|
Obliterati posted:Lol at these idiots who didn't stockpile against British failure six months ago hi bru im dad
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 21:16 |
|
|
Oooordaaaah, ooooooordah. I hereby table the motion to have Theresa May think about maybe calling a printer repair guy. Aye - 10 Nay - 302 The Nay's have it. Ooooooordah, oooordah! Next is the motion by the right honourable gentleman from London to see about perhaps thinking of the possibility that we might brainstorm alternate avenues of approach. Aye - 4 Nay - All the rest.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:31
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/NickBoles/status/1113535651880869888
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:32
|
|
|
I'll carry my printer there in exchange for a hug from jezza
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:32
|
|
|
a loose marxist acquaintance of mine
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:33
|
|
|
how many tins of sausages and biscuit packs should I have put up for me Brexit mateys, cor blimey crikeys I am a British man that likes to roger me bollocks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:38
|
|
|
Inexplicable Humblebrag posted:a loose marxist acquaintance of mine glad im not the only one who thought about that post
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:38
|
|
|
this is w/o a doubt my fav brexit event
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
john bercow stockpiling all the xerox ink in case of no deal brexit
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:45
|
|
|
A GLISTENING HODOR posted:
Arthur Super Sheds Jackson
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:52
|
|
|
How long until I can buy a slightly used Aston Martin for twelve whole American dollars and a German chocolate bar?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:52
|
|
|
lol https://twitter.com/danielhowdon/status/1113541605942800390?s=19
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:54
|
|
|
I've ordered a hundred gallons of Buckfast and HP printer ink. The currency of the wasteland!
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:54
|
|
|
the usa oil invasion meme but it's her majesty's army going for any common commodity
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:01
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:I've ordered a hundred gallons of Buckfast and HP printer ink. The currency of the wasteland! guess that HP ink must still be more expensive by volume than human blood
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:05
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Lamo why didn’t they make it require a super majority hahahah. because it was a government run opinion poll, not a legally binding vote
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:09
|
|
|
microcosm
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:11
|
|
|
someone was asking about exports and how we'll be messed. one of our major exports is arms, and that's mostly to the Saudis so British firms will still be #great and #British after BREXIT
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:15
|
|
|
Soviet Space Dog posted:because it was a government run opinion poll, not a legally binding vote The government announced its intention to abide by the result multiple times in the lead up to the referendum. The fact that it didn't actually bind parliament is a constitutional quirk.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:25
|
|
|
DangerousDan posted:someone was asking about exports and how we'll be messed. one of our major exports is arms, and that's mostly to the Saudis so British firms will still be #great and #British after BREXIT yeah im sure the UK will still be part of the EU military-industrial grift program after brexit, no risk there
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:25
|
|
|
Bryter posted:The government announced its intention to abide by the result multiple times in the lead up to the referendum. The fact that it didn't actually bind parliament is a constitutional quirk. the government could do whatever it wanted if it had the votes in parliament, it isn't a constitutional "quirk" to treat a referendum as non-binding and if the government actually wanted to alter the constitution to make the UK a referendum run country they probably should have done that first
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:30
|
|
|
Soviet Space Dog posted:the government could do whatever it wanted if it had the votes in parliament, it isn't a constitutional "quirk" to treat a referendum as non-binding and if the government actually wanted to alter the constitution to make the UK a referendum run country they probably should have done that first what constitution
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:33
|
|
|
Soviet Space Dog posted:the government could do whatever it wanted if it had the votes in parliament, it isn't a constitutional "quirk" to treat a referendum as non-binding and if the government actually wanted to alter the constitution to make the UK a referendum run country they probably should have done that first Don't know why they'd reconfigure the core of the UK constitution when they didn't need to. The overwhelming majority of the UK understood how the referendum was presented and isn't convinced by "it was only advisory" pedantry.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:35
|
|
|
is Buckfast a made up English word?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:36
|
|
|
neutral milf hotel posted:is Buckfast a made up English word? all words are made up 
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:38
|
|
|
neutral milf hotel posted:is Buckfast a made up English word? its a posion they brew up and send north to ruin scotland
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:40
|
|
|
Jazerus posted:what constitution The magna Carta? That other foundational document that governs how poachers on royal woodlands will be prosecuted by a council of local reeves?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:41
|
|
|
Bryter posted:Don't know why they'd reconfigure the core of the UK constitution when they didn't need to. The overwhelming majority of the UK understood how the referendum was presented and isn't convinced by "it was only advisory" pedantry. you were the one that brought in the government binding parliament without even passing legislation, which is a massive massive overreach of the powers of the government. thats basically a coup
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:41
|
|
|
To be fair, didnt the tories fight a general election on a manifesto about this stuff after the brexit referendum, and they beat corbyn's labour on this manifesto? Its not like they just had the referendum and then went straight to where they are now without seeking any form of mandate for what they're doing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:43
|
|
|
Soviet Space Dog posted:you were the one that brought in the government binding parliament without even passing legislation, which is a massive massive overreach of the powers of the government. thats basically a coup I didn't claim the government bound parliament. I don't know what you're talking about.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:45
|
|
|
Dammit, all these non-recycleable bottle caps! I have a cunning post brexit meltdown plan.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:48
|
|
|
Bryter posted:I didn't claim the government bound parliament. I don't know what you're talking about. I'm very sorry for misinterpreting "The government announced its intention to abide by the result multiple times in the lead up to the referendum. The fact that it didn't actually bind parliament is a constitutional quirk." to mean "The government announced its intention to abide by the result multiple times in the lead up to the referendum. The fact that it didn't actually bind parliament is a constitutional quirk."
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:49
|
|
|
neutral milf hotel posted:is Buckfast a made up English word? its a made up drug. like cake. but in liquid form. mind out for Czech Neck tho' Bryter posted:I didn't claim the government bound parliament. I don't know what you're talking about. 
staberind has issued a correction as of 22:54 on Apr 3, 2019 |
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:49
|
|
|
staberind posted:its a made up drug. Being liquid, it has a much faster effect on the area of the brain known as Shatner’s Bassoon.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:53
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:Being liquid, it has a much faster effect on the area of the brain known as Shatner’s Bassoon. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FghPqueu034 but I Digress.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:57
|
|
|
Soviet Space Dog posted:I'm very sorry for misinterpreting "The government announced its intention to abide by the result multiple times in the lead up to the referendum. The fact that it didn't actually bind parliament is a constitutional quirk." to mean "The government announced its intention to abide by the result multiple times in the lead up to the referendum. The fact that it didn't actually bind parliament is a constitutional quirk." I think you've somehow misinterpreted me saying the referendum didn't technically bind parliament as me saying the government did bind parliament? The government declared that they would consider themselves politically bound by the result of the referendum. Parliament voted for the referendum. It wasn't changed retroactively, and there was no "coup". Bryter has issued a correction as of 23:25 on Apr 3, 2019 |
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 23:08
|
|
|
It's 23.10pm and the House of Commons is still voting on amendments and readings. Peter Bone made a point of order asking Bercow to stop the farce It's like a live feed of Purgatory
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 23:12
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHIVeWhCMU8
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 23:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 21:16 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/PaulBrandITV/st...ingawful.com%2F This seems like it would be bad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 23:24
|
|
