|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:In the New Zealand Mosque shooter's Manifesto he said he made money from Bitconnect. I loooooove Bitconneeeeeeeeeeeect
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 06:16 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 11:16 |
|
McGiggins posted:Real talk, has there been any actual real attempt to set up an actual non-illegal marketplace for like food and poo poo with any coins? Many, maybe you would like https://openbazaar.org/. Also remember that darknet markets, including Silk Road, don't tend to be restricted to drugs, they merely permit them. There were (in honesty, much smaller) sections for books, artwork, collectibles and so on. xtal fucked around with this message at 07:17 on Mar 15, 2019 |
# ? Mar 15, 2019 07:11 |
|
xtal posted:Many, maybe you would like https://openbazaar.org/. artwork
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 08:38 |
|
You could pay Steam with Bitcoin for about a month before they said NOPE. One of the big things that killed it beyond the volatility was that the transaction fees were higher than the game's price.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 09:24 |
|
McGiggins posted:Real talk, has there been any actual real attempt to set up an actual non-illegal marketplace for like food and poo poo with any coins? Dominos in australia allowed payment via Bitcoin. Then they didn't.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 09:33 |
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:In the New Zealand Mosque shooter's Manifesto he said he made money from Bitconnect. dude seems like a broke-brained meme troll, so probably bs
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 10:54 |
|
oohhboy posted:You could pay Steam with Bitcoin for about a month before they said NOPE. One of the big things that killed it beyond the volatility was that the transaction fees were higher than the game's price. quote:In the past few months we've seen an increase in the volatility in the value of Bitcoin and a significant increase in the fees to process transactions on the Bitcoin network. For example, transaction fees that are charged to the customer by the Bitcoin network have skyrocketed this year, topping out at close to $20 a transaction last week (compared to roughly $0.20 when we initially enabled Bitcoin). Unfortunately, Valve has no control over the amount of the fee. These fees result in unreasonably high costs for purchasing games when paying with Bitcoin. The high transaction fees cause even greater problems when the value of Bitcoin itself drops dramatically.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 11:09 |
|
the comments. Some barely veiled marketing for an exchange or some other butts. None addresses why they dumped it. $0.5 transaction fee which is no doubt a lie and itself is volatile. None acknowledge having to comply with consumer laws hence the charging backwards and forwards making refunds the poo poo show. Transaction speed while not mentioned directly is via the price window nor the volatility making pricing near impossible. I wonder why they even started other than the roundabout possibility of encouraging purchases. They are a private company so they don't need to pump the share price. drat butts are so terrible even if you get someone else to touch it for you all the real money is covered in poo poo. Talked to a friend on an occasion about butts and I told them if I was to ever take a butt as payment I would demand 5 - 10x butts than cash. Paying with actual poo poo at minimum has the utility of making fertiliser or a truck for Biff to drive into.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 11:35 |
|
oohhboy posted:I wonder why they even started other than the roundabout possibility of encouraging purchases. They are a private company so they don't need to pump the share price. drat butts are so terrible even if you get someone else to touch it for you all the real money is covered in poo poo.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 13:50 |
|
https://www.newsbtc.com/2019/02/06/ceo-who-held-150m-in-crypto-died-in-a-region-known-for-having-a-fake-death-mafia/ The whole Quadriga CEO fake death and run away with xxx million fiasco is hilarious. And I still try to find empathy towards the people who lost their life savings there (https://youtu.be/X6-T8fn-sCM)... Also:
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 21:13 |
|
El_Elegante posted:I’m curious to know the viability of Zimbabwean banknotes as a laundering method. It's not a laundering method, it's a bitcoin-adjacent conspiracy theory that believes the Zimbabwean dollar will somehow magically become equal to real dollars by an act of Congress or something, thus making the proud owners billionaires+ overnight Somehow it's even nuttier than bitcoin.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 21:50 |
|
Play posted:It's not a laundering method, it's a bitcoin-adjacent conspiracy theory that believes the Zimbabwean dollar will somehow magically become equal to real dollars by an act of Congress or something, thus making the proud owners billionaires+ overnight I think that's Iraqi dinars, unless they're the same wacky scam.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 22:17 |
|
Norton the First posted:I think that's Iraqi dinars, unless they're the same wacky scam. for what it's worth I checked the markets earlier and there are no iraqi dinars or zimbabwe dollars for sale on the main market. There are, however, counterfeit kuwaiti/jordanian dinars for sale, which at least sounds like a plausible component of a money laundering scheme
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 23:01 |
|
poverty goat posted:for what it's worth I checked the markets earlier and there are no iraqi dinars or zimbabwe dollars for sale on the main market. That's HOW you know everyone wants them CAN"T YOU SEE??! BUY BUY BUY
|
# ? Mar 15, 2019 23:28 |
|
https://decryptmedia.com/5898/inside-spankchain-ameen-soleimani-ethereum
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 02:14 |
|
Okay but I'm not sure what Mazlow's hierarchy of needs has to do with bitcoin
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 02:29 |
|
Rev. Dr. Moses P. Lester posted:https://decryptmedia.com/5898/inside-spankchain-ameen-soleimani-ethereum sorry, already been done over at the green thread empty whippet box posted:I was just in jail for ten days and this was in the criminal legal newsletter and i tore it out and brought it home so i could post it here, you are welcome. somebody finally said it, we can all go home now
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 02:34 |
|
MarcusSA posted:Or you could just use a P.O. Box Love getting packages addressed to my completely untraceable P.O. Box labeled “Drugs inside. Do not open!”
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 02:58 |
|
Burt Sexual posted:Love getting packages addressed to my completely untraceable P.O. Box labeled “Drugs inside. Do not open!” Mitch Hedberg said it best. "I like the Fed Ex driver because he's a drug dealer and he don't even know it."
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 07:46 |
|
http://bitgear.co/ Nearly everything has a "SALE" tag on it, and every single item is 404. I sort-of recognized the address, because I used to live in that area, so I poked around on Google Maps. The building Bitgear lists as its address is a little stucco house with a sign on the front which reads, "PhysicalAddress.com."
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 22:03 |
|
Veni Vidi Ameche! posted:http://bitgear.co/ Nothing screams legitimacy like "PhysicalAddress.com."
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 22:08 |
|
CaptainSarcastic posted:Nothing screams legitimacy like "PhysicalAddress.com." Get with the times grandpa, everything is on the internet now. It's right in the name, physical address, but dot com!
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 22:45 |
|
Mimesweeper posted:Get with the times grandpa, everything is on the internet now. It's right in the name, physical address, but dot com! PhysicalAddress.com LLC Response 11/07/2017 Client is unhappy because they were unaware of the United State Postal Service requirement even though we communicated that fact on our FAQ page and in several emails sent immediately after signing up. Client is also unhappy that we were forced to returned to sender (per ****** ****** ****** ******* Requirements) any mail received on behalf of the client because they refused to complete required **** form. Client signed up on October 17, 2017. Client was unwilling to complete the required ****** ****** ****** ******* **** form. We clearly state, on our Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) page, that this form needs to be completed before we can process a client’s mail. It is the first item on the FAQ page. After the client finished the sign up process, our system automatically sent them an email with a pre-populated **** form attached and details on how to complete it. That email also contains a verification code that is required to activate the account. We know the client received and read this email because they used the verification code to activate the account a few minutes after they completed the sign up process on Oct 17. We also sent a welcome email a few minutes later, and followed it up with a phone call. The welcome email reiterates the **** **** form requirement. In this case, the welcome email was sent six minutes after the client signed up. We reach out to the client multiple times requesting that they complete **** **** form so that we can process any mail we receive on their behalf. Client called and cancelled service on Friday November 3, 2017. We immediately refunded the client. We have had a number of correspondences with the client. The client has accused us of not making them aware of the **** **** requirement until we received mail for them a few weeks after signing up. This is simply not true. It is the first item on our FAQ page, and we sent them two emails the day they signed up making them aware of this fact. We know they read at least one of them because it contains the verification code to activate the account. The client has also accused us of sending their mail to an address they did not authorize. What they are referring to, is us giving their mail back to the postal carriers and asking them to return the mail to sender because the client did not complete the required ****** ****** ****** ******* **** form. On the complaint, the client says the disputed amount is $7.00. This amount is confusing given that the amount we charged the client on the day they signed up (Oct 17, 2017) was $28.98. We refunded the $28.98 on Nov 3 — the day the canceled. We are not sure what we could have done differently. The **** **** requirement is posted on our FAQ. If a client does not read the FAQ, we make them aware right after signing up with two emails and a phone call. We offer a 30-day money-back-guarantee. We refunded the client immediately upon cancelling. We returned any mail received for the client per **** requirements. The client had received three items, per her request, on Nov 6 we gave her the names of the three senders so she could contact the senders and have the mail redelivered to her chosen address. If need be, we can provide supporting evidences for all of the above.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 22:50 |
|
Bitcoin!
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 23:12 |
|
CaptainSarcastic posted:PhysicalAddress.com LLC Response What's with the seemingly innocuous things like the form name being redacted?
|
# ? Mar 18, 2019 01:04 |
|
norp posted:What's with the seemingly innocuous things like the form name being redacted? Not as innocuous as you think. The USPS has forms titled "gently caress poo poo Hitlers remaining ball" (address forwarding form) and "dog dick coffee table" (for having your mail held while on vacation).
|
# ? Mar 18, 2019 01:44 |
|
MrUnderbridge posted:"dog dick coffee table" how the hell did you get my mailing address!
|
# ? Mar 18, 2019 01:49 |
It’s form PS 1093-C. Totally classified stuff.
|
|
# ? Mar 18, 2019 01:50 |
|
Laslow posted:It’s form PS 1093-C. Totally classified stuff. Jesus are you trying to get the feds to visit lowtax again?
|
# ? Mar 18, 2019 01:56 |
|
my bitcoin nazi piece in foreign policy is up. my favourite sentence: quote:One neo-Nazi podcaster found a credit card processor that was fine with the content of his show but said he was untouchable for another reason: He was considered a money laundering risk because he dealt in cryptocurrency. (Cantwell, who just managed the amazing achievement of getting himself kicked off Gab)
|
# ? Mar 19, 2019 21:06 |
|
How the gently caress does a Nazi get kicked out of gab?
|
# ? Mar 19, 2019 21:34 |
|
Cryptocurrencies: so bad even Nazis won't touch them
|
# ? Mar 19, 2019 21:43 |
|
By popular demand posted:How the gently caress does a Nazi get kicked out of gab? some people attract the wrong kind of attention. (cantwell attracted fed attention and I think doxxed another right winger)
|
# ? Mar 19, 2019 21:43 |
|
divabot posted:my bitcoin nazi piece in foreign policy is up. Thank goodness my org has a business subscription to the FP website so I never get paywalled, good article.
|
# ? Mar 19, 2019 22:19 |
|
divabot posted:bitcoin nazi
|
# ? Mar 19, 2019 22:32 |
|
By popular demand posted:How the gently caress does a Nazi get kicked out of gab? this text followed by this text did the trick he joins weev and the concept of lolicon
|
# ? Mar 20, 2019 00:24 |
|
orange juche posted:Thank goodness my org has a business subscription to the FP website so I never get paywalled, good article. private browsing is your friend
|
# ? Mar 20, 2019 00:25 |
|
divabot posted:private browsing is your friend That works on that site? neat.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2019 00:30 |
|
divabot posted:private browsing is your friend Honestly, in this day and age you're a little crazy if you don't use a cookie-clearing extension. That'll handily defeat those sites that count the number of articles you're looked at. Rather than going on my usual paranoid rant about all this, I'll just drop a link to privacytools.io. The only recommendation on that site that I disagree with is the Brave web browser, whose devs tried to use it to promote their own special cryptocurrency.
|
# ? Mar 20, 2019 00:43 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 11:16 |
|
divabot posted:this text followed by this text did the trick Now, I'm definitely not telling all you right wing guys to smash your dicks to a bloody pulp, but should you decide to against my recommendations might I draw your attention to Dicksmasher 7000 line of industrial vises?
|
# ? Mar 20, 2019 04:52 |