|
Greatest Living Man posted:Check the debug logs. They say pretty specifically what's hitting and why it's being excluded. After a fair bit of work I figured out my problem. Long story short, I'd moved my Sonarr installation to my server, and through some course of events had deleted my indexer and not re-added it. So, no sources means no files. :facepalm: quote:There is a setting in radarr to remove extraneous files. There should also be a 'trash' folder that the file may have been moved to. Hmm, I guess I'll add all the usual video extensions to this list and hope that solves any future issues with "sample" files. I can't find and trash folder for Sonarr so I guess I'm out of luck there.
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2019 00:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 06:46 |
|
|
BeastOfExmoor posted:Hmm, I guess I'll add all the usual video extensions to this list and hope that solves any future issues with "sample" files. I can't find and trash folder for Sonarr so I guess I'm out of luck there. IIRC it should be an exclusion list to remove stuff like .nfo files. Those particular files wouldn't be in the trash folder, but files deleted for an upgrade might be. You probably need to click show advanced settings.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2019 04:53
|
|
|
I have a Synology ds215j, and recently switched to frugal, however I can't seem to get 100 mbit with them, only around 60-70 (in EU). I've set the server for 50 connections and SSL and my line speed in the general settings to 11 MB/s. I also have no limit set in the sabnzbd UI. Anything else I might be missing? I heard a lot of people saying they get 100 mbit with them.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2019 16:11
|
|
|
You can lower the connections for sure, you might be having issues due to that. And eh sometimes I get fantastic speeds from my provider, sometimes not. Maybe your distance from the servers etc.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2019 18:02
|
|
|
Tried some more things, turns out I can max out my connection if I disable SSL. The obvious conclusion here, of course, is to upgrade my NAS to a 4-bay, currently eyeing the 418play.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2019 14:41
|
|
|
You should be able to reach 100mbit with like 1/5th of the connections you are using. With more connections comes more overhead. If the device is too weak for encryption though that's a separate problem.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2019 22:41
|
|
|
NGD is running a 6 months for $17 deal https://newsgroupdirect.com/member/billing/?planid=151&deal= The countdown clock said 10 days 6 hours left when I posted this.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2019 22:31
|
|
|
Here's something weird that's happening on my sonarr install on my synology system that I never saw when I used it on my PC. The show appears normally named, and yet Sonarr can't match it to anything else. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 21:04
|
|
|
If you mouse over the red ! it will give you the reasons why it was ignored.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2019 22:08
|
|
|
bred posted:If you mouse over the red ! it will give you the reasons why it was ignored.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2019 00:54
|
|
|
I dunno why its happening, but FWIW, that show works fine for me.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2019 01:34
|
|
|
my "Add to SABnzbd" and "Add to nzbget" integration aren't working for either nzbgeek or nzb.su, even after triple-checking my settings. are there any stupid nub mistakes that could be loving me up? bot nzbgeek and nzb.su give ma notification that they have been added, but the nzbs don't appear in the sabnzbd or nzbget logs, so the file just isn't making it there. adding the file manually works just fine, and my Sonarr/Radarr integration works just fine.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2019 10:44
|
|
|
What setting do I want to be tinkering with in radarr to prevent it from trying to "upgrade" the quality on my existing movies? When I migrated to radarr from couchpotato radarr tried to start redownloading all my existing stuff in higher quality. Thank god for no bandwidth limit fios, it did like 2TB before i realized.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2019 15:21
|
|
|
cr0y posted:What setting do I want to be tinkering with in radarr to prevent it from trying to "upgrade" the quality on my existing movies? When I migrated to radarr from couchpotato radarr tried to start redownloading all my existing stuff in higher quality. Thank god for no bandwidth limit fios, it did like 2TB before i realized. For each Quality Profile you set a "cut-off" this is the lowest quality that it will not attempt to upgrade from. When you added each movie to Radarr you set it's quality profile.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2019 16:55
|
|
|
Has anyone gotten NordVPN to play nice on a Synology NAS with Sonarr, Radarr and SABnzbd? I followed this guide for setting up NordVPN on it: https://nordvpn.com/tutorials/synology-nas/openvpn/ The NAS can connect to the internet fine and Sonarr/Radarr can connect to tvdbid to search for new items (the first search always fails tho no matter what? weird), but ALL indexers fail to connect now and SABnzbd can't connect to my provider (newshosting). I'm guessing all the programs don't understand that there is a VPN now and need to be told to route through it, but i have no idea how to do it. Sonarr/Radarr/SABnzbd is being ran through Docker. Edit: or i re-read the op and a VPN is actually pointless for this kind of stuff cause your ISP cant tell what you are downloading anyway via usenet? correct? Dongattack fucked around with this message at 19:54 on Feb 6, 2019 |
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2019 19:16
|
|
|
If your Usenet provider has SSL just use that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2019 04:37
|
|
|
edit: no sorry, that was SSH, terminology is confusing when you dont even know what it all really is
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2019 17:57
|
|
|
SSL is just encryption that hides what you're downloading from your ISP. A VPN is definitely overkill for downloading from Usenet. You'd only want to use a VPN if you were posting copyrighted stuff.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2019 23:08
|
|
|
Are public torrents in any way better than Usenet for content? I have a VPN and am moderately interested in setting up a jail behind the VPN for automated downloading of public torrents for stuff that's not found on private indexers or trackers.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2019 23:17
|
|
|
sedative posted:SSL is just encryption that hides what you're downloading from your ISP. A VPN is definitely overkill for downloading from Usenet. You'd only want to use a VPN if you were posting copyrighted stuff. Yeah, nobody to my knowledge has ever been busted for solely downloading from usenet. Greatest Living Man posted:Are public torrents in any way better than Usenet for content? I have a VPN and am moderately interested in setting up a jail behind the VPN for automated downloading of public torrents for stuff that's not found on private indexers or trackers. For content? Maybe. Either stuff that has been DMCA'd or out of retention for your service. Even with a VPN I'd want to get off seeding a public torrent ASAP.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2019 23:19
|
|
|
So if i followed this guide for enabling SSL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yajoUSlivYw But it failed to work at the very end where i have to access the NAS via "xxxx.synology.me:5001", the address just never resolved and i got a 404. The youtube comments say to try using Quickconnect, but if i do all this are people gonna be able to see/try to connect to my NAS via the internet?
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 00:32
|
|
|
Dongattack posted:So if i followed this guide for enabling SSL: Your connection to your NAS isn't what people were suggesting you encrypt.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 00:40
|
|
|
No I was talking about using the SSL servers from your Usenet provider. In sabnzbd you'd just change your servers from something like news.whatever.com port 119 to news.whatever.com port 563. Check your provider's site to find the right address and port number.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 00:43
|
|
|
sedative posted:No I was talking about using the SSL servers from your Usenet provider. In sabnzbd you'd just change your servers from something like news.whatever.com port 119 to news.whatever.com port 563. Check your provider's site to find the right address and port number. Oooooooh, okay thanks, i'll try to figure that out tomorrow. edit: actually it was super easy so i could do it from my trash laptop in bed and it turns out i have always been using the SSL port. crisis averted i guess lol, thank you everyone 
Dongattack fucked around with this message at 01:16 on Feb 8, 2019 |
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 01:11
|
|
|
EL BROMANCE posted:Yeah, nobody to my knowledge has ever been busted for solely downloading from usenet. Really? I mean there would be no inventive to seed a public torrent, but it's not like your true IP would be figured out by DMCAbots if you did. Unless the VPN provider complied with such requests.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 04:27
|
|
|
Greatest Living Man posted:Unless the VPN provider complied with such requests. And there’s the issue. Hasn’t happened to my knowledge, but doesn’t mean it can’t and won’t happen. There’s nothing to gain by hanging on seeding on public sites for the most part, so unless you need to just hop off when you can.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 04:51
|
|
|
EL BROMANCE posted:There’s nothing to gain by hanging on seeding on public sites for the most part Somebody has to. It's certainly not going to be me, but I'm glad that some people do.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 13:33
|
|
|
EL BROMANCE posted:Yeah, nobody to my knowledge has ever been busted for solely downloading from usenet. I once got a DMCA notice from downloading from usenet many years ago, and it was from using a NON-SSL connection. 99% of my downloads these days come from usenet with a SSL connection, not 1 single notice.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 14:55
|
|
|
derk posted:I once got a DMCA notice from downloading from usenet many years ago, and it was from using a NON-SSL connection. I think it's likely that you're mis-remembering some things. Those notices come after someone informs your ISP that a specific IP address downloaded a specific thing at a specific time, then the ISP sends you the notice after they correlate your IP, time and request with your user account. With usenet the only way that the reporter can know that your IP address was associated with a download would be if they had access to the usenet server's log files and that seems really unlikely and something SSL would not prevent since your request would still be logged with your IP. With torrents your IP goes into the pool and is publicaly available to anyone else connected to that swarm, but with usenet nothing is shared to the rest of the public. It's highly likely your notice was about a torrent download and not usenet and you're just mistaken.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 16:45
|
|
|
GutBomb posted:I think it's likely that you're mis-remembering some things. Those notices come after someone informs your ISP that a specific IP address downloaded a specific thing at a specific time, then the ISP sends you the notice after they correlate your IP, time and request with your user account. With usenet the only way that the reporter can know that your IP address was associated with a download would be if they had access to the usenet server's log files and that seems really unlikely and something SSL would not prevent since your request would still be logged with your IP. With torrents your IP goes into the pool and is publicaly available to anyone else connected to that swarm, but with usenet nothing is shared to the rest of the public. It's highly likely your notice was about a torrent download and not usenet and you're just mistaken. you're probably right, this was many many many years ago.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 17:54
|
|
|
Yeah, your ISP isn't inspecting your Usenet traffic and picking out file names or anything like that, they don't care and they don't want to care. If they were to do something like that it'd actually put them in a legally worse spot because they'd be stepping out from behind the "common carrier" shield to a point where they were actively policing traffic.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 18:36
|
|
|
wolrah posted:Yeah, your ISP isn't inspecting your Usenet traffic and picking out file names or anything like that, they don't care and they don't want to care. If they were to do something like that it'd actually put them in a legally worse spot because they'd be stepping out from behind the "common carrier" shield to a point where they were actively policing traffic. Pardon my ignorance on how this whole thing works, but why is this true for usenet traffic, but not torrents?
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 18:44
|
|
|
The ISP aren't actively inspecting your connections to torrents, property owners are and then their legal team files complaints to the ISP who have to then get involved. People downloading lots is good for ISPs with capped connections, always a good excuse to charge people for going over their quota.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2019 18:50
|
|
|
Ugh nzbs.org been indexing a ton of fakes with malware infections the last few days. Last few batches I spotted by hand, but tonight my Radarr install grabbed like 5 of them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2019 04:15
|
|
|
EL BROMANCE posted:Ugh nzbs.org been indexing a ton of fakes with malware infections the last few days. Last few batches I spotted by hand, but tonight my Radarr install grabbed like 5 of them. Set file size minimums in your quality profiles in Radarr. That’ll avoid like 99% of that problem.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2019 04:18
|
|
|
They’re padded out so the file sizes (for some at least) are realistic. They’re easy to spot by hand because they’re all around the same size, but Radarr can’t see that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2019 05:05
|
|
|
EL BROMANCE posted:They’re padded out so the file sizes (for some at least) are realistic. They’re easy to spot by hand because they’re all around the same size, but Radarr can’t see that. Hmm, are they faking scene group names too? Maybe set a tag to only get from a certain group that you know puts out legit releases?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2019 05:07
|
|
|
Some examples. Day 1 all had [Fox at the end, I can’t remember what yesterday’s batches were, today are all Epic. Mix of stuff that’s out and stuff that isn’t. File size is growing, they were all under 1gb on day 1, yesterday all around 1.3. Naturally some of them are obvious fakes, but a 1.8gb HC HDRip is possible from a not so hot source. I’m guessing they’re not gonna stop, and will change again by tomorrow. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2019 05:25
|
|
|
EL BROMANCE posted:Some examples. Day 1 all had [Fox at the end, I can’t remember what yesterday’s batches were, today are all Epic. Mix of stuff that’s out and stuff that isn’t. File size is growing, they were all under 1gb on day 1, yesterday all around 1.3. Naturally some of them are obvious fakes, but a 1.8gb HC HDRip is possible from a not so hot source. I’m guessing they’re not gonna stop, and will change again by tomorrow. Yeah I have gotten a couple of those for new releases. Using geek & cat. Not really an issue so far since it's not getting executed. If it did, it's in a FreeBSD jail. Mostly just a minor annoyance.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2019 07:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 06:46 |
|
|
is there any reason a radarr installation would be deleting certain movies in certain folders? I keep having specific movies get deleted automatically, or renamed with the titles of other nzbs, then deleted, I think?
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2019 09:08
|
|