Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
vincentpricesboner
Sep 3, 2006

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Tighclops posted:

Please tell me that Kiefer isn't a chud :(

He's far from a chud but regardless of his politics he is a serial drunk driver so a pretty garbage guy overall.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rime
Nov 2, 2011

by Games Forum
So this week there's a "Green New Deal W/Leap" event here featuring speakers such as D. Suzuki. Going to try and get the mic at some point, here's what I've got for a hardball:

"We've heard a considerable discussion surrounding emissions, paths to reduce emissions while maintaining a growing "green" economy, but not a whole lot about how to reduce the impact of our heavily resource-extraction based economy / industrial civilization and the ecological footprint from it. Or how a growing economy is even possible in this context unless we continue to externalize the environmental cost of our actions.

With the IPBES summary making it clear that our biodiversity is at risk of collapse, how is an emissions-focused green new deal intended to address this greater crisis?

So I guess my questions is, if we focus solely on reducing emissions and improving things such as urban transit density while still clearcutting our remaining old-growth and shipping the raw logs abroad, or signing off on wide-scale fracking & mining initiatives in the Stikine, or building the continents largest LNG export facility - are we achieving anything other than placating woke folk in the cities? And if we make the hard choices necessary to actually transition to an environmentally sustainable future in BC, what does that look like for the rural bulk of the province - which has little economic foundation beyond resource extraction?

Thank you."


Thoughts on how I can tighten this up to really frost the room as hard as I can?

Rime fucked around with this message at 20:25 on Jun 17, 2019

Oxyclean
Sep 23, 2007


Pleads posted:

Scheer's there and on CBC right now but he's such a loving amorphous white nobody that I don't think people realize it

Granted I don't think Scheer (or Dougie) have any place at Pride, but I can't help but feel like there's a real lovely juxtaposition of going to a parade for a sports team winning and saying you don't feel the need to go to (/support) Pride.

The Berzerker
Feb 24, 2006

treat me like a dog


https://twitter.com/globalnews/status/1140703875667652608

gee whiz, ya hate to see it.

EvidenceBasedQuack
Aug 15, 2015

A rock has no detectable opinion about gravity

Arcsquad12 posted:

Nah Keifer was just calling out the conservatives tge other day for invoking Tommy Douglas so it seems kind of short sighted for the NDP to immediately then around and do the same thing.

Difference being Tommy Douglas was first leader of the NDP, father of universal medicare, and that the current "head-to-toe" universal healthcare platform is a continuation of what Douglas fought for.

It's not at all like Dug Ford and his greedy friends.

Azerban
Oct 28, 2003




i was cheering for 'dooooooooooooo-ug'

bunnyofdoom
Mar 29, 2008
THE HATE CRIME DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON
There has been a shooting at the parade

Kindest Forums User
Mar 25, 2008

Let me tell you about my opinion about Bernie Sanders and why Donald Trump is his true successor.

You cannot vote Hillary Clinton because she is worse than Trump.

Rime posted:

So this week there's a "Green New Deal W/Leap" event here featuring speakers such as D. Suzuki. Going to try and get the mic at some point, here's what I've got for a hardball:

"We've heard a considerable discussion surrounding emissions, paths to reduce emissions while maintaining a growing "green" economy, but not a whole lot about how to reduce the impact of our heavily resource-extraction based economy / industrial civilization and the ecological footprint from it. Or how a growing economy is even possible in this context unless we continue to externalize the environmental cost of our actions.

With the IPBES summary making it clear that our biodiversity is at risk of collapse, how is an emissions-focused green new deal intended to address this greater crisis?

So I guess my questions is, if we focus solely on reducing emissions and improving things such as urban transit density while still clearcutting our remaining old-growth and shipping the raw logs abroad, or signing off on wide-scale fracking & mining initiatives in the Stikine, or building the continents largest LNG export facility - are we achieving anything other than placating woke folk in the cities? And if we make the hard choices necessary to actually transition to an environmentally sustainable future in BC, what does that look like for the rural bulk of the province - which has little economic foundation beyond resource extraction?

Thank you."


Thoughts on how I can tighten this up to really frost the room as hard as I can?
That's way too long. And Leap/GND are broad as hell, so I'm not sure why you're bringing up biodiversity, since it can be easily covered by the evolving commitment.

A better hardball would be to ask why they aren't explicitly critical of capitalism. Like,

"Capitalism is an economic system that is dependent on infinite growth through endless exploitation. Not only that, it concentrates power to an elite who are using their influence to prevent any meaningful progress. This makes capitalism incompatible with the major tenets of both Leap and Green New Deal. Why aren't you boldly confronting capitalism when it is clearly the biggest obstacle?"

But I forgot you're actually a liberal so maybe not.

enki42
Jun 11, 2001
#ATMLIVESMATTER

Put this Nazi-lover on ignore immediately!

Rime posted:

Thoughts on how I can tighten this up to really frost the room as hard as I can?

The question is really good but I'd avoid the "placating woke folk in the cities" phrasing, there's better ways to say that without it seeming like you're just dunking on people instead of genuinely asking a question.

vincentpricesboner
Sep 3, 2006

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

bunnyofdoom posted:

There has been a shooting at the parade

Hopefully no one actually got hurt. Or that it was just someone freaking out thinking they saw a gun. Doesnt appear any injuries so far.

https://twitter.com/erinmnicks/status/1140711605472243722

bunnyofdoom
Mar 29, 2008
THE HATE CRIME DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON

zapplez posted:

Hopefully no one actually got hurt. Or that it was just someone freaking out thinking they saw a gun. Doesnt appear any injuries so far.

https://twitter.com/erinmnicks/status/1140711605472243722

TPS says one victim, a woman.

https://twitter.com/TPSOperations/status/1140709828450508800

Kindest Forums User
Mar 25, 2008

Let me tell you about my opinion about Bernie Sanders and why Donald Trump is his true successor.

You cannot vote Hillary Clinton because she is worse than Trump.

Rime posted:

So this week there's a "Green New Deal W/Leap" event here featuring speakers such as D. Suzuki. Going to try and get the mic at some point, here's what I've got for a hardball:

"We've heard a considerable discussion surrounding emissions, paths to reduce emissions while maintaining a growing "green" economy, but not a whole lot about how to reduce the impact of our heavily resource-extraction based economy / industrial civilization and the ecological footprint from it. Or how a growing economy is even possible in this context unless we continue to externalize the environmental cost of our actions.

With the IPBES summary making it clear that our biodiversity is at risk of collapse, how is an emissions-focused green new deal intended to address this greater crisis?

So I guess my questions is, if we focus solely on reducing emissions and improving things such as urban transit density while still clearcutting our remaining old-growth and shipping the raw logs abroad, or signing off on wide-scale fracking & mining initiatives in the Stikine, or building the continents largest LNG export facility - are we achieving anything other than placating woke folk in the cities? And if we make the hard choices necessary to actually transition to an environmentally sustainable future in BC, what does that look like for the rural bulk of the province - which has little economic foundation beyond resource extraction?

Thank you."


Thoughts on how I can tighten this up to really frost the room as hard as I can?

Also this doesn't really make sense at all in the context of Leap and GND. like, 50% of their focus is on respecting the rights of indigenous people. Indigenous people happen to be the most militant activisits against those projects you mentioned.... So you sound clueless and trying to gotchya people who are doing a lot more than you are.

Kindest Forums User
Mar 25, 2008

Let me tell you about my opinion about Bernie Sanders and why Donald Trump is his true successor.

You cannot vote Hillary Clinton because she is worse than Trump.
I helped facilitate one of the GND town halls. And if anything, it was a great way to mobilize people. I'm not exactly sure what they're trying to achieve, since the results of the Town Halls are ideologically all over the map. There's no way you can take the results of these townhalls and create something coherent. But I doubt that's even their intention. Having A LOT of people get together to brainstorm about climate change is a great strategy to mobilize people. Hopefully they can use this energy into something productive, hopefully something anti-capitalist.

vincentpricesboner
Sep 3, 2006

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
https://twitter.com/TPSOperations/status/1140716091129442305

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

Kindest Forums User posted:

I helped facilitate one of the GND town halls. And if anything, it was a great way to mobilize people. I'm not exactly sure what they're trying to achieve, since the results of the Town Halls are ideologically all over the map. There's no way you can take the results of these townhalls and create something coherent. But I doubt that's even their intention. Having A LOT of people get together to brainstorm about climate change is a great strategy to mobilize people. Hopefully they can use this energy into something productive, hopefully something anti-capitalist.

Rime's question seems quite appropriate for that kind of venue? I don't think the most effective way to advocate for socialism to to relentlessly give the same stump speech about how everything comes back to capitalism. Sometimes, frustrating though it may be, you need to give people the intellectual tools to reach that conclusion themselves and hope for the best.

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

Rime posted:

So this week there's a "Green New Deal W/Leap" event here featuring speakers such as D. Suzuki. Going to try and get the mic at some point, here's what I've got for a hardball:

"We've heard a considerable discussion surrounding emissions, paths to reduce emissions while maintaining a growing "green" economy, but not a whole lot about how to reduce the impact of our heavily resource-extraction based economy / industrial civilization and the ecological footprint from it. Or how a growing economy is even possible in this context unless we continue to externalize the environmental cost of our actions.

With the IPBES summary making it clear that our biodiversity is at risk of collapse, how is an emissions-focused green new deal intended to address this greater crisis?

So I guess my questions is, if we focus solely on reducing emissions and improving things such as urban transit density while still clearcutting our remaining old-growth and shipping the raw logs abroad, or signing off on wide-scale fracking & mining initiatives in the Stikine, or building the continents largest LNG export facility - are we achieving anything other than placating woke folk in the cities? And if we make the hard choices necessary to actually transition to an environmentally sustainable future in BC, what does that look like for the rural bulk of the province - which has little economic foundation beyond resource extraction?

Thank you."


Thoughts on how I can tighten this up to really frost the room as hard as I can?

Here's the same question with some minor tweaks and 25% fewer words. My biggest suggestion would be trying to move all your questions to the end, because otherwise it can be a bit hard to follow your train of thought. As things stand I think you probably won't get a decent answer to all your questions so you might want to decide which one you'll prioritize and cut the others :


We've heard a lot about reducing emissions while still growing a "green" economy, but we haven't talked enough about the ecological footprint of our resource-extraction economy and industrial civilization. We need to ask if it is even possible to continue growing without externalizing the environmental cost of our actions.

If we focus on reducing emissions, better transit and increased urban density while still clearcutting our remaining old-growth and shipping the raw logs abroad, or signing off on wide-scale fracking and mining initiatives, or building the continent's largest LNG export facility, then our efforts will be self defeating. On the other hand, if we make the hard chocies necessary to transition to a sustainable future in BC then what will happen to the bulk of the province that relies on the resource extraction economy?

With the IPBES summary making it clear that our biodiversity is at risk of collapse, how will an emissions-focused green new deal address this greater crisis?

Kindest Forums User
Mar 25, 2008

Let me tell you about my opinion about Bernie Sanders and why Donald Trump is his true successor.

You cannot vote Hillary Clinton because she is worse than Trump.

Helsing posted:

Rime's question seems quite appropriate for that kind of venue? I don't think the most effective way to advocate for socialism to to relentlessly give the same stump speech about how everything comes back to capitalism. Sometimes, frustrating though it may be, you need to give people the intellectual tools to reach that conclusion themselves and hope for the best.

At least at my town hall, pretty much everything Rime said was covered multiple times:
Stopping fossil fuel production and harmful industrial activity and transition to green jobs. Even the biodiversity was mentioned, and this was just at my table.... This is pretty much consensus at this point.


It sounds like Rime wants to confront Suzuki and the GND. So maybe he can do something better than"hey, what are we gonna do about jobs and biodiversity"

Rime
Nov 2, 2011

by Games Forum
My experience with the GND concept, Canadian and American, is that it seeks to continue business as usual industrial civilization by pivoting to "green" initiatives with an emphasis on carbon emissions as a primary metric of success. Indeed, one of the underlying talking points is how all these "green" initiatives will boost economic productivity and growth cycles which are currently stagnating. More money for everyone, so that they can buy poo poo. Green poo poo, like EV's, the environmental cost of which we will entirely ignore.

When in reality business as usual, except green means we all die because it does nothing to address the rampant consumption which underpins the entire IPBES summary.

So yes, you are correct, my goal here is largely to pay $15 to dunk on Suzuki (whom I despise) while pointing out that the GND achieves nothing, that it is a gargantuan greenwashing initiative by liberal capitalism.

That re-wording is legit, Helsing, I am not practised at being succinct.

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011
Maybe you could also mention the Guardian's report today on how like 90% of our recycling just gets landfilled or incinerated but it happens in developing countries so we pretend it isn't real, that seems to be getting a decent amount of traction right now. I think it's a perfect example of greenwashing externalizing environmental costs so we can fool ourselves into thinking we're making a difference when really we aren't.

Entropic
Feb 21, 2007

patriarchy sucks
https://twitter.com/zachhajas/status/1140702948294569992?s=21

Arc Hammer
Mar 4, 2013

Got any deathsticks?
They really wanted to cut the booing short by announcing the next guest real quick.

xtal
Jan 9, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

Arcsquad12 posted:

They really wanted to cut the booing short by announcing the next guest real quick.

Doug Ford, the Apple monitor stand of Ontario

Wistful of Dollars
Aug 25, 2009


I was saying ”boo-uggs"

The Butcher
Apr 20, 2005

Well, at least we tried.
Nap Ghost

Syfe posted:

The people who sign up to take part and wear banana costumes will be paid $135 for the six hours they'll be out there, plus $20 for parking, or $120 for the half a dozen people dressed in branded yellow T-shirts and black shorts.

Canada Proud is organizing a similar event at Yonge and Dundas in Toronto on Wednesday.

"This campaign is intended to be a lighthearted, tongue-in-cheek approach to politics. It uses facts and poses questions to shed light on some of Trudeau's policies and decisions. It’s not meant to be a nasty smear campaign," reads the pitch sent by Tigris looking for participants.

Canada Proud founder Jeff Ballingall denies he is paying protesters, nor is this an organized rally, rather these events are meant to promote the anti-Trudeau campaign.

"We're trying to laugh at Trudeau really, have fun with it because I think people are sick of, no one really wants the doom and gloom scary-style politics, I think it's really effective if people are laughing at Trudeau," he said, denying that calling the prime minister "bananas" is disrespectful.

From last page but I think I'm coming more and more onboard with Postess' shtick of of Trudeau best Conservative PM thing.

What the gently caress are these people getting still so worked up about that they think Trudeau is still loving them over on?

We nationalized the loving pipeline expansion. Every single announcement about anything O&G related from the feds is gently caress YEAH ROLL COAL.

The hell do these people need to be satisfied??

Like plausibly in this timeline we might be going to see military APCs running over over protestors in the BC woods. Will that be enough? Or will Trudeau still be a soy boy for not authorizing the use of mounted guns on said APCs?

The government is bending over backwards for these idiots and it's still never enough apparently.

apatheticman
May 13, 2003

Wedge Regret

The Butcher posted:

From last page but I think I'm coming more and more onboard with Postess' shtick of of Trudeau best Conservative PM thing.

What the gently caress are these people getting still so worked up about that they think Trudeau is still loving them over on?

We nationalized the loving pipeline expansion. Every single announcement about anything O&G related from the feds is gently caress YEAH ROLL COAL.

The hell do these people need to be satisfied??

Like plausibly in this timeline we might be going to see military APCs running over over protestors in the BC woods. Will that be enough? Or will Trudeau still be a soy boy for not authorizing the use of mounted guns on said APCs?

The government is bending over backwards for these idiots and it's still never enough apparently.

They've been told to be mad so they are mad. Doesn't have anything to do with reality. Even if the CPC get in they'll be mad at something else (immigrants, green peace, etc).

The right has effectively weaponized the 40 and over's impotent rage..

ocrumsprug
Sep 23, 2010

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Kindest Forums User posted:

At least at my town hall, pretty much everything Rime said was covered multiple times:
Stopping fossil fuel production and harmful industrial activity and transition to green jobs. Even the biodiversity was mentioned, and this was just at my table.... This is pretty much consensus at this point.


It sounds like Rime wants to confront Suzuki and the GND. So maybe he can do something better than"hey, what are we gonna do about jobs and biodiversity"

So he is less asking a gotcha question and asking a question they have an answer for...

I look forward to hearing some specifics about the green jobs for Terrace.

Rime
Nov 2, 2011

by Games Forum
There are plenty under 30 who have been indoctrinated into this warped mindset from birth and refuse to challenge themselves with critical thinking. I posted some screencaps over in one of the climate threads a week or two back.

Ideology does not descriminate by age.

infernal machines
Oct 11, 2012

we monitor many frequencies. we listen always. came a voice, out of the babel of tongues, speaking to us. it played us a mighty dub.

Helsing posted:

The American military literally sent a group of officials to the studio making 24 and begged them to tone down all the torture scenes because it was directly influencing American soldiers and causing them to commit atrocities in Iraq.

Justice_Scalia.txt

PittTheElder
Feb 13, 2012

:geno: Yes, it's like a lava lamp.

apatheticman posted:

They've been told to be mad so they are mad. Doesn't have anything to do with reality. Even if the CPC get in they'll be mad at something else (immigrants, green peace, etc).

The right has effectively weaponized the 40 and over's impotent rage..

Yeah I constantly hear people here in Alberta who are excited about Kenney getting elected because at least he'll stand up and fight for Alberta.

But fight for what? Unclear. And against who? The Federal government who bought a pipeline for us, apparently.

RBC
Nov 23, 2007

IM STILL SPENDING MONEY FROM 1888

Arcsquad12 posted:

They really wanted to cut the booing short by announcing the next guest real quick.

yeah and those guests were the rogers and bell ceos and they got like no boos at all. this fuckin country

2 million people for a parade for a sports victory and we cant even general strike

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

The Butcher posted:

The hell do these people need to be satisfied??

Like plausibly in this timeline we might be going to see military APCs running over over protestors in the BC woods. Will that be enough? Or will Trudeau still be a soy boy for not authorizing the use of mounted guns on said APCs?
i deal with a lot of people in the oil and gas sector and when you press them on why a PC government will be better it usually comes down to something like “A PC government will do things better”. There’s never and real specifics just stuff like “cutting taxes and reducing red tape” or “standing up for Canadian oil and gas”. It’s just purely “I want my team to win”

The Butcher
Apr 20, 2005

Well, at least we tried.
Nap Ghost
I'm just hard pressed to imagine any greater level of "cutting red tape" than "nvm, here's a couple billion, you guys go distribute a bonus to the shareholders and we will sort this out later in the courts".

Sage Grimm
Feb 18, 2013

Let's go explorin' little dude!

Mr. Apollo posted:

i deal with a lot of people in the oil and gas sector and when you press them on why a PC government will be better it usually comes down to something like “A PC government will do things better”. There’s never and real specifics just stuff like “cutting taxes and reducing red tape” or “standing up for Canadian oil and gas”. It’s just purely “I want my team to win”

Ran into one a couple weeks back. One quote that stood out: "Whenever they are hiring they're only looking for women or Muslims to fill their quota for diversity." :v:

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

The Butcher posted:

I'm just hard pressed to imagine any greater level of "cutting red tape" than "nvm, here's a couple billion, you guys go distribute a bonus to the shareholders and we will sort this out later in the courts".
I had the CEO of a large exploration company tell me that for every new exploration project, he has to do “at least half an hour of paper work which is insane” and thank goodness the UCP will reduce his workload.

The Butcher
Apr 20, 2005

Well, at least we tried.
Nap Ghost
Ah just looked it up again, your usual quarterly payout was $0.1625 per share.

Price per share was about $46 bucks before the split.

After the government bailout, a special one time payout of $11.4 per share.

So assuming a $10k investment, $2,478.26

$100k investment, $24,782.60

Decent. And basically a straight transfer from everyone in Canada to KML stockholders, vast majority of them being Americans.

For a thing that:

A) Might not exist.

B) Might exist but never make any money.

C) Might not exist or make any money, but WILL get get people killed for no reason.

flakeloaf
Feb 26, 2003

Still better than android clock

Wistful of Dollars posted:

I was saying ”boo-uggs"

https://twitter.com/EdtheSock/status/1140706128373911557?s=19

Entropic
Feb 21, 2007

patriarchy sucks
holy crap, Ed the Sock still exists?

Kindest Forums User
Mar 25, 2008

Let me tell you about my opinion about Bernie Sanders and why Donald Trump is his true successor.

You cannot vote Hillary Clinton because she is worse than Trump.

Rime posted:

My experience with the GND concept, Canadian and American, is that it seeks to continue business as usual industrial civilization by pivoting to "green" initiatives with an emphasis on carbon emissions as a primary metric of success. Indeed, one of the underlying talking points is how all these "green" initiatives will boost economic productivity and growth cycles which are currently stagnating. More money for everyone, so that they can buy poo poo. Green poo poo, like EV's, the environmental cost of which we will entirely ignore.

When in reality business as usual, except green means we all die because it does nothing to address the rampant consumption which underpins the entire IPBES summary.

So yes, you are correct, my goal here is largely to pay $15 to dunk on Suzuki (whom I despise) while pointing out that the GND achieves nothing, that it is a gargantuan greenwashing initiative by liberal capitalism.

That re-wording is legit, Helsing, I am not practised at being succinct.
The Canadian and American Green New Deal are only similar by name. Canadian Green New Deal is a grassroots movement that does not have any specific objectives. Just read their pact man, it's not exactly language used by liberals:
https://act.greennewdealcanada.ca/the-text/
And they literally reference biodiversity in their fundamental principles! They only have two principles! How did you miss it!?

•It must meet the demands of Indigenous knowledge and science and cut Canada’s emissions in half in 11 years while protecting cultural and biological diversity.

•It must leave no one behind and build a better present and future for all of us.



I don't like Suzuki either, and if I was in your position , I'd be down for dunking too. But your strategy is way off. Like I said, you're question isn't going to blow anyone away, because it's something that's being discussed regularly. A lot of people attending these Town Halls aren't exactly liberals either, we had a lot of activists/former activists attend ours. You're preaching to the choir.

But capitalism is still rarely brought up. Which is dumb. Everyone keeps avoiding. loving bring that poo poo up. Ask them if they think capitalism is compatible with climate change action. Ask them how they can prevent this movement from being co-opted capitalists vampires. Dooooo itttttt

Wistful of Dollars
Aug 25, 2009

Entropic posted:

holy crap, Ed the Sock still exists?

the sock of Theseus.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Postess with the Mostest
Apr 4, 2007

Arabian nights
'neath Arabian moons
A fool off his guard
could fall and fall hard
out there on the dunes
If yer plan to avert a climate crisis begins with implementing UNDRIP, FPIC, and the 94 Calls to Action from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, it sounds like maybe the climate crisis isn't really that bad

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply