|
Brisc Rubal is a lobbyist for a union.
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 17:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 23:59 |
|
|
seems like internal CSM drama and :dagger: at each other
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 17:26
|
|
|
Republicans can't help but FYGM, it's in their nature.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 17:38
|
|
|
Klyith posted:Republicans can't help but FYGM, it's in their nature. in my experience a lobbyist for a union isnt a republican unless he's lobbying against unions
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 17:41
|
|
|
FAT32 SHAMER posted:in my experience a lobbyist for a union isnt a republican he is in the republican party unions will hire republicans to lobby for them, they ain't picky. you hire republican lobbyists to lobby the gop, dem lobbyists to lobby dems. that's how lobbying works.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 17:52
|
|
|
I like his post on the eve-o forums. In short, he is sure he did not leak anything “that could be monetized.” 
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 18:07
|
|
|
Klyith posted:he is in the republican party e; yeah you right, he ran as a republican in VA lol hoisted by my own petard agaaaaiiiiinnnnnnn
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 18:28
|
|
|
Haha what a loving goof
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 18:38
|
|
|
FAT32 SHAMER posted:in my experience a lobbyist for a union isnt a republican I knew hella chuds in unions what are you talking about
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 19:42
|
|
|
Does anyone know what he leaked? Was he dumping Rorquals before the nerf announcement or what? Hording PLEX?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 20:49
|
|
|
x
Klyith fucked around with this message at 05:25 on Sep 25, 2019 |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2019 22:03
|
|
|
Rutibex posted:Does anyone know what he leaked? Was he dumping Rorquals before the nerf announcement or what? Hording PLEX? I think the scuttlebutt is he leaked the faction gun tech 2 ammo change, and the people who he told and got the one year ban, had just bought up billions in faction guns, then sold them when the change was announced. Of course this is 100% based on what I read someone else post somewhere, so I do not know if that is accurate or not.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 00:18
|
|
|
Seems like he just didn't take it seriously enough
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 08:22
|
|
|
kinda interested in seeing if getting banned from eve and csm will have real life consequences for this guy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 10:31
|
|
|
NavyBlue posted:kinda interested in seeing if getting banned from eve and csm will have real life consequences for this guy. If you play enough EVE to be on the CSM it's fair to say this will likely take a large toll on his social life.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 10:47
|
|
|
NavyBlue posted:kinda interested in seeing if getting banned from eve and csm will have real life consequences for this guy. Lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 12:04
|
|
|
Why are you laughing?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 12:35
|
|
|
CCP regulating lobbying, like 13 years too late. To me this game died the day they decided to let the dudes who owned BPOs keep their BPOs, after removing BPOs from the game. When was it, I don't even remember.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 13:36
|
|
|
 Ugh motherfucker no, this makes 0 sense. How can an INGAME TRANSACTION be illicit, especially in this game created specifically to facilitate illicit transactions (scams) between players. Consequently there can be only 1 explanation to this: CCP are bad people Mr. Pickles fucked around with this message at 13:45 on Apr 9, 2019 |
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 13:39
|
|
|
Mr. Pickles posted:CCP regulating lobbying, like 13 years too late. To me this game died the day they decided to let the dudes who owned BPOs keep their BPOs, after removing BPOs from the game. When was it, I don't even remember. That's kind of a weird hill there. Tech 2 BPOS have very little impact these days. I mean, they'd be nice to have but researchd BPCs let you have fewer materials in the build.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 14:39
|
|
|
CainFortea posted:That's kind of a weird hill there. Tech 2 BPOS have very little impact these days. I mean, they'd be nice to have but researchd BPCs let you have fewer materials in the build. Don’t researches BPOs do that too? Could you not research tech 2 BPOs?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 15:13
|
|
|
ZombieLenin posted:Don’t researches BPOs do that too? Could you not research tech 2 BPOs? You can. The advantage of a Tech 2 BPO is that it will have between 5 and 10% more materials reduction than an invented BPC (depending on what decryptor you use for the corresponding invention job.) The downside is that they're slow to copy and that you generally don't have a ton of Tech 2 BPOs, which limits how many runs you can perform using your BPO. An inventor is limited only by his industry stable and quantity > quality in Eve not just in spaceship combat, but industry as well. T2 BPOs confer an advantage, but not one that makes a particularly large amount of money. It wasn't always this way. Today, invented BPCs default to an ME of 2 (of a maximum of 10.) However, before the Crius expansion overhauled invention, invented BPCs defaulted to ME -2. That doesn't sound that bad, until you learn that a negative ME reduces the material efficiency of a BPC not by -1% per level, but -25% per level. So, depending on which decryptors were used, any inventor required between 0% to 100% more materials than an unresearched T2 BPO.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 15:51
|
|
|
ZombieLenin posted:Don’t researches BPOs do that too? Could you not research tech 2 BPOs? The TL;DR is that t2 bpos are ever so slightly more efficient than invention, but super low volume. With invention you can poo poo out a hundred times the volume for drat near no cost compared to the market value of a t2 bpo. So the "correct" thing to do is selling the t2 bpo and use the isk for more characters/accounts for more throughput.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 16:48
|
|
|
Mr. Pickles posted:CCP regulating lobbying, like 13 years too late. To me this game died the day they decided to let the dudes who owned BPOs keep their BPOs, after removing BPOs from the game. When was it, I don't even remember. They never removed T2 BPOs. T2 BPO were always supposed to be a limited run lottery. The problem was the lottery was rigged in favor of BoB CCP insiders 
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 16:49
|
|
|
Morkfang posted:Why are you laughing? He’s a lawyer and now he has to tell the state bar he broke a corporate NDA
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 19:34
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:He’s a lawyer and now he has to tell the state bar he broke a corporate NDA he doesn't if he didn't
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 19:37
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:He’s a lawyer and now he has to tell the state bar he broke a corporate NDA Probably he does not. Also, are we taking CCP investigations as gospel again? They banned a completely random guy over the monument vandalism for the crime of having registered a character name that was the same/similar as a handle used by one of the vandals.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 19:42
|
|
|
Also the changes to industry over the years have continued to gently caress the T2 BPO advantage. Combo of no remote blueprint use and citadels means that using your super-valuable T2 ME10/TE10 BPO in the safety of NPC stations is only a fraction more value than invented BPCs. Putting your BPO in a citadel to regain your advantage means putting it at risk, since citadels drop in-use blueprints when they die. I recall hearing that the only T2 BPOs that really matter, as far as blocking out competition with invention, were basic T2 mods and that type of poo poo. And that this is a good thing because needing to do invention on that stuff would be max tedious.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 19:52
|
|
|
Klyith posted:Putting your BPO in a citadel to regain your advantage means putting it at risk, since citadels drop in-use blueprints when they die. Actually, it's the opposite. BPOs can never drop or be destroyed from having an engineering complex bite it while they're in the middle of a job. They always go to asset safety.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 19:54
|
|
|
Gwyneth Palpate posted:Actually, it's the opposite. BPOs can never drop or be destroyed from having an engineering complex bite it while they're in the middle of a job. They always go to asset safety. Unless you're wormholin
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 20:02
|
|
|
Cobbsprite posted:Unless you're wormholin for that's it's a non-issue, wormholers can't even afford to replace falcons let alone have expensive BPOs
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 20:03
|
|
|
Klyith posted:Also the changes to industry over the years have continued to gently caress the T2 BPO advantage. Combo of no remote blueprint use and citadels means that using your super-valuable T2 ME10/TE10 BPO in the safety of NPC stations is only a fraction more value than invented BPCs. Putting your BPO in a citadel to regain your advantage means putting it at risk, since citadels drop in-use blueprints when they die. Well that explains why my T2 mod margins suck...
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 20:11
|
|
|
One of the dumbest things I ever did in EVE was sell *both* of the T2 BPOs (Ogre and Praetor II) I won. I probably could've bought myself a faction titan or two with them today, but back then they weren't fun to produce off of, and it's not like earning isk is difficult. If I still had them I'd have likely just given them to the alliance to make cheap ratting drones for Delve. ~Oh well~.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 20:23
|
|
|
Gwyneth Palpate posted:for that's it's a non-issue, wormholers can't even afford to replace falcons let alone have expensive BPOs They should try to SRP one for giggles
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 20:24
|
|
|
Maneck posted:Probably he does not. it's surprising how many veteran people forget the total bullshit that is ccp's security team is, like you've been playing since 2010 and you still don't know that a lot of the time on high profile incidents they're total dogshit?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 21:13
|
|
|
remember when they banned 80 people because of the bonus room fiasco? it was only when James 315 pbuh made a 15 page essay that CCP realized "Hey, we can't just ban an entire chat room because 3 people did weird stuff in it" and unbanned the majority of the people they banned, who 90% were literal scam VICTIMS from previous bonus rooms
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 21:15
|
|
|
1001 Arabian dicks posted:remember when they banned 80 people because of the bonus room fiasco? "If there was crime, there should be punishment. If the specific criminal should be involved in the punishment process then this was a happy accident, but if not then any criminal would do, and since everyone was undoubtedly guilty of something, the net result was that, in general terms, justice was done." -Men at Arms, Terry Pratchett
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 21:37
|
|
|
1001 Arabian dicks posted:remember when they banned 80 people because of the bonus room fiasco? Hey, I'm in the 10%! Also, sucks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 21:38
|
|
|
Facebook Aunt posted:"If there was crime, there should be punishment. If the specific criminal should be involved in the punishment process then this was a happy accident, but if not then any criminal would do, and since everyone was undoubtedly guilty of something, the net result was that, in general terms, justice was done." -Men at Arms, Terry Pratchett I would give 10 years of my life to bring this man back for just 1
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 21:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 23:59 |
|
|
Gwyneth Palpate posted:Actually, it's the opposite. BPOs can never drop or be destroyed from having an engineering complex bite it while they're in the middle of a job. They always go to asset safety. Woah, really? What about the bug when T2 BPOs were dropping from citadel wrecks, early in the citadels rollout? I thought that was because the in-use blueprints were supposed to drop, and the bug was that sometimes they were dropping a T2 version of the same BP? I got the totally wrong idea from that I guess.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2019 22:07
|
|