right, everyone...literally everyone has said and is saying it's non-negotiable...is this the Tories thinking that because they can unilatiraly decide to revoke article 50 that pertains to all their negotiations with the EU? post username combo
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:01 |
|
We know you're selling this house for £500,000 and not a penny less but my family had a vote and we've decided we'll pay £1. ... What do you mean you won't sell it at that price?? We already sold our old house! It's your fault we're homeless!
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:03 |
|
OK so to summarize: May had arranged a deal with the EU. To avoid creating a hard border with Ireland it involved keeping the whole UK in a customs union until some other solution was figured out. The Tories didn't like this because it's not Brexity enough. It got slammed in parliament and didn't pass. This triggered a vote of no confidence. She survived that. Today was a vote on an amendment to May's deal. This so-called Brady amendment says that the Deal with the EU would be the same except that the UK wouldn't be in a customs union. The Brady amendment says that there will be no hard border with Ireland and the customs problem will be solved with "alternative arrangements." There is no explanation for what these would be, and nobody has any actual answers or solutions, so this is basically an impossible and vague demand that has been tagged on to the EU deal. The Tories thought that if they did this they would have some leverage in negotiating with the EU, for reasons I still don't understand. The amendment passed. The EU just repeated that the deal will not be renegotiated, as they have been saying all along.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:05 |
|
JFairfax posted:post username combo People are really annoyed by my username well not annoyed apparently but it's just part of a Terry Pratchett quote that I couldn't put up there in its interity.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:07 |
|
^^^^^^ You don't use enough exclamation marks for that then.An insane mind posted:How...the backstop is non-negotiable right, everyone...literally everyone has said and is saying it's non-negotiable...is this the Tories thinking that because they can unilatiraly decide to revoke article 50 that pertains to all their negotiations with the EU? Probably cause they go back on business deals all the time. "Oh you thought I would be paying back the loan with interest? Don't know what makes you think that"
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:07 |
|
You laugh now, but wait until next year when every single person in the UK is a billionaire I mean, it will mostly because the UK Pound is one-to-one with the Venezuela Bolivar, but still
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:08 |
|
They voted to make no deal Brexit impossible but they also voted to make the Brexit deal impossible
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:11 |
|
https://twitter.com/Bust3d00/status/1090353173389295616
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:12 |
|
twoday posted:OK so to summarize: god-loving-drat
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:15 |
|
its like watching a lovely chess player challenge a computer and getting forced into checkmate over 20 moves of being checked
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:17 |
|
maybe i can do this *check* alright how about an amendment then *check*
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:18 |
|
twoday posted:OK so to summarize: I am vaguely wondering if the English language itself is somehow corrosive to the human mind.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:18 |
|
The Dipshit posted:I am vaguely wondering if the English language itself is somehow corrosive to the human mind. orwell's theory was that it was the combination of english and politics
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:19 |
|
twoday posted:They voted to make no deal Brexit impossible but they also voted to make the Brexit deal impossible
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:20 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:but brexit's still all cracked and broken Sorry, Rask, the mob has spoken.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:21 |
|
CactusWeasle posted:You laugh now, but wait until next year when every single person in the UK is a billionaire Actually this is good for britcoin
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:24 |
|
twoday posted:OK so to summarize: Thanks
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:24 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 18:43 |
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:its like watching a lovely chess player challenge a computer and getting forced into checkmate over 20 moves of being checked I'd say its more like the lovely chess player being checkmated "ok computer how about I do this" *you lose text continues flashing* "ok computer how about I do this instead *you lose text flashes brighter*
|
# ? Jan 29, 2019 22:32 |