Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
a dingus
Mar 22, 2008

Rhetorical questions only
Fun Shoe
I thought that was a bullet proof vest

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

evil_bunnY
Apr 2, 2003

slidebite posted:

Here you go


Amazing

Luneshot
Mar 10, 2014

I mean the correct drone is the lights on top of a crane

kill me now
Sep 14, 2003

Why's Hank crying?

'CUZ HE JUST GOT DUNKED ON!

Previa_fun posted:

That would have been hilariously expensive and I wonder how well you could fly in tight formation with a swing-wing.

I love the idea of A-7 Blue Angels though.

The Tomcat has a manual wing sweep selector. They could have just selected full aft for tight formation passes.

It would have added some cool sweep/unsweep dynamics to the show for sure.

Previa_fun
Nov 10, 2004

Also the Blues are to receive and start transitioning to Super Hornets next year, and shortening their show.
https://theaviationgeekclub.com/former-blue-angel-talks-about-teams-transition-to-super-hornet-and-new-airshow-routine/

I'm calling the dirty loop and solo tuckaway cross/opposing turns are going away.

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-02-01/sofia-flying-telescope-occultation-chasing-shadow-titan/10635802

Here's some Aeronautical Insanity for you, a 747SP with a big hole in it for a telescope.

Best Friends
Nov 4, 2011

https://www.seattletimes.com/busine...lion-air-crash/

quote:


As Boeing hustled in 2015 to catch up to Airbus and certify its new 737 MAX, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) managers pushed the agency’s safety engineers to delegate safety assessments to Boeing itself, and to speedily approve the resulting analysis.

But the original safety analysis that Boeing delivered to the FAA for a new flight control system on the MAX — a report used to certify the plane as safe to fly — had several crucial flaws.

That flight control system, called MCAS (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System), is now under scrutiny after two crashes of the jet in less than five months resulted in Wednesday’s FAA order to ground the plane.

Current and former engineers directly involved with the evaluations or familiar with the document shared details of Boeing’s “System Safety Analysis” of MCAS, which The Seattle Times confirmed.

The safety analysis:

-Understated the power of the new flight control system, which was designed to swivel the horizontal tail to push the nose of the plane down to avert a stall. When the planes later entered service, MCAS was capable of moving the tail more than four times farther than was stated in the initial safety analysis document.

-Failed to account for how the system could reset itself each time a pilot responded, thereby missing the potential impact of the system repeatedly pushing the airplane’s nose downward.

-Assessed a failure of the system as one level below “catastrophic.” But even that “hazardous” danger level should have precluded activation of the system based on input from a single sensor — and yet that’s how it was designed.

The people who spoke to The Seattle Times and shared details of the safety analysis all spoke on condition of anonymity to protect their jobs at the FAA and other aviation organizations.

Both Boeing and the FAA were informed of the specifics of this story and were asked for responses 11 days ago, before the second crash of a 737 MAX last Sunday.

Late Friday, the FAA said it followed its standard certification process on the MAX. Citing a busy week, a spokesman said the agency was “unable to delve into any detailed inquiries.”

Boeing responded Saturday with a statement that “the FAA considered the final configuration and operating parameters of MCAS during MAX certification, and concluded that it met all certification and regulatory requirements.”

Adding that it is “unable to comment … because of the ongoing investigation” into the crashes, Boeing did not respond directly to the detailed description of the flaws in MCAS certification, beyond saying that “there are some significant mischaracterizations.”

Several technical experts inside the FAA said October’s Lion Air crash, where the MCAS has been clearly implicated by investigators in Indonesia, is only the latest indicator that the agency’s delegation of airplane certification has gone too far, and that it’s inappropriate for Boeing employees to have so much authority over safety analyses of Boeing jets.

“We need to make sure the FAA is much more engaged in failure assessments and the assumptions that go into them,” said one FAA safety engineer

Godholio
Aug 28, 2002

Does a bear split in the woods near Zheleznogorsk?
Time to watch Boeing stock, I guess.

CAT INTERCEPTOR
Nov 9, 2004

Basically a male Margaret Thatcher

Everytime I read more about the 737max cluster it just gets amazingly worse

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane
It looks like they rowed themselves up poo poo creek and then threw away the paddle, yes.

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

PT6A posted:

It looks like they rowed themselves up poo poo creek and then threw away the paddle, yes.

And they didn't assess the safety impact of a padde-less creek entry seriously enough.

Sperglord
Feb 6, 2016
According to the Wall Street Journal, the Department of Justice has gotten involved and gone so far as to subpoena Boeing and the FAA:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/faas-737-max-approval-is-probed-11552868400?mod=hp_lead_pos1

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane
Betcha Boeing is feeling real happy about all the military poo poo they have going on, because I think they're going to take a fairly thorough beating on the civilian side of their business from this thing.

TTerrible
Jul 15, 2005
Where is the dude that was saying we're all idiots and it was a nothing burger.

drunkill
Sep 25, 2007

me @ ur posting
Fallen Rib
In the oval office.

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


TTerrible posted:

Where is the dude that was saying we're all idiots and it was a nothing burger.

If you're referring to me, you are all still idiots. Not because of this, just in general. I know I am. In the grand scheme of things, it is a nothing burger. Boeing shares will dip for a few months and in a couple of years it'll be like nothing happened. People will still fly. Airlines will still try to save money in any way they can. Boeing will still be building airplanes.

TTerrible
Jul 15, 2005

Finger Prince posted:

If you're referring to me, you are all still idiots. Not because of this, just in general. I know I am. In the grand scheme of things, it is a nothing burger. Boeing shares will dip for a few months and in a couple of years it'll be like nothing happened. People will still fly. Airlines will still try to save money in any way they can. Boeing will still be building airplanes.

I honestly can't remember who it was. I mean, yeah there is no way this is going to sink Boeing but it is being taken pretty seriously now. I never claimed I wasn't an idiot, that would be extremely dishonest.

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

It's not a nothing burger, but a something poo poo sandwich in the great breakfast buffet we call life.

slidebite
Nov 6, 2005

Good egg
:colbert:

Sperglord posted:

According to the Wall Street Journal, the Department of Justice has gotten involved and gone so far as to subpoena Boeing and the FAA:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/faas-737-max-approval-is-probed-11552868400?mod=hp_lead_pos1

Well poo poo.

Lawsuits from passengers families to airlines and everyone in between is going to be interesting.

Jealous Cow
Apr 4, 2002

by Fluffdaddy

Sperglord posted:

According to the Wall Street Journal, the Department of Justice has gotten involved and gone so far as to subpoena Boeing and the FAA:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/faas-737-max-approval-is-probed-11552868400?mod=hp_lead_pos1

When did all this supposed weirdness with the FAA being forced to hand testing off to Boeing happen?

rscott
Dec 10, 2009
The MAX is like 40% of our revenue right now so everyone here is pretty much sitting with our buttholes clenched, if they have to slow production the whiplash in the supply chain after the ramp up to 52 units a month is going to be immense

Cocoa Crispies
Jul 20, 2001

Vehicular Manslaughter!

Pillbug

Jealous Cow posted:

When did all this supposed weirdness with the FAA being forced to hand testing off to Boeing happen?

Did the FAA ever have the ability and authority to do testing themselves?

ManifunkDestiny
Aug 2, 2005
THE ONLY THING BETTER THAN THE SEAHAWKS IS RUSSELL WILSON'S TAINT SWEAT

Seahawks #1 fan since 2014.

Finger Prince posted:

If you're referring to me, you are all still idiots. Not because of this, just in general. I know I am. In the grand scheme of things, it is a nothing burger. Boeing shares will dip for a few months and in a couple of years it'll be like nothing happened. People will still fly. Airlines will still try to save money in any way they can. Boeing will still be building airplanes.

“A few hundred people died due to corporate incompetence, there’s a federal investigation which may most likely lead to at least one if not several members of a Fortune 500 company’s leadership and the loss of tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars in value and a severe hit to the corporation’s reputation a global market facing increasing competition, but yeah, total nothingburger” 🙄

Jealous Cow
Apr 4, 2002

by Fluffdaddy

Cocoa Crispies posted:

Did the FAA ever have the ability and authority to do testing themselves?

https://www.seattletimes.com/busine...lion-air-crash/

quote:

As Boeing hustled in 2015 to catch up to Airbus and certify its new 737 MAX, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) managers pushed the agency’s safety engineers to delegate safety assessments to Boeing itself, and to speedily approve the resulting analysis.

Answered my own question. It was 2015.

Thanks, Obama

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


ManifunkDestiny posted:

“A few hundred people died due to corporate incompetence, there’s a federal investigation which may most likely lead to at least one if not several members of a Fortune 500 company’s leadership and the loss of tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars in value and a severe hit to the corporation’s reputation a global market facing increasing competition, but yeah, total nothingburger” 🙄

Won't somebody please think of the shareholder value!

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747

Finger Prince posted:

Won't somebody please think of the shareholder value!

Trainee PornStar
Jul 20, 2006

I'm just an inbetweener

vuk83 posted:

I don't get it?

I think it's referring to the 'gatwick drones' turning out to most likely have been plastic bags.

Captain Postal
Sep 16, 2007

ManifunkDestiny posted:

“A few hundred people died due to corporate incompetence, there’s a federal investigation which may most likely lead to at least one if not several members of a Fortune 500 company’s leadership and the loss of tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars in value and a severe hit to the corporation’s reputation a global market facing increasing competition, but yeah, total nothingburger” 🙄

It's a $200B+ company. Each loss if $100M in payouts is 0.05%. The random noise in their share-price before this happened was literally 100x bigger.

Even once you factor in compensation to customers, in the long run this won't loving dent them.

(And do you really think any politician in office would let them fail?)

Mortabis
Jul 8, 2010

I am stupid

Finger Prince posted:

Won't somebody please think of the shareholder value!

Don't worry I'm thinking about it

I think you're right, by the way. Boeing is going to lose a ton of money over this but it is very unlikely to go bankrupt and the 737 will ultimately be fixed.

I certainly wouldn't want to be a Boeing executive paid in stock right now.

Nebakenezzer
Sep 13, 2005

The Mote in God's Eye

Mortabis posted:

I certainly wouldn't want to be a Boeing executive paid in stock right now.

I know, right? They need that money to bribe their children into an elite university!!

OK, interest check: I found this in the libriary. I could scan and post the whole thing with modest effort if enough pilots/mechanics find it cool. Or is this already online?











Jealous Cow
Apr 4, 2002

by Fluffdaddy

Nebakenezzer posted:

I know, right? They need that money to bribe their children into an elite university!!

OK, interest check: I found this in the libriary. I could scan and post the whole thing with modest effort if enough pilots/mechanics find it cool. Or is this already online?













Unnngghhh that design work :popeye:

KYOON GRIFFEY JR
Apr 12, 2010



Runner-up, TRP Sack Race 2021/22
double delux class :gritin:

AlexanderCA
Jul 21, 2010

by Cyrano4747

Mortabis posted:


I certainly wouldn't want to be a Boeing executive paid in stock right now.

I don't know how this works, but unless they're paid on the change in stock value instead of the stock value itself this would likely be still a lot of money in absolute terms? So yeah I'll take that deal if they don't want it.

Hexyflexy
Sep 2, 2011

asymptotically approaching one

Jealous Cow posted:

Unnngghhh that design work :popeye:

I’d buy that for my coffee table.

bull3964
Nov 18, 2000

DO YOU HEAR THAT? THAT'S THE SOUND OF ME PATTING MYSELF ON THE BACK.


This shitstorm isn't going to have huge concentrated effects like Boeing going bankrupt, it's going to have millions of small ripple effects.

Part suppliers for the plane are going to get hit hard from production stoppage after such a quick ramp up.

Some airlines are going to be stuck with choosing between cancelling orders if they can or hoping that some combination of Boeing and their own spin will calm customer concerns to the point where they won't lose fares to airlines that aren't using the MAX. No matter what they choose, the timings of adding planes to their fleet are going to be affected.

Reviews of the certification process could delay new planes like the 777x from entering service.

We also don't know if the MAX will be cleared to fly after this latest software fix since the whole certification process has been called into question. It may be a lot longer before they are allowed to fly again.

FuturePastNow
May 19, 2014


AlexanderCA posted:

I don't know how this works, but unless they're paid on the change in stock value instead of the stock value itself this would likely be still a lot of money in absolute terms? So yeah I'll take that deal if they don't want it.

I'm sure their executives see any drop as a chance to buy more stock for themselves.

Sperglord
Feb 6, 2016

Mortabis posted:

I certainly wouldn't want to be a Boeing executive paid in stock right now.


FuturePastNow posted:

I'm sure their executives see any drop as a chance to buy more stock for themselves.

If you're stupid enough to get stock from your employer and not hedge it, go ahead and buy more.

Carth Dookie
Jan 28, 2013

Mortabis posted:

I certainly wouldn't want to be a Boeing executive paid in stock right now.

I would.

I'd just have to make peace with being obscenely wealthy rather than godly wealthy. It's would be tough, but I think I'd make it.

Best Friends
Nov 4, 2011

Whether executives are or are not buying their own stock at retail price is a great indicator of internal perception of future value. I would not take it as a given that Boeing execs right now would do that.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mortabis
Jul 8, 2010

I am stupid

AlexanderCA posted:

I don't know how this works, but unless they're paid on the change in stock value instead of the stock value itself this would likely be still a lot of money in absolute terms? So yeah I'll take that deal if they don't want it.

Typically they're given call options, so yes if the stock price goes down those options are worthless. (They get other compensation as well of course).

e: simple explanation of how this works: a call option is an option to buy shares of the stock at a particular price (called the strike price) on or before a particular date. So if the stock price is above the strike price, you can make money by executing the option and selling the stock. If it's below, then you don't exercise the option at all and get $0. Executives get them and then try to make the stock price go up so that they can make a ton of money on their options. Because of odd tax rules regarding performance-based pay for executives, this forms an increasingly large portion of their compensation.

Mortabis fucked around with this message at 23:58 on Mar 18, 2019

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply