Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Astroman posted:

Why are you automatically seeing misogyny here when he didn't even say why he found her insufferable?
Because when there's an incredibly online, incredibly toxic, and incredibly vocal contingent of nerds warring for control of every genre fiction franchise, it's kind of on you to explain how you're not one of them rather than on everybody else to expect that nobody is.

I don't like it either, but if somebody tells me they hate the new Star Wars movies and forty-nine times out of fifty when you let them talk long enough, they basically just hate that women and black people have agency in genre fiction now, I kind of have to assume the fiftieth person doesn't have any legitimate points to make until they say what they are.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pesky Splinter
Feb 16, 2011

A worried pug.

Box of Bunnies posted:

James Dreyfus is doing the "trans people in bathrooms and changerooms are a danger to everyone else!!" thing on Twitter again the same loving day the story about a trans girl having her head stomped in with a boot despite being segregated into her own facilities came out.

I don't care if Big Finish recorded his appearance in the Early Adventures a couple of years ago before he started on this bullshit, I obviously don't expect them to shelve something they've already got ready for release, but the fact that they were pally with him while announcing it last month and are using his presence to promote it without saying anything about this hateful bullshit means I'm done with them and seriously side-eyeing everyone else that keeps lapping it up

It's really put me off his next appearance, and yeah, just the glossing over of it by BF is really lovely. They can't be all "time lords are cool with trans, and we've also employed a trans actor"...and then also turn a blind eye to employing a massive transphobic poo poo. Not that it'll do much but will send off an email like jivjov; they wouldn't (or I like to think they wouldn't) tolerate this poo poo if it were one of the guys they were promoting was posting racist, or homophobic poo poo. Same should apply to transphobia.

jivjov posted:

Yeah it really feels like the MacQueen Master got shelved when Big Finish started regularly getting Gomez, Roberts, and Jacobi :(

On the topic of actual non-poo poo human beings playing the Master, apparently they haven't completely shelved him, but it would be nice to hear his impish voice again.

corn in the bible posted:

I listened to The 8th Of March, big finish's box set for Women's Day. It was a mixed bag--River and Leela was good (and a rare team-up, which is nice), Ace and Benny was nice enough, Paternoster Gang was terrible, UNIT was OK. If their goal in putting in a Paternoster audio here was to sell people on the upcoming series then that is a hell of a miscalculation cause it's super bad

I found it just okay, overall. River and Leela's interactions were fun, although the story didn't really engage me. The Ace and Benny one felt like it could have been expanded on into a 2-hour monthly one - probably my favourite of the bunch. I didn't think the Paternoster one was so bad - it's the weakest of the boxset, but it was just okay IMO. UNIT was fine - standard UNIT boxset story, although it did have my favourite exchange of the boxset:

(Paraphrasing)
Reporter: So I've got some questions about those lights in the sky seen over London?
Kate: Chinese New Year.
Reporter: Sightings of a sea monster off the Scottish coast?
Kate: A hoax.
Reporter: And reports of more sightings of the Beast of Bodmin Moor?
Kate: ... ... I'll have a word with her.

Davros1
Jul 19, 2007

You've got to admit, you are kind of implausible



https://twitter.com/bigfinish/status/1114458479052435456

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

Big Finish working hard to convince RTD to come write for them, eh?

Astroman
Apr 8, 2001


LividLiquid posted:

Because when there's an incredibly online, incredibly toxic, and incredibly vocal contingent of nerds warring for control of every genre fiction franchise, it's kind of on you to explain how you're not one of them rather than on everybody else to expect that nobody is.

I don't like it either, but if somebody tells me they hate the new Star Wars movies and forty-nine times out of fifty when you let them talk long enough, they basically just hate that women and black people have agency in genre fiction now, I kind of have to assume the fiftieth person doesn't have any legitimate points to make until they say what they are.

Of course there's also the problem with online, that even if someone says they aren't coming at it from a view of hating women and black people having agency, people still won't believe them and will try to assume "they're lying, I know in their heart they are a shitlord" and disregard everything they say. If you want to see sexism, racism, etc everywhere, you're going to see it. :shrug:



Chokes McGee posted:

what all of them

like



all of them



beevers, ainley, and delgado too

I don't think it's any other than the 4 listed. But on that topic, they've just about come out and said in The Two Masters and the River story that Beevers IS the Delgado Master after being injured and unable to regenerate; and in the interviews on the River one Beevers says he's pretty much playing him that way. I could see Beevers being able to pull off a convincing Delgado if he just changed his cadence to be a bit more suave, confident and less sepulchral, and I would love to see him playing a full on uninjured Delgado Master in something with Tim Treloar.

I also see that even the Dark Shadows line has become more amenable to recasting dead actors because they are bringing back Julia Hoffman with Julie Newmar (yes, Catwoman!) playing the part. Hopefully they can get someone to convincingly play Original Barnabus, Professor Stokes, Roger, and Elizabeth and really do some old school stories.

Chokes McGee
Aug 7, 2008

This is Urotsuki.

corn in the bible posted:

I listened to The 8th Of March, big finish's box set for Women's Day. It was a mixed bag--River and Leela was good (and a rare team-up, which is nice), Ace and Benny was nice enough, Paternoster Gang was terrible, UNIT was OK. If their goal in putting in a Paternoster audio here was to sell people on the upcoming series then that is a hell of a miscalculation cause it's super bad

On a scale from Scourge of the Shadow to Nekromantia how bad is it

Pesky Splinter
Feb 16, 2011

A worried pug.

Astroman posted:

I don't think it's any other than the 4 listed. But on that topic, they've just about come out and said in The Two Masters and the River story that Beevers IS the Delgado Master after being injured and unable to regenerate; and in the interviews on the River one Beevers says he's pretty much playing him that way. I could see Beevers being able to pull off a convincing Delgado if he just changed his cadence to be a bit more suave, confident and less sepulchral, and I would love to see him playing a full on uninjured Delgado Master in something with Tim Treloar.

I'll have to relisten, because I thought Beevers was his own seperate incarnation; I know it's been a bit back-and-forth about Delgado Master and Crispy Master being the same incarnation, depending on the book/comic/audio/etc. And I know BF have pretty much said that the Pratt/Beevers Crispy Master is the same incarnation in the Two Masters. Again though, I know that the Master's incarnations is a big clusterfuck of body hopping and hissing. :v:

My favoured one is:
Young Master grows up to be Dreyfus Master (sans transphobic arsehole actor) -> x number of regenerations -> Delgado -> Regenerates into a non-hosed up Beevers/Pratt, burnt the gently caress up into Crispy Beevers -> Uses the Eye of Harmony to turn into not-so-crispy Beevers -> Potentially some body-hopping -> Possesses Tremas, becomes Ainley. -> Burns Ainley up but survives and reverts to Crispy Beevers -> Decides it would be a fantastic idea to become a hissing smoke snake, and somehow becomes Hissy -> Posseses Roberts -> At some point reverts back to Hissy and body hops again. -> The CIA restore him to use him as a soldier in the upcoming Time War, becoming MacQueen -> Regenerates into Jacobi -> Regenerates into Simms -> Regenerates into Gomez's Missy.

I know the comics add a Asian boy War Master before Jacobi. And some of the books imply that the War Chief is an incarnation as well. :shrug:

I'm glad that Doctor Who doesn't really give too much of a poo poo about canon - I like the approach of "yeah all this other poo poo probably happened...but this is the story we want to tell now, at this very moment, and we're not going to be bound too heavily to it."

cargohills
Apr 18, 2014

Astroman posted:

they've just about come out and said in The Two Masters and the River story that Beevers IS the Delgado Master after being injured and unable to regenerate

I've not heard the River story but The Two Masters really doesn't support this. Beevers still sounds like himself before he gets crispy.

The_Doctor
Mar 29, 2007

"The entire history of this incarnation is one of temporal orbits, retcons, paradoxes, parallel time lines, reiterations, and divergences. How anyone can make head or tail of all this chaos, I don't know."

Pesky Splinter posted:

And some of the books imply that the War Chief is an incarnation as well. :shrug:


I believe he is, too. The way the Doctor instantly recognises him, and this sort of wacky, off the wall plan of creating a massive self-contained war dimension is right up the Master's alley.

After The War
Apr 12, 2005

to all of my Architects
let me be traitor

Chokes McGee posted:

On a scale from Scourge of the Shadow to Nekromantia how bad is it

"Scourge of the Shadow" sounds like some TS Eliot poo poo and now I want that to be real instead of "Shadow of the Scourge." :smithcloud:

corn in the bible
Jun 5, 2004

Oh no oh god it's all true!

Chokes McGee posted:

On a scale from Scourge of the Shadow to Nekromantia how bad is it

I haven't heard either of those, it is just really dumb and has bad repetitive jokes. Sort of the problem with the characters as a whole, but now they're on their own without the doctor/clara as distractions...

corn in the bible fucked around with this message at 21:15 on Apr 6, 2019

Chokes McGee
Aug 7, 2008

This is Urotsuki.

After The War posted:

"Scourge of the Shadow" sounds like some TS Eliot poo poo and now I want that to be real instead of "Shadow of the Scourge." :smithcloud:

whoops!

corn in the bible posted:

I haven't heard either of those, it is just really dumb and has bad repetitive jokes.

shadow of the scourge is fantastic and purposefully funny and don't let any of these other jerks tell you otherwise

nekromantaea otoh (or whatever, idc how it's spelled) is very very bad

Narsham
Jun 5, 2008

Astroman posted:

Of course there's also the problem with online, that even if someone says they aren't coming at it from a view of hating women and black people having agency, people still won't believe them and will try to assume "they're lying, I know in their heart they are a shitlord" and disregard everything they say. If you want to see sexism, racism, etc everywhere, you're going to see it. :shrug:

I really didn't like The Phantom Menace, but I don't feel compelled to post in the comment thread of anything online that mentions that movie, ever.

Last Jedi is the absolute worst for this, though. I've had some reasoned discussions with non-shitlords about the movie: for example, one of the main reasons for disagreement in one conversation was that the other person hated the movie because it radically redefined (retconned) Star Wars. I liked it for that reason, and argued that most of the Star Wars movies did that and the best ones did it the most. Once you arrive at "this is a thing the movie does that I consider good and you consider bad," I don't see the point in continuing the discussion. Understand each other and move on.

Most of the people still up in arms have a very different agenda in claiming, online, that the movie was objectively bad and a flop and the franchise better correct itself and Disney better be listening or they and all their buddies are going to boycott. Whether or not they claim that sexism and racism has nothing to do with their reaction, their motives in bringing this stuff up at every opportunity are pretty suspect and it's quite reasonable to assume that the reason they just won't stop posting goes deeper than a disagreement about a film's artistic merit.

2house2fly
Nov 14, 2012

You did a super job wrapping things up! And I'm not just saying that because I have to!
Why didn't the whole rebel fleet just go to the casino

The_Doctor
Mar 29, 2007

"The entire history of this incarnation is one of temporal orbits, retcons, paradoxes, parallel time lines, reiterations, and divergences. How anyone can make head or tail of all this chaos, I don't know."

2house2fly posted:

Why didn't the whole rebel fleet just go to the casino

The casino bit is entirely superfluous, and they should have just technobabbled straight onto the big star destroyer.

corn in the bible
Jun 5, 2004

Oh no oh god it's all true!

Edward Mass
Sep 14, 2011

𝅘𝅥𝅮 I wanna go home with the armadillo
Good country music from Amarillo and Abilene
Friendliest people and the prettiest women you've ever seen
𝅘𝅥𝅮
The "base under siege" story hurt Episode VIII for me, mainly because it put the rest of the stories on a clock that they didn't need to have hanging above their heads. I'd go more into this, but this is not one of the 58 Star Wars threads on these here forums.

Dabir
Nov 10, 2012

The casino bit was the entire point of the film

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."
The casino bit had huge issues but the payoff with the broom kid at the end was fantastic.

marktheando
Nov 4, 2006

The casino sequence was worth it just for the bit where they say the place is home to the worst scum in the galaxy, then cuts to some rich people.

The_Doctor
Mar 29, 2007

"The entire history of this incarnation is one of temporal orbits, retcons, paradoxes, parallel time lines, reiterations, and divergences. How anyone can make head or tail of all this chaos, I don't know."

Doctor Spaceman posted:

The casino bit had huge issues but the payoff with the broom kid at the end was fantastic.

marktheando posted:

The casino sequence was worth it just for the bit where they say the place is home to the worst scum in the galaxy, then cuts to some rich people.

These are both good points. :hmmyes:

Narsham
Jun 5, 2008

marktheando posted:

The casino sequence was worth it just for the bit where they say the place is home to the worst scum in the galaxy, then cuts to some rich people.

It was as close as Star Wars is ever likely to get to Oxygen. Though in my ideal world, there's a scene in Episode IX where Kylo Ren has just gotten himself comfy on a throne and Mark Gatiss walks into the room to collect on the massive debt that the First Order ran up building all those massive starships. (Bonus points if he represents the Ferrous Bank.) Ren starts to choke him and he points out that he's an expendible employee, and the bank isn't even headquartered on a single planet so there's nothing Ren can do to destroy it. After it becomes clear Ren knows nothing whatsoever about the economic part of running an Empire, Gatiss' character is named Minister of Finance.

The crippling taxes he institutes on all but the wealthiest Imperials end up giving the struggling Resistance a massive recruitment boost.

Obviously a fantasy scenario, though past movies have hinged upon parliamentary procedure, so not impossible.

Vinylshadow
Mar 20, 2017

Clearly Canto Bight was where Clara was at the end of Listen when she went to the barn and talked to the kid Doctor, who was the broom kid at the end of the movie

After The War
Apr 12, 2005

to all of my Architects
let me be traitor
Like 90% of Classic Who is about mining/labor/land rights disputes and more franchises can learn from that.

Chokes McGee
Aug 7, 2008

This is Urotsuki.

After The War posted:

Like 90% of Classic Who is about mining/labor/land rights disputes and more franchises can learn from that.

The border negotiation treaties















OF DEATH

McGann
May 19, 2003

Get up you son of a bitch! 'Cause Mickey loves you!

jivjov posted:

For all the good it'll do...I reached out with another email to them asking them to positively affirm that they won't be employing him ever again

As have I, making the point to some low-paid intern that Doctor Who is a beacon of progressive ideals for many people and a positive escapism from a world that seems increasingly darker. But, y'know, whatever good that'll do. I'm at least content that I've made my opinion towards his actions clear and I will not be purchasing anything with him involved.


Though on a less serious note - I did enjoy his performance, but it was somewhat lacking from what I expected in a 'first doctor/master' meetup. I would think there'd be a lot less animosity and it would be a good place to showcase how their relationship declined. But it was an enjoyable story regardless. Shame it's now tainted forever for me :/

Although the Torchwood series has been a bright spot for me overall, the latest release has been a real struggle to get through, and I abandoned it in favor of the Gallifrey Time War series. Maybe I'll pop back to it at some point, but does it get any better than the first thirty minutes or so?

Khanstant
Apr 5, 2007

LividLiquid posted:

Because when there's an incredibly online, incredibly toxic, and incredibly vocal contingent of nerds warring for control of every genre fiction franchise, it's kind of on you to explain how you're not one of them rather than on everybody else to expect that nobody is.

I don't like it either, but if somebody tells me they hate the new Star Wars movies and forty-nine times out of fifty when you let them talk long enough, they basically just hate that women and black people have agency in genre fiction now, I kind of have to assume the fiftieth person doesn't have any legitimate points to make until they say what they are.

I mean, I'd assume the same crowd also hated the prequels and probably for similar reasons, not tied to the progressive culture shift stuff. Disney outright obliterated decades of canon and history and material, makes all the canon butchery from the prequels look tame in comparison. Change every woman and POC to a white person, I'd wager there'd still be the same proportion of gripers. At the same time, I totally get how it got entangled up in all that and it's basically impossible to have a conversation about it one way or the other anymore.

Khanstant fucked around with this message at 03:09 on Apr 8, 2019

TinTower
Apr 21, 2010

You don't have to 8e a good person to 8e a hero.
though tbh, the only good thing about the old SWEU's obsession with a superweapons arms race is when the Hutts got a superlaser, tried to use it, and blew themselves up. :colbert:

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

It did disappoint me in that Big Finish story where the Sontarans did actually manage to get their hands on a weapon that made the Daleks/Time Lords at least notice them during the Time War. I far preferred the notion that the Sontarans were just hideously offended that the entire time the war was going on, they were running around desperately trying to take part but neither side even noticed they existed.

Big Mean Jerk
Jan 27, 2009

Well, of course I know him.
He's me.

Khanstant posted:

I mean, I'd assume the same crowd also hated the prequels and probably for similar reasons, not tied to the progressive culture shift stuff. Disney outright obliterated decades of canon and history and material, makes all the canon butchery from the prequels look tame in comparison. Change every woman and POC to a white person, I'd wager there'd still be the same proportion of gripers. At the same time, I totally get how it got entangled up in all that and it's basically impossible to have a conversation about it one way or the other anymore.

My sister receives death threats or some other form of harassment almost every time she posts a comment on any of the Star Wars social media accounts, and somehow I doubt it has anything to do with Disney relegating a bunch of books and games to non-canon status. It’s an extremely vocal minority of insecure male fans who are threatened by the inclusion of prominent non-white non-male characters and they’re just using the “Disney killed the EU!”, “Disney raped my childhood!”, “Rey is a Mary Sue!”, “The Sequels suck!”, etc arguments as a dogwhistle so they don’t have to openly admit that they’re racist or misogynistic.

I’m sure there are legitimate non-chud fans who take umbrage with the Disney films for various real reasons, but it’s hard to fault anyone for assuming they’re arguing in bad faith at first glance when 99.9% of Star Wars discussion on the internet has been co-opted by chud fanboys.

Burkion
May 10, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Big Mean Jerk posted:


I’m sure there are legitimate non-chud fans who take umbrage with the Disney films for various real reasons,

*Waves*

Mind, cross out the 'The' there. I've never actually seen any of the new Star Wars movies besides Rogue One, which was Fine.

I'm not a huge Star Wars guy and I hate Disney just on principle and have for y-e-a-r-s. Nearing a decade on that one! I actually think I'd like Last Jedi if only because of how many lovely people it made cry.

I have one friend who is one of those "he's not a bad person, but he holds some deep seated ugly views that he doesn't realize he holds and he's afraid to actually think about and confront them" types. Like I say that in a mean way but I do mean it genuinely, he isn't actively regressive and whatever- but he is. Deep down. Mostly due to his own lack of introspection and whatever. He rides hard on the "She's a Sue" train and that things are bad because they're bad. Trying to argue that kind of logic is doomed to failure because it isn't wrapped in any actual logic.

It's born from an emotional response to something that he's not even fully aware of and any time some one pokes that bear it gets into a whole other debate that's easily sidetracked and cliffaced. So I can say with some minor assurance

Even if some of the CHUDS genuinely, honestly, truly believe they don't have an issue with women and try to argue the merits of the film

They might still have an issue with women that they themselves are blind to. They wouldn't attack some one for being a woman, they wouldn't do other nasty things- but they are resentful and don't fully understand why. And reaching those people is not your job, nor is it anyone elses. If you can try to make them understand, that's great, but for most they have to see it in themselves to come around.


And the loudest ones are the ones that DO actively belittle women and think they're lesser and how dare this franchise ever feature someone that isn't one to one relatable for me and they deserve every bit of scorn and hate they get

Khanstant
Apr 5, 2007

Big Mean Jerk posted:

My sister receives death threats or some other form of harassment almost every time she posts a comment on any of the Star Wars social media accounts, and somehow I doubt it has anything to do with Disney relegating a bunch of books and games to non-canon status. It’s an extremely vocal minority of insecure male fans who are threatened by the inclusion of prominent non-white non-male characters and they’re just using the “Disney killed the EU!”, “Disney raped my childhood!”, “Rey is a Mary Sue!”, “The Sequels suck!”, etc arguments as a dogwhistle so they don’t have to openly admit that they’re racist or misogynistic.

I’m sure there are legitimate non-chud fans who take umbrage with the Disney films for various real reasons, but it’s hard to fault anyone for assuming they’re arguing in bad faith at first glance when 99.9% of Star Wars discussion on the internet has been co-opted by chud fanboys.

Yeah, that poo poo is real, annoying and exhausting, like so much else in this timeline. I'm still super uncomfortable with Disney using CGI and insane copyright laws to allow themselves to puppet actors from beyond the grave. The implications of being in a Disney project and consequently signing away your own image for life and after just adds to the general mountain of Disney problems for me, almost none of which seem to be topics of contention for most.

You know what, thinking back I think I have encountered people who hated TLJ but actually praised Rogue One. Personally, as just a stupid old star wars nerd, Rogue One was the most offensive of any post-Disney SW product, since it directly changed the story and tensions of New Hope, going so far as to like intrude on actual shots and moments of the first ever movie. Just a weird and kind of rude thing to do. Nobody agreed with me on that gripe though, folks seemed to like Darth Vader suddenly doing nu-SW sabre rave dancing in the Correllian, were okay with the hot potato game where Vader fails to get it as it bops around comicly in front of him, eventually cutting to Leia gazing into space saying the name of the movie Rogue One apparently directly leads into now. That was fine by them, but Rose exists so... TLJ bad?

gently caress, I keep having flashbacks to SW discussions, I remember deliberately unsubbing or blocking SW subs on reddit because it was so frustrating to wade into in every post. I like stupid canon nerd squabbling, but not weird hate boy social media gang bullshit.

I liked TLJ, with the caveat in the same way I thought Prometheus and Star Trek 2009 were enjoyable, but that they would be more appropriate in their own unique skins instead of existing IP. I wonder if the prequel trilogy would likewise have been better if it was it's own cohesive contained thing.

Regarding Mary Sue: I hate looking up Clara discussions, the first time I did it I was surprised anyone hated her for any reason at all, and I remember being ultra confused at someone who accused her of Mary Sue. Like, I don't think you get to call anyone a Mary Sue if The Doctor is around, a magic alien who gets new powers and tricks more often than golden age superman did. The Doctor is basically a walking game of Calvinball. Besides, what kind if monster do you have to be to take issue with Clara anyway?

Almost curious how or if that comes up in the shittier parts of the web about the current Doctor, since it's seems so obvious to refute it with just how Doctor Who is. I'm still waiting to start the most recent season, so I've avoided pretty much any review or response to it besides a few metafilter posts.

Khanstant fucked around with this message at 06:27 on Apr 8, 2019

Open Source Idiom
Jan 4, 2013

McGann posted:

Although the Torchwood series has been a bright spot for me overall, the latest release has been a real struggle to get through, and I abandoned it in favor of the Gallifrey Time War series. Maybe I'll pop back to it at some point, but does it get any better than the first thirty minutes or so?

It gets stabby-er, and there's a good scene with Gwen towards the end.

Oh, and Eve Myles has a terrifying bit where she reinacts a scene from the original series. That's about it. If it's not doing it for you in the spooksy department, or as a satire of Big Finish productions, then it's probably not doing it for you.

Pesky Splinter
Feb 16, 2011

A worried pug.

Khanstant posted:

Almost curious how or if that comes up in the shittier parts of the web about the current Doctor, since it's seems so obvious to refute it with just how Doctor Who is. I'm still waiting to start the most recent season, so I've avoided pretty much any review or response to it besides a few metafilter posts.

I haven't deleved too deeply, but some of the louder vocal backlash to the new series was insane - pretty much like all the comments you can probably imagine to the new SW films - female main lead, BAME actors doing things, etc - to the point that I wonder why they even loving watch the show. Like, Series 11 has problems, but having a female lead and a racially diverse cast...you have to be hosed-in-the-head to even consider those as "problems".

I once found a site that was dedicated to re-editing DW to follow a more conservative outlook - like, if you're going to spend your time and effort to edit out a vast chunk of the show - why are you even watching it at that point?

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

Pesky Splinter posted:

I once found a site that was dedicated to re-editing DW to follow a more conservative outlook

Wha... what? Why? How? No scratch that, why? WHY!?! :psyduck:

After The War
Apr 12, 2005

to all of my Architects
let me be traitor

Jerusalem posted:

Wha... what? Why? How? No scratch that, why? WHY!?! :psyduck:

The Daleks finally figured out how to use Adobe Premiere?

Chokes McGee
Aug 7, 2008

This is Urotsuki.

After The War posted:

The Daleks finally figured out how to use Adobe Premiere?

THE DOC-TOR IS USING THE CLONE TOOL! E-RASE! E-RASE!

Sydney Bottocks
Oct 15, 2004

Pesky Splinter posted:

I once found a site that was dedicated to re-editing DW to follow a more conservative outlook - like, if you're going to spend your time and effort to edit out a vast chunk of the show - why are you even watching it at that point?

How does that work, do they like re-edit The Claws of Axos to make Chinn the hero of the story or what

After The War
Apr 12, 2005

to all of my Architects
let me be traitor
I found their cut of Caves of Androzani!

(Bearing in mind that Morgus is a business owner, and not officially part of the government in any way.)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

corn in the bible
Jun 5, 2004

Oh no oh god it's all true!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply