|
Cyrano4747 posted:whatever caveman figured out bashing your fellow tribesman's head in with a rock to take his wife and sweet cloak wasn't optimal for a smoothly functioning society. don't doxx me
|
# ? May 2, 2019 03:45 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 18:56 |
|
The virgin society-dweller and the chad caveman
|
# ? May 2, 2019 19:54 |
|
Hunter-gatherers obtain sustenance like THIS Agriculturalists obtain sustenance like THIS
|
# ? May 2, 2019 20:33 |
|
|
# ? May 2, 2019 23:02 |
|
I love the face on that glyptodon. "Just ignore them Greg. You are better than this. Just keep walking."
|
# ? May 2, 2019 23:41 |
|
Mr Enderby posted:I love the face on that glyptodon. "Just ignore them Greg. You are better than this. Just keep walking." And the hump (?) makes it look like he's hunched over scowling, which makes it even better. Edit: Actually, would humans even be able to kill that thing with spears? That armor looks pretty tough. Guildencrantz fucked around with this message at 09:41 on May 3, 2019 |
# ? May 3, 2019 09:38 |
|
Guildencrantz posted:Edit: Actually, would humans even be able to kill that thing with spears? That armor looks pretty tough. The humans make repeated attempts to kill the glyptodon. The attacks fail physically but they confirm in the glyptodon a suspicion that the world is ultimately hostile and vulnerability precedes betrayal. The glyptodon retreats into interiority and self pity. The humans gently caress around having noisy barbecues, while the glyptodon dies alone and unloved. Some humans build a house out of its shell, and gently caress inside it.
|
# ? May 3, 2019 10:46 |
https://twitter.com/DrSueOosthuizen/status/1123486595905204224
|
|
# ? May 3, 2019 13:07 |
|
why did it take me so long to read any primary sources I'm reading Caesar now and it's super exciting and honestly way better written than any modern history book about the Gallic wars I've read
|
# ? May 3, 2019 19:10 |
|
A lot of primary sources are pretty dull, to be honest. I'm not sure if it's the actual primary source or the academic tendency to translate everything into overwrought Victorian English instead of something more readable. I am not remotely fluent in either Latin or Greek so I've never read anything in the original languages. Caesar was writing specifically as propaganda to be read out for the general population so it's in a punchier, simpler style in the original too.
|
# ? May 3, 2019 19:13 |
|
Yeah I'm assuming that it's a combination of Caesar being designed for mass consumption and the Landmark translation's aim at a lay audience but I'm seriously more into this than anything I've read in a while. There might not be many ancient writings that have the same punch but I assume like at least two of Herodotus, Thucydides and Xenophon would
|
# ? May 3, 2019 19:16 |
|
Xenophon is pretty great. I love his inspirational speech about hoe horses are useless
|
# ? May 3, 2019 19:23 |
|
Tunicate posted:Xenophon is pretty great. Poor Bucephalus, thought of his shadow and died.
|
# ? May 3, 2019 19:56 |
cheetah7071 posted:Yeah I'm assuming that it's a combination of Caesar being designed for mass consumption and the Landmark translation's aim at a lay audience but I'm seriously more into this than anything I've read in a while. There might not be many ancient writings that have the same punch but I assume like at least two of Herodotus, Thucydides and Xenophon would The Landmark Herodotus is excellent.
|
|
# ? May 3, 2019 22:45 |
|
Tunicate posted:Xenophon is pretty great. the anabasis fuckin rips, yeah. very vivid and down to earth
|
# ? May 3, 2019 22:49 |
|
I enjoyed arrian's book about Alexander the Great (in translation), that's also called anabasis I think twelve emperors or whatever by seutonius was okay Gibbon is practically original source at this point and reading between the lines to get a view of the times it was written in was fun. gibbon was the all time best snarky footnote writer, too
|
# ? May 4, 2019 00:27 |
|
I found Ammianus Marcellinus to be a fairly fun read
|
# ? May 4, 2019 02:53 |
King of False Promises posted:The Landmark Herodotus is excellent. Yeah I'm still pretty salty that there is now a landmark edition of xenophon's hellenica, and a landmark of Arian's anabasis, but no landmark xenophon's anabasis, what the gently caress [
|
|
# ? May 4, 2019 03:06 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:Yeah I'm still pretty salty that there is now a landmark edition of xenophon's hellenica, and a landmark of Arian's anabasis, but no landmark xenophon's anabasis, what the gently caress Their website says that's up next
|
# ? May 4, 2019 03:11 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:Yeah I'm still pretty salty that there is now a landmark edition of xenophon's hellenica, and a landmark of Arian's anabasis, but no landmark xenophon's anabasis, what the gently caress No dogs. Therefore not Xenophon's best work.
|
# ? May 4, 2019 03:15 |
|
An example of the kind of excitement I'm getting from just reading Caesar instead of a history book about Caesar is in book three of the Gallic Wars when he goes into great length about how the Veniti boats are superior to Roman ships in the stormy Atlantic in basically every way, lists all the things that don't work on them, like ramming them, grappling them, building towers on your boats to get higher up, etc. Only when the actual pitched battle is fought does he reveal that he had come up with the strategy of using improvised polearms to cut the ropes connecting the mast to the hull to render their sails useless Both compelling to read just as a piece of exciting literature and full of cool little historical tidbits I've missed by not reading primary sources and am now kicking myself over (Romans built towers on their boats to try to get the high ground over other boats! That's really cool!)
|
# ? May 4, 2019 03:21 |
Epicurius posted:No dogs. Therefore not Xenophon's best work. Arian's Cynegeticus is better anyway because it has Horme quote:
cheetah7071 posted:Their website says that's up next It's been listed as in development for over a decade now. "Polybius, Xenophon’s Anabasis, and other titles are in process with no scheduled publication dates. As more information becomes available, it will be posted on the site."
|
|
# ? May 4, 2019 03:28 |
|
cheetah7071 posted:An example of the kind of excitement I'm getting from just reading Caesar instead of a history book about Caesar is in book three of the Gallic Wars when he goes into great length about how the Veniti boats are superior to Roman ships in the stormy Atlantic in basically every way, lists all the things that don't work on them, like ramming them, grappling them, building towers on your boats to get higher up, etc. Only when the actual pitched battle is fought does he reveal that he had come up with the strategy of using improvised polearms to cut the ropes connecting the mast to the hull to render their sails useless The Romans were really bad at boats. DCXCIX–DCC AUC: In which Bad Boat Republic invades Good (!) Cav Island
|
# ? May 4, 2019 04:47 |
|
Platystemon posted:The Romans were really bad at boats.
|
# ? May 4, 2019 04:50 |
|
cheetah7071 posted:An example of the kind of excitement I'm getting from just reading Caesar instead of a history book about Caesar is in book three of the Gallic Wars when he goes into great length about how the Veniti boats are superior to Roman ships in the stormy Atlantic in basically every way, lists all the things that don't work on them, like ramming them, grappling them, building towers on your boats to get higher up, etc. Only when the actual pitched battle is fought does he reveal that he had come up with the strategy of using improvised polearms to cut the ropes connecting the mast to the hull to render their sails useless Everything about Caesar's naval campaigns against the Veneti and his cross-Channel raid on Britain is amazing and it pisses me off there aren't more sources about it.
|
# ? May 4, 2019 04:50 |
|
Platystemon posted:The Romans were really bad at boats. The Romans got good at boats when they mounted flamethrowers on them, I don't know what you're talking about .
|
# ? May 4, 2019 04:52 |
|
Don Gato posted:The Romans got good at boats when they mounted flamethrowers on them, I don't know what you're talking about . “The Romans” Paging Byzantine.
|
# ? May 4, 2019 04:54 |
|
Platystemon posted:“The Romans” bold stance to take in this thread
|
# ? May 4, 2019 04:55 |
|
Oh, I know.
|
# ? May 4, 2019 04:55 |
|
I should have used some weasel words and suggested I meant only that they “were” bad at boats in the first third of their twenty‐two‐century history.
|
# ? May 4, 2019 04:57 |
|
Probably the best Roman boat story is that time the Vandals conquered Africa thereby cutting the economic lifeline of the empire in Italy, so the Eastern Emperor understandably freaked out at the possibility of his sister empire being destroyed and his imperial colleague dethroned on his watch, so spent hundreds of thousands of pounds building a fleet of over 1000 boats to help the Western Empire reconquer Africa. Then when they actually showed up, they got distracted negotiating and the Vandals sneakily torched half the fleet in a single night and the Western Empire collapsed within ten years lol
|
# ? May 4, 2019 05:09 |
|
skasion posted:Probably the best Roman boat story is that time the Vandals conquered Africa thereby cutting the economic lifeline of the empire in Italy, so the Eastern Emperor understandably freaked out at the possibility of his sister empire being destroyed and his imperial colleague dethroned on his watch, so spent hundreds of thousands of pounds building a fleet of over 1000 boats to help the Western Empire reconquer Africa. Then when they actually showed up, they got distracted negotiating and the Vandals sneakily torched half the fleet in a single night and the Western Empire collapsed within ten years lol Thank the worst ever emperor for that.
|
# ? May 4, 2019 05:11 |
|
HEY GUNS posted:i thought that from late antiquity until...way too far into the middle ages, boat combat was land combat on a boat, complete with towers and catapults Nah it was about ramming. The Romans were godawful at it in the First Punic War, so they decided "well, we're good at stabbing" and invented the corvus so they could just latch onto a Carthaginian boat and send over soldiers to murder everyone. Eventually they figured out actual boat combat and ditched the corvus. Basically everyone was riding around in a big torpedo and the goal was to slam the other dude before you got slammed. The only real variation was the period when Roman flamethrower ships were loving up anyone dumb enough to try them.
|
# ? May 4, 2019 05:28 |
|
HEY GUNS posted:i thought that from late antiquity until...way too far into the middle ages, boat combat was land combat on a boat, complete with towers and catapults It was waaaaaaayyyy more complicated than that. I had started a series of effortpost a long while ago about Classical and Hellenistic navies but never finished. I should probably do that.
|
# ? May 4, 2019 07:22 |
|
Grand Fromage posted:Nah it was about ramming. The Romans were godawful at it in the First Punic War, so they decided "well, we're good at stabbing" and invented the corvus so they could just latch onto a Carthaginian boat and send over soldiers to murder everyone. Eventually they figured out actual boat combat and ditched the corvus. I was trying to look up stuff about the Byzantine navy and apparently during the Imperial period it seems like everyone just kind of forgot about rams. Like Isidore of Seville writing in the The Etymologies describes ships that still have a small, vestigial ram, but suggests that their purpose is to protect the hull from rocks. I had a hard time finding any details but in the byzantine period at some point ships started including a kind of rigid projecting wooden beak or spur above the prow, which may have been used for ramming? It's hard to find details. However being above the waterline I don't think they would flood ships the way ancient rams would, though they could have busted oars or even capsized ships. 12th century illustration of a naval battle between the Byzantines and Rus. The description says the Romans are using the spurs to smash oars but it looks more like they are capsizing ships to me model of a 16th century Venetian galley showing the spur
|
# ? May 4, 2019 19:12 |
|
HEY GUNS posted:i thought that from late antiquity until...way too far into the middle ages, boat combat was land combat on a boat, complete with towers and catapults Middle Ages nothin', I think I may have gotten the wrong impression of the Battle of Midway.
|
# ? May 5, 2019 07:00 |
|
If you think about it everyone is really in the air force except submariners and sappers.
|
# ? May 5, 2019 15:46 |
|
quote:Basiliscus fled to sanctuary in a church, but he was betrayed by Acacius and surrendered himself and his family after extracting a solemn promise from Zeno not to shed their blood. Basiliscus, his wife Aelia Zenonis and his son Marcus were sent to a fortress in Cappadocia,[26] where Zeno had them enclosed in a dry cistern, to die from exposure.
|
# ? May 6, 2019 04:26 |
|
I'm sure he was like "fair enough, no foul, I did kinda walk into that one".
|
# ? May 6, 2019 08:04 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 18:56 |
|
the cistern thing reminds me of the huge cistern they had in constantinople (apparently there's at least one other big one still around). the water infrastructure of the romans is fairly well known as far as engineering goes, but i still wish we knew more. they did aqueducts, fracking, water-driven factories, and roman captive engineers designed a weir-based irrigation system in Persia. and the egyptians were still doing their ancient thing... i read that mesopotamia used the elevation difference between the euphrates and tigris to irrigate the area in between throughout its history, nicely dealing with salinity by washing it into the tigris. it was when political problems or major floods reshaping the area hit that the system broke down and salinity built up i wondered if syrians had cool irrigation methods, somebody had to feed antioch and whatnot. apparently the answer, or part of it, is qanats (asian water engineering, basically a nearly horizontal well; that's cool they were around in the roman east too, didn't know that). it looks like hundreds of them were irrigating crops right up until widespread use of pumps dried 'em up in the 1970's edit: more detail from that paper on qanats in pre-roman antiquity, cool that the persians did hydraulic engineering in egypt when they were running it quote:the best evidence (archaeological and written accounts) suggests that qanat irrigation was first invented in the Armenian-Persian region about 600-700 B.C. Some scholars have suggested that qanats were originally introduced in Syria by the Persians, when Syria was incorporated as a province within their empire in the 6th century B.C. Persians had already used qanats nearby to open up the water supply for Egypt's Kharga Oasis by about 500 B.C. (Forbes, 1964, p. 183), and ancient Persian potsherds found inside qanats in the Arava Valley, in the Israeli Negev, suggest that these qanats were first constructed during the Persian rule of the Holy Land (537-332 B.C.) editedit: i also found a paper that modestly traces 5500 years of water cistern history, in case you ever wanted to know more than any human should know about cisterns in history. i'll just share that people in crete had cisterns going back to the neolithic and are apparently still using cistern technology and techniques developed in the bronze age (i guess they probably aren't using the same cisterns, but by the 2nd millennium bc they already were putting a layer of plaster on the cistern to prevent leakage so with maintenance they could theoretically last thousands of years, i guess) oystertoadfish fucked around with this message at 15:55 on May 6, 2019 |
# ? May 6, 2019 15:17 |