Tales of Woe posted:

i dont like five guys as much as shake shack or the local chains but theyre the only place here that has those coke machines that have like 50 flavors so there's that

bushisms.txt posted:

Any burger joint that only has American cheese is trash by default.

oddium posted:

LawfulWaffle posted:

REmake 2: I just cleared Leon A. Will I spoil anything noteworthy if I play some of the side stories? I’m saving Claire B for next week.

Tales of Woe posted:

i dont like five guys as much as shake shack or the local chains but theyre the only place here that has those coke machines that have like 50 flavors so there's that

CharlieFoxtrot posted:

How are their shakes

In Training posted:

Actually dontvplay the girl since it uses a map from Claire's story.

homeless snail posted:

it melts better

Nate RFB posted:

Someone please make a mod to stop the shopkeeper in Spelunky from getting mad from incidental traps that get set off outside of my control, it is Literally Killing Me.

Propaganda Hour posted:

For at least 40 years I have been doing battle with fast food clerks and restaurant waitresses over the difference between hamburgers and cheeseburgers because I do not like cheese on my hamburger. People who want cheese on their hamburgers should be forced to say, “I want a cheeseburger.” I should not be required to say, “I want a hamburger, no cheese,” or even answer a question such as, “Do you want cheese on your hamburger?” No, I say, because if I wanted cheese I would have ordered a cheeseburger which is what you call a hamburger with cheese on it. This semantic battle became outright war at a fast-food franchise one day when I was charged for a cheeseburger after ordering a hamburger with no cheese. “Yes, you have to pay for the cheese because our hamburgers come with cheese,” I was told by a clerk who was rendered speechless when I asked if she would give me money for a diamond ring she did not request, and I planned never to give her.

I slowly explained that I ordered a hamburger and was now being told I had to pay for cheese that I was not getting. “I’m sorry sir but you have to pay the same price because we sell hamburgers with cheese,” the clerk said, patiently explaining that I would not get any cheese on my burger and completely misunderstanding the point I was trying to make. The majority of people I have spoken to about this seem to think it is perfectly acceptable to ruin a hamburger by putting cheese on it and think anyone who frets over the bastardization of the English language is simply a troublemaker. Just order a hamburger with no cheese, they tell me.

Listen, I can almost understand the backwards logic. If a restaurant orders its frozen burgers with cheese from a corporate entity, cooks them early in the morning and then drops them into some heated vat full of grease for hours, it would be difficult for employees to separate the melted cheese from the burgers. Employees would have to put down their cell phones, grab the burger patties, pull off the cheese and then go back to texting, which would really mess up their smart phones.

But if the burger is made fresh daily, it would seem to me that delivering a hamburger without cheese to a customer would actually save the restaurant time and demonstrate some good will. Customers should not be forced to pay for something they do not want and did not order. And Americans should never be forced to say they want a “hamburger, no cheese.”

Propaganda Hour posted:

For at least 40 years I have been doing battle with fast food clerks and restaurant waitresses over the difference between hamburgers and cheeseburgers because I do not like cheese on my hamburger. People who want cheese on their hamburgers should be forced to say, “I want a cheeseburger.” I should not be required to say, “I want a hamburger, no cheese,” or even answer a question such as, “Do you want cheese on your hamburger?” No, I say, because if I wanted cheese I would have ordered a cheeseburger which is what you call a hamburger with cheese on it. This semantic battle became outright war at a fast-food franchise one day when I was charged for a cheeseburger after ordering a hamburger with no cheese. “Yes, you have to pay for the cheese because our hamburgers come with cheese,” I was told by a clerk who was rendered speechless when I asked if she would give me money for a diamond ring she did not request, and I planned never to give her.

I slowly explained that I ordered a hamburger and was now being told I had to pay for cheese that I was not getting. “I’m sorry sir but you have to pay the same price because we sell hamburgers with cheese,” the clerk said, patiently explaining that I would not get any cheese on my burger and completely misunderstanding the point I was trying to make. The majority of people I have spoken to about this seem to think it is perfectly acceptable to ruin a hamburger by putting cheese on it and think anyone who frets over the bastardization of the English language is simply a troublemaker. Just order a hamburger with no cheese, they tell me.

Listen, I can almost understand the backwards logic. If a restaurant orders its frozen burgers with cheese from a corporate entity, cooks them early in the morning and then drops them into some heated vat full of grease for hours, it would be difficult for employees to separate the melted cheese from the burgers. Employees would have to put down their cell phones, grab the burger patties, pull off the cheese and then go back to texting, which would really mess up their smart phones.

But if the burger is made fresh daily, it would seem to me that delivering a hamburger without cheese to a customer would actually save the restaurant time and demonstrate some good will. Customers should not be forced to pay for something they do not want and did not order. And Americans should never be forced to say they want a “hamburger, no cheese.”

Macaluso posted:

I've seen that post before, I think it was a twitlonger? Or a reddit post. Either way it's an abomination and if you don't like cheese on your burger and your body is able to process cheese, you don't deserve a burg

tithin posted:

I'm considering buying a second switch so I can actually yknow, play it and not have to wait for my kid to be done with it. How is the switch with using the same account on a second console? I remember the 3ds was rear end and you couldn't do it.

DLC Inc posted:

I'd bet a zillion bucks that those two unreleased games are going to be 100x times better versions of anything Bioware/Bethesda tries in the future, I added Apex Legends mainly because Respawn was kind of in Bioware's shoes but did something that actually saved them

Propaganda Hour posted:

For at least 40 years I have been doing battle with fast food clerks and restaurant waitresses over the difference between hamburgers and cheeseburgers because I do not like cheese on my hamburger. People who want cheese on their hamburgers should be forced to say, “I want a cheeseburger.” I should not be required to say, “I want a hamburger, no cheese,” or even answer a question such as, “Do you want cheese on your hamburger?” No, I say, because if I wanted cheese I would have ordered a cheeseburger which is what you call a hamburger with cheese on it. This semantic battle became outright war at a fast-food franchise one day when I was charged for a cheeseburger after ordering a hamburger with no cheese. “Yes, you have to pay for the cheese because our hamburgers come with cheese,” I was told by a clerk who was rendered speechless when I asked if she would give me money for a diamond ring she did not request, and I planned never to give her.

I slowly explained that I ordered a hamburger and was now being told I had to pay for cheese that I was not getting. “I’m sorry sir but you have to pay the same price because we sell hamburgers with cheese,” the clerk said, patiently explaining that I would not get any cheese on my burger and completely misunderstanding the point I was trying to make. The majority of people I have spoken to about this seem to think it is perfectly acceptable to ruin a hamburger by putting cheese on it and think anyone who frets over the bastardization of the English language is simply a troublemaker. Just order a hamburger with no cheese, they tell me.

Listen, I can almost understand the backwards logic. If a restaurant orders its frozen burgers with cheese from a corporate entity, cooks them early in the morning and then drops them into some heated vat full of grease for hours, it would be difficult for employees to separate the melted cheese from the burgers. Employees would have to put down their cell phones, grab the burger patties, pull off the cheese and then go back to texting, which would really mess up their smart phones.

But if the burger is made fresh daily, it would seem to me that delivering a hamburger without cheese to a customer would actually save the restaurant time and demonstrate some good will. Customers should not be forced to pay for something they do not want and did not order. And Americans should never be forced to say they want a “hamburger, no cheese.”

Propaganda Hour posted:

For at least 40 years I have been doing battle with fast food clerks and restaurant waitresses over the difference between hamburgers and cheeseburgers because I do not like cheese on my hamburger. People who want cheese on their hamburgers should be forced to say, “I want a cheeseburger.” I should not be required to say, “I want a hamburger, no cheese,” or even answer a question such as, “Do you want cheese on your hamburger?” No, I say, because if I wanted cheese I would have ordered a cheeseburger which is what you call a hamburger with cheese on it. This semantic battle became outright war at a fast-food franchise one day when I was charged for a cheeseburger after ordering a hamburger with no cheese. “Yes, you have to pay for the cheese because our hamburgers come with cheese,” I was told by a clerk who was rendered speechless when I asked if she would give me money for a diamond ring she did not request, and I planned never to give her.

I slowly explained that I ordered a hamburger and was now being told I had to pay for cheese that I was not getting. “I’m sorry sir but you have to pay the same price because we sell hamburgers with cheese,” the clerk said, patiently explaining that I would not get any cheese on my burger and completely misunderstanding the point I was trying to make. The majority of people I have spoken to about this seem to think it is perfectly acceptable to ruin a hamburger by putting cheese on it and think anyone who frets over the bastardization of the English language is simply a troublemaker. Just order a hamburger with no cheese, they tell me.

Listen, I can almost understand the backwards logic. If a restaurant orders its frozen burgers with cheese from a corporate entity, cooks them early in the morning and then drops them into some heated vat full of grease for hours, it would be difficult for employees to separate the melted cheese from the burgers. Employees would have to put down their cell phones, grab the burger patties, pull off the cheese and then go back to texting, which would really mess up their smart phones.

But if the burger is made fresh daily, it would seem to me that delivering a hamburger without cheese to a customer would actually save the restaurant time and demonstrate some good will. Customers should not be forced to pay for something they do not want and did not order. And Americans should never be forced to say they want a “hamburger, no cheese.”

Macaluso posted:

Five Guys is trash, Shake Shack is loving delicious and I'll fight anyone who disagrees.