Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Gripweed
Nov 8, 2018

ASK ME ABOUT MY
UNITED STATES MARINES
FUNKO POPS COLLECTION



What was that book the guy on It Could Happen Here kept recommending ?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SlimGoodbody
Oct 20, 2003

Gripweed posted:

What was that book the guy on It Could Happen Here kept recommending ?

I just started this podcast and hooboy it's good and also not helping my anxiety at all

I Before E
Jul 2, 2012

Matt didn't bring up the weirdest part of the Heimlich story, which is that he did a bunch of no oversight trials in Ethiopia where he injected malaria into HIV patients to see if it helped

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it

SlimGoodbody posted:

I just started this podcast and hooboy it's good and also not helping my anxiety at all

I had to stop. It's so good but the pictures he paints are chilling

Greatbacon
Apr 9, 2012

by Pragmatica

Gripweed posted:

What was that book the guy on It Could Happen Here kept recommending ?

Cities Under Siege? https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ENPW8FS/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1

Gripweed
Nov 8, 2018

ASK ME ABOUT MY
UNITED STATES MARINES
FUNKO POPS COLLECTION



Spoeank posted:

I had to stop. It's so good but the pictures he paints are chilling

As the show goes on he talks about the feedback he's getting from people about how depressed/scared the podcast is making them, and there's a notable adjustment in the show. It gets, I dunno how to describe it, more clinical, a little less darkly speculative. Broad strokes of what would happen as opposed to "here is what's going to happen to you". It's most noticeable during the genocide episode, where it feels like he's going out of his way to avoid really getting into what that would be like in America. Plus there's more focus on positive stuff people are doing now.


That's it! thanks!

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


rubin is such a loving baby. did he think everyone would love him after he took a big payday from the koch brothers?

i legit think he's dumb as hell and doesn't realize people can see through all of it.

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

alas C-SPAM thread, what a cruel fate you had to suffer :911:


huh, wasn't there a study conducted on Facebook in the same vein?

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

multijoe posted:

I mean come on, what 'deviant thoughts' being silenced by a 'culture of militant conformism' do you think she's refering to here? It's practically Dave Rubin level 'I'm being silenced by the regressive left!!' poo poo

The "deviant thoughts" refer to socialism you nitwit.

quote:

On the contrary, if we are “catching up” with the rest of the West, Catholic paternalism will not be replaced with the post-war secular European social democracy, which has been under attack for a generation.

quote:

For those who want neither a return to the past offered by the right or the liberal individualism offered by the permitted American model of the left, a feat of the imagination will be required to offer an alternative vision. Ireland could instead, for example, draw from our own unique radical traditions to fight for the rights of those who do not own property. Instead of lazily adopting the liberal cosmopolitanism of Silicon Valley, we could look out to the great cultures of the world for inspiration, to those elements that have withstood the marketisation and Americanisation of everything. We could use the best of what technological advancement could offer – greater leisure time and less work would be a good start. But the first step to understanding, before we can have any hope of changing, our current predicament will be acknowledging that the long 19th century is indeed over but that what is replacing it is not an egalitarian vision but the failing, globalised American vision of progressive individualism in culture and economics – the illusion of choice and freedom in a time of greater alienation, atomisation and diminishing expectations for the many and unlimited enrichment for the few.

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!
Apropos of nothing, I noticed that Matt's "Monster Fash" episode got a lot of comments on Patreon, and the ones that weren't just saying "cool" were quibbling over how to define fascism.

I still don't understand why this has consumed so much energy among centrists and leftists, nor why so many of them, even the leftists, want to define fascism as an aesthetic instead of a political-economic structure.

Jonah Galtberg
Feb 11, 2009

it’s because they’re also only socialists as an aesthetic op

No Dignity
Oct 15, 2007

Slanderer posted:

The "deviant thoughts" refer to socialism you nitwit.

Yeah she's definitely complaining about getting dragged on twitter for her views on workers owning the means of production and not her well documented lovely social views that have made her a person non grata on the Irish and British left.

If it was about socialism she'd have written an article that was just about socialism, rather than try to tar *legal abortions* by association with woke brand bullshit and neoliberal capitalism. There is literally no reason to bring it up, nor imply its been imported to the country by decadent foreign elites unless she's finds it objectionable. Its an absolutely bizarre position to defend.

thotsky
Jun 7, 2005

hot to trot
Fascist / totalitarian aesthetic has been a thing for decades, and fascists do like to blur the line between aesthetic and ideology / reality, so I don't blame people for being confused.

T-man
Aug 22, 2010


Talk shit, get bzzzt.

It's depressing to realize, but when it comes to mainstreaming ideology and getting into power the fash are a lot better at it. Now, of course, they get a lot of help from the state, but they're the ones with the police and courts right now.

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!
On the one hand, I agree with Matt that even if there's a valid argument that the Keynesian military-industrial complex is fascist, that broadens the term to the point of being useless as a heuristic.

On the other hand, it is a valid argument, and I think there's been a deliberate push to downplay and occlude any similarity between our late capitalist regime and those of the fascists. With all due respect to Arendt and Eco, this leads to a lot of people going on, and on, and on about the aesthetics. Thanks to the Trump campaign, there's a bit of a market for glib charlatans to make evocative statements about fascism that don't actually identify or diagnose anything, but just mystify everyone further. (I guess it started after people got bored with the "Does Trump have narcissistic personality disorder?" articles.)

It's ironic how their audience can understand that fascism isn't just a moment in history that could never recur, but remain obsessed with the particular trappings--the uniforms, slogans, posters, etc. Everyone has an "I know it when I see it" concept of fascism per Star Wars, but they don't ever think about imperialism.

T-man posted:

It's depressing to realize, but when it comes to mainstreaming ideology and getting into power the fash are a lot better at it. Now, of course, they get a lot of help from the state, but they're the ones with the police and courts right now.
Historically, fascists offer themselves as a solution to the problem of democracy, so getting support from the rich and powerful is baked in!

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

multijoe posted:

Yeah she's definitely complaining about getting dragged on twitter for her views on workers owning the means of production and not her well documented lovely social views that have made her a person non grata on the Irish and British left.

If it was about socialism she'd have written an article that was just about socialism, rather than try to tar *legal abortions* by association with woke brand bullshit and neoliberal capitalism. There is literally no reason to bring it up, nor imply its been imported to the country by decadent foreign elites unless she's finds it objectionable. Its an absolutely bizarre position to defend.

Please address the article and not your extremely important twitter grievances, thanks!

painynumbs
Apr 1, 2011
love getting just pissed off about a woman who’s on a podcast, sometimes

WorkerThread
Feb 15, 2012

painynumbs posted:

love getting just pissed off

Stringent
Dec 22, 2004


image text goes here

painynumbs posted:

love getting just pissed on

prefect
Sep 11, 2001

No one, Woodhouse.
No one.




Dead Man’s Band

I wouldn't pay two hundred bucks to have a garbanzo bean in my mouth.

Boywhiz88
Sep 11, 2005

floating 26" off da ground. BURR!
Why do we focus on just Angela Nagle when there’s a whole bunch of “pro-life Democrats” and similarly bullshit positions? VICE News Tonight interviewed a Democratic state Senator from Louisiana, and how she talked about her anti-abortion/anti-choice beliefs came off as both opportunistic in respect to votes and overtly religious. But she also helped to pass the abolishment of the death penalty.

I certainly would like to see her replaced but could a pro-choice Democrat or a socialist who made abortion a part of their national health plan win in that district? What about the alternative? An insane conservative who would vote against any of the good bills that the Democrat would have voted for? It really is damned if you and damned if you don’t.

EDIT: what I’m trying to say is why focus on this pundit when there are folks doing real damage within?

Gripweed
Nov 8, 2018

ASK ME ABOUT MY
UNITED STATES MARINES
FUNKO POPS COLLECTION



I'm trying to listen to Trashfuture and hoo boy it's not good

ZenMasterBullshit
Nov 2, 2011

Restaurant de Nouvelles "À Table" Proudly Presents:
A Climactic Encounter Ending on 1 Negate and a Dream
It's weird that Chapo goes on and on and on about understanding dog whistles and knowing who your enemy is but if you call out someone for say....repeatedly writing articles and giving talks tying sexual liberation and self expression to 'corruptive identity politics and Social Justice idiocy that poisons the left' which is a decades old bullshit argument made by the kind idiots that want a more 'socially conservative leftist movement' for being probably kind of a lovely person you get scolded big time.

Lady's a British pundit and writer who's big into Germaine Greer and has for years written pieces lamenting all this self expression and identity poliics that draw leftist focus away from where it should be. She's your average Mumsnet poster.

It's some really obviously reactionary bullshit barely masked as fighting for 'the real left'.

Boywhiz88 posted:

Why do we focus on just Angela Nagle when there’s a whole bunch of “pro-life Democrats” and similarly bullshit positions? VICE News Tonight interviewed a Democratic state Senator from Louisiana, and how she talked about her anti-abortion/anti-choice beliefs came off as both opportunistic in respect to votes and overtly religious. But she also helped to pass the abolishment of the death penalty.

I certainly would like to see her replaced but could a pro-choice Democrat or a socialist who made abortion a part of their national health plan win in that district? What about the alternative? An insane conservative who would vote against any of the good bills that the Democrat would have voted for? It really is damned if you and damned if you don’t.

EDIT: what I’m trying to say is why focus on this pundit when there are folks doing real damage within?

I mean...you do listen to Chapo yeah? Anyone listening here gets that poo poo all the time. It's surprisingly easy to not like either of them.

ZenMasterBullshit fucked around with this message at 12:55 on May 31, 2019

Chakan
Mar 30, 2011

Gripweed posted:

I'm trying to listen to Trashfuture and hoo boy it's not good

TF is very hit-or-miss. Good episodes have the bunch of them working well together to rip into some insane aspect of UK politics and bad episodes feel like a british parody of myself and four of my friends all yelling over each-other about what fast food chain has the best fries in high school.

still, I’m excited to find out what gettingyourdicksucked.com can do for me.

ZenMasterBullshit
Nov 2, 2011

Restaurant de Nouvelles "À Table" Proudly Presents:
A Climactic Encounter Ending on 1 Negate and a Dream

Chakan posted:

TF is very hit-or-miss. Good episodes have the bunch of them working well together to rip into some insane aspect of UK politics and bad episodes feel like a british parody of myself and four of my friends all yelling over each-other about what fast food chain has the best fries in high school.

still, I’m excited to find out what gettingyourdicksucked.com can do for me.

So it's just Chapo but with less awful accents?

What's the TERF ratio on the pod? I'd assume good but it's British Politics so you gotta make sure.

prefect
Sep 11, 2001

No one, Woodhouse.
No one.




Dead Man’s Band
Dammit, Will, that's not how you pronounce "Moog". :rant:

Moog (/ˈmoʊɡ/ MOHG

ZenMasterBullshit
Nov 2, 2011

Restaurant de Nouvelles "À Table" Proudly Presents:
A Climactic Encounter Ending on 1 Negate and a Dream

prefect posted:

Dammit, Will, that's not how you pronounce "Moog". :rant:

Moog (/ˈmoʊɡ/ MOHG


No no I'm pretty sure Mohg is some klingon from DS9.

Chakan
Mar 30, 2011
Chapo is more focused and runs a smaller group, but yeah for the most part. The biggest diff is that TF is made up of people that are almost all younger than Felix. While I get a fair bit of their references, I have no clue if people over 35 can listen to it without turning to dust.

KoldPT
Oct 9, 2012

ZenMasterBullshit posted:

So it's just Chapo but with less awful accents?

What's the TERF ratio on the pod? I'd assume good but it's British Politics so you gotta make sure.

No terves, they have trans guests every now and then too.

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

ZenMasterBullshit posted:

It's weird that Chapo goes on and on and on about understanding dog whistles and knowing who your enemy is but if you call out someone for say....repeatedly writing articles and giving talks tying sexual liberation and self expression to 'corruptive identity politics and Social Justice idiocy that poisons the left' which is a decades old bullshit argument made by the kind idiots that want a more 'socially conservative leftist movement' for being probably kind of a lovely person you get scolded big time.

Lady's a British pundit and writer who's big into Germaine Greer and has for years written pieces lamenting all this self expression and identity poliics that draw leftist focus away from where it should be. She's your average Mumsnet poster.

It's some really obviously reactionary bullshit barely masked as fighting for 'the real left'.


I mean...you do listen to Chapo yeah? Anyone listening here gets that poo poo all the time. It's surprisingly easy to not like either of them.

This is gibberish.

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

we get it, you're Irish

sins of a previous thread shall not be forgotten :commissar:

thotsky
Jun 7, 2005

hot to trot
Why do you care so deeply about reading a reactionary agenda into some woman on twitter if you cannot articulate it without an essay on the subtext of her writing, instead of just reading the text? She wants an alternative to neoliberal faux-social justice as the country moves from traditional catholic values, you have to be extremely uncharitable to think she is asking for a return to those values and not socialism.

Nagles most culturally relevant contribution is a critical exposé on anime-Nazis. She's a poster, and terminally online, you should not have to work so hard to prove that she is a chud. Even if she were one, why should people care? She's a medium.com level celebrity at best; the obsession with lefty female podcasts personalities, and the general trend of proscribing them regressive or "strasserite" agendas is weird as gently caress.

Grevling
Dec 18, 2016

Chapo is nazbol.

Stringent
Dec 22, 2004


image text goes here
If I had to pick a chapo to work with irl it'd be Amber.

papa horny michael
Aug 18, 2009

by Pragmatica
https://twitter.com/jayrosen_nyu/status/1134462167372226562

lol that Rachel Maddow's crazy russiagate nonsense is finally getting pushback.

KirbyKhan
Mar 20, 2009
Probation
Can't post for 2 hours!
Soiled Meat

Stringent posted:

If I had to pick a chapo to work with irl it'd be Amber.

I would not be able to work with Virgil. Our bathroom habits are in sync.

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!

Boywhiz88 posted:

Why do we focus on just Angela Nagle when there’s a whole bunch of “pro-life Democrats” and similarly bullshit positions? VICE News Tonight interviewed a Democratic state Senator from Louisiana, and how she talked about her anti-abortion/anti-choice beliefs came off as both opportunistic in respect to votes and overtly religious. But she also helped to pass the abolishment of the death penalty.

I certainly would like to see her replaced but could a pro-choice Democrat or a socialist who made abortion a part of their national health plan win in that district? What about the alternative? An insane conservative who would vote against any of the good bills that the Democrat would have voted for? It really is damned if you and damned if you don’t.

EDIT: what I’m trying to say is why focus on this pundit when there are folks doing real damage within?
As Marx said in the 18th Brumaire, bourgeois revolutions are dramatic and exciting and successful precisely because their real ambitions are relatively petty and short-term, but cloaked in grandiosity. A genuine proletarian revolution must constantly question itself, investigate itself, refine itself.

This means that leftists should tear each other to threads instead of actually fighting conservatism. If we put aside our theoretical differences to try to make a difference in the world, we would do Strasserisms.

comingafteryouall
Aug 2, 2011


hey people, the technique for choking victims taught by the red cross now is a combination of 5 back blows and 5 abdominal thrusts. I don't remember how you do the heimlich, but for the abdominal thrusts you place one hand write about the choking victim's belly button and thrust upward to hopefully get a kind of vomit reaction out of them. don't do this to someone unless they're choking or they want to vomit. You probably don't want to try this unless you have someone show you the correct hand placement, but if someone's choking and you're desperate it might help.

that's my PSA for Chapo listeners hope you enjoyed it.

ZenMasterBullshit
Nov 2, 2011

Restaurant de Nouvelles "À Table" Proudly Presents:
A Climactic Encounter Ending on 1 Negate and a Dream

Stringent posted:

If I had to pick a chapo to work with irl it'd be Amber.

Her or virgil. You'd at least get a lot of smoke breaks either way

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!

comingafteryouall posted:

hey people, the technique for choking victims taught by the red cross now is a combination of 5 back blows and 5 abdominal thrusts.
Let's do the Time Warp again!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply