|
SirPablo posted:Season ten was complete trash. Max Power tho
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 10:02 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 16:42 |
|
super sweet best pal posted:I hope the moment he dies the Simpsons writers start having Lisa eat meat again. There's apparently an episode where Lunchlady Doris convinces Lisa to add bugs to her diet. I looked it up and the description cut off at a point where I thought it might also be the Fit Tony one. It's not, but that wouldn't have been a surprise at this point. I miss when we could have "which of these awful Simspons episodes is fake?" without them all turning out to be real.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 10:42 |
P&tP was a funny episode, but it was where the characters became props to hang jokes on instead of people the audience is expected to care about. And you can still have a decent show by doing that so long as the jokes are good, but those also turned to poo poo soon after.
|
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 11:18 |
|
bitterandtwisted posted:P&tP was a funny episode, but it was where the characters became props to hang jokes on instead of people the audience is expected to care about. And you can still have a decent show by doing that so long as the jokes are good, but those also turned to poo poo soon after. It really is an all around good episode, but it's the moment when someone set the show to evil.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 12:31 |
|
CodfishCartographer posted:Up yours, children. DUNDUNDUNDUN-DUN-DUN-DUNDUNDUN
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 14:43 |
|
had a shot of bourbon. lets get back to comedy. principal artamaran catches nelson smosking meth in his locker. meanwhile, lou becomes chief for the day while babysitting ralph
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 15:28 |
|
I wonder, if they found a "lost" script from the 90s and produced it today, if it would stand out as a particularly good episode, or if we're all so soured on the modern Simpsons that it would go unnoticed
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 17:06 |
|
dads_work_files posted:I wonder, if they found a "lost" script from the 90s and produced it today, if it would stand out as a particularly good episode, or if we're all so soured on the modern Simpsons that it would go unnoticed Maybe it was "lost" for a reason
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 17:15 |
|
They kind of did that with a Judd Apatow spec script written during the earliest seasons, but unfortunately they didn't leave well enough alone and produce it as-is.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 17:30 |
|
what's the episode where moe thinks he's got aids, and instead it turns out he's just got mesothelioma from all the asbestos in his bar
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 17:51 |
|
dads_work_files posted:I wonder, if they found a "lost" script from the 90s and produced it today, if it would stand out as a particularly good episode, or if we're all so soured on the modern Simpsons that it would go unnoticed They'd have to get rid of Lionel Hutz and/or Troy McClure so we'd potentially be missing a lot of good jokes. And it would still have the really lifeless animation of the modern episodes so a lot of good visual gags would fall flat.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 17:56 |
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:what's the episode where moe thinks he's got aids, and instead it turns out he's just got mesothelioma from all the asbestos in his bar
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 18:02 |
|
A Fancy Hat posted:They'd have to get rid of Lionel Hutz and/or Troy McClure so we'd potentially be missing a lot of good jokes. Also the voice acting isn’t as good and the modern staff would “punch up” the script with poo poo.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 18:19 |
|
A Fancy Hat posted:They'd have to get rid of Lionel Hutz and/or Troy McClure so we'd potentially be missing a lot of good jokes. I still think you guys are way overestimating how big of a part these characters were back in the day. Part of what made them so great, beyond Hartman being incredible, was how sparingly and smartly they were used
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 18:33 |
|
Riptor posted:I still think you guys are way overestimating how big of a part these characters were back in the day. Part of what made them so great, beyond Hartman being incredible, was how sparingly and smartly they were used It felt like they were trying to expand Hutz near the end with him having a real estate job. I think I remember reading that the plan was to have him show up with different jobs going forward.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 18:36 |
|
SeANMcBAY posted:It felt like they were trying to expand Hutz near the end with him having a real estate job. I think I remember reading that the plan was to have him show up with different jobs going forward. So, he was replaced with Gil?
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 18:50 |
|
Iron Crowned posted:So, he was replaced with Gil? Pretty much. It’s interesting how Gil debuts in Hutz’s last episode in hindsight.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 18:55 |
|
They do a similar gag in Futurama. The same sketchy guy runs the robot fights, butterfly brawls, etc.
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 19:09 |
And Ken Adelberg in Home Movies
|
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 19:20 |
|
Data Graham posted:And Ken Adelberg in Home Movies Hm, I must have missed that Simpsons episode
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 22:54 |
|
that time bob oblong sued homer for waste dumping nuclear material into the towns " local watering hole"
|
# ? Mar 22, 2019 22:57 |
|
SeANMcBAY posted:Pretty much. It’s interesting how Gil debuts in Hutz’s last episode in hindsight. Not his last, but it's very close. Gil is a good character. He just suffers from the comparison. Edit: oh I misread that I thought you were talking Hartman's last episode
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 04:08 |
|
PostNouveau posted:Not his last, but it's very close. Yeah, I meant Hutz’s last speaking role. I know Troy McClure shows up in a later one.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 06:44 |
|
It's weird that people get down on Principal and the Pauper for being an episode where they got a little bit fast and loose with their established characters when Hurricane Ned did the exact same thing. I guess it's just because Skinner is a more beloved side character; but I feel like Hurricane Ned started the change from "so much better than you that you hate him" Ned to "Crazed zealot" Ned Flanders. Seymour kept his established traits; Ned slowly morphed into something completely different. Excellent episode though.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 08:20 |
|
The Vegas episode hosed with the character of Flanders more.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 08:25 |
|
White wine spritzer! I didn't think Hurricane Neddy or Viva Ned Flanders were inconsistent- in Vegas, the whole episode is based around Homer coercing Ned to act against his own instincts, so the "change" (which doesn't last) isn't coming from internally. With Ned's freak-out after the hurricane, we saw a little bit of that frustration in Homer Loves Flanders (one of my all time favs) where he loses his poo poo in church- it just gave a little more backstory and was something that neither needed to be walked back or mentioned again. Also, his beatnik parents are from an earlier episode so there's really nothing in this episode that goes against anything already established. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oicDiFsW1_s e: meant to add also the zealous tendency shows up in the episode where the Simpsons kids are put in foster care of the Flandereseses it's not wrong, but overall all the best side characters have been boiled down to their own tropes and stereotypes and Ned is no exception Harold Stassen fucked around with this message at 08:54 on Mar 23, 2019 |
# ? Mar 23, 2019 08:48 |
|
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 10:15 |
|
I’m 60.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 10:44 |
|
talk about a low point
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 11:39 |
|
Filthy Haiku posted:It's weird that people get down on Principal and the Pauper for being an episode where they got a little bit fast and loose with their established characters when Hurricane Ned did the exact same thing. Uh...I like both episodes but those two plots are not remotely similar at all, lol. One was providing a sensible backstory to why a character acts the way he does, while the other tried to tell the audience that a beloved character never truly existed and was actually a farce this entire time. No, the real problem with Hurricane Ned was that the spanking program explains his lack of anger, but it doesn't explain why that necessarily caused him to be a Bible thumper.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 11:44 |
|
SeANMcBAY posted:It’s a good podcast. One of the hosts is longtime front page writer Bob Mackey. Wow! A Bob Mackey!
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 13:56 |
|
Skrill.exe posted:Wow! A Bob Mackey. drat it
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 13:57 |
|
Cubone posted:milhouse's parents getting divorced and staying divorced at the end of the episode was hilarious exactly because by sitcom logic it shouldn't have happened You know, now that I'm older the 'X days without a suicide' joke is kind of messed up
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 14:28 |
|
Phlegmish posted:You know, now that I'm older the 'X days without a suicide' joke is kind of messed up
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 14:43 |
|
Phlegmish posted:You know, now that I'm older the 'X days without a suicide' joke is kind of messed up Had occasion to visit an acquaintance who was living in a divorced mens' colony. They're every bit as depressing as they're portrayed in that ep and a little worse. All the cleaning supplies were kept locked up so the residents couldn't drink the bleach and poo poo.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2019 15:03 |
|
https://twitter.com/meganamram/status/1108182248887476224?s=19 Tonight!
|
# ? Mar 24, 2019 16:14 |
|
Wait does this mean we have a chance of a good episode happening here?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2019 16:28 |
|
Wait a minute why did they let someone funny write a Simpsons episode in 2019?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2019 16:33 |
|
I'll watch it, but I won't be happy about it
|
# ? Mar 24, 2019 16:35 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 16:42 |
|
Is this the episode where Bart is mad about an all-female cast reboot? Y'all getting excited about that?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2019 18:23 |