Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

TheGreatEvilKing posted:

I was expecting Cersei to stay in power by ordering Qyburn to raise her a whole undead army for some reason.

Oh well.

Given the way he got all obsessed with the severed arm of that wight Jon and co showed off it would not surprise me if he figured out a way to co-opt control of the army of the dead from the Night King or at least found a way to make wights of his own and Cersei goes "I want a million of that please--oh poo poo they're eating everyone Qyburn what have you done!"

Because Cersei is that dumb and self-destructive.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sephyr
Aug 28, 2012

Katt posted:


I always thought the "Baron likes little boys" thing to be a bit ham fisted. It's all done completely outside the story itself. Almost in a parallel universe between the baron and the reader as a way for the author to go "hate this guy now" with as little effort as possible.

Yup, definitely overboard. The Baron has -some- nuance, in that even he is not for just wiping out everyone on Arrakis, unlike his dunderhead nephew, if only because he's not one to waste a workorce. And as fond of brutality as he is, even he is not above trying for a subtler approach, setting Feyd up to be a savior figure to rule based on more than just jackboots.

But it does feel like Herbert was a bit insecure that he made the heroes a bit too cynical (showing how the Atreides use propaganda like fiends, have plans contemplating the elimination of whole segments of their population if things go south and are cocnerned that may not be possible in Arrakis, etc), he doubled down on making the Baron a pile of vices.

Which is amusing because in the 1980s movie even -that- wasn't enough and they had to go with heart plugs and grease baths and carefully nurtured pustules.

Katt
Nov 14, 2017

Before I even got into the dune franchise I saw this piece like 14 years ago which basically became my mental depiction of the baron through the books.



Any depictions of him as a regular but puffy man never worked.

theblackw0lf
Apr 15, 2003

"...creating a vision of the sort of society you want to have in miniature"
Was reading an article from a TV critic who was saying this about ASoIaF

quote:

The level of backstory and information there is about each and every aspect of Martin’s world is really only rivaled by Tolkien’s Middle-earth and the Star Wars universe. (

I don't know, I'd put Malazan and WOT up there.

Katt
Nov 14, 2017

I want to re-read WOT but woke adult me is going to lose it at all the "yell at your wife to show that you love her" stuff. Not to mention the hundreds of pages dedicated to women spanking one another. And Mat getting raped.

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

Katt posted:

I want to re-read WOT but woke adult me is going to lose it at all the "yell at your wife to show that you love her" stuff. Not to mention the hundreds of pages dedicated to women spanking one another. And Mat getting raped.

I bought all the Wheel of Time books cheap and used with the intent of reading them just to say I did it, but the opening pages of Book 0 for the series is a 4 page description of where some dude’s armour came from and nothing about the guy wearing it, and I cringed so hard I closed the book and put it back on the shelf.

It’s been like two years since I touched it last, so I’m still working up the courage to dive back into it.

Ungratek
Aug 2, 2005


I'm very excited for this exchange:

Jon: I told you I knew where to stick it

Sam:

Jon: what now

Katt
Nov 14, 2017

nine-gear crow posted:

I bought all the Wheel of Time books cheap and used with the intent of reading them just to say I did it, but the opening pages of Book 0 for the series is a 4 page description of where some dude’s armour came from and nothing about the guy wearing it, and I cringed so hard I closed the book and put it back on the shelf.

It’s been like two years since I touched it last, so I’m still working up the courage to dive back into it.

Audiobook at work/travel?

The books also have a ton of "women amirite?"


Ma fath-er alweys usad ta say that a womenz is like an.... uhhhh *looks around* stove! sometimes they cook yer food for ya all right and proper and sometimes they burn your house down

Rinse and repeat like 400 times.

I remember thinking "Oh well people just had different views when this was originally written back in 196......1990? What?

Sephyr
Aug 28, 2012

Katt posted:

Before I even got into the dune franchise I saw this piece like 14 years ago which basically became my mental depiction of the baron through the books.



Any depictions of him as a regular but puffy man never worked.

Oh my god, that is amazing.


But wait until you read the prequel books and discover the epic twist that the Baron used to be a SUPER BUFF gym rat and only got fat because he was infected with a tailored germ by a bene Gesserit, out of vengeance for him raping her . It completely casts the character in a new...light...?

And now I'm scared of googling Yezzan zo Qagaz, or whoever was the bizarre non-character that bought Tyrion during his slavery holiday.

esperterra
Mar 24, 2010

SHINee's back




brb tugging braid and smoothing skirt

Intel&Sebastian
Oct 20, 2002

colonel...
i'm trying to sneak around
but i'm dummy thicc
and the clap of my ass cheeks
keeps alerting the guards!
why the gently caress are you reading Dune sequel and prequel books?

Like at best there's about 1/4th of a good read in the direct sequel and the rest is a huge trashfire.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

nine-gear crow posted:

I bought all the Wheel of Time books cheap and used with the intent of reading them just to say I did it, but the opening pages of Book 0 for the series is a 4 page description of where some dude’s armour came from and nothing about the guy wearing it, and I cringed so hard I closed the book and put it back on the shelf.

It’s been like two years since I touched it last, so I’m still working up the courage to dive back into it.

The first book is really good in my opinion. They go downhill from there, and somewhere around book 5, there is a cliff. Book 9 I believe it is, in particular, is really bad, nothing happens, then like book 10 is set BEFORE book 9. Book 0 was wholly unnecessary. Ultimately the promise of the books is not fulfilled, and they simply go on for way too long. I think there's a certain truism in people maintaining the same characterization over their life. People only change so much. But that doesn't mean people want to read "the dice rattled in his head" or "smoothed her skirts" over and over and over and over. Also, Sanderson wrote the last 3 books and he did a terrible job (because he's a terrible writer).

Katt
Nov 14, 2017

Sephyr posted:

Oh my god, that is amazing.


But wait until you read the prequel books and discover the epic twist that the Baron used to be a SUPER BUFF gym rat and only got fat because he was infected with a tailored germ by a bene Gesserit, out of vengeance for him raping her . It completely casts the character in a new...light...?

And now I'm scared of googling Yezzan zo Qagaz, or whoever was the bizarre non-character that bought Tyrion during his slavery holiday.

Yeah I read nearly all the prequels and I thought they were alright in a sort of young-adult villain of the week kind of way.


If I recall she raped him first to get a child and it didn't work so she came back to rape him a second time but he turned the tables and raped her back and she got revenge by infecting him with some corpulence germ.

It also has the part where Glossu Rabban tries to get along with his father but he ends up casually destroying the economy of the whole planet for giggles.

Like his dad will go "ah the mating song of the space-manatees" Then the distant sound of machinegun fire and chainsaws, and he will run out and see his son single handedly butchering like a third of the planets female space-manatees. The survivors are now so terrified of their ancestral mating spot that they go extinct or some crap and the whole planets economy built around space-manatee furs collapses.

I think Rabban does this like three times before his father curses him out and Rabban strangles him to death and goes to live with his uncle.

Katt fucked around with this message at 20:30 on Apr 12, 2019

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

pseudanonymous posted:

The first book is really good in my opinion. They go downhill from there, and somewhere around book 5, there is a cliff. Book 9 I believe it is, in particular, is really bad, nothing happens, then like book 10 is set BEFORE book 9. Book 0 was wholly unnecessary. Ultimately the promise of the books is not fulfilled, and they simply go on for way too long. I think there's a certain truism in people maintaining the same characterization over their life. People only change so much. But that doesn't mean people want to read "the dice rattled in his head" or "smoothed her skirts" over and over and over and over. Also, Sanderson wrote the last 3 books and he did a terrible job (because he's a terrible writer).

Which is kind of weird, because according to Sanderson he said he used to get hate mail from people quoting stuff they claimed he wrote which was awful only for it to have been one of the segments Jordan wrote before he died and when they cited what they claimed were superior Jordan-written passages they were actually quoting stuff Sanderson had written.

I dunno, this sub has a weird culty bug up its rear end about Sanderson but he’s not that bad. Although he does seem to be convinced that if you really pay attention to GRRM’s writing Westeros has no moon, which is the dumbest thing I’ve heard since “Varys is a merman”, so ya know...

Katt
Nov 14, 2017

I thought Sanderson was alright and I didn't notice the transition too much other than a strong reduction in rants about women.

Sephyr
Aug 28, 2012

Intel&Sebastian posted:

why the gently caress are you reading Dune sequel and prequel books?

Like at best there's about 1/4th of a good read in the direct sequel and the rest is a huge trashfire.

Hey, I once was a hopeful human being. Those books helped kill it way back then.

Besides, nowaday you don't even have to wait for the author's kids to churn our derivative, unasked-for drivel of the main work, as 'Fire and Blood' proves!

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

nine-gear crow posted:

Which is kind of weird, because according to Sanderson he said he used to get hate mail from people quoting stuff they claimed he wrote which was awful only for it to have been one of the segments Jordan wrote before he died and when they cited what they claimed were superior Jordan-written passages they were actually quoting stuff Sanderson had written.

I dunno, this sub has a weird culty bug up its rear end about Sanderson but he’s not that bad. Although he does seem to be convinced that if you really pay attention to GRRM’s writing Westeros has no moon, which is the dumbest thing I’ve heard since “Varys is a merman”, so ya know...

There's a chapter in the last book that's longer than most books. I never read anything else he wrote because he did such a poo poo job of WoT to be honest. Also just because Sanderson claims that poo poo about who wrote what I don't necessarily believe him. It's very self-serving to say "oh that stuff that doesn't sound like it belongs in the books you've been reading for 20 years was written by the dead guy who wrote it and can't defend himself, not the new guy who is now writing stuff"

I don't see why Westeros has to have a moon. There is a thing with the Dothraki about the moon being blown up but.. yeah "Qartheen believe that dragons were hatched from a second moon that came too close to the sun and cracked, while Dothraki believe that the moon is a goddess, wife to the sun." It seems like there's a moo. So in this instance, he's just wrong.

Intel&Sebastian
Oct 20, 2002

colonel...
i'm trying to sneak around
but i'm dummy thicc
and the clap of my ass cheeks
keeps alerting the guards!
So what the gently caress does he think "moon boy" is named after?

Kuiperdolin
Sep 5, 2011

to ride eternal, shiny and chrome

THUNDERDOME LOSER 2022

And moon tea.
And the mountains of the moon.

Katt
Nov 14, 2017

Intel&Sebastian posted:

So what the gently caress does he think "moon boy" is named after?

Maybe a "Moon" is just some sort of unimpressive herb?


Wasn't Dannys son supposed to gently caress the moon or something?

less laughter
May 7, 2012

Accelerock & Roll

Intel&Sebastian posted:

So what the gently caress does he think "moon boy" is named after?

as well as the Moon Door that Littlefinger pushes Lysa out through to her death

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

Kuiperdolin posted:

And moon tea.
And the mountains of the moon.

And the moon door, and the fact that House Arryn’s logo has a giant loving crescent moon on it. I have no idea where he gets it from but I’ve been listening to the Writing Excuses podcast on and off for years now and this has been a consistent thing that Sanderson has cited as “great worldbuilding” is the idea that Westeros has no moon, and it’s just a background element of the world that’s never touched upon when... he’s just wrong. Provably wrong.

kcroy
May 30, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

nine-gear crow posted:

I dunno, this sub has a weird culty bug up its rear end about Sanderson but he’s not that bad. Although he does seem to be convinced that if you really pay attention to GRRM’s writing Westeros has no moon, which is the dumbest thing I’ve heard since “Varys is a merman”, so ya know...

You might be misrepresenting this thread. I think I'm like the one person here who doesn't like Sanderson. IIRC Most people seem to think he would be a good replacement.

kcroy
May 30, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

less laughter posted:

as well as the Moon Door that Littlefinger pushes Lysa out through to her death

It's slang for Vagina, has nothing to do with what we call the moon. Who puts a "moon" door in the floor?

Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Dec 22, 2005

GET LOSE, YOU CAN'T COMPARE WITH MY POWERS
Having read nothing by sanderson and drawing my conclusion from nothing but opinions in this thread, I feel he's okay but not great. That's the thread's opinion, therefore.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

kcroy posted:

You might be misrepresenting this thread. I think I'm like the one person here who doesn't like Sanderson. IIRC Most people seem to think he would be a good replacement.

No, I think he's poo poo and I think the majority of the none-Sanderon thread think he's poo poo.

Kaladin the paladin.

Sally
Jan 9, 2007


Don't post Small Dash!
who the gently caress is sanderson

kcroy
May 30, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

pseudanonymous posted:

No, I think he's poo poo and I think the majority of the none-Sanderon thread think he's poo poo.

Kaladin the paladin.

haha ok, just saw your post. I stand corrected.

less laughter
May 7, 2012

Accelerock & Roll

Katt posted:

Wasn't Dannys son supposed to gently caress the moon or something?

no he was the Stallion Who Mounts the World

less laughter
May 7, 2012

Accelerock & Roll

kcroy posted:

Who puts a "moon" door in the floor?

it's not in the floor

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Dash Rendar posted:

who the gently caress is sanderson

He's a mormon who shits out fantasy books non-stop that are pretty uniformly terrible.

Katt
Nov 14, 2017

less laughter posted:

no he was the Stallion Who Mounts the World

Well that makes no sense. Where does he keep his feet? Like if he's loving the moon he can stand on the earth but if there's no moon how can he gently caress the earth? Does he just hang on it limply like a sailor on a barrel at sea?

How does he get any proper leverage into it?

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

kcroy posted:

You might be misrepresenting this thread. I think I'm like the one person here who doesn't like Sanderson. IIRC Most people seem to think he would be a good replacement.

Not in this thread, but there’s a whole other thread in TBB dedicated to ripping his bowels out. Though the dude leading the charge got perma’d a month ago, so who knows if it’s calmed down any. Maybe not.

Dash Rendar posted:

who the gently caress is sanderson

Brandon Sanderson, a dude who shits out like 5 books a year and is also super Mormon without being a flaming rear end in a top hat like most Mormon AuthorsTM tend to be (see: Card, Orson Scott; Correia, Larry, etc.). He shot to fame by being hand picked by Robot Jordan to finish the Wheel of Time books after it was clear Jords wasn’t going to live to see it through himself. He co-hosts a weekly writing podcast called Writing Excuses and also thinks Westeros has no moon.

Now you know who the gently caress Brandon Sanderson is.

Katt
Nov 14, 2017

nine-gear crow posted:

super Mormon without being a flaming rear end in a top hat like most Mormon AuthorsTM tend to be (see: Card, Orson Scott; Correia, Larry, etc.)

Did you do Orson twice?

Admittedly he is a surprisingly big rear end in a top hat. I read all the ender stuff out of sheer stubbornness and by god. Jeez.

Like he defines the totality of the Muslim world as "once they learned to stop doing terrorism the middle east prospered. Ops now they're doing terrorism again. RIP"

YaketySass
Jan 15, 2019

Blind Idiot Dog
The irony is that we are all, in a sense, mounting the world.

TK-42-1
Oct 30, 2013

looks like we have a bad transmitter



YaketySass posted:

The irony is that we are all, in a sense, mounting the world.

the world is mounting us all tbh

Kylaer
Aug 4, 2007
I'm SURE walking around in a respirator at all times in an (even more) OPEN BIDENing society is definitely not a recipe for disaster and anyone that's not cool with getting harassed by CHUDs are cave dwellers. I've got good brain!
We did not know if we were in the world or the world was in us.

Karpaw
Oct 29, 2011

by Cyrano4747
Our cunts became the world.

Liquid Communism
Mar 9, 2004

коммунизм хранится в яичках

Katt posted:

Did you do Orson twice?

Admittedly he is a surprisingly big rear end in a top hat. I read all the ender stuff out of sheer stubbornness and by god. Jeez.

Like he defines the totality of the Muslim world as "once they learned to stop doing terrorism the middle east prospered. Ops now they're doing terrorism again. RIP"

The hilarious part is how alike those two are, despite Correia being a hardcore right wing libertarian who spends his free time fellating the military, and Card being a centrist Democrat most of his adult life until he went off the loving deep end and signed up with Gingrich because he just hates gay people that much (enough that he wrote and published a Hamlet fanfic all about how Hamlet's dad was a pedophile because all gay men are) , and Obama being elected broke his tiny little brain and made him write a whole screed:

http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2013-05-09-1.html posted:

By Orson Scott Card May 9, 2013
Unlikely Events

This is the column where I predict how American democracy ends.

No, no, it's just a silly thought experiment! I'm not serious about this! Nobody can predict the future! It's just a game. The game of Unlikely Events.

It isn't my work as a writer of science fiction and fantasy that prepares me to write about unlikely events. My job in writing sci-fi is to make impossible events seem not just possible but likely. Inevitable.

That's because the reader enters a work of fiction knowing that it didn't happen. So the writer's made-up characters and events must seem truthful. We must pass the plausibility test.

History, now -- we expect history to be true, and therefore, instead of plausibility, we depend on evidence. While many participants in real events might be working as hard as possible to conceal the truth, the historian must ferret out whatever documents and testimony can lead us to discover what actually happened.

Historical lies have great persistence. There are still people who think that Winston Churchill "failed" at Gallipoli; who believe that Richard III murdered his nephews, though the only person with a motive to kill them was Henry Tudor; who believe that George W. Bush lied about WMDs in Iraq.

That's because politically useful lies are treasures, not to be easily given up by those who benefit from them.

Even when the facts are known, however, historians still argue endlessly over cause. Why did this or that event happen? No matter how much evidence you have, causality always recedes into the realm of wishful thinking -- historians assign weight to various causes according to their own systems of belief.

With fiction, on the other hand, causality is the one certain thing. We know that the events didn't happen and the people didn't exist, but when the author tells you why things happened, it is meaningless to argue about it. It's not as if you can provide evidence for a different view!

The place where fiction and history come together is in the absurd business of predicting the future.

Absurd, because predictors are inevitably wrong.

In predicting the future, we are bound by the same rules of plausibility that bind fiction writers, yet we must also respect the rules of evidence that bind historians.

The biggest problem with prediction is that there is almost always an underlying assumption of: "If present trends continue." But present trends never continue.

If the increase in bottled-water sales had continued to grow at the same rate shown in the 1980s, we would already be running out of fresh water. If birth rates had continued at baby boom rates, we'd already be at 500 million Americans (or more).

Present trends never continue. But when they'll end, and what will replace them, are the questions that lead almost all predictions to be absurdly wrong.

Nobody knew that Communism would fall in the Soviet Union, or that eastern Europe would win its freedom bloodlessly, after years of failed revolts.

(Actually, I was laughed at in the 1980s for publicly predicting the possibility of the fall of Soviet Communism, but I certainly didn't know the schedule or the means by which it would happen.)

Nobody predicted the collapse of Japan's "economic miracle." The dotcom boom became a bubble only after it popped. The crash in the housing market was completely, obviously predictable -- after it happened.

Yet this doesn't mean prediction is useless or meaningless. There were plenty of people who foretold the disaster that Hitler would bring to the world if he came to power in Germany, and those predictions were exactly fulfilled.

The only reason people were taken by surprise was that they simply refused to believe (a) what Hitler himself said he would do, and (b) the previous related examples from history.

So today we have a president whose faith in the good will of Muslim leaders is touching but groundless, whose threats and promises mean nothing, and whose ignorance of history is terrifying.

Iran and North Korea are led by dictators who don't care about the survival of their own people, and who have clearly announced their intentions. Yet our president sits on his hands.

Does it take any particular brains to predict that if Iran is not stopped, they will use nukes against Israel? Or that if someone stops them, it won't be Barack Obama?

North Korea is a different matter; the Kims don't care about their people, but they do care about their own continuation in absolute power. The Iranians, however, are ideologues. They believe that it doesn't matter if they achieve success by the world's standards, as long as they please God.

The real question is whether Obama would actually do anything in the event of a nuclear attack on Israel -- or on anybody. From Benghazi to Boston, his policy is to pretend that Muslims never do anything bad.

So he chums about with Islamist Turks, his "red line" on war crimes in Syria meant nothing, he is funding the Christian-killing Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and when our consulate in Benghazi was under attack and we had the means to stop it, he did absolutely nothing.

Predicting that Obama will continue to do nothing is easy and obvious. Like Neville Chamberlain, who went straight from optimism (Hitler will never start a war) to despair (we might as well make whatever peace with him we can get), Obama would certainly respond to a nuclear strike on Tel Aviv and Haifa with a call for negotiations and a complete abandonment of whatever part of Israel survived.

The only way he would go to war would be under the threat of rebellion from his own party in Congress, who would be destroyed in the next election if the U.S. did nothing.

On foreign policy, Obama is already the dumbest president in American history, and there's so much competition for that title. Only the fact that Al Gore, John Kerry, and Joe Biden were never president leaves him in sole possession of the crown.

But that brings me to a little thought experiment that seized my imagination a few weeks ago and won't go away.

Obama is, by character and preference, a dictator. He hates the very idea of compromise; he demonizes his critics and despises even his own toadies in the liberal press. He circumvented Congress as soon as he got into office by appointing "czars" who didn't need Senate approval. His own party hasn't passed a budget ever in the Senate.

In other words, Obama already acts as if the Constitution were just for show. Like Augustus, he pretends to govern within its framework, but in fact he treats it with contempt.

How far might he take his dictatorial disposition? Is there any plausible way for him to remain as president for life, like the dictators he so admires and envies in Russia, China, and the Muslim world?

At first glance, the idea is absurd. The U.S. military would never accept such a thing. Nor would the people. Nor would ...

But wait. Let's think about this. Is there any way that Barack Obama could remain president forever, the way Putin has held on to power in Russia?

In his years as president, the national media have never challenged Obama on anything. His lies and mistakes are unreported or quickly forgotten or explicitly denied; his critics are demonized.

It's hard to imagine how American press coverage would be different if Obama were a Hitler- or Stalin-style dictator, except of course that everyone at Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, and the Rhinoceros Times would be in jail. Or dead.

So as a science fiction writer and a student of history, allow me to spin a plausible scenario about how, like Augustus Caesar, Napoleon Bonaparte, Adolph Hitler, and Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama could become lifetime dictator without any serious internal opposition.

Keep in mind that he already governs unconstitutionally, with czars and without a budget. He bullies his opponents, and ignores crimes by his own team. He treats Congress with contempt -- both Republicans and Democrats.

Having been anointed from the start of his career because he was that magical combination -- a black man who talks like a white man (that's what they mean by calling him "articulate" and a "great speaker") -- he has never had to work for a living, and he has never had to struggle to accomplish goals. He despises ordinary people, is hostile to any religion that doesn't have Obama as its deity, and his contempt for the military is complete.

You'd think that such a man could not possibly remain in office past the Constitutional limit of two terms -- but I think the plan is already in place.

Look at how Hillary Clinton is being set up as the fall guy on Benghazi. Her lies under oath will destroy her in the run-up to the 2016 election, while the press will never hold Obama's feet to the fire.

This is because Michelle Obama is going to be Barack's Lurleen Wallace. Remember how George Wallace got around Alabama's ban on governors serving two terms in a row? He ran his wife for the office. Everyone knew Wallace would actually be pulling the strings, even though they denied it.

Michelle Obama will be Obama's designated "successor," and any Democrat who seriously opposes her will be destroyed in the media the way everyone who contested Obama's run for the Democratic nomination in 2008 was destroyed.

But the plan goes deeper than this. Barack Obama, like Hitler and the Iranian dictators, announced his plan, though the media (as with Hitler) has "forgotten" it.

Barack Obama needs to have a source of military power that is under his direct control. Like Hitler, he needs a powerful domestic army to terrify any opposition that might arise.

Obama called for a "national police force" in 2008, though he never gave a clue about why such a thing would be necessary. We have the National Guard. We have the armed forces. The FBI. The Secret Service. And all the local and state police forces.

The trouble is that all of these groups have long independent histories and none of them is reliably under Barack Obama's personal control. He needs Brown Shirts -- thugs who will do his bidding without any reference to law.

Obama will claim we need a national police force in order to fight terrorism and crime. The Boston bombing is a useful start, especially when combined with random shootings by crazy people.

Where will he get his "national police"? The NaPo will be recruited from "young out-of-work urban men" and it will be hailed as a cure for the economic malaise of the inner cities.

In other words, Obama will put a thin veneer of training and military structure on urban gangs, and send them out to channel their violence against Obama's enemies.

Instead of doing drive-by shootings in their own neighborhoods, these young thugs will do beatings and murders of people "trying to escape" -- people who all seem to be leaders and members of groups that oppose Obama.

Already the thugs who serve the far left agenda of Obama's team do systematic character assassination as a means of intimidating their opponents into silence. But physical beatings and "legal" disappearances will be even more effective -- as Hitler and Putin and many other dictators have demonstrated over and over.

All the abuses of the Patriot Act that Bush was accused of, but never actually did, will be the standard operating procedure of Obama's personal army, the NaPo.

But the media will cover all the actions of the NaPo as if it were merely a full-employment program for unemployed urban youth. Or if they finally wise up (maybe after a few reporters disappear), they'll be cowed into submission very quickly.

Meanwhile, Obama will use the NaPo to whip the U.S. military into shape. The armed forces are largely recruited from among the half of American society that doesn't vote for Barack Obama. So they will be relentlessly underfunded and disarmed; prominent generals who might become foci of resistance to Obama will be destroyed as Petraeus was.

As for gun control, it will hardly be necessary. Obama already has his program of ammunition control. Guns without bullets are decorative. And he will have armored cars for the NaPo, precisely so that right-wing militia types can't use snipers against them.

These are simple steps, but they have worked for every dictator ruthless enough to use them. Most people want only to be left alone; Obama will leave them alone as long as they shut up and do what they're told.

But it won't be just the NaPo. Once the government has firm control of health care, we'll find that the families of his opponents don't qualify for expensive medical care. Their children and parents will be medical-care hostages.

Once we get the clear idea that people or groups -- or even regions -- that oppose Obama simply don't get any medical care, it will rarely be necessary to send in the NaPo armored cars.

By the election of 2018, both parties will only field candidates approved by Obama's people. And since polling places will be supervised closely by the NaPo, people casting -- and counting -- the votes will know what is expected.

The Congress will become the rubber stamp that Obama already treats them like. There will be no more subpoenas. No more testifying before committees that sometimes ask hard questions.

The Supreme Court justices who might oppose him will retire, or suffer medical accidents, and be replaced by judges who think the Constitution means whatever politically correct opinion needs it to mean.

And if some brave congressmen or local governments try to oppose him, they will be put on trial on trumped-up charges -- to which they will usually plead guilty, in exchange for continuing medical care (or employment) for their families.

By the time Michelle has served her two terms, the Constitution will have been amended to allow Presidents to run for reelection forever. Obama will win by 98 percent every time. That's how it works in Nigeria and Zimbabwe; that's how it worked in Hitler's Germany.

And you can be sure that those unionized teachers who spewed venom and hatred in Wisconsin will be ready to brainwash America's children about the glories of Obama-style "freedom." Any teachers who don't follow the union program will be fired.

Almost all the mechanisms are already in place. It just takes a tweak here and there, and America is ready to be the country that is worthy of a Beloved Leader like Barack Obama.

All right, the game is over. We don't seriously think any such thing will happen.

But if we learn anything from history, it's this: Anything can happen. American democracy, already a pale shadow of what it once was, is only a couple of centuries old.

Like the Roman Republic, it will be easy for people to conclude that a Constitution written for a bunch of backwater provinces simply can't meet the needs of the World's Only Superpower.

The editorial writers at the New York Times and Washington Post are ready right now to talk warmly about "post-democratic America" and explain why it's about time we eliminated the ability of primitive Republicans, with their neanderthal reliance on "guns and religion," to obstruct the onward march of Enlightened government.

They already hate democracy. They already demonize anyone who opposes them, and believe that their opponents have no right to be heard, and that courts should force their program on the ignorant masses.

They are already fascists in their hearts. They love Barack Obama precisely because his arrogance is so emblematic of their own sense of superiority.

Hitler came to absolute power because the military and businessmen of Germany saw him as the one to put their opponents in their place.

That's how the American elites -- the educational establishment, the unions, the media -- already see Obama. Like Hitler's allies, they won't understand what a monster they've created until his power is so entrenched that he can turn it against them. And then it will be too late.

That's what history teaches us -- it can happen anywhere. And when the historians write about it after the fact, they will point out how obvious all the signs were from the start -- the way they write about Hitler now. Why did so many people go along with him?

Because his allies thought they could control him. They thought he would serve their goals. Obama has been put into power by idiots who think they control him even now. They think that because he's so phenomenally uneducated and lazy, they are smarter than he is. That he is their puppet.

But then, without such fools, history wouldn't be such interesting reading.

Will these things happen? Of course not. This was an experiment in fictional thinking.

But it sure sounds plausible, doesn't it? Because, like a good fiction writer, I made sure this scenario fit the facts we already have -- the way Obama already acts, the way his supporters act, and the way dictators have come to power in republics in the past.

Just keep your head down, and you'll be OK. Unless your children repeat at school things you said in the privacy of your home. Unless an Obama crony wants your house or your job. Unless you tell the wrong joke to the wrong people. Unless you have already written or said dangerous things that will come back to get you shot trying to avoid arrest ...

Just kidding. Because if I really believed this stuff, would I actually write this essay?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

TK-42-1
Oct 30, 2013

looks like we have a bad transmitter



man that sure is a lot of words i don’t care about at all

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply