|
Hot Dog Day hasn't posted since December. Did he re-reg?
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 18:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 08:21 |
|
|
He got banned?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 18:21
|
|
|
Pook Good Mook posted:Oh it's a person, not a board. Got it, thanks. Well let's not go crazy here
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 18:24
|
|
|
Speaking of scum Cool my first letter delivered by UPSP
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 18:32
|
|
|
Arcturas posted:Sounds like Kirkland drafted the order to make their lives easier. Still, if you want to load things on Relativity then you need to have someone who knows how to do that, either your paralegal or whichever vendor/litigation support service you are using to host your Relativity databases. Soothing Vapors posted:whoever let Kirkland draft the order should be disbarred But I agree that you should just go ahead and produce whatever files you want in native format. Just rename the file name with the Bates number
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 18:33
|
|
|
Motherfucker is apparently still posting, not just here. Jerk. Or he did what I've done, which is accidentally unsubscribe.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 18:38
|
|
|
joat mon posted:Public Defenders should be first against the wall for their participation in, and legitimization of, the prison-industrial complex. gvibes posted:That is pretty typical of any ESI order entered in litigation.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 18:41
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:Speaking of scum i gotta get some letterhead like this
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 18:42
|
|
|
Soothing Vapors posted:man I gotta move to a better district
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 18:55
|
|
|
gvibes posted:Should have clarified that I meant federal courts. I don't do state courts. me too. our judges suck at governing ESI and I'm genuinely, without being lovely, not sure most of the plaintiff's bar around here knows what a load file is because I've seen maybe 2-3 in the last 8 years
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 18:59
|
|
|
gvibes posted:That is pretty typical of any ESI order entered in litigation. I reached out to plaintiff support on the case and they recommended converting everything except excel sheets to pdf or tiff, bates number everything in the files and in the file name, and have a “slip sheet” document for each excel file that says “Document Produced Natively” with it’s own bates number. If we can find someone local who can help with generating relativity compatible load files we will, but we’re just giving them what we have with the response from the plaintiff support included.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 19:05
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:Speaking of scum You can spell any way you want when your letterhead is that awesome.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 19:13
|
|
|
Ugh - should have been a plaintiff's lawyer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0Wgz7auLAk
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 19:18
|
|
|
I like to think at some point all the big-law firms started this way and they were the 1 in 1,000 that got lucky and blew up. poo poo, Abe Lincoln was a plaintiff's lawyer once.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 19:23
|
|
|
nm posted:You can spell any way you want when your letterhead is that awesome. That's the edited version of one of his billboards: 
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 19:35
|
|
|
Holla at ya people
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 19:45
|
|
|
Sab0921 posted:Ugh - should have been a plaintiff's lawyer. ulmont posted:That's the edited version of one of his billboards: chef's kiss dot gif
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 19:50
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:no, seriously: if you look closely at Kirkland filings, you'll notice the actual equity partners all have "P.C." after their name. that is because the human is not a kirkland partner: the human has formed an individual professional corporation and that corporation is the kirkland partner. What is the reason for this? Seems like its gotta be some tax thing but I’m not sure what advantage it would give.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 20:02
|
|
|
So It Goes posted:What is the reason for this? Seems like its gotta be some tax thing but I’m not sure what advantage it would give. no idea. may be a liability thing, actually, but I've never asked. whatever it is, the benefits must not be huge or more firms would copy it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 20:13
|
|
|
random legal puzzler i thought of while ruminating on Mr. Nice's posts about robert kraft's discount handjob emporium. like myself, Mr. Nice has been thinking a lot about mr. kraft getting his hog wrenched. lets say that the police have in their possession probable cause for an arrest/search, but don't know they do. they, for example, have possessions of an elderly billionare getting a $59 handjob, but didn't watch it yet. they then stop that elderly billionare because he left a discount handjob emporium at a traffic stop based on that he just left a discount handjob emporium but, for the purposes of argument, we'll assume that just because you left a discount handjob massage parlor doesn't constitute probable cause. does the existence of the videos in the possession of the police, even if they didn't watch them, constitute probable cause?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 20:16
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:random legal puzzler i thought of while ruminating on Mr. Nice's posts about robert kraft's discount handjob emporium. like myself, Mr. Nice has been thinking a lot about mr. kraft getting his hog wrenched. Yes. Subjective knowledge (and even subjective intent in most states) is not the analysis. It's a post-facto objective standard applied at the time of arrest. Pook Good Mook fucked around with this message at 20:55 on Apr 3, 2019 |
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 20:24
|
|
|
rub maps dot com
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 20:41
|
|
|
Kalman posted:“The Admission Without Examination filing fee is $2500. This fee covers the cost of processing the Application, investigating matters contained in the applicant's completed Character & Fitness Questionnaire, and preparing of the Character Report.” That's insane. Do you at least get to have a  admission ceremony?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:07
|
|
|
Whitlam posted:That's insane. Do you at least get to have a Lawyers getting admitted on motion have no time or interest in that poo poo
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:08
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:Lawyers getting admitted on motion have no time or interest in that poo poo Oh okay, it's a way to buy your way into another jurisdiction, essentially. We don't have that here, you basically just do it (although you have to tell the Board if you're authorised to muck about with trust money and do a period of supervised legal training).
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:43
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:Lawyers getting admitted on motion have no time or interest in that poo poo I'm against the idea of admittance ceremonies even for new baby lawyers. This isn't a cause for celebration.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:48
|
|
|
Tokelau All Star posted:I'm against the idea of admittance ceremonies even for new baby lawyers. This isn't a cause for celebration. Admittance wake?
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:52
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:random legal puzzler i thought of while ruminating on Mr. Nice's posts about robert kraft's discount handjob emporium. like myself, Mr. Nice has been thinking a lot about mr. kraft getting his hog wrenched. No, though Utah v. Strieff reveals the direction the SCOTUS is going on cases like this. Maybe the fact that it's a rich white guy will help the law not get any worse. I'd give a rich white guy a handie if it would mean having a functioning fourth amendment.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 21:56
|
|
|
wait has nobody seen the video yet? Its simply captured data? or just the arresting officers have not seen the video yet? I think if the video has been seen by anyone in the police department then there is probable cause but otherwise there is not.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 22:51
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:Holla at ya people The best part of those billboards is Alvin Kamara trolling Marshon Lattimore by claiming it's Lattimore on the billboards. https://twitter.com/A_kamara6/status/997250191643283456
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 23:01
|
|
|
Kawasaki Nun posted:wait has nobody seen the video yet? Its simply captured data? or just the arresting officers have not seen the video yet? I think if the video has been seen by anyone in the police department then there is probable cause but otherwise there is not. presumably the police and/or DA have seen it, they filed a motion to suppress or whatever its called there to try and keep it both out of the trial and out of public hands, but I think EW's question was did it matter if someone saw it before the arrest
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 23:05
|
|
|
ulmont posted:The best part of those billboards is Alvin Kamara trolling Marshon Lattimore by claiming it's Lattimore on the billboards. I like how on Lafonta's website, its a video of all these ripped athletes working out, flexing, rock hard abs...then pudgy lawyer walks out by the boxing ring, ready to fight the insurance companies...FOR YOU
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 23:10
|
|
|
Whitlam posted:That's insane. Do you at least get to have a Hell if I know, I wasn’t going to pay that just to be barred in a state I live in but perform literally zero legal work in.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 01:19
|
|
|
Whitlam posted:Oh okay, it's a way to buy your way into another jurisdiction, essentially. We don't have that here, you basically just do it (although you have to tell the Board if you're authorised to muck about with trust money and do a period of supervised legal training). I got liscenced to practice no sweat interstate, yeah. Its pretty simple. The irony now is now I know more about interstate law than my "home" state.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 01:45
|
|
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:Speaking of scum Take it to SA-Mart, not allowed here.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 02:48
|
|
|
And DV ain't playin' he'll gently caress you up! Flip bitch!
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 14:20
|
|
|
Ani posted:We ended up conceding to them on everything anyway because sponsors have all the leverage. To be honest, in my experience this is what roughly decides 99.5% of provision disputes/issues anyway in contract negotiations. (The remaining .5% is when one of the attorneys doesn't recognize the issue.) So much of being an attorney is positioned as being adroit arguments, etc. In my experience, the reality in transactional law is two teams of lawyers arguing with each other until one client says, "gently caress it, I don't care about that, we need this deal." SlyFrog fucked around with this message at 15:39 on Apr 5, 2019 |
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 17:50
|
|
|
SlyFrog posted:To be honest, in my experience this is what roughly decides 99.5% of provision disputes/issues anyway in contract negotiations. (The remaining .5% is when one of the attorneys doesn't recognize the issue.) So much criminal law is "Okay here's the defence we can run in the trial" "gently caress it man if I plead guilty am I just going to like, get out in 2 months on parole?" "Probably." "Can I do that?" "Absolutely."
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 02:47
|
|
|
algebra testes posted:So much criminal law is For some clients it's better to take 3-6 months in jail over 6-12 months of probation because they're going to violate probation over something dumb.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 02:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 08:21 |
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:For some clients it's better to take 3-6 months in jail over 6-12 months of probation because they're going to violate probation over something dumb. Fuckin truth, but good luck convincing them of that. Also, like half my job as a PD was convincing people who didn't want to go to trial to go to trial cause they had a good case and the other half convincing people who did want to go to trial not to because their case sucked and the offer ruled. There needs to be a dunning-Kruger for how lovely your case is v. wanting to go to trial.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2019 03:05
|
|