|
sounds a worse manager than he was a player, if that's possible
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 13:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 22:13 |
|
|
big crush on Chad OMG posted:13 days until the return of Alan Pardew on a 10 year contract, John Carver on 15, and an announcement that the club is no longer for sale and off the market The new owner's business partner, Mek-Hal Azhlai, looks familiar...
|
|
#
?
Jun 17, 2019 13:21
|
|
|
water wet https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/11743720/manchester-united-fans-top-list-of-football-related-arrests-involving-racism
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2019 02:28
|
|
|
r.y.f.s.o. posted:water wet Chelsea fans must be disappointed then
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2019 06:01
|
|
|
Nah, top 6 is what we expect.
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2019 12:28
|
|
|
quote:Championship clubs Leeds and Millwall each had 15 supporters arrested, while Leicester had 14 and Chelsea 13. Millwall you say? https://twitter.com/georgiepiehead/status/1089971226196525058
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2019 14:58
|
|
|
r.y.f.s.o. posted:water wet Do they get a trophy for that?
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2019 17:01
|
|
|
r.y.f.s.o. posted:water wet [United voice] They aren’t racists they’re just made to look like racists.
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2019 21:42
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/skysportsnews/status/1141399735997214722?s=21 I know it’s Sky, but interesting.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2019 20:31
|
|
|
Wow, did not expect that.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2019 20:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2019 21:18
|
|
|
i presume it's something to do with the licensing of the plane for commercial travel
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2019 21:24
|
|
|
My first thought was a man in Yorkshire wielding an RPG launcher.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2019 23:39
|
|
|
big crush on Chad OMG posted:i presume it's something to do with the licensing of the plane for commercial travel Yeah the pilot didn't have a commercial license so suspect whoever organised the charter is the one who's been arrested
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 08:31
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:I know it’s Sky, but interesting. Off topic, but Sky are fairly reliable by British media standards.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 09:24
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/martynziegler/status/1141619805335801857 Premier League deciding not to use VAR for GK position on PK.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 09:48
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 09:54
|
|
|
can't read the full article, but what happens when the ref makes a clear and obvious error in what is probably the most game changing situation? if you're gonna use var, use var kcer fucked around with this message at 10:20 on Jun 20, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 10:17
|
|
|
It's really dumb not to use VAR on penalties. Keepers now know that they should be on the line, and if they break that rule it's their own fault. What is so difficult about that? Looking forward to PL keepers loving up every penalty in Europe and for national teams.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 10:37
|
|
|
This is a situation where VAR can easily and objectively correct a game-changing decision, of course they’ve chickened out of it
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 11:00
|
|
|
Vegetable posted:This is a situation where VAR can easily and objectively correct a game-changing decision, of course they’ve chickened out of it Yeah, don't want to make it more difficult to fix a match by being able to objectively correct a decision.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 11:26
|
|
|
it's not even a situation where there's a lot of interpretation, it's a quick whisper in ref's ear to say he was off his line and it needs to be retaken it's all of 5 seconds, or should be anyway
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 11:53
|
|
|
var sucks and this is why
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 12:23
|
|
|
VAR dramatically changed how the world cup was played in that everyone was diving every chance they got in the hopes var would give them a soft call. The goals per game increased but the goals from open play decreased.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 12:53
|
|
|
Bogan Krkic posted:var sucks and this is why
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 12:56
|
|
|
I like how VAR has worked in the u21s Euros, barring one harsh handball decision and linesmen being a bit lazy with offside flags when encouraged to let marginal calls go.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 13:34
|
|
|
Bit of a wider discussion, but with VAR coming in, they should change the offside rule back to clear daylight between the attacker and last defender. Having any part of your body infront is dumb e.g if Lindgard had like one size smaller shoes, he would have been onside and England would have beaten Holland
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 14:32
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:Bit of a wider discussion, but with VAR coming in, they should change the offside rule back to clear daylight between the attacker and last defender. Having any part of your body infront is dumb e.g if Lindgard had like one size smaller shoes, he would have been onside and England would have beaten Holland This is a bad take
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 14:52
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:Bit of a wider discussion, but with VAR coming in, they should change the offside rule back to clear daylight between the attacker and last defender. Having any part of your body infront is dumb e.g if Lindgard had like one size smaller shoes, he would have been onside and England would have beaten Holland Offside is offside, don’t be silly.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 14:55
|
|
Shrapnig posted:Offside is offside, don’t be silly. A striker having their toe in front of the last defender is not an advantage..
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 15:01
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:A striker having their toe in front of the last defender is not an advantage.. He won't mind standing back a bit, then.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 15:06
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:Bit of a wider discussion, but with VAR coming in, they should change the offside rule back to clear daylight between the attacker and last defender. Having any part of your body infront is dumb e.g if Lindgard had like one size smaller shoes, he would have been onside and England would have beaten Holland Nah
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 15:26
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:Bit of a wider discussion, but with VAR coming in, they should change the offside rule back to clear daylight between the attacker and last defender. Having any part of your body infront is dumb e.g if Lindgard had like one size smaller shoes, he would have been onside and England would have beaten Holland
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 15:34
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:Bit of a wider discussion, but with VAR coming in, they should change the offside rule back to clear daylight between the attacker and last defender. Having any part of your body infront is dumb e.g if Lindgard had like one size smaller shoes, he would have been onside and England would have beaten Holland yeah, nah
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 15:37
|
|
|
Why?
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 15:40
|
|
|
Because it’s stupid as gently caress? The striker is leaned way over but there is a sliver of daylight between their torsos so it’s allowed? Where does the “clear daylight” have to be in relation to their bodies? What is “clear daylight”? It’s so much easier to make it an either or decision, you’re either behind or in line of the defending player, or you’re ahead and offside.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 15:53
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:Why? You'll have the same issue as before where nothing is clearly defined. sassassin posted:He won't mind standing back a bit, then. This is really why. If you want to be absolutely sure then take half a step back.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 15:54
|
|
|
sassassin posted:He won't mind standing back a bit, then.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 15:57
|
|
|
one of the weird things about VAR and offside is it seems like the angle of the camera relative to attacker and defender can change the perspective quite a bit and thus change what looks offside and what doesn't. you see the same thing with the positioning of outfield cameras in baseball stadiums. i really noticed this on some meaningless play during the first leg of liverpool/barca...it was an offside call deep in the attacking area, and it was the bernabeu, so the camera was probably quite a bit further away from the pitch than in smaller stadiums. i feel like the linesman got the call right, but it looked weird nonetheless when it was on replay. bewbies fucked around with this message at 16:00 on Jun 20, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 15:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 22:13 |
|
|
bewbies posted:one of the weird things about VAR and offside is it seems like the angle of the camera relative to attacker and defender can change the perspective quite a bit and thus change what looks offside and what doesn't. you see the same thing with the positioning of outfield cameras in baseball stadiums. I don't think the footage the VAR refs see are the same ones we see on tv.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2019 16:13
|
|