|
if you were just going to bring one commie back to life, the obvious choice is Sankara.  or maybe Ho Chi Minh???
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 01:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 11:59 |
|
|
Pol loving Pot.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 01:08
|
|
|
Pol Pot, but for lanyards
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 01:12
|
|
|
Pol Pot, but for the trolls
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 01:17
|
|
|
i like the idea of a hardline sect slicing man-buns off ritualistically and the receiver bawling because of imperialist thought
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 01:20
|
|
|
che was a meme before there were memes. he would be the best resurrected communist for this era
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 01:32
|
|
|
my girlfriend Rosa Luxemburg
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 01:37
|
|
|
really disappointed that nobody said to bring back karl marx yet. obvious best choice, he could finish capital among other things, and his burns are amazing. can you imagine them in 2019? he would own at twitter.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 01:37
|
|
|
That’s exactly why we should thank him for his service and let him stay dead
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 01:41
|
|
|
i dunno i want to read karl's take on finance capitalism
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 01:46
|
|
|
y'all really gotta consider the condition people's livers were in before y'all start resurrectin'
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 02:08
|
|
|
wrong thread
smarxist fucked around with this message at 02:17 on Jul 12, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 02:15
|
|
|
on an unrelated note does anyone know the name of a good russian lawyer
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 02:21
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:i dunno i want to read karl's take on finance capitalism “what the gently caress have you done???”
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 03:36
|
|
|
R. Guyovich posted:on an unrelated note does anyone know the name of a good russian lawyer maybe Pussy Riot will help him find legal representation as he is a fellow activist 
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 03:41
|
|
|
GalacticAcid posted:I like your NEP, but I do not like your NEPmen. They are so unlike your NEP. Lmao
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 03:53
|
|
|
NEP sings the NEP song (10 years version)
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 04:01
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:that reminds me of that terrible archangel show with the post-brosan bond where stalin is reborn and all of russia swarms around him as their new leader it was a BBC movie adapted from a story, starring Daniel Craig as a historian who specialized in Soviet history, and the dude is Stalin's bastard who is also named Josef, but is painted as an unstable psychopath the remaining communists in Russia wanted to prop up as a figurehead. at the very end Craig's prostitute tour guide assassinates him to save the world from his imagined brutality
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 04:28
|
|
|
Pole Pot, and it's just for the fellas
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 05:03
|
|
|
now watch me NEP now watch me nae nae
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 05:07
|
|
|
it was really embarrassing when romney hired the nepmen for "who let the dogs out"
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 06:05
|
|
|
but seriously i understand why the NEP was established but do not understand the conflicting directions of trotsky and stalin in the late 20s what happen, it seems like stalin was ideologically fluid for no real reason
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 06:08
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/inquirerdotnet/status/1149556797927112704
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 07:29
|
|
|
i say swears online posted:but seriously i understand why the NEP was established but do not understand the conflicting directions of trotsky and stalin in the late 20s trotsky wanted to put a ton more resources into exporting revolution and helping communist parties in western europe. stalin thought this wouldn’t work and wanted to focus on building up the ussr’s own productive capacity, with comintern support as an afterthought (and careful to not truly piss off france and the uk). that’s my baby understanding
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 13:50
|
|
|
pussy riot/red scare most ambitious crossover event in history
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 14:06
|
|
|
THS posted:trotsky wanted to put a ton more resources into exporting revolution and helping communist parties in western europe. stalin thought this wouldn’t work and wanted to focus on building up the ussr’s own productive capacity, with comintern support as an afterthought (and careful to not truly piss off france and the uk). that’s my baby understanding Granted the real background of what was going on was the Soviet Union had an extremely dire trade situation, but that involves lots of statistics so usually people ignore it. Ardennes fucked around with this message at 15:54 on Jul 12, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 14:14
|
|
|
i say swears online posted:but seriously i understand why the NEP was established but do not understand the conflicting directions of trotsky and stalin in the late 20s When the material conditions change, my opinion changes. - Stalin
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 14:42
|
|
|
you saw what happened in 41, the ussr taking on industrialized western europe following the civil war would probably have ended pretty badly
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 15:47
|
|
|
mila kunis posted:you saw what happened in 41, the ussr taking on industrialized western europe following the civil war would probably have ended pretty badly The Polish-Soviet War showed the West could check Soviet advances by just supplying arms.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 15:56
|
|
|
THS posted:trotsky wanted to put a ton more resources into exporting revolution and helping communist parties in western europe. stalin thought this wouldn’t work and wanted to focus on building up the ussr’s own productive capacity, with comintern support as an afterthought (and careful to not truly piss off france and the uk). that’s my baby understanding that’s also my rough apprehension, they broadly wanted the same thing but stalin had a more concrete plan for industrializing at home while trotsky thought that the whole project was doomed without more revolutions getting off the ground pronto
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 15:57
|
|
|
Plutonis posted:Pol loving Pot.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 15:59
|
|
|
Ardennes posted:The Polish-Soviet War showed the West could check Soviet advances by just supplying arms. Not to mention that Japan had troops in Siberia until like the 20s so the risk of two fronts was real
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 16:21
|
|
|
Plutonis posted:Not to mention that Japan had troops in Siberia until like the 20s so the risk of two fronts was real Yeah, they had troops around Vladivostok until 1922 and they occupied Northern Shakalin until 1925. But yeah, but "socialism in one country" was already a de facto outcome.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 18:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Jaccuse1/status/1149747799656763392
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2019 19:33
|
|
|
I have an old friend who is pretty conservative and he's always trying to get me to read Gulag Archipelago. Is it worth the effort? My impression of it is that the books ignore why revolution took place in Russia and it makes a lot of heavy claims that can't be corroborated.
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2019 17:45
|
|
|
apropos of nothing, I am, personally, against slave labor
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2019 17:47
|
|
|
Fleetwood posted:I have an old friend who is pretty conservative and he's always trying to get me to read Gulag Archipelago. Is it worth the effort? My impression of it is that the books ignore why revolution took place in Russia and it makes a lot of heavy claims that can't be corroborated. no, Solzhenitsyn is a fascist and the book is just campfire stories from prisoners
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2019 17:52
|
|
|
just play Rise of the Tomb Raider's Russia sections for an equally nuanced view
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2019 17:52
|
|
|
Read it on the condition he reads some Marx or something
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2019 17:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 11:59 |
|
|
Assassins Creed Presents: Karl Marx
|
|
#
?
Jul 13, 2019 17:59
|
|